SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus + Intel Arc B580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

95 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
98%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus

93,785 Benchmark Score
Top 2% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B580

23,021 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus paired with the Intel Arc B580 is a desktop combination that lands in the 82nd percentile overall, indicating a strong upper-midrange configuration. The CPU is a 24-thread powerhouse that sits in the 96th percentile of all processors, while the GPU, at the 68th percentile, is the clear limiting factor for high-resolution gaming. This build excels in multi-threaded productivity and delivers excellent 1080p esports performance, but it is not a 4K ultra-settings gaming machine.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The build ranks in the 82nd percentile overall, with the CPU at the 96th percentile and the GPU at the 68th percentile.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus scores 93,785, which is essentially tied with the Intel Xeon 6520P at 93,786 (0% delta), and is 1.5% behind the AMD EPYC 4564P (95,183) and 2.1% behind the AMD EPYC 4565P (95,764).

Q: What is the GPU's closest rival in terms of average benchmark score?

A: The Arc B580's average score of 23,021 is nearly identical to the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP (23,061, -0.2% delta) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (22,895, +0.6% delta).

Q: What kind of memory and storage interface does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus with a bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s, and it offers PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes. It also supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the measured average FPS across all tested games for this pairing?

A: The pair achieves an average of 98.3 FPS across all games tested at various resolutions. It ranks 2824th out of 3732 pairs in terms of average FPS.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU and the GPU?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus has a launch MSRP of $299, and the Intel Arc B580 has a launch MSRP of $249 USD.

Q: Is the performance data for gaming measured or estimated?

A: The data is measured. The `dataIsMeasured` field is true, meaning the FPS figures come from actual testing rather than estimation.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data reveals a clear division of labor in this pairing. The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is an elite performer in CPU-bound tasks, achieving a 96th percentile ranking among all CPUs. Its average benchmark score of 93,785 places it in the company of server-grade processors, with its nearest rival being the Intel Xeon 6520P at a 0% delta. It trails only slightly behind the AMD EPYC 4564P by 1.5% and the EPYC 9175F by 1.9%, showing that it punches far above its desktop-class designation.

In stark contrast, the Intel Arc B580's average benchmark score of 23,021 places it in the 68th percentile of all GPUs. This score is nearly identical to the older NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, which it edges out by 0.6%, and the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP, which beats it by 0.2%. The GPU's performance class is significantly lower than that of the CPU, making the processor the dominant component in this build.

The combined system percentile of 82 reflects the CPU's dominance. In compute-heavy benchmarks like PassMark, the CPU shows staggering results: a multi-thread score of 68,574 and an integer math score of 175,986. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 15,748 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3,068 are respectable for its class but cannot match the relative strength of the CPU. The data shows a system that is a productivity monster held back in graphics-intensive scenarios by its mid-range GPU.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is a 24-core, 24-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake Refresh architecture, built on a 3 nm process by TSMC. It operates with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, with a TDP of 125W. The lack of hyperthreading is notable, but the sheer core count allows it to dominate in multi-threaded workloads.

Benchmark results confirm its strength. In Cinebench R23, it scores 44,253 points in multi-core and 2,439 points in single-core. The Cinebench R20 results show a similar pattern: 24,461 multi-core and 3,453 single-core. For data-heavy tasks, the PassMark data compression score is 804,322, and the encryption score is 59,097. These numbers are reflected in its 96th percentile ranking, positioning it as a top-tier processor for rendering, compilation, and scientific computing.

The CPU's memory bandwidth is 115.2 GB/s via dual-channel DDR5, which is adequate for feeding its 24 cores. The 36 MB of shared L3 cache and 3 MB per core L2 cache provide ample fast storage for active data. For real-world workloads, this translates to exceptional performance in video editing, 3D rendering, and software development, where multi-core scaling is paramount. Its single-thread score of 5,068 in PassMark also ensures snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks and lightly-threaded applications.

Balance and Bottleneck

In this configuration, the Intel Arc B580 is unequivocally the bottleneck in gaming and graphics-heavy workloads. The CPU sits in the 96th percentile, while the GPU sits in the 68th. This imbalance is starkly visible in the gaming FPS scaling across resolutions. For example, in Counter-Strike 2, the system delivers 150 FPS at 1080p, which drops to 99 FPS at 1440p and 56 FPS at 4K. This scaling pattern is typical of a GPU-limited scenario, where the frame rate is heavily dependent on resolution.

The data shows the GPU is the limiting factor even at lower resolutions in demanding titles. In Cyberpunk 2077, the frame rate is just 44 FPS at 1080p and drops to 22 FPS at 4K. Similarly, Red Dead Redemption 2 achieves only 40 FPS at 1080p. The CPU is not the constraint here; the Arc B580's compute power is insufficient to push higher frame rates in these AAA titles.

Conversely, in CPU-light or esports titles, the balance shifts. Valorant achieves a massive 344 FPS at 1080p, and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 332 FPS. These high frame rates suggest that the CPU can easily feed the GPU in less demanding scenarios. The bottleneck is workload-dependent: the CPU is the star for productivity, but the GPU holds back 1440p and 4K gaming performance.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built on the Intel Socket 1851, which is modern and active. The CPU supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus with ECC capabilities, making it suitable for workstation use. The PCIe Gen 5 support with 20 CPU lanes provides high-bandwidth connectivity for future storage and expansion cards.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is sufficient for the Arc B580's bandwidth needs. With a TDP of 190W and a suggested PSU of 450W, there is headroom in a standard desktop power supply to upgrade to a more powerful GPU without necessarily changing the power supply unit, provided it has a single 8-pin connector available. The CPU's TDP of 125W is modest for a 24-core part.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data points directly to the GPU. The CPU has significant headroom, as evidenced by its 96th percentile ranking. A user could replace the Arc B580 with a more powerful graphics card to balance the system and unlock the CPU's full gaming potential, especially at higher resolutions where the current GPU is the limiting factor. The platform's active status and modern features mean the CPU will not be a bottleneck for several generations of GPU upgrades.

Who Should Build It

This build is ideal for professionals and prosumers who prioritize multi-threaded compute power but game at 1080p. The CPU's 96th percentile performance makes it a perfect choice for content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or software compilation. The high PassMark scores in integer math (175,986) and floating-point math (229,491) indicate strong performance in scientific computing and data analysis tasks.

For gamers, this system is a 1080p esports machine. It delivers exceptional frame rates in competitive titles like Valorant (344 FPS), CS:GO (332 FPS), and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege (178 FPS). It is also capable of running many AAA titles at 1080p with playable frame rates, such as Call of Duty: Warzone at 194 FPS and Doom at 112 FPS. However, for 1440p or 4K gaming, the GPU will require settings to be turned down.

Students and small business workstations would also benefit from this build. The CPU's ECC memory support and 24 threads make it suitable for research, financial modeling, and database management. The system's strong multi-tasking capabilities ensure smooth operation when running multiple virtual machines or compiling large codebases.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B580 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, codenamed Battlemage, using a 5 nm process by TSMC. It features 2,560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 80 ROPs. The GPU is equipped with 20 ray tracing cores, which support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6.

The memory subsystem consists of 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 456.0 GB/s. The GPU operates at a base and boost clock of 2670 MHz, with memory running at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective). This configuration yields a pixel rate of 213.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 427.2 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 13.67 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 27.34 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio).

Benchmark results show a GPU that performs admirably for its class. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 109,672 and OpenCL score of 92,821 are solid. The PassMark G3D score of 15,748 and GPU compute score of 7,729 indicate good general compute capability. However, the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3,068 shows it is not a high-end gaming part. The 68th percentile ranking places it between the RTX 2080 and RTX 3080 in average score, but with significant differences in ray tracing performance. For rendering and compute tasks, the 12 GB VRAM is beneficial, but the 13.67 TFLOPS of FP32 performance limits its suitability for demanding professional 3D workloads compared to higher-tier cards.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs a top-tier 24-core CPU with a mid-range GPU. The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is a flagship-class processor in the 96th percentile, while the Intel Arc B580 is a solid mainstream GPU in the 68th percentile. The combined percentile of 82 reflects the CPU's substantial contribution to the overall performance profile.

The system is best described as a "productivity-first" desktop with respectable gaming capabilities. It is not a balanced gaming rig for high-refresh-rate 1440p or 4K play, but it is a monster for multi-threaded workloads. The CPU's performance in Cinebench R23 (44,253 multi-core) and PassMark multi-thread (68,574) places it in the field of workstation processors. The GPU, while capable at 1080p, is the limiting factor in this pairing. This is a build for users who need serious compute power and are willing to accept mid-range gaming performance.

Gaming Performance

All gaming figures presented here are measured, not estimated. The data shows a strong 1080p performer that struggles at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the system excels in esports and competitive titles: Valorant leads with 344 FPS, followed by CS:GO at 332 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone at 194 FPS. Counter-Strike 2 achieves 150 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege hits 178 FPS.

In single-player AAA titles at 1080p, performance is more varied. Doom runs at 112 FPS, Assetto Corsa at 89 FPS, and Thief at 83 FPS. However, demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (44 FPS), Red Dead Redemption 2 (40 FPS), and The Medium (31 FPS) will require reduced settings for a smooth experience. Ark: Survival Ascended is nearly unplayable at 22 FPS.

Moving to 1440p, the GPU bottleneck becomes apparent. Valorant drops to 293 FPS, but most titles fall below 100 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone is an outlier at 172 FPS, and CS:GO remains high at 228 FPS. Most AAA games hover between 30-60 FPS, with Control at 47 FPS, Cyberpunk 2077 at 33 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 30 FPS. At 4K, only Valorant (235 FPS) and CS:GO (135 FPS) remain highly playable. Most other games drop to 20-40 FPS, making 4K gaming viable only for esports titles or older games with lower demands. The average FPS across all games and resolutions is 98.3, but this figure is skewed by the high esports numbers. For a balanced gaming experience, this build is best used at 1080p.