SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

86 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
GPU Bottleneck
CPU
98%
VS
GPU
74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus

93,785 Benchmark Score
Top 2% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM presents a fascinating study in workload distribution. The CPU sits in the 96th percentile among all processors, while the GPU rests at the 50th percentile among all graphics cards. This 46-point percentile gap immediately signals that the processor is the dominant component in this pairing, capable of driving far more graphics horsepower than the RTX 3070 TiM can utilize in most scenarios.

Benchmark results reinforce this imbalance. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 44,253 and single-core score of 2,439 indicate exceptional computational throughput. The Passmark single-thread score of 5,068 further confirms strong per-core performance. Meanwhile, the GPU's specifications—8 GB of GDDR6 memory, 5,888 shading units, and 16.60 TFLOPS of FP32 compute—place it squarely in the mid-range tier of graphics hardware. The data suggests that in CPU-bound workloads such as physics calculations (Passmark physics score of 4,064), data compression (804,322), and integer math (175,986), the processor will finish tasks well before the graphics card becomes relevant.

However, the bottleneck flips dramatically in graphics-intensive scenarios. The RTX 3070 TiM's 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 259.4 GTexel/s texture rate are respectable but hardly exceptional for modern titles. The CPU's 24 cores and 24 threads can feed the GPU far more draw calls and geometry than the RTX 3070 TiM can rasterize. In gaming at 1080p or 1440p, the GPU will almost certainly be the limiting factor, with the CPU idling while waiting for the graphics pipeline to complete frames.

The FPS scaling picture is absent from measured data—no measuredFps rows exist for this exact combination. But the benchmark scores allow for reasoned inference. The CPU's Cinebench R20 single-core score of 3,453 and multi-core score of 24,461 suggest it can maintain high frame pacing in esports titles, while the GPU's 50th percentile standing hints at mid-range frame rates in AAA games. The 125 W TDP of the CPU and 220 W TDP of the GPU indicate a system that draws modest power, with the processor unlikely to thermally throttle even under sustained all-core loads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform foundation here is Intel Socket 1851, which anchors the Core Ultra Series 2 family. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s. ECC memory support is present, a feature that appeals to workstation users who prioritize data integrity over raw speed. The memory bus width and bandwidth figures are solid for the platform class, though not extraordinary.

PCIe connectivity comes via Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. This modern interface provides ample bandwidth for the RTX 3070 TiM, which uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 connection. The GPU's bus interface is fully compatible with the CPU's Gen 5 lanes, and the older Gen 4 specification of the graphics card will not bottleneck data transfer in practical workloads. The 20 CPU lanes also leave room for a Gen 5 NVMe SSD or other high-speed expansion cards alongside the graphics card.

The power delivery situation is straightforward. The GPU's suggested PSU is 550 W, while the CPU has a 125 W TDP. Combined with the system's other components, a 550 W power supply provides reasonable headroom under typical loads. The GPU draws power through a single 8-pin connector, which is manageable for most power supplies. The CPU's unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, though doing so would increase power draw beyond the stock 125 W TDP—users considering this path should factor additional PSU headroom into their plans.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be a higher-tier graphics card. The CPU's 96th percentile standing means it has substantial headroom to pair with a GPU that ranks significantly higher than the 50th percentile. The Xeon 6520P rival scores 93,786 in average benchmarks, a delta of 0 percent from the 270K Plus's 93,785 average—this near-identical performance confirms the CPU is not the limiting factor in this build. Upgrading the GPU to a higher-tier Ampere or newer architecture card would better utilize the CPU's capabilities, particularly at higher resolutions where graphics load increases.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all frame rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than verified results.

The CPU's strong single-core performance—Cinebench R15 single-core score of 354, R20 of 3,453, R23 of 2,439, and Passmark single-thread of 5,068—suggests excellent frame pacing in games that rely heavily on single-threaded logic. The GPU's 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs indicates mid-pack graphics capability. In esports titles like competitive shooters or MOBAs, the CPU's high single-core scores should allow the GPU to reach its maximum frame output, likely producing high refresh rates at 1080p. The GPU's 135.4 GPixel/s pixel rate supports this expectation.

For AAA games at 1080p with ultra settings, the RTX 3070 TiM's 16.60 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 8 GB of VRAM should deliver playable frame rates, though the 50th percentile standing suggests it will not dominate. At 1440p, the GPU's 448.0 GB/s bandwidth becomes more critical, and the 8 GB memory capacity may prove limiting in texture-heavy titles. The CPU's 24 cores and 36 MB of shared L3 cache provide ample geometry and draw call processing, but the GPU will cap performance in these scenarios.

At 4K, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck. The CPU's 96th percentile performance is largely irrelevant when the GPU's 50th percentile compute is overwhelmed by pixel work. The RTX 3070 TiM's 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores enable ray tracing and DLSS, but the 8 GB VRAM capacity may restrict texture quality when these features are enabled. Benchmark results indicate the CPU would not constrain frame rates at any resolution, leaving the GPU as the sole performance limiter in gaming workloads.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus a high-performance processor?

A: Yes. The CPU ranks in the 96th percentile among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 93,785. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 44,253 and single-core score of 2,439 place it among the top tier of desktop CPUs.

Q: How does the RTX 3070 TiM compare to other GPUs?

A: The GPU sits at the 50th percentile among all graphics cards. It has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, 5,888 shading units, and 16.60 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, which places it in the mid-range of graphics hardware.

Q: What memory does this build support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s. ECC memory is also supported, which is notable for workstation use cases.

Q: Can this system handle ray tracing?

A: The RTX 3070 TiM includes 46 RT cores specifically for ray tracing workloads. The GPU also has 184 tensor cores for DLSS and AI-accelerated features, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes ray tracing capabilities.

Q: What power supply is recommended?

A: The GPU lists a suggested PSU of 550 W. The CPU has a 125 W TDP, so a 550 W power supply provides adequate headroom for this configuration under typical loads.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking. The base clock is 3.70 GHz with a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, and the unlocked multiplier permits manual tuning beyond stock settings.

Q: What socket does this CPU use?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus uses Intel Socket 1851, which is the platform for Core Ultra Series 2 processors.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is a 24-core, 24-thread desktop processor from the Core Ultra Series 2 family, built on the Arrow Lake Refresh codename. The 3 nm process node from TSMC packs 17,800 million transistors into a 243 mm² die. This process advantage is reflected in the benchmark scores—the CPU achieves a 96th percentile ranking among all processors, indicating top-tier performance.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This large cache allocation supports the high throughput seen in Passmark tests. The data compression score of 804,322 and floating point math score of 229,491 indicate strong computational capabilities for workloads that benefit from large caches and parallel execution.

Clocks are set at 3.70 GHz base and 5.50 GHz boost, with an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. The 125 W TDP is moderate for a 24-core processor, suggesting efficient power management. The Passmark multi-thread score of 68,574 and integer math score of 175,986 demonstrate robust multi-threaded performance, while the single-thread score of 5,068 confirms strong per-core capability.

The nearest rivals provide context for the CPU's positioning. The Intel Xeon 6520P scores 93,786 on average, a delta of 0 percent from the 270K Plus's 93,785. The AMD EPYC 4564P scores 95,183 (delta of -1.5 percent), the EPYC 9175F scores 95,615 (delta of -1.9 percent), and the EPYC 4565P scores 95,764 (delta of -2.1 percent). This places the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus in the same performance class as server-grade processors, though slightly behind the higher-scoring EPYC models.

For real workloads, the Cinebench scores are revealing. R15 multi-core of 6,656 and R20 multi-core of 24,461 show strong scaling across the 24 cores. The R23 multi-core score of 44,253 is particularly impressive for a desktop chip. Single-core scores of 354 (R15), 3,453 (R20), and 2,439 (R23) indicate that the CPU handles lightly-threaded tasks with ease, making it suitable for both multi-threaded rendering and single-threaded productivity applications.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM is based on the GA104 chip using the Ampere architecture, manufactured on Samsung's 8 nm process. The die contains 17,400 million transistors across 392 mm², with a transistor density of 44.4 million per square millimeter. The GPU is end-of-life, succeeded by the GeForce 40 series and preceded by the GeForce 20 series.

Memory configuration includes 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective speed. This bandwidth is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming but may constrain performance at higher resolutions or with heavy texture loads.

The compute configuration is substantial: 5,888 shading units, 184 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. Clock speeds are 915 MHz base and 1410 MHz boost. These specifications yield 16.60 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and the same 16.60 TFLOPS for FP16 (1:1 ratio). The pixel rate is 135.4 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 259.4 GTexel/s.

Ray tracing and AI acceleration are handled by 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores, respectively. These enable DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) features, along with OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4 API support. The GPU occupies a triple-slot form factor, measures 270 mm in length, 140 mm in height, and 55 mm in width, and requires a single 8-pin power connector.

The GPU's 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs places it in the middle of the performance spectrum. With no benchmark scores listed and no nearest rivals provided, the percentile position is the primary performance indicator. The 16.60 TFLOPS FP32 figure is moderate for modern rendering workloads—capable for 1080p gaming and entry-level 1440p, but not competitive with higher-end cards that typically exceed 30 TFLOPS.

For rendering tasks, the GPU's texture rate of 259.4 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 135.4 GPixel/s suggest it can handle moderate 3D workloads. The 8 GB VRAM is a limiting factor for large scenes or high-resolution textures, potentially causing spills to system memory in demanding applications. The tensor cores provide acceleration for AI-based features like DLSS, which can offset some of the raw performance limitations in gaming.

Who Should Build It

The target audience for this CPU+GPU pairing is defined by the benchmark data. The CPU's 96th percentile performance makes it suitable for users who need serious computational power, while the GPU's 50th percentile standing indicates mid-range graphics capability. This combination serves specific use cases well.

Gamers at 1080p resolution will find this build capable, as the CPU's strong single-core scores (5,068 Passmark single-thread) ensure the GPU is the only limiting factor. The RTX 3070 TiM's 16.60 TFLOPS and 8 GB VRAM handle most titles at this resolution with high settings. At 1440p, performance will be more constrained but playable in many titles, particularly with DLSS enabled through the 184 tensor cores.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's multi-core prowess. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 44,253 indicates strong performance in CPU-bound rendering tasks, while the GPU's CUDA cores and 46 RT cores assist with GPU-accelerated effects and ray-traced previews. The Passmark data compression score of 804,322 supports fast file archival and compression workflows.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU's 24 cores and 24 threads for parallel compilation, along with ECC memory support for data integrity in long-running builds. The Passmark integer math score of 175,986 and extended instructions score of 63,506 indicate strong performance in compute-heavy development tasks. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support with 20 CPU lanes allows for fast NVMe storage, reducing build and test times.

Students and small business workstations can leverage the CPU's single-thread performance (5,068 Passmark single-thread) for responsive everyday computing, while the GPU handles presentation graphics or light CAD work. The 96th percentile CPU ensures longevity for future software demands, even if the 50th percentile GPU becomes dated sooner. This pairing is not ideal for 4K gaming or heavy GPU compute, but it excels in CPU-intensive workflows with moderate graphics needs.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM in a desktop configuration. The CPU is a 24-core, 24-thread processor from Intel's Core Ultra Series 2, based on the Arrow Lake Refresh architecture, manufactured on a 3 nm TSMC process. The GPU is an Ampere-architecture card with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, based on the GA104 chip from Samsung's 8 nm process.

The combined percentile ranking for this pairing is 73rd among all desktop configurations, placing it in the upper-mid tier of system performance. The CPU's 96th percentile standing dominates this ranking, while the GPU's 50th percentile pulls the combined score down. This is a CPU-first build where the processor is clearly the star component.

The class is desktop, and the overall tier is solidly mid-to-high range. The CPU's average benchmark score of 93,785 places it alongside server-class Xeon and EPYC processors, with deltas of 0 percent to -2.1 percent against its nearest rivals. The GPU's lack of benchmark scores and nearest rivals means its 50th percentile position is the only comparative data point, but that ranking indicates average performance among all GPUs.

The 125 W TDP of the CPU and 220 W TDP of the GPU combine for a system that is power-efficient relative to its computational capability. The 550 W suggested PSU provides adequate headroom. The platform supports DDR5 memory with ECC, PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes, and the CPU has an integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU iGPU for basic display output without the discrete card.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU delivers an average benchmark score of 93,785 across all tests, ranking in the 96th percentile among all CPUs. The nearest rival is the Intel Xeon 6520P with an average score of 93,786, a delta of 0 percent—essentially identical performance. The AMD EPYC 4564P scores 95,183 (-1.5 percent), the EPYC 9175F scores 95,615 (-1.9 percent), and the EPYC 4565P scores 95,764 (-2.1 percent).

Individual CPU benchmark scores show consistent strength. Cinebench R15 multi-core: 6,656; single-core: 354. Cinebench R20 multi-core: 24,461; single-core: 3,453. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 44,253; single-core: 2,439. Passmark tests include data compression at 804,322, data encryption at 59,097, extended instructions at 63,506, prime numbers at 615, floating point math at 229,491, integer math at 175,986, multi-thread at 68,574, physics at 4,064, random string sorting at 96,945, and single-thread at 5,068.

The GPU has no benchmark scores listed and an average benchmark score of 0, with no nearest rivals provided. Its performance indicator is the 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs. The GPU's specifications—16.60 TFLOPS FP32, 448.0 GB/s bandwidth, 135.4 GPixel/s pixel rate, and 259.4 GTexel/s texture rate—provide the only quantitative performance reference.

The combined picture is a CPU that performs at server-grade levels in multi-threaded workloads, as evidenced by its near-identical score to the Xeon 6520P, combined with a GPU that performs at the median of all graphics cards. The overall combined percentile of 73 reflects this split: exceptional CPU performance tempered by average GPU capability. This pairing excels in CPU-bound tasks like compilation, rendering, and data processing, while GPU-bound workloads like high-resolution gaming will perform at mid-range levels.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU's single-core score of 5,068 (Passmark) ensures it will not bottleneck frame generation, allowing the GPU's 16.60 TFLOPS to deliver high frame rates in competitive titles. The 50th percentile GPU ranking suggests mid-range performance that may not sustain 144Hz in the most demanding games, but esports titles should run smoothly.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 24 threads handle both game logic and encoding workloads without contention. The Passmark multi-thread score of 68,574 indicates ample headroom for software encoding, while the GPU's NVENC (via 184 tensor cores) provides hardware encoding options that offload the CPU entirely.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 44,253 accelerates timeline rendering and export operations. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth handle 1080p and some 1440p video effects in real time, though 4K multi-stream editing may require proxy workflows due to VRAM limitations.

3D rendering: CPU-based renderers will perform excellently, with the R20 multi-core score of 24,461 indicating strong multi-threaded ray tracing capability. GPU-based renderers will be limited by the 16.60 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 8 GB VRAM, making the GPU suitable for preview renders but not final-frame production at high resolutions.

Software development: The Passmark integer math score of 175,986 and extended instructions score of 63,506 support fast compilation of large codebases. The 24 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, while ECC memory support ensures data integrity during long compile sessions.

Student and office work: The single-thread score of 5,068 (Passmark) provides snappy application responsiveness for document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheet work. The CPU's 96th percentile ranking ensures this system will remain responsive for years of office software updates, while the GPU handles presentation graphics and light creative tasks without strain.