SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

67,469 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX paired with the Intel Arc A370M is a high-core-count mobile processor combined with a modest entry-level discrete GPU. This pairing targets a specific niche: maximum CPU throughput for professional and productivity workloads in a laptop chassis, with the GPU serving as an accelerator rather than the primary feature. The data shows a stark contrast in capability between the two components, placing the system’s overall performance firmly in the hands of the CPU.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance class of the Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score of 67469 places it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. Its performance is comparable to workstation-class processors like the Intel Xeon w5-3525 and AMD EPYC 4484PX, with a performance delta of -0.3% and -0.5%, respectively.

Q: How does the Arc A370M GPU compare to other graphics cards?

A: The Arc A370M has an average benchmark score of 29175, placing it in the 74th percentile of all GPUs. Its direct rivals include the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH and the AMD FirePro W8000, with the Arc A370M trailing them by a negligible 0.1%.

Q: What are the key specifications of the Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX?

A: This is a 24-core, 24-thread mobile processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture. It has a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a TDP of 55 W. It is manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC.

Q: What kind of memory and storage expansion does the platform support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. It also provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes for high-speed connectivity to storage and other devices.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the processor includes Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units. This provides a fallback display output and basic graphics acceleration even when the discrete Arc A370M is not in use.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for the CPU and GPU pairing is 84. This indicates that the overall system sits above the majority of other laptop configurations in the database, largely driven by the exceptional CPU performance.

Q: Is the GPU capable of hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc A370M is based on the Xe-HPG architecture and includes 8 dedicated ray tracing cores. It also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which includes features like hardware ray tracing and variable rate shading.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data reveals a significant performance disparity between the two core components. The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX is a powerhouse, with an average benchmark score of 67469. This places it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, putting it in direct competition with high-end workstation chips. For instance, it sits just 0.3% behind the Intel Xeon w5-3525 and 0.5% behind the AMD EPYC 4484PX. This is a top-tier mobile processor that can handle the most demanding multi-threaded workloads.

In contrast, the Intel Arc A370M is a more modest performer. Its average benchmark score of 29175 places it in the 74th percentile of all GPUs. The data shows it is virtually tied with the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, scoring 0.1% lower, and the AMD FirePro W8000, also 0.1% lower. It even outperforms the AMD Radeon RX 6800M by a 1% margin in the average score, a surprising result given the latter’s typically higher-end positioning, but the aggregate score is still far below the CPU’s capability.

Looking at specific CPU metrics, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35589 is exceptionally high for a mobile part, underscoring its workstation-level compute capability. The single-core score of 2204 is also strong, indicating good responsiveness for everyday tasks. The Geekbench multi-core score of 20795 and single-core score of 2458 align with this pattern. In PassMark, the multi-thread score of 55759 is substantial, while the single-thread score of 4713 confirms strong per-core performance. The CPU’s 94th percentile ranking is not an anomaly; it is a consistent result across all major benchmark suites.

The combined percentile for the build is 84. This figure is heavily influenced by the CPU’s high percentile, as the GPU’s 74th percentile is pulled down by the lack of a dedicated high-end graphics solution. The combined picture is that of a laptop built primarily for CPU-intensive tasks where the GPU is a secondary consideration for acceleration or light graphics work.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is an entry-level mobile GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, built on a 6 nm process by TSMC. It features 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. This memory configuration is adequate for its performance class but will be a limiting factor in high-resolution or high-texture gaming.

The GPU has a base clock of 1550 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz. Its 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output pipelines deliver a pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 131.2 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is rated at 4.198 TFLOPS. The GPU also includes 8 ray tracing cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though performance in this area will be limited by its overall throughput.

In the Arc A370M’s benchmark results, the Geekbench OpenCL score is 29676, and the Vulkan score is 28673. These are consistent with its 74th percentile ranking and its near-identical standing to rivals like the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH and AMD FirePro W8000. For rendering tasks, this GPU is not a primary renderer. Its 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth are restrictive for complex 3D scenes. The data suggests it is suited for light acceleration, basic video encoding, and general desktop compositing. Its 8 RT cores allow for some ray-traced effects, but the low FP32 throughput means complex ray-traced renders will be slow. The GPU is best viewed as a capable companion for the CPU, handling display output and light graphics work rather than heavy rendering.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, which uses the Intel BGA 2114 socket. This is a mobile platform, meaning the CPU is soldered to the motherboard and is not upgradable. The memory support is dual-channel DDR5 with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is the primary interface for high-speed devices like NVMe SSDs and potentially external GPU enclosures.

The GPU is also a mobile component and is not upgradable in a traditional sense. The system’s PSU headroom is determined by the CPU’s 55 W TDP and the GPU’s 35 W TDP. With a combined TDP of 90 W, the data suggests that a laptop power supply capable of handling this load is sufficient. The suggested PSU is not listed, but the low TDPs indicate that a standard laptop power adapter is adequate.

A sensible next upgrade path is not about changing the core components, as they are fixed in a laptop. Instead, it involves maximizing the system’s potential through memory and storage. Upgrading to faster or higher-capacity DDR5 memory modules and installing a PCIe Gen 5 NVMe SSD would be the most practical way to improve system responsiveness and data throughput. The CPU’s performance headroom is substantial, so the system will remain relevant for CPU-bound tasks for a long time, but the GPU will eventually become the bottleneck for any graphics-intensive work.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. As such, all FPS figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores of the individual components. The data shows a clear imbalance for gaming.

The CPU’s 94th percentile score is far more than sufficient for any modern game, ensuring that it will not be a bottleneck. The limiting factor will be the Intel Arc A370M, which sits in the 74th percentile. With 4 GB of VRAM and a 64-bit memory bus, the GPU is suited for 1080p gaming at medium to low settings in most titles.

The GPU’s performance is comparable to the AMD Radeon RX 470, which is a legacy desktop card. In practice, gamers should expect playable frame rates in esports titles like CS:GO or League of Legends at high settings, and 30-60 FPS in older or less demanding AAA titles at medium settings. For the latest AAA releases, the 4 GB VRAM buffer will be exceeded at high textures, likely causing stuttering or requiring significant settings reductions. The 8 RT cores are present, but enabling ray tracing will severely impact frame rates, making it an unrealistic option for smooth gameplay. The data indicates this is not a gaming-first machine; it is a workstation with a discrete GPU that can handle light gaming on the side.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is a specialist tool. The primary audience is professionals and creators who need extreme multi-core processing power in a portable form factor. The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX’s 24 cores and high Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35589 make it an ideal choice for software developers compiling large codebases, data scientists running complex simulations, and engineers using CAD or CAE software. The high PassMark data compression score of 608381 also indicates strong performance in archiving and file management tasks.

Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s power, but the GPU will be a bottleneck. The Arc A370M can assist with some GPU-accelerated effects in editing software, but the 4 GB VRAM will limit the complexity of the projects. Students in fields like computer science or engineering will find the CPU performance valuable for their coursework, though they may not need the discrete GPU. Small business workstations that handle heavy data analysis or financial modeling would also benefit from the CPU’s capabilities, provided graphics performance is not a primary requirement. This is not a system for gamers or general consumers; it is for users where CPU compute is the absolute priority.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX is a flagship mobile processor from Intel’s Core Ultra Series 2. It has 24 cores and 24 threads, based on the Arrow Lake architecture. It operates with a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, all within a 55 W TDP. The CPU is manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC, with a die size of 243 mm² containing 17,800 million transistors. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 36 MB of L3 cache.

The benchmark results for this CPU are exceptional. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35589 demonstrates its massive multi-threading capability. The single-core score of 2204 is also strong, indicating that it can handle lightly-threaded tasks with speed. The Geekbench multi-core score of 20795 reinforces this position. In PassMark, the processor scores 4713 in single-thread tests and 55759 in multi-thread tests. It also excels in specific workloads, such as a PassMark data compression score of 608381 and a floating-point math score of 191186.

The CPU’s 94th percentile ranking reflects its performance, placing it alongside server and workstation parts. Its nearest rivals in terms of average score are the Intel Xeon w5-3525 and AMD EPYC 4484PX, with performance gaps of less than 1%. For real workloads, this means a user can expect desktop-level or better rendering, compilation, and simulation performance in a laptop. The single-thread performance is also top-tier, ensuring a snappy user interface and fast application launch times. The data shows a processor that is overkill for most consumer tasks but is a powerhouse for professional ones.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX mobile CPU with the Intel Arc A370M mobile GPU in a laptop form factor. The CPU is a 24-core, 24-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, and it represents the pinnacle of Intel’s mobile computing performance. The GPU is an entry-level discrete part based on the Xe-HPG architecture, designed to provide a step up from integrated graphics.

The combined percentile for this build is 84, driven almost entirely by the CPU’s 94th percentile ranking. The GPU’s 74th percentile is a secondary factor. This configuration is clearly a high-end workstation-class laptop. The CPU is the star of the show, with its 94th percentile score putting it in the top 6% of all processors. The GPU is a supporting player, offering adequate graphics for a professional machine but not for gaming. The overall tier of this build is that of a powerful mobile workstation, not a gaming laptop. It is designed for users who require maximum CPU compute in a portable package and are willing to accept modest graphics performance in return.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU in this build is heavily skewed. The CPU is a top-tier performer, ranking in the 94th percentile, while the GPU is a mid-range part, ranking in the 74th percentile. This creates a clear bottleneck scenario where the GPU will be the limiting factor in any graphics-intensive workload.

In CPU-bound tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, code compilation, and data processing, the system will perform exceptionally well. The Core Ultra 9 275HX will operate at its full potential, and the GPU will have little impact on the final result. The data shows that the CPU is capable of sustaining high multi-threaded throughput, as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35589.

However, in GPU-bound tasks like gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering, the Arc A370M will be the limiting factor. The CPU will be waiting for the GPU to catch up, resulting in performance that is far below what the CPU alone could handle. For example, in a game, the FPS will be dictated by the GPU’s 74th percentile performance, not the CPU’s 94th percentile. The FPS scaling will be poor at higher resolutions because the 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will be saturated. The system is best understood as a high-performance CPU with a discrete GPU for basic graphics, where the CPU is the primary engine and the GPU is a peripheral component.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX + Intel Arc A370M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds