SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
98%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus

93,785 Benchmark Score
Top 2% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

17,639 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is a desktop build that combines a high-end 24-core processor with a mainstream 8 GB graphics card. This combination targets a specific sweet spot: heavy multi-threaded productivity on the CPU side, paired with solid 1080p and capable 1440p gaming on the GPU side. The data shows a system that sits in the 79th percentile overall, indicating it outperforms the majority of all tracked desktop configurations, though the GPU is the clear limiting factor for high-resolution gaming.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The build has a combined percentile of 79, meaning it performs better than 79% of all tracked system pairings.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus has an average benchmark score of 93785, which is essentially tied with the Intel Xeon 6520P (93786, 0% delta). It trails the AMD EPYC 4564P by 1.5%, the AMD EPYC 9175F by 1.9%, and the AMD EPYC 4565P by 2.1%.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 falls into the 61st percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 17639.

Q: Is the measured FPS data based on real tests or estimates?

A: The data is measured. The `dataIsMeasured` field is true, meaning the FPS figures for each game and resolution come from actual benchmark runs.

Q: What is the CPU's architecture and process node?

A: The processor is based on the Arrow Lake Refresh codename, part of the Core Ultra Series 2 generation, and is manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and what type is it?

A: The GPU is equipped with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 272.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU's launch MSRP?

A: The launch MSRP for the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is $299.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data reveals a stark contrast between the CPU and GPU capabilities. The processor is a top-tier performer, sitting in the 96th percentile among all CPUs. Its average benchmark score of 93785 places it in the company of enterprise server chips, with its nearest rival being the Intel Xeon 6520P at a 0% delta, showing they are statistically identical. The CPU is only 1.5% behind the AMD EPYC 4564P and 2.1% behind the AMD EPYC 4565P, which are high-core-count server processors. This indicates the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus provides workstation-class compute performance in a desktop package.

In contrast, the GPU sits in the 61st percentile among all GPUs. Its average score of 17639 is nearly identical to the AMD Radeon HD 7790, with a delta of -0.2%. It is also comparable to integrated graphics solutions like the AMD Radeon 780M, which it beats by only 0.3%. This puts the RTX 4060 firmly in the mainstream segment, not a high-end card. The combined picture is a system with exceptional processing power that is often bottlenecked by the graphics card, especially in GPU-intensive tasks like high-resolution gaming or 3D rendering.

The system's combined percentile of 79 reflects this imbalance. It is a strong overall score, but the CPU is doing the heavy lifting. The pair's average FPS across all tested games is 119.7, ranking it 1990 out of 3732 pairs. This mid-pack ranking in gaming, despite a top-4% CPU, confirms that the GPU is the primary constraint in this build.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is a 24-core, 24-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake Refresh architecture, built on a 3 nm process by TSMC. It features a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, with a TDP of 125 W. The chip supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, offering a memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s. It includes 36 MB of shared L3 cache and 3 MB of L2 cache per core, with a 192 KB L1 cache per core.

Benchmark results show this is a computational powerhouse. In Cinebench R23, it scores 44253 in multi-core and 2439 in single-core. The multi-core score is exceptionally high, reflecting the 24 physical cores. The single-core score of 2439 is also competitive, indicating strong per-thread performance for a desktop chip. This is further supported by a Passmark single-thread score of 5068. In Passmark's multi-thread test, it scores 68574, which is a high figure that places it above most consumer and many professional processors.

For real workloads, this translates to exceptional performance in heavily threaded tasks. The data compression score of 804322 and floating-point math score of 229491 show it can handle data processing and scientific calculations with ease. The data encryption score of 59097 and extended instructions score of 63506 signal strong performance in security-related and SIMD-optimized workloads. While the 24 threads are not hyper-threaded (24 cores, 24 threads), the sheer core count more than compensates for this, as evidenced by the near-parity with enterprise Xeon and EPYC processors in average score. The processor's 96th percentile ranking confirms it is a top-tier choice for CPU-bound tasks like video encoding, code compilation, and 3D scene simulation.

Who Should Build It

This build is for users whose primary demands are on the CPU, with gaming being a secondary but important consideration. The processor's 96th percentile performance makes it ideal for content creators who work with 4K video editing, 3D rendering, and complex simulations where the 44253 Cinebench R23 multi-core score will dramatically reduce render times. Software developers compiling large codebases will see significant throughput gains from the 24 cores, and the ECC memory support adds stability for long-running compute jobs.

For gamers, this system is best suited for those playing at 1920x1080 resolution, where the RTX 4060's 61st percentile performance is most effective. The measured FPS data shows many titles exceeding 100 FPS at 1080p, making it a strong choice for high-refresh-rate competitive gaming. However, users with 1440p high-refresh monitors will need to adjust settings or rely on upscaling, as the GPU struggles to maintain high frame rates in demanding titles. Students and small business users who need a fast, responsive workstation for office applications, data analysis, and light creative work will find the CPU's responsiveness excellent, though the GPU is overkill for basic tasks and the money could be saved if gaming is not a priority.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data, which is based on real benchmark runs, shows a clear pattern. At 1920x1080, the RTX 4060 delivers excellent performance in esports and lighter titles. Counter-Strike 2 runs at 184 FPS, Valorant at 422 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege at 219 FPS. Even demanding titles like Call of Duty: Warzone achieve 194 FPS at 1080p. This makes the system ideal for high-refresh 1080p gaming.

At 2560x1440, performance drops significantly. Valorant remains very high at 360 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone stays playable at 172 FPS. However, more demanding games begin to struggle. Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 41 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 37 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to a barely playable 17 FPS. The 1440p experience is inconsistent, working well for fast-paced shooters but requiring settings reductions for AAA single-player titles.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly overmatched. Valorant is still at 288 FPS, but most other titles fall below 40 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 27 FPS, Call of Duty: Warzone at 146 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 at 68 FPS. Heavy titles like Ark: Survival Ascended run at 9 FPS, making 4K gaming only viable for undemanding or highly optimized games. The overall average FPS across all tested games at all resolutions is 119.7, but this number is skewed by the high performance in esports titles.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using the AD107 chip on a 5 nm process. It has 3072 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 ROPs. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1830 MHz with a boost clock of 2460 MHz. It features 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS. The card has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 272.0 GB/s. Its FP32 compute performance is 15.11 TFLOPS.

The benchmark results indicate this is a solid mainstream card. Its Passmark G3D score is 19545, placing it in the 61st percentile. However, its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon HD 7790, a card from a much older generation, and integrated graphics like the Radeon 780M. This shows that while the RTX 4060 is a capable card, it is not a high performer relative to the broader GPU market. In DirectX 12, it scores 76 in the Passmark DX12 test, which is a low score, suggesting the card's performance in modern, heavily optimized APIs is limited by its 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus.

For rendering workloads, the 8 GB VRAM is a significant constraint. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2302 is modest. The GPU's compute performance, measured by Passmark GPU Compute at 9213, is adequate but not exceptional. The 15.11 TFLOPS of FP32 power is useful for real-time effects, but large scenes in 3D applications will exceed the VRAM capacity. The tensor cores are present for DLSS, which can help alleviate the performance deficit at higher resolutions, but the core rasterization performance remains the bottleneck. The card supports modern APIs including DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data paints a clear picture of a CPU-bound system. The processor sits in the 96th percentile, while the GPU sits in the 61st percentile. This massive gap means the CPU is rarely the limiting factor in any workload. In gaming, the RTX 4060 is almost always the bottleneck. This is evident in the FPS scaling: at 1080p, where the GPU is less stressed, frame rates are high. But as resolution increases to 1440p and 4K, the GPU's workload increases and FPS drops dramatically, while the CPU has spare capacity.

For example, in Cyberpunk 2077, the system runs at 54 FPS at 1080p, but this drops to 41 FPS at 1440p and 27 FPS at 4K. The CPU is not the cause of this drop; the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus are saturated. Conversely, in CPU-heavy games like Valorant, the strong CPU is what allows the 422 FPS at 1080p. The GPU is still fast enough to render those frames, but the CPU's 5068 single-thread score ensures the game logic and draw calls are processed quickly.

In productivity workloads, the CPU is the star. The GPU's compute score of 9213 is low, meaning tasks like GPU-accelerated rendering or machine learning will be slow. However, for CPU-based tasks like video encoding, the 44253 Cinebench R23 multi-core score will process frames much faster. This system is well-balanced for a user who prioritizes CPU performance and games at 1080p, but it is unbalanced for 4K gaming or GPU-accelerated creation.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs an Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus processor with an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 graphics card. The CPU is a 24-core, 24-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake Refresh architecture, designed for the Intel Socket 1851. It is a high-end enthusiast part, given its 96th percentile ranking and a launch MSRP of $299. The GPU is an end-of-life mainstream card from the GeForce 40-series, based on the Ada Lovelace architecture, with a launch MSRP of 299 USD.

The overall tier of this system, based on its 79th combined percentile, is upper-midrange. It is not a top-tier enthusiast gaming rig, but it is a very powerful workstation-class CPU wrapped in a system with a capable, though not high-end, GPU. The build's strength lies in its CPU compute power, which rivals server processors from Intel and AMD. Its weakness is the GPU, which limits the system's ability to handle high-resolution gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads. As a complete package, it is a versatile machine that excels at productivity and handles 1080p gaming admirably.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1920x1080, this system is excellent for competitive shooters. The measured data shows 422 FPS in Valorant, 219 FPS in Rainbow Six Siege, and 194 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone, making it ideal for high-refresh monitors. The 184 FPS in Counter-Strike 2 also supports this.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and high multi-thread score of 68574 in Passmark make it capable of handling game capture and encoding alongside gameplay. The GPU's NVENC encoder, part of the Ada Lovelace architecture, can offload this task, but the CPU has ample headroom for software encoding if needed.

Video Editing: The 44253 Cinebench R23 multi-core score indicates exceptional performance in rendering timelines and exporting video. The CPU's 96th percentile ranking ensures it can handle 4K or even 8K footage, though the GPU's 8 GB VRAM may limit effects-heavy workflows.

3D Rendering: CPU-based rendering in applications like Blender or Cinema 4D will be very fast, thanks to the 24 cores and 36 MB L3 cache. However, GPU-accelerated rendering will be slow, as the RTX 4060's 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 8 GB VRAM are limiting factors for complex scenes.

Software Development: Compilation times will be short, driven by the processor's 96th percentile multi-core performance and high data compression score of 804322. The 24 threads allow for parallel builds, and ECC memory support provides stability for long-running test suites.

Student and Office Work: For word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing, this system is massively overqualified. The CPU's single-thread score of 5068 ensures snappy application responsiveness, and the system will handle any multitasking scenario without noticeable slowdowns. However, the GPU is unnecessary for these tasks.