SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 356H + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 356H

41,215 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 7 356H + Intel Arc A370M

This pairing combines Intel's Panther Lake-based Core Ultra 7 356H mobile processor with the Intel Arc A370M discrete GPU in a laptop configuration. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from benchmark scores rather than direct game testing. The data shows a system that sits at the 81st combined percentile, indicating a solidly upper-midrange mobile platform with clear strengths in CPU-heavy workloads and modest but capable GPU performance.

Gaming Performance

Since the FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame data for this CPU+GPU pairing, there are no verified frame rates at any resolution or quality preset. All gaming expectations must be inferred from the individual component benchmarks. The Arc A370M scores 29,676 in Geekbench OpenCL and 28,673 in Geekbench Vulkan, placing it at the 74th percentile among all GPUs. Those scores suggest it can handle 1080p gaming at medium to high settings in most titles, with esports games running comfortably at high refresh rates. The CPU's single-thread performance — 2,040 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 4,072 in Passmark single-thread — is strong enough to feed the GPU without holding it back in most scenarios.

At 1080p ultra settings, expect the GPU to be the limiting factor in graphically demanding AAA titles. The A370M's 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will constrain texture-heavy scenes and high-resolution assets. For competitive shooters and lighter titles, the CPU's 16 cores and high boost clock can push frame rates well beyond what the GPU can display, making those games GPU-bound rather than CPU-bound. At 1440p, the GPU's bandwidth and memory capacity become increasingly strained, and the system would likely require reduced settings to maintain playable frame rates. The estimated FPS picture is one of a capable 1080p gaming laptop that trades blows with older desktop GPUs like the Radeon RX 470, which sits within 0.6% of the A370M's average benchmark score.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture using the DG2-128 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. It features 1,024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster operation pipelines. The GPU runs at a 1,550 MHz base clock with a 2,050 MHz boost clock, delivering 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 8.397 TFLOPS of FP16 performance via the 2:1 ratio. Pixel fill rate is 65.60 GPixel/s and texture fill rate is 131.2 GTexel/s, figures that align with its midrange mobile positioning.

Memory configuration is notably constrained: 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus running at 1,750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) yields 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a significant bottleneck for modern games that increasingly require more than 4 GB of VRAM at high settings, and the narrow bus limits memory-intensive workloads. However, the GPU does include 8 dedicated ray tracing cores, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The presence of ray tracing hardware at this tier is a differentiator, though the modest compute throughput means ray-traced effects will require conservative settings. The GPU's 35 W TDP and IGP slot width indicate it is designed for thin-and-light laptops where power efficiency matters more than raw performance. With a 74th percentile ranking and an average benchmark score of 29,175, the A370M sits in the upper-middle tier of mobile GPUs, trading blows with the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (0.1% slower) and Radeon RX 470 (0.6% faster) while notably trailing the Radeon RX 6800M by just 1% in average score — a surprising result given the 6800M's much higher tier in desktop-class mobile graphics.

Benchmark Performance

The Core Ultra 7 356H delivers strong multi-threaded results: 3,055 in Cinebench R15 multi-core, 12,153 in Cinebench R20 multi-core, and 18,395 in Cinebench R23 multi-core. Single-core scores are equally competitive at 303 (R15), 1,715 (R20), and 2,040 (R23). In Passmark, the CPU achieves 33,978 multi-thread, 4,072 single-thread, and 103,128 floating-point math. Its average benchmark score of 41,215 places it at the 87th percentile among all CPUs, which is a strong showing for a mobile part. The nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 with a nearly identical average score of 41,208 (0% delta), the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H at 41,263 (-0.1%), the desktop AMD Ryzen 9 5900X at 41,376 (-0.4%), and the Intel Core Ultra X7 358H at 40,967 (+0.6%). This CPU is effectively in a dead heat with a previous-generation desktop flagship, which speaks volumes about its multi-threaded capability.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 29,175 places it at the 74th percentile, with nearest rivals being the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH at 29,197 (-0.1%), AMD FirePro W8000 at 29,211 (-0.1%), AMD Radeon RX 470 at 28,996 (+0.6%), and AMD Radeon RX 6800M at 28,874 (+1%). The combined picture is a system where the CPU is markedly stronger relative to its peers than the GPU is relative to its own field. The 87th percentile CPU paired with a 74th percentile GPU creates an imbalance where the processor is capable of much more than the graphics card can feed or render. The overall combined percentile of 81 reflects this blend, pulling the system slightly below the CPU's tier while remaining above the GPU's tier.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows a CPU-forward configuration. The Core Ultra 7 356H's 87th percentile CPU ranking versus the Arc A370M's 74th percentile GPU ranking means the graphics card is the primary limiting factor in gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads. In CPU-bound tasks like data compression (336,177 Passmark score), encryption (26,345), and multi-threaded rendering, the processor has ample headroom. The CPU's nearest rival being the desktop Ryzen 9 5900X — a 12-core desktop part — underscores that this laptop CPU is not the weak link in any workload.

For gaming, the GPU will bottleneck in graphically intensive titles. The A370M's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth create ceilings that no amount of CPU headroom can overcome. However, in CPU-heavy scenarios like physics simulation (Passmark physics score of 2,895), the processor can deliver results that rival desktop parts. The FPS scaling picture, estimated from scores, shows that lowering resolution from 1440p to 1080p will yield diminishing returns once the GPU hits its memory bandwidth limit. Conversely, raising settings from medium to ultra will impact frame rates more than CPU-bound titles would suggest. For mixed workloads — such as gaming while streaming or rendering while gaming — the CPU's 16 threads can handle concurrent tasks without starving the GPU of data, but the GPU remains the performance ceiling for visual output.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 356H is a 16-core, 16-thread processor based on the Panther Lake architecture, built on Intel's 3 nm process node. It belongs to the Core Ultra Series 3 generation and targets the mobile segment with a 25 W TDP. Base clock is 1.90 GHz with a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, and it uses the Intel BGA 2540 socket. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support covers DDR5 and LPDDR5X in dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s. The processor does not support ECC memory, and it is not multiplier-unlocked. It provides PCIe Gen 5 with 12 CPU lanes and integrates Intel Xe3 Graphics.

The CPU's 87th percentile ranking is justified by its benchmark results. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,395 is remarkable for a 25 W mobile part, matching or exceeding many desktop CPUs from previous generations. The Passmark multi-thread score of 33,978 and integer math score of 83,111 indicate strong general-purpose compute. Data encryption at 26,345 and extended instructions at 27,898 show capable security and SIMD performance. The single-thread score of 4,072 in Passmark is competitive for modern workloads, and the boost clock of 4.70 GHz should deliver responsive day-to-day performance. The lack of simultaneous multi-threading (16 cores, 16 threads) is notable — the CPU relies on physical cores only, which can impact heavily threaded workloads that benefit from SMT, but the high core count mitigates this. The release date of 2026-01-04 marks this as a new-generation part, and production status is active, meaning it will be available in current laptops.

FAQ

Q: How does the Core Ultra 7 356H compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X?

A: The two processors have nearly identical average benchmark scores — 41,215 for the Intel part versus 41,376 for the Ryzen 9 5900X, a delta of -0.4%. This means the laptop CPU matches a previous-generation desktop flagship in overall performance, despite the massive difference in power envelope and cooling requirements.

Q: Is the Arc A370M suitable for 1080p gaming?

A: Based on its 74th percentile ranking and benchmark scores of 29,676 in OpenCL and 28,673 in Vulkan, the A370M is capable of 1080p gaming at medium to high settings in most titles. However, its 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit ultra settings and high-resolution textures.

Q: What is the main bottleneck in this system?

A: The GPU is the limiting factor. The CPU sits at the 87th percentile while the GPU sits at the 74th percentile, so graphically demanding workloads will be constrained by the A370M's compute throughput, memory capacity, and bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, ECC memory is not supported. The processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X in dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s.

Q: How does the Arc A370M compare to the Radeon RX 6800M?

A: Surprisingly, the A370M's average benchmark score of 29,175 is 1% higher than the RX 6800M's 28,874, despite the latter being a much larger and more power-hungry GPU. This benchmark gap does not necessarily translate to gaming performance, where the 6800M's larger memory bus and VRAM capacity would typically prevail.

Q: What is the CPU's production status and release timeline?

A: The Core Ultra 7 356H has an active production status with a release date of 2026-01-04. It is based on the Panther Lake architecture on Intel's 3 nm process node.

Q: Can this system handle content creation workloads?

A: Yes, the CPU's 16 cores and strong multi-threaded scores (18,395 in Cinebench R23 multi-core) make it highly capable for video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 performance provides acceleration for GPU-accelerated effects, though the 4 GB VRAM may limit complex scenes.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: In esports and lighter titles, the CPU's 4.70 GHz boost clock and strong single-thread performance (2,040 Cinebench R23 single-core) can drive high frame rates, but the GPU's 74th percentile ranking means you will likely be GPU-bound above 1080p or at high settings. Expect good 1080p performance in competitive games, with reduced settings needed for consistent high refresh rates.

Streaming: The 16 physical cores provide ample headroom for encoding and streaming while gaming. The Passmark multi-thread score of 33,978 and data encryption score of 26,345 indicate the CPU can handle concurrent workloads without significant frame drops, though the GPU's modest performance may require lowering game settings to maintain stream quality.

Video editing: The CPU excels here with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,395 and Passmark floating-point math of 103,128, making timeline scrubbing and export rendering fast. The GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS and 8 RT cores can accelerate effects and previews, though 4 GB VRAM may limit working with high-resolution footage or complex compositions.

3D rendering: Multi-threaded rendering workloads will benefit from the CPU's 87th percentile ranking, with Cinebench R15 multi-core at 3,055 and R20 at 12,153 indicating strong performance in CPU-based renderers. GPU rendering with the A370M is possible but limited by 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth, making it suitable for smaller scenes or preview renders.

Software development: The CPU's 16 cores and high integer math score of 83,111 make compilation and testing fast. The 18 MB L3 cache and 115.2 GB/s memory bandwidth support large codebases and virtual machines, while the active production status and modern architecture ensure compatibility with current development tools.

Student and office work: This is overkill for typical productivity tasks. The CPU's single-thread score of 4,072 in Passmark makes document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheet work instantaneous, while the GPU's support for modern APIs and hardware-accelerated decoding ensures smooth video playback and web content. The 25 W CPU TDP contributes to long battery life in a laptop form factor.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H mobile processor with the Intel Arc A370M discrete GPU. The CPU is a 16-core Panther Lake part on Intel's 3 nm process with a 25 W TDP, while the GPU is a 35 W Xe-HPG architecture part with 4 GB GDDR6 memory. The combined percentile ranking of 81 places this system in the upper-midrange tier of all possible builds, with the CPU contributing most of the strength at the 87th percentile and the GPU trailing at the 74th percentile. This is a CPU-first configuration where the processor delivers desktop-class multi-threaded performance in a power-efficient mobile package, but the GPU is more modest in comparison. The system is best described as a productivity-first laptop that can handle gaming as a secondary capability, rather than a gaming-first machine.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who prioritize CPU performance over GPU performance in a laptop form factor. Gamers at 1080p who play esports titles or older games will find the A370M sufficient, especially given its 74th percentile ranking and ray tracing support, but those seeking high-refresh 1440p gaming should look elsewhere. Content creators — particularly video editors, 3D artists, and developers — will benefit most from the CPU's 87th percentile ranking and 16 cores, which handle rendering, compilation, and multitasking with ease. Students and professionals in engineering, data science, or software development will appreciate the processor's strong multi-threaded scores for simulations, coding, and analysis workloads. Small business users running office applications or light database work will find the system far more capable than needed, with the CPU's single-thread performance ensuring responsive interaction. The build is not ideal for those whose primary workload is GPU-intensive, such as machine learning training or high-end 3D rendering, due to the A370M's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth constraints.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 356H + Intel Arc A370M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 356H

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds