SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX + Intel Arc A570M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

67,469 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A570M

58,239 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX paired with the Intel Arc A570M is a laptop-class combination with a striking internal imbalance: a 24-core Arrow Lake-HX flagship processor sitting at the 94th percentile of all CPUs, matched with a mid-tier Alchemist discrete GPU at the 88th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile of 91 reflects a machine whose compute muscle dramatically outruns its graphics capability. This is an all-Intel platform — CPU and GPU both fabricated by TSMC, on 3 nm and 6 nm nodes respectively — and the benchmark data tells a clear story about what this build is and, more importantly, what it is not.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming. The Arc A570M is the ceiling here. With 2048 shading units, 5.325 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, and 224 GB/s of memory bandwidth on a 128-bit bus, this GPU lands in the 88th percentile, statistically neck-and-neck with the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT in the aggregated database scores (a deltaPct of -0.3). That percentile position suggests competent 1080p-class performance, but the 8 GB of GDDR6 will be the constraint at higher settings in modern titles. The CPU will never be the problem — the Ultra 9 275HX's single-thread Passmark score of 4713 is more than enough to feed any frame rate this GPU can produce.

Streaming. This is where the pairing starts to make sense. Encoding and compression are CPU-bound tasks, and the 275HX posts a Passmark data encryption score of 47112 and data compression score of 608381 — strong numbers that sit comfortably within its 94th-percentile overall standing. A streamer could run a game on the Arc A570M while the 24 cores absorb x264 or x264-quality software encoding without breaking a sweat. The problem is the GPU side: streaming while gaming splits a modest graphics budget thinner than most streamers would like.

Video editing. Very capable, with a caveat. A Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35589 places this CPU in workstation territory — it trades blows with the Intel Xeon w5-3525 (deltaPct -0.3), the AMD EPYC 4484PX (-0.5), and even the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX (-0.6). Timeline scrubbing, proxies, and export-side CPU encoding will all feel fast. The 36 MB of shared L3 cache and 102.4 GB/s of dual-channel DDR5 bandwidth keep assets flowing. The caveat is GPU-accelerated effects and timeline previews, which fall to the A570M's 8 GB frame buffer and modest FP16 throughput of 10.65 TFLOPS.

3D rendering. Cinebench is a rendering test by design, and the numbers here — 19899 in R20 multi-core, 5619.5 in R15 multi-core — confirm the CPU does rendering work like a professional chip. CPU render engines will treat this laptop like a mobile workstation. GPU-path rendering (ray tracing in viewport, GPU render engines) is weaker by comparison: 16 RT cores is a modest count, and the Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239 reflects it.

Software development. Compiling is the classic multi-core grind, and a Geekbench multi-core score of 20795 backed by 24 threads makes this an excellent compilation machine. Passmark multithread at 55759 and integer math at 155218 support the same verdict for build pipelines, container workloads, and local test suites. The 2204 single-core Cinebench R23 score also keeps single-threaded scripts and REPL loops responsive.

Student and office work. Frankly overkill — in a good way. Documents, browsers, video calls, and research multitasking will never stress a CPU whose worst rival comparison is a 0.7% gap to the Intel Xeon 6515P. Battery-driven thermals in a laptop chassis are the practical consideration, since this chip is built to boost to 5.40 GHz, but raw capability is never in question.

FAQ

Q: How powerful is the CPU compared to the rest of the market?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX sits in the 94th percentile of all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 67469. Its nearest rivals are server and workstation chips — the Intel Xeon w5-3525 (-0.3%), AMD EPYC 4484PX (-0.5%), AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX (-0.6%), and Intel Xeon 6515P (0.7%) — all within a rounding error of its aggregate performance.

Q: Is this build good for gaming?

A: Partially. The CPU is elite for gaming — a Passmark single-thread score of 4713 and single-core Geekbench of 2458 mean frame pacing and simulation-heavy titles are never CPU-limited. But the Arc A570M at the 88th GPU percentile, with 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, is the limiting component. Expect it to be treated as a 1080p-oriented GPU. Note that no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination in the database; all frame-rate discussion is estimated from benchmark scores.

Q: How many cores and threads does the CPU have?

A: 24 cores and 24 threads — no SMT doubling on this Arrow Lake-HX part. Each core carries 3 MB of L2 cache, with 192 KB of L1 per core, plus 36 MB of shared L3.

Q: What memory does the platform support?

A: DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, delivering 102.4 GB/s of memory bandwidth. ECC is not supported.

Q: Can the CPU be overclocked?

A: Yes — the multiplier is unlocked, which is notable for a BGA-packaged mobile part soldered to the board. Practical tuning headroom will still be governed by the laptop's cooling, given the chip's 5.40 GHz maximum boost.

Q: What APIs does the Arc A570M support?

A: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 — a fully modern API feature set, including ray tracing support via its 16 RT cores.

Q: Is this a desktop or a laptop?

A: A laptop. The buildClass field lists it as such, the CPU uses the BGA 2114 socket (soldered, not socketed), the GPU is an integrated-package mobile part drawing 75 W, and the GPU's display outputs are listed as "Portable Device Dependent."

Upgrade Path and Platform

The upgrade story here is unusual because this is a soldered, laptop-class platform. The CPU sits on Intel BGA 2114 — there is no socket, no swap, no drop-in replacement. The Arc A570M connects over PCIe 4.0 x8 and is likewise fixed. Anyone buying this configuration is buying a closed system, so "upgrade path" in practice means external enclosures and peripherals rather than component swaps.

What the platform offers internally is still worth understanding. The CPU exposes PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU alone, which is generous bandwidth for a mobile platform — Thunderbolt- or OCuLink-connected external GPU enclosures are the realistic graphics upgrade route, and Gen 5 lanes mean the interface itself won't be the bottleneck for a future external card. Memory is DDR5, dual-channel, 102.4 GB/s. Check whether the specific laptop ships with both channels populated, because single-stick configurations would halve that bandwidth and hurt the CPU's performance in memory-bound workloads — a real concern given how much multi-core throughput this chip can generate.

On power: the CPU is rated at 55 W TDP and the GPU at 75 W. There is no suggestedPsu field for this build, which is expected — it's a laptop, and the chassis handles power delivery. The practical takeaway is that combined sustained draw is modest by desktop standards, and an external GPU enclosure with its own power supply is the cleanest way to add graphics headroom later. A sensible next step for a user who outgrows the A570M is exactly that: keep the 94th-percentile CPU, offload rendering and gaming to an external graphics solution over those Gen 5 lanes, and the platform rebalances immediately.

Who Should Build It

The honest answer: nobody will "build" this — it ships as a complete laptop — but the buyer profile is clear from the data.

Mobile workstation users. Engineers, analysts, and technical professionals who need Xeon-adjacent CPU performance (deltas of 0.3% to 0.7% against three server/workstation chips) in a portable chassis get exactly that here. The 35589 Cinebench R23 multi-core score makes long-running simulations, batch data processing, and compilation genuinely fast.

Developers. The 20795 Geekbench multi-core score and strong Passmark integer math (155218) suit heavy build environments, VMs, and CI-style local workloads. Unlocked multiplier tuning is a bonus for those who like to experiment within thermal limits.

Casual-to-mid-tier gamers. Players targeting 1080p, or esports titles at high refresh, will find the A570M adequate and the CPU essentially unbounded. Anyone targeting 1440p/4K AAA gaming should look elsewhere — the GPU percentile and 8 GB buffer say so plainly.

Students and office professionals. Massively over-served on CPU. Fine, if the laptop's price and battery profile suit; the raw performance will outlast a degree program easily.

Small business workstations. The Xeon-class benchmark adjacency, DDR5 bandwidth, and 24 threads make this a defensible choice for a portable CAD, data, or media station — with the standing caveat that GPU-accelerated workloads run into the A570M's ceiling quickly.

Serious 3D artists and video professionals should think twice: rendering and editing CPU-side is excellent, but GPU-accelerated paths are the weak leg. An external GPU or a desktop alternative makes more sense for that audience.

CPU Analysis

The Core Ultra 9 275HX is the flagship of Intel's mobile Arrow Lake-HX line: 24 cores, 24 threads (one thread per core — Arrow Lake abandons hyperthreading), a 2.70 GHz base clock and a 5.40 GHz maximum boost. It's built on TSMC's 3 nm process, packs 17.8 billion transistors into a 243 mm² die, and is part of Core Ultra Series 2. It launched on January 12, 2025.

The cache hierarchy is where a lot of the multi-core performance lives: 192 KB of L1 and a full 3 MB of L2 per core, plus 36 MB of shared L3. That generous per-core L2 keeps 24 cores from tripping over each other in memory-bound parallel workloads, and the 102.4 GB/s dual-channel DDR5 pipeline backs it up.

What do the scores mean in practice? Cinebench R23 multi-core at 35589 and R20 at 19899 describe sustained all-core throughput in the same neighborhood as Xeon and EPYC workstation parts. Geekbench multi-core at 20795 confirms it in a different test family. Single-core results — 2204 in R23, 2809 in R20, 334 in R15, 2458 in Geekbench — are strong rather than record-setting, which matches Arrow Lake's design: massive parallel throughput ahead of razor-edge single-thread peaks. Passmark single-thread at 4713 is nonetheless a solidly upper-tier result.

The Passmark subtests sketch the workload profile. Integer math at 155218 and floating point at 191186 show balanced numeric throughput. Data compression at 608381 and encryption at 47112 indicate strong throughput for security and archival tasks. Extended instructions at 47016 confirm capable SIMD/vector throughput. Random string sorting at 74320 reflects solid memory subsystem behavior, and physics at 3338 is a good proxy for game simulation performance. The overall 94th percentile placement and an average score of 67469 against a field of all CPUs — including desktop flagships — is the headline: this is top-tier silicon by any measure.

There's also the integrated graphics: Arc Xe-LPG with 64 EU. In a laptop with a discrete Arc A570M, the iGPU mainly serves as a power-efficient fallback for light display work, though it can handle QuickSync-class media duties.

Gaming Performance

The database contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU/GPU combination, and dataIsMeasured is explicitly false. Every frame-rate statement below is therefore an estimate derived from the benchmark scores — treat them as directional, not measured.

Starting with the CPU: nothing in gaming's CPU-side demands will strain the 275HX. Single-core Geekbench of 2458, single-thread Passmark of 4713, and a Passmark physics score of 3338 describe a processor that can drive frame pacing and simulation at frame rates well beyond what the display side can render. CPU-induced stutter should be effectively off the table.

The GPU is the story. The Arc A570M scores 58239 in Geekbench OpenCL, placing it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. Its rivals by aggregate score — the Radeon RX 6950 XT at -0.3%, the RX 5600 OEM at +0.3%, the NVIDIA P102-100 at -0.5%, and the Radeon PRO V710 at -0.7% — confirm that the database's aggregate metrics see this as a firmly mid-pack GPU, though the OpenCL compute test is not a pure gaming proxy and those aggregate score comparisons shouldn't be read as gaming equivalence.

From the raw specs — 2048 shading units, a 900 MHz base and 1300 MHz boost clock, 5.325 TFLOPS FP32, 166.4 GTexel/s texture rate, 83.2 GPixel/s pixel rate, and 224 GB/s of bandwidth across a 128-bit bus feeding 8 GB of GDDR6 — the realistic estimate is 1080p gaming at high settings in most titles, with AAA games at maximum settings requiring reduced settings or upscaling help. The 64 ROPs are respectable, and DirectX 12 Ultimate support including ray tracing (16 RT cores) is present, but ray-traced effects at 1080p will consume a large share of this GPU's budget. The 8 GB frame buffer is the binding constraint at 1440p and above, particularly in texture-heavy open-world games. Esports and lighter titles should run comfortably at high refresh rates given the CPU's headroom.

For anyone who needs hard numbers rather than estimates, the absence of measured FPS data for this pairing is itself a data point: treat all gaming claims for this configuration with appropriate caution.

Benchmark Performance

The exact figures, and what they mean:

CPU scores. Cinebench R15: 5619.5 multi-core, 334 single-core. Cinebench R20: 19899 multi-core, 2809 single-core. Cinebench R23: 35589 multi-core, 2204 single-core. Geekbench: 20795 multi-core, 2458 single-core. Passmark multithread: 55759; single-thread: 4713. The average benchmark score across the suite is 67469, placing the chip in the 94th percentile of all CPUs.

GPU scores. The Arc A570M has one recorded benchmark: Geekbench OpenCL at 58239, giving an average score of 58239 and the 88th percentile among all GPUs.

Rival context (CPU). The deltas tell the story compactly: Intel Xeon w5-3525 at -0.3%, AMD EPYC 4484PX at -0.5%, AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX at -0.6%, Intel Xeon 6515P at 0.7%. The 275HX essentially scores in a dead heat with dedicated workstation and server processors. That a mobile part does this is the single most notable fact in the entire dataset.

Rival context (GPU). Radeon RX 6950 XT at -0.3%, RX 5600 OEM at +0.3%, NVIDIA P102-100 at -0.5%, Radeon PRO V710 at -0.7%. These are aggregate-database comparisons spanning compute and gaming tests, and they place the A570M as a solidly upper-mid-tier part on paper — while its memory configuration and raw specs keep real-world gaming expectations more grounded.

Combined. The build's combined percentile of 91 is high, but it's dragged down from the CPU's 94 by the GPU's 88. The combined picture is a compute-heavy laptop that outscores its graphics subsystem by a clear margin.

Build Overview

This is a laptop — buildClass confirms it — pairing Intel's top mobile Arrow Lake-HX CPU with a mid-tier Arc 5-series discrete GPU, both from Intel, in an all-blue team configuration. The CPU debuted January 12, 2025; the GPU architecture is older, dating to late July 2023, so the platform mixes a current-generation processor with previous-generation graphics.

By tier: the CPU at the 94th percentile is flagship-class, workstation-adjacent silicon. The GPU at the 88th percentile is a capable mid-tier mobile part. The combined 91st percentile is genuinely strong in absolute terms — this is an upper-echelon laptop in aggregate — but the internal composition matters more than the aggregate. This is a rendering and compute laptop with serviceable graphics, not a gaming flagship with a strong CPU attached.

Balance and Bottleneck

The bottleneck is unambiguous: the GPU limits games and GPU-accelerated workloads; nothing limits CPU workloads.

The evidence is arithmetic. The CPU sits at the 94th percentile with an average benchmark score of 67469, statistically tied with Xeon and EPYC workstation processors — chips that exist to do sustained multi-core computation. The GPU sits at the 88th percentile with a single-datum average of 58239 from Geekbench OpenCL, a compute-context test rather than a pure gaming benchmark. In any workload that needs both — modern games, GPU-accelerated video editing, 3D viewports — the A570M's 8 GB frame buffer, 128-bit bus, and 5.325 TFLOPS of FP32 will saturate long before the 275HX's 24 threads run out of work. The CPU's Passmark physics score of 3338 and single-thread result of 4713 describe frame-feeding capacity the GPU cannot consume.

For purely CPU-bound workloads — compilation (Geekbench multi 20795), rendering (R23 multi 35589), compression (608381), encryption (47112) — the balance reverses entirely and the A570M is irrelevant except as a display adapter. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG 64EU graphics could even handle display duties while the discrete card idles.

The practical conclusion follows directly from the data. Buy this configuration for its processor, treat the GPU as a serviceable 1080p-class bonus, and if graphics demands grow, the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes and the laptop's external-enclosure options are the escape hatch — because on a BGA 2114 board, nothing inside this machine is ever being replaced.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX + Intel Arc A570M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

Intel Arc A570M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds