SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

97 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
98%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus

93,785 Benchmark Score
Top 2% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

56,083 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080, creating a desktop configuration that targets high-performance computing and gaming. The CPU, part of the Core Ultra Series 2, is built on a 3 nm TSMC process and features 24 cores with 24 threads, a base clock of 3.70 GHz, and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The GPU, based on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, offers 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus. Combined, this system sits at the 92nd percentile among all tested configurations, indicating a top-tier pairing for demanding applications and high-refresh-rate gaming.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is a 24-core, 24-thread processor that operates without Hyper-Threading, meaning each core handles a single thread. This design choice, paired with a 3 nm process node from TSMC, allows for high power efficiency while maintaining a 125 W TDP. The base clock of 3.70 GHz can boost up to 5.50 GHz, providing substantial single-thread headroom for latency-sensitive workloads.

Benchmark results show a strong multi-core presence. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 44,253 points in multi-core and 2,439 points in single-core. The multi-core figure places it in the 96th percentile among all CPUs, making it competitive with server-grade processors. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon 6520P, which scores 93,786 on average, and the AMD EPYC 4564P, which scores 95,183. The Ultra 7 270K Plus trails the EPYC 4564P by 1.5% and the EPYC 9175F by 1.9%, showing that it trades blows with enterprise silicon in heavy threaded workloads.

In PassMark tests, the processor excels in data compression with a score of 804,322, and integer math with 175,986. Floating-point math reaches 229,491, while extended instructions (SIMD) score 63,506. The multi-thread score of 68,574 reinforces the CPU’s parallel processing strength. The single-thread score of 5,068 is respectable, though not class-leading, indicating that while the CPU can drive high frame rates, it does not dominate in purely single-threaded tasks.

The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration supports high-bandwidth access to frequently used data, which is critical for gaming and content creation. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s, and includes ECC memory support for error correction in professional workflows.

For real workloads, the 24 cores and 24 threads make this CPU a strong choice for video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, where parallel scaling is near-linear. The high boost clock ensures that lighter tasks, such as web browsing or office applications, remain responsive. The passmark physics score of 4,064 suggests solid performance for physics simulations in games, though the GPU will handle most rendering tasks.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data, based on ultra settings, shows that this pairing delivers high frame rates across a wide range of titles, with an average of 210.7 FPS across all tested games. This places the pair at rank 157 out of 3,732 configurations, which is the 96th percentile for gaming performance.

At 1920x1080, the system excels in esports titles. Counter-Strike 2 runs at 337 FPS, Valorant at 624 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege at 400 FPS. These numbers far exceed the refresh rates of most monitors, making the system ideal for competitive play. In Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, the frame rate reaches 744 FPS, demonstrating the CPU’s ability to feed the GPU in low-resolution, high-FPS scenarios. Minecraft also hits 332 FPS, while Roblox reaches 435 FPS.

At 2560x1440, performance remains high but shows scaling. Valorant drops to 592 FPS, still an enormous margin, while Counter-Strike 2 sits at 223 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 172 FPS, and Overpower manages 120 FPS. The average across all titles at this resolution is still well above 100 FPS for most games, with only a few exceptions like Ark: Survival Ascended at 31 FPS.

At 3840x2160 (4K), the GPU becomes the primary limiter. Call of Duty: Warzone still achieves 146 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 runs at 125 FPS. Valorant remains playable at 526 FPS. However, graphically intense titles like Cyberpunk 2077 drop to 49 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 runs at 45 FPS. Ark: Survival Ascended is the most demanding, falling to 16 FPS. The Medium also struggles at 47 FPS, showing that 4K ultra settings can tax even the RTX 5080.

The data is measured, not estimated, so these figures represent actual in-game performance. For 1080p and 1440p gaming, this system is overpowered for most titles, offering headroom for high-refresh-rate monitors. For 4K gaming, it handles esports and lighter titles with ease, but AAA games may require settings adjustments to maintain 60 FPS.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using TSMC’s 5 nm process. The GB203 chip contains 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, giving it a transistor density of 120.6 million per mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 2295 MHz and boosts to 2617 MHz, with memory running at 1875 MHz (30 Gbps effective).

Memory configuration is a key strength. The card features 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 960.0 GB/s. This high bandwidth is essential for 4K textures and complex shaders. The GPU has 10,752 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units. Ray tracing is handled by 84 RT cores, while 336 tensor cores accelerate AI-based workloads like DLSS.

Compute performance is substantial. The GPU delivers 56.28 TFLOPS of FP32 and FP16 performance, with a pixel rate of 293.1 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 879.3 GTexel/s. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 8,637. PassMark G3D shows a score of 36,565, while Geekbench OpenCL scores 235,901 and Vulkan scores 255,450. The PassMark GPU compute score is 21,789.

The RTX 5080 sits in the 87th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon 8060S, which trails by 0.6%, and the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB, which is 0.7% behind. The Radeon RX 9070 GRE is 2.2% ahead, showing that the 5080 is competitive but not the absolute fastest card available.

For rendering workloads, the high FP32 throughput and 16 GB of VRAM make this GPU suitable for 3D modeling, video editing, and GPU-accelerated effects. The RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, which improves lighting and reflection quality in supported games. The tensor cores enable DLSS, which can boost frame rates at higher resolutions, though the measured FPS data already reflects ultra settings without relying on upscaling.

The GPU has a TDP of 360 W and requires a 750 W power supply, as suggested by the PSU recommendation. It uses a single 16-pin power connector and occupies a dual-slot design. Display outputs include one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1b, supporting high refresh rates at 4K or multi-monitor setups.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between CPU and GPU is well-matched for most workloads, but the bottleneck shifts depending on resolution and game type. At 1920x1080, the CPU is often the limiting factor. The high frame rates in esports titles, such as 744 FPS in CS:GO and 624 FPS in Valorant, show that the GPU is capable of rendering frames faster than the CPU can issue draw calls. The CPU’s single-thread score of 5,068 and its 96th percentile ranking support this, as it provides enough processing power to drive high FPS, but the GPU is not fully saturated.

At 2560x1440, the balance is more even. Frame rates drop by roughly 30-40% compared to 1080p, indicating that the GPU is now doing more work. The CPU still has headroom, as evidenced by the 592 FPS in Valorant and 262 FPS in Rainbow Six Siege. For most games at this resolution, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, but the CPU’s strong multi-core performance ensures that background tasks, like streaming or Discord, do not interfere with frame pacing.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly the bottleneck. The frame rates in AAA titles, such as 49 FPS in Cyberpunk 2077 and 45 FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2, are limited by the GPU’s rasterization and memory bandwidth. The CPU’s performance is less relevant at this resolution, as the pixel fill rate and shader complexity dominate. The 960.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 56.28 TFLOPS of compute are the limiting factors here.

The pairRankByFps data shows an average of 210.7 FPS across all games, with a rank of 157 out of 3,732 pairs. This indicates that the configuration is in the top 4% for gaming, meaning that while the GPU is strong, the CPU is not holding it back in most scenarios. The 1.5% gap to the AMD EPYC 4564P in CPU benchmarks is negligible for gaming, where the RTX 5080 does the heavy lifting.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 93,785, placing it in the 96th percentile of all CPUs. This score is nearly identical to the Intel Xeon 6520P at 93,786, with a 0% delta. The AMD EPYC 4564P scores 95,183, which is 1.5% higher, and the EPYC 9175F scores 95,615, 1.9% higher. These rivals are server processors, so the Ultra 7 270K Plus performs at enterprise level for a desktop chip.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 56,083, placing it in the 87th percentile of all GPUs. The AMD Radeon 8060S scores 55,757, which is 0.6% lower, and the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55,698, 0.7% lower. The Radeon RX 9070 GRE scores 57,367, which is 2.2% higher. This shows that the RTX 5080 is a strong performer, though it is not the undisputed leader in its class.

The combined percentile for this build is 92, indicating that the CPU and GPU together outperform 92% of all tested configurations. The CPU’s 96th percentile and GPU’s 87th percentile combine to create a system that excels in both multi-threaded productivity and high-resolution gaming. The CPU’s 44,253 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and the GPU’s 8,637 3DMark Steel Nomad score are representative of the system’s capabilities.

In PassMark, the CPU’s multi-thread score of 68,574 and the GPU’s G3D score of 36,565 show that both components are above average. The CPU’s data compression score of 804,322 is particularly impressive, suggesting strong performance in file archiving and compression tasks. The GPU’s compute score of 21,789 indicates solid performance for OpenCL-based workloads.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the system delivers frame rates that exceed 300 FPS in titles like Counter-Strike 2 (337 FPS) and Valorant (624 FPS), making it ideal for 240 Hz or 360 Hz monitors. At 1440p, frame rates remain above 100 FPS in most games, including 172 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.

Streaming: The 24-core CPU provides ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The PassMark multi-thread score of 68,574 ensures that x264 encoding at high presets will not bottleneck the GPU, which can still render frames at 140 FPS in Control or 161 FPS in Fortnite at 1080p.

Video editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 44,253 accelerates timeline rendering and export, while the GPU’s 56.28 TFLOPS of FP32 performance speeds up effects and color grading. The 16 GB of VRAM handles 4K footage and multiple layers without swapping.

3D rendering: In applications like Blender or Maya, the CPU’s 24 cores will drive viewport performance, while the GPU’s 10,752 shading units and 84 RT cores provide fast final-frame rendering. The 960.0 GB/s memory bandwidth reduces texture loading times.

Software development: The CPU’s 5.50 GHz boost clock and 36 MB of L3 cache improve compilation times and code analysis. The PassMark integer math score of 175,986 shows strong integer performance, which is relevant for algorithms and data processing.

Student and office work: The system is overpowered for word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing, but the high single-thread score of 5,068 ensures snappy application launches and smooth multitasking. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running data tasks.

Who Should Build It

This build is for gamers who prioritize high refresh rates at 1080p or 1440p. The measured FPS data shows that the system can run esports titles at over 300 FPS, making it suitable for competitive players. It also handles 4K gaming in less demanding titles, such as Valorant at 526 FPS, but AAA games at 4K will require settings tweaks.

Content creators who work with video, 3D, or large datasets will benefit from the CPU’s 96th percentile multi-core performance and the GPU’s 87th percentile compute power. The 16 GB of VRAM is sufficient for 4K video editing and moderate 3D scenes, while the 24 cores accelerate rendering and encoding.

Software developers and data scientists can leverage the CPU’s integer math score of 175,986 and the GPU’s tensor cores for machine learning inference. The ECC memory support is a plus for code that requires high data integrity.

Small business workstations that run virtual machines, database servers, or engineering simulations will find the CPU’s 24 threads and 36 MB of L3 cache adequate. The GPU is more than necessary for office tasks, but it can accelerate CUDA-based applications if needed.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus has 24 cores and 24 threads, with no Hyper-Threading.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 5080 have?

A: The GPU features 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus.

Q: What is the average FPS across all tested games?

A: The pair achieves an average of 210.7 FPS across all games at ultra settings.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The CPU scores 93,785 on average, matching the Intel Xeon 6520P at 93,786, and trailing the AMD EPYC 4564P by 1.5%.

Q: Can this system run 4K games?

A: Yes, but with limits. Esports titles like Valorant run at 526 FPS, while AAA games like Cyberpunk 2077 drop to 49 FPS at ultra settings.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 5080 has a memory bandwidth of 960.0 GB/s.

Q: What power supply is recommended?

A: The suggested PSU for this GPU is 750 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 360 W.

Build Overview

This desktop build combines the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus, a 24-core processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080, a Blackwell 2.0 architecture GPU. The CPU is built on a 3 nm process and has a 125 W TDP, while the GPU uses a 5 nm process and has a 360 W TDP. The system ranks in the 92nd percentile overall, with the CPU in the 96th percentile and the GPU in the 87th percentile.

The CPU’s 44,253 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and the GPU’s 8,637 3DMark Steel Nomad score indicate a high level of performance for both productivity and gaming. The measured FPS data shows an average of 210.7 FPS across all games, placing the pair at rank 157 out of 3,732 configurations. This is a high-end desktop system designed for users who need a balance of multi-threaded compute power and high-resolution gaming capability.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1851, which is specific to the Core Ultra Series 2. It supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC support. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface.

The GPU requires a 750 W power supply, and its TDP is 360 W. The CPU’s TDP is 125 W, so the total system draw is within the recommended PSU headroom. The GPU uses a single 16-pin power connector and is a dual-slot design, measuring 304 mm in length, so case compatibility is a consideration.

A sensible next upgrade would be to add more DDR5 memory, as the platform supports dual-channel but the memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s can be fully utilized with higher-density modules. The CPU is unlocked, allowing overclocking via the multiplier, which could improve the 5,068 single-thread score. For the GPU, the PCIe 5.0 interface is future-proof, but the 16 GB of VRAM may become a limit for 4K textures in coming years. The socket supports only this generation of processors, so a CPU upgrade would require a new motherboard.