SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX + Intel Arc A550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

67,469 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A550M

49,737 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX and Intel Arc A550M pairing represents a high-performance mobile platform designed for demanding workloads. The data indicates a 24-thread processor built on a 3 nm process paired with a dedicated graphics solution that, while end-of-life, still commands a strong position in the database. The combined benchmark percentile of 90 places this configuration in the upper echelon of all tested systems, suggesting a balanced approach to both CPU-intensive and GPU-accelerated tasks.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX is a 24-core, 24-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake-HX architecture, manufactured by TSMC on a 3 nm process node. It operates with a base clock of 2.70 GHz and can boost up to 5.40 GHz, which is reflected in its strong single-threaded performance. The CPU includes 36 MB of shared L3 cache, with 192 KB of L1 and 3 MB of L2 cache per core. This configuration supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

Benchmark results show this is a serious multi-threaded performer. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 35589 points in the multi-core test and 2204 points in the single-core test. The single-core score indicates excellent responsiveness for lightly-threaded tasks, while the multi-core score demonstrates substantial throughput for heavily-parallel workloads. Geekbench results reinforce this, with a multi-core score of 20795 and a single-core score of 2458.

The processor’s percentile ranking of 94 against all CPUs puts it in the top 6% of all processors tested in the database. Its average benchmark score of 67469 is nearly identical to its nearest rivals, including the Intel Xeon w5-3525 (67673, -0.3% delta) and the AMD EPYC 4484PX (67822, -0.5% delta). This indicates the 275HX competes directly with enterprise-grade server chips in raw computational power, despite being a mobile part.

Real-world implications are significant. The PassMark multi-thread score of 55759 suggests the CPU can handle video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation with ease. The data compression score of 608381 and integer math score of 155218 point to strong performance in database operations and general productivity. For single-threaded tasks, the PassMark single-thread score of 4713 is high, ensuring snappy application launches and responsive UI interaction. The floating-point math score of 191186 is particularly strong, indicating proficiency in scientific and engineering simulations.

Balance and Bottleneck

The system’s combined percentile of 90 suggests good overall balance, but the data reveals where the bottleneck lies. The CPU’s percentile of 94 is higher than the GPU’s percentile of 86, indicating the processor is the stronger component relative to its peers. This means in most gaming scenarios, the Intel Arc A550M will be the limiting factor, especially at higher resolutions where GPU load increases.

The CPU’s multi-threaded capabilities far exceed what the GPU can feed in real-time graphics. For instance, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35589 indicates the CPU can process game logic and physics far faster than the GPU can render frames. This imbalance is typical for high-core-count processors paired with mid-range GPUs. In CPU-light, GPU-heavy scenarios like 4K gaming, the GPU will be the primary constraint. Conversely, in CPU-heavy tasks like AI inference or complex simulations, the Core Ultra 9 275HX will dominate, and the GPU will be underutilized.

The GPU’s Geekbench Vulkan score of 49580 is respectable, but when compared to the CPU’s Geekbench multi-core score of 20795, it is clear that the processor is not the limiting factor in most workloads. The gap between the CPU’s percentile (94) and GPU’s percentile (86) is 8 points, which is a meaningful difference. This suggests that users should not expect the GPU to keep pace with the CPU in every scenario. For a more balanced system, a higher-tier GPU would be needed, but the current pairing still offers strong performance for most tasks.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The Arc A550M’s 86th percentile ranking suggests it can handle 1080p gaming at high settings, but it will likely struggle to maintain consistently high frame rates at 1440p or above in demanding titles. The CPU’s strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 2204) ensures minimal frame pacing issues, but the GPU will cap overall FPS.

Streaming: The 24-core CPU is excellent for streaming. The PassMark multi-thread score of 55759 allows for simultaneous game encoding and streaming without significant performance penalties. The GPU’s 16 RT cores and support for DirectX 12 Ultimate provide hardware-accelerated encoding, but the CPU can easily handle x264 encoding at high presets.

Video Editing: The combination of a strong CPU and a capable GPU is ideal for video editing. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 19899 indicates fast timeline rendering and export times. The GPU’s 8 GB of VRAM and 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth will accelerate effects and color grading, though the CPU will handle most of the heavy lifting in codec-heavy workflows.

3D Rendering: This is where the CPU shines. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35589 places it in contention with workstation-class processors, making it a viable option for CPU-based rendering in Blender or V-Ray. The GPU’s 8.397 TFLOPS of FP32 performance can also assist in GPU-accelerated rendering, though its 8 GB VRAM may limit scene complexity.

Software Development: The high core count and strong single-thread performance are ideal for compilation. The PassMark data compression score of 608381 suggests rapid code compilation and packaging. The 36 MB of L3 cache helps with frequent data access patterns in large codebases, reducing build times.

Student and Office Work: This configuration is overkill for basic productivity, but it excels at multitasking. The 24 threads handle dozens of browser tabs, office applications, and background processes without slowdown. The CPU’s high single-thread score (2458 Geekbench) ensures instant response in document editing and spreadsheet calculations.

Who Should Build It

This platform targets users who need serious multi-threaded compute power in a laptop form factor. The Core Ultra 9 275HX is aimed at content creators who render 3D scenes, edit high-resolution video, or compile large software projects. The 94th percentile CPU ranking means these users will see workstation-class performance without needing a desktop.

Gamers at 1080p will find the Arc A550M sufficient for high-refresh gaming in esports titles, but those seeking 1440p or 4K gaming should look elsewhere. The GPU’s 86th percentile suggests it is a solid mid-range option, but it does not match the CPU’s top-tier status.

Developers and engineers working with large datasets will benefit from the 24 threads and 36 MB of L3 cache. The PassMark integer math score of 155218 indicates strong performance in data processing and algorithm execution. Students in STEM fields will find the CPU capable of running simulations and statistical analysis, though the GPU is less critical for these tasks.

Small business workstations that require virtualization, database management, or heavy spreadsheet analysis will benefit from the CPU’s multi-threaded prowess. The 17,800 million transistors and 243 mm² die size indicate a complex, high-performance design that can handle sustained workloads without thermal throttling, given the 55 W TDP.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 67469, placing it at the 94th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are all enterprise or HEDT parts: the Intel Xeon w5-3525 (67673, -0.3%), AMD EPYC 4484PX (67822, -0.5%), and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX (67868, -0.6%). The Core Ultra 9 275HX is also 0.7% faster than the Intel Xeon 6515P (67006). This places the mobile CPU in the same performance class as server processors.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 49737, putting it at the 86th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (49957, -0.4%), AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (50001, -0.5%), and AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (50951, -2.4%). The Arc A550M is 2.6% faster than the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (48477). This demonstrates that the GPU competes with previous-generation high-end desktop cards, despite being a mobile part.

The combined percentile of 90 reflects the strong overall performance of this pairing. However, the discrepancy between the CPU’s 94th and GPU’s 86th percentile means that the system is not perfectly balanced. The CPU is a top-tier part, while the GPU is merely above average. This combined score indicates a system that excels at CPU-bound tasks and is competent at GPU-bound tasks, but the GPU will occasionally hold back the full potential of the processor.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A550M is based on the Xe-HPG architecture, codenamed Alchemist, and belongs to the Arc 5 Mobile generation. It is manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC, with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. The GPU features 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. It includes 16 RT cores for hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but the data does not specify tensor cores, suggesting AI acceleration is not a primary focus.

The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. The base clock is 900 MHz, with a boost clock of 2050 MHz. The memory operates at 1750 MHz, or 14 Gbps effective. This configuration yields a pixel rate of 131.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 262.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 8.397 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance of 16.79 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio).

The Geekbench OpenCL score is 49894, and the Vulkan score is 49580. These scores are remarkably close, indicating consistent performance across different APIs. The GPU’s 86th percentile ranking places it above the majority of GPUs in the database, but its nearest rivals are all desktop parts. The RTX 5070 Ti is only 0.4% faster, while the RX 6900 XT is 2.4% faster. This suggests the A550M is a capable mobile GPU that can compete with desktop parts from the previous generation.

The 16 RT cores provide decent ray tracing performance, but the 8 GB VRAM may be a limitation for modern games with high-resolution textures. The 224.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p gaming but may become a bottleneck at higher resolutions. The GPU’s 60 W TDP indicates it is designed for thin-and-light laptops, but this also limits its sustained performance compared to higher-power desktop counterparts.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, and dataIsMeasured is false. Therefore, all frame rate discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores and percentile rankings.

Based on the GPU’s 86th percentile and its similarity to the Radeon RX 6800 XT (which it outperforms by 2.6%), the Arc A550M should deliver playable frame rates at 1080p with ultra settings in most games. The 8.397 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is sufficient for 60+ FPS in esports titles and older AAA games. However, newer, more demanding titles may require lowering settings to maintain smooth performance.

The CPU’s strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 2204) ensures that frame times are consistent, reducing stutter in CPU-bound scenarios. At 1440p, the GPU will be the limiting factor, and users should expect to reduce settings to medium or high to achieve 60 FPS. At 4K, the 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth will likely cause performance drops, making 4K gaming impractical at high settings.

The gap between CPU and GPU percentiles (94 vs. 86) means that in games with heavy physics or AI, the CPU will be underutilized while the GPU works at full capacity. The estimated FPS figures should be treated as approximations, and actual performance may vary depending on driver optimizations and game-specific engine behavior.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core Ultra 9 275HX uses the Intel BGA 2114 socket, which is a mobile socket, meaning the CPU is soldered to the motherboard and not upgradeable. The platform supports dual-channel DDR5 memory, with a maximum theoretical bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is sufficient for a high-end GPU and one or two NVMe SSDs.

The Arc A550M is a mobile GPU with a 60 W TDP, and it is also soldered, so it cannot be upgraded independently. The system’s power supply requirements are modest given the 55 W CPU TDP and 60 W GPU TDP, but the exact PSU wattage is not specified in the FACT PACK. Users should ensure their laptop’s power adapter can handle sustained loads, especially during gaming or rendering.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be increasing memory capacity, as DDR5 is supported and more RAM will benefit multi-tasking and large datasets. The 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes allow for a fast NVMe SSD, which would improve load times and data access. However, the CPU and GPU are both soldered, so the platform has a fixed performance ceiling.

The production status of the CPU is "Active," while the GPU is "End-of-life." This suggests the CPU will continue to receive support, but the GPU may not receive future driver optimizations. Users should consider this when planning long-term use, as older GPUs may see diminishing performance in newer games.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX has 24 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score of 67469 is 0.3% lower than the Intel Xeon w5-3525 (67673), 0.5% lower than the AMD EPYC 4484PX (67822), and 0.6% lower than the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX (67868). It is 0.7% higher than the Intel Xeon 6515P (67006).

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A550M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a memory bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s and an effective memory clock of 14 Gbps.

Q: Does the system support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU has 16 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes hardware-accelerated ray tracing.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more powerful relative to their respective markets?

A: The CPU is at the 94th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is at the 86th percentile of all GPUs, indicating the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers.

Q: Can the GPU handle 4K gaming?

A: Based on its 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth, 4K gaming is likely to be impractical at high settings. The GPU is better suited for 1080p gaming, where its 86th percentile ranking suggests strong performance.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the CPU?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a theoretical memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX + Intel Arc A550M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

Intel Arc A550M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds