SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus + Intel Arc B570

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
98%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus

93,785 Benchmark Score
Top 2% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B570

20,556 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and Intel Arc B570 pairing represents a high-end desktop configuration with a combined percentile ranking of 81. The CPU is a 24-core Arrow Lake Refresh part that outperforms 96% of all processors, while the GPU sits at the 65th percentile among graphics cards. This combination creates an interesting dynamic where a flagship-tier processor is paired with a mid-range graphics solution, resulting in a system that excels in compute-heavy tasks but remains grounded in gaming performance. The measured FPS data across 50 titles provides a comprehensive view of what this pairing can deliver at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K resolutions.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc B570 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, codenamed Battlemage, using a 5 nm TSMC process with 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die. The GPU operates at a consistent 2500 MHz base and boost clock, with memory running at 2375 MHz for 19 Gbps effective throughput. The 10 GB GDDR6 memory pool is accessed via a 160-bit bus, delivering 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a dual-slot card measuring 272 mm in length and 115 mm in height, requiring a single 8-pin power connector and a 450 W suggested PSU.

The graphics core houses 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 80 raster operation pipelines. Ray tracing is handled by 18 dedicated RT cores, while the architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6. The FP32 compute throughput is 11.52 TFLOPS, with FP16 reaching 23.04 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. Pixel fill rate is 200.0 GPixel/s and texture fill rate is 360.0 GTexel/s, figures that place this card in a specific performance envelope relative to its rivals.

Benchmark data reveals a mixed picture for the Arc B570. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the card scores 2649, while Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores are 83514 and 96844 respectively. The Passmark G3D score of 14195 and GPU compute score of 7281 indicate solid general-purpose performance. However, legacy DirectX tests show lower numbers: DirectX 10 scores 65, DirectX 11 scores 118, DirectX 12 scores 72, and DirectX 9 scores 164. These figures suggest the card is optimized for modern APIs rather than older titles.

The GPU's percentile ranking of 65 places it just behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, which shows a 0.1% delta, and essentially tied with the Intel Arc A750 at -0.1%. The closest rivals include the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M at 0.4% and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X at -0.5%. For rendering workloads, the 10 GB VRAM and 380 GB/s bandwidth provide adequate capacity for 1080p and 1440p texture-heavy scenes, though the FP32 throughput of 11.52 TFLOPS may limit complex compute tasks compared to higher-tier cards.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU delivers exceptional benchmark results across all tested workloads. In Cinebench R15, it scores 6656 multicore and 354 singlecore. Cinebench R20 shows 24461 multicore and 3453 singlecore, while Cinebench R23 reaches 44253 multicore and 2439 singlecore. Passmark results are equally robust: multithread score of 68574, single thread of 5068, floating point math at 229491, integer math at 175986, extended instructions at 63506, data encryption at 59097, data compression at 804322, physics at 4064, random string sorting at 96945, and prime numbers at 615.

These scores place the CPU at the 96th percentile among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 93785. The nearest rivals are remarkably close: the Intel Xeon 6520P matches at 93786 with a 0% delta, the AMD EPYC 4564P comes in at 95183 with -1.5%, the AMD EPYC 9175F at 95615 with -1.9%, and the AMD EPYC 4565P at 95764 with -2.1%. This clustering suggests the Ultra 7 270K Plus performs nearly identically to enterprise server processors in aggregate benchmarks.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 20556 places it at the 65th percentile. The combined percentile for this build is 81, with an average FPS across games of 87.3 at ultra settings. The pair ranks 3006 out of 3732 possible pairs by FPS, which indicates that while the CPU is top-tier, the GPU holds back overall gaming performance. The measured data shows 1080p gaming is largely playable across most titles, 1440p requires compromises in demanding games, and 4K is consistently challenging.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is a 24-core, 24-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake Refresh architecture, manufactured on a 3 nm TSMC process node. The chip contains 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The TDP is 125 W, and the processor uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform with PCIe Gen 5 support providing 20 CPU lanes. Memory support includes dual-channel DDR5 with a bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported.

Cache configuration consists of 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The integrated graphics solution is Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units. The processor was released on 2026-03-10 with a launch MSRP of $299, and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking. The process node and transistor count indicate a dense, efficient design that prioritizes throughput.

The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 44253 demonstrates exceptional multi-threaded performance, driven by the 24 cores capable of boosting to 5.50 GHz. The single-core score of 2439 in R23 reflects strong per-thread performance that benefits lightly-threaded applications. Passmark multithread at 68574 corroborates the multicore strength, while the single thread score of 5068 shows responsiveness in everyday tasks.

The data encryption score of 59097 and data compression of 804322 highlight the CPU's ability to handle security and archival workloads efficiently. Floating point math at 229491 and integer math at 175986 indicate robust scientific and general computational capabilities. The physics score of 4064 and extended instructions at 63506 further confirm the processor's versatility across different workload types. The 96th percentile ranking places this CPU among the fastest available, with rivals being server-class EPYC and Xeon parts, underscoring its suitability for demanding professional applications.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and Intel Arc B570 combination achieves a combined percentile of 81, indicating it outperforms 81% of tested desktop configurations.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon 6520P?

A: The Core Ultra 7 270K Plus has an average benchmark score of 93785, which is nearly identical to the Xeon 6520P's 93786, resulting in a 0% delta.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking and its closest competitor?

A: The Arc B570 ranks at the 65th percentile among all GPUs, with its nearest rival being the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile at a 0.1% delta, followed closely by the Intel Arc A750 at -0.1%.

Q: What are the measured FPS figures for Cyberpunk 2077 at different resolutions?

A: At ultra settings, Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 39 FPS in 1920x1080, 29 FPS in 2560x1440, and 19 FPS in 3840x2160.

Q: What type of memory does the CPU support and what is the bandwidth?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s, and it also supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the launch MSRP for the CPU and the GPU?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus has a launch MSRP of $299, while the Intel Arc B570 has a launch MSRP of 219 USD.

Q: How many RT cores does the Arc B570 have and what is the FP32 performance?

A: The Arc B570 features 18 RT cores and delivers 11.52 TFLOPS of FP32 compute performance.

Gaming Performance

Measured FPS data at ultra settings across 50 games reveals a clear resolution scaling pattern. At 1920x1080, the average FPS across all tested games is 87.3, with most titles achieving playable frame rates. Competitive shooters perform exceptionally well: Valorant hits 304 FPS, CS:GO reaches 293 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone achieves 194 FPS. Counter-Strike 2 runs at 133 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege hits 158 FPS.

At 2560x1440, performance drops but remains viable for many titles. Valorant still reaches 259 FPS, CS:GO achieves 201 FPS, and Warzone runs at 172 FPS. More demanding games struggle: Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 29 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 manages 27 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended falls to 12 FPS. The 1440p resolution is playable for esports and lighter titles but challenging for AAA releases.

At 3840x2160, the GPU's 10 GB VRAM and 380 GB/s bandwidth become limiting factors. Valorant still achieves 207 FPS, and Warzone maintains 146 FPS. However, most games fall below 60 FPS: Fortnite runs at 21 FPS, Cyberpunk at 19 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 18 FPS. Heaviest titles like The Medium (18 FPS) and Ark (6 FPS) are unplayable at 4K ultra. The data clearly shows this pairing is best suited for 1080p high-refresh gaming, with 1440p viable for less demanding titles.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who need exceptional CPU performance for professional workloads while maintaining solid 1080p gaming capability. Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation will benefit from the CPU's 96th percentile ranking and 24 cores. The 44253 Cinebench R23 multicore score indicates strong rendering performance, while the 804322 data compression score suits archival and large-file workflows.

Game developers and data scientists will find the CPU's 68574 Passmark multithread score useful for building and testing code, though the GPU's 65th percentile may limit GPU-accelerated workloads. Students in engineering or computer science programs can leverage the processor's single-thread score of 5068 for everyday tasks. Small business workstations requiring heavy multitasking, virtualization, or database operations will perform admirably given the CPU's 96th percentile standing.

The GPU's 65th percentile makes this a mid-range gaming machine at best. Gamers at 1080p will experience high frame rates in esports titles like Valorant (304 FPS) and CS:GO (293 FPS). Those seeking 1440p or 4K gaming should consider a more powerful GPU, as the data shows most AAA titles fall below 60 FPS at these resolutions. Users prioritizing productivity over gaming will find this pairing well-balanced.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, esports titles run exceptionally well with Valorant at 304 FPS, CS:GO at 293 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege at 158 FPS. The 87.3 average FPS across all games at this resolution means most titles exceed 60 FPS, making this a capable 1080p high-refresh system.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 68574 Passmark multithread score provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The 96th percentile processor ranking ensures no bottleneck from simultaneous gameplay and streaming software, though the GPU's 65th percentile limits visual quality settings during streams.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 44253 and 804322 data compression score indicate strong performance in rendering and exporting video projects. The 10 GB GPU memory supports 1080p and 1440p editing timelines, though 4K projects may strain the 380 GB/s bandwidth.

3D rendering: The CPU's 96th percentile ranking and near-identical performance to Xeon and EPYC rivals make this a solid choice for CPU-based rendering. GPU-accelerated rendering will be limited by the Arc B570's 11.52 TFLOPS FP32 performance, which sits at the 65th percentile.

Software development: The 5068 single-thread score and 175986 integer math score accelerate compilation and code analysis. The 24-thread processor handles parallel builds efficiently, while the 115.2 GB/s memory bandwidth supports large development environments.

Student and office work: The single-thread performance ensures responsive application usage, and the integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provides a fallback display output. The CPU's 96th percentile ensures no lag in productivity suites, though the GPU is overkill for basic office tasks.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus with the Intel Arc B570. The CPU is a 24-core, 24-thread Arrow Lake Refresh processor on the Socket 1851 platform, released March 2026 with a launch MSRP of $299. The GPU is an Intel Arc B570 based on the Xe2-HPG Battlemage architecture, released January 2025 with a launch MSRP of 219 USD.

The CPU's 96th percentile ranking places it in the top tier of processors, rivaling server-class chips like the Xeon 6520P and EPYC 4564P. The GPU's 65th percentile puts it in the mid-range segment, competing with mobile RTX 3070-class parts and the previous-generation Arc A750. The combined percentile of 81 reflects this imbalance, where the processor is far stronger than the graphics card.

The build class is desktop, confirming this is intended as a stationary workstation or gaming tower. The CPU's 125 W TDP and GPU's 150 W TDP suggest a total system draw that fits within typical desktop PSU ranges, with the suggested 450 W PSU providing adequate headroom. The overall tier from percentiles is high-end CPU with mid-range GPU, creating a system that excels in compute but is modest in graphics.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a significant imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The CPU's 96th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 65th percentile means the processor can execute far more instructions than the graphics card can render. In gaming workloads, the GPU is the clear bottleneck at higher resolutions, as evidenced by the FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K.

At 1920x1080, the average FPS of 87.3 indicates the GPU is keeping up reasonably well with the CPU's frame generation capability. However, at 2560x1440, many titles drop below 60 FPS, and at 3840x2160, most games fall below 30 FPS. This resolution-dependent scaling shows the GPU's bandwidth and compute limits, not the CPU's capacity.

In CPU-bound workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, and data compression, the CPU's 96th percentile ensures no bottleneck. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 44253 and Passmark multithread of 68574 demonstrate the processor's ability to handle heavy computational tasks without waiting on other components. The GPU's 65th percentile would only limit GPU-accelerated tasks, not standard CPU operations.

For a balanced system, users would need a GPU that matches the CPU's 96th percentile ranking. The current pairing means gamers will be limited by the GPU, while productivity users will experience no such constraint. The 87.3 average FPS across games at 1080p shows the GPU can deliver playable frame rates, but the 3006 out of 3732 pair rank by FPS indicates this is not an optimal gaming combination.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Socket 1851 platform provides the foundation for future upgrades. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, offering ample bandwidth for next-generation storage and graphics cards. Memory is dual-channel DDR5 with a bandwidth of 115.2 GB/s and ECC support, allowing for server-grade reliability. The unlocked multiplier enables overclocking to extract additional performance from the 3.70 GHz base and 5.50 GHz boost clocks.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which may limit performance with future high-bandwidth cards. The 1x 8-pin power connector and 450 W suggested PSU provide a baseline for power delivery. The 150 W TDP of the Arc B570 leaves headroom within the suggested PSU for a more powerful GPU, should users choose to upgrade. A sensible next step would be a GPU with higher percentile ranking to match the CPU's capabilities.

The CPU's 125 W TDP and the platform's support for DDR5 memory mean a memory upgrade to higher-capacity or higher-speed modules is straightforward, given the dual-channel configuration. The 36 MB L3 cache and 3 MB L2 per core provide ample on-chip storage for most workloads. The 17,800 million transistors on a 3 nm process indicate this is a recent, efficient design that should remain relevant for several years.

For users looking to increase gaming performance, replacing the Arc B570 with a higher-tier GPU would leverage the CPU's 96th percentile ranking more effectively. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support ensures compatibility with future graphics cards, while the 20 CPU lanes provide flexibility for storage and other expansion cards. The active production status of both components suggests ongoing driver and software support.