SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 268V + Intel Arc A570M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
85%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 268V

20,897 Benchmark Score
Top 15% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A570M

58,239 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 268V is a mobile processor built on the Lunar Lake architecture, manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC. It is part of the Core Ultra Series 2 generation, targeting thin-and-light laptops where power efficiency is paramount. The chip features 8 cores and 8 threads, with no hyperthreading, meaning each core handles a single thread. This design choice favors efficiency and thermal management over raw multi-threading throughput, which is a common trade-off in low-power mobile parts. The base clock sits at 2.20 GHz, with a boost clock reaching 5.00 GHz, allowing the processor to scale up significantly when workloads demand it.

The cache hierarchy is substantial for a mobile chip. Each core has 192 KB of L1 cache and 2.5 MB of L2 cache, while the shared L3 cache amounts to 12 MB. This arrangement ensures that frequently accessed data stays close to the cores, reducing latency in performance-sensitive tasks. The memory bus is dual-channel, though the specific memory type is listed as dependent on the motherboard. Notably, ECC memory is not supported, which is typical for consumer-oriented mobile processors. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 4 lanes for CPU-attached devices, which is a forward-looking feature for fast SSDs and external GPU enclosures, though the limited lane count means expansion is constrained.

The integrated graphics are the Arc 140V, which adds a capable GPU option for systems without a discrete graphics card. The processor is marked as mobile, with a TDP of just 17 watts, emphasizing its role in battery-powered devices. The socket is Intel BGA 2833, meaning it is soldered to the motherboard and not upgradeable. The production status is active, and the release date was September 23, 2024. The multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not an option for enthusiasts.

Benchmark results paint a picture of a processor that punches above its power envelope. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score is 10653, while the single-core score is 1921. These numbers indicate strong single-threaded performance, which is crucial for everyday responsiveness and lightly-threaded applications. The multicore score, while lower than desktop parts, is respectable for a 17-watt chip and suggests it can handle moderately parallel workloads without significant slowdowns. Geekbench scores of 9963 (multicore) and 2270 (single-core) corroborate this, with the single-core figure being particularly competitive for a mobile part. PassMark results show a multithread score of 19297 and a single-thread score of 4051, with floating-point math at 57628 and integer math at 42669. Data compression and encryption scores of 181443 and 13779 respectively indicate solid throughput for archival and security tasks.

The average benchmark score across all tests is 20897, placing the CPU in the 74th percentile of all CPUs. This means it outperforms roughly three-quarters of the processors in the database, a strong showing for a low-power mobile chip. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE, which scores 20900 (a 0% delta), and the Intel Core i5-12600T at 20917 (-0.1% delta). The AMD EPYC 7J13, a server-grade chip, sits at 20845 (0.2% delta), and the Intel Core Ultra 5 125U is at 20826 (0.3% delta). This clustering shows the Ultra 7 268V is competitive with a range of desktop and mobile processors, despite its much lower TDP.

For real workloads, the single-core performance is the standout feature. Tasks like web browsing, office document editing, and light coding will feel snappy, as the 5.00 GHz boost clock allows for rapid burst processing. The multicore scores suggest it can handle video editing in lightweight projects or compiling code, though longer render times are expected compared to high-core-count desktop CPUs. The low TDP means sustained loads will be limited by thermal and power constraints, but the architecture is designed to maximize efficiency per watt.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark suite shows a well-rounded performer. In Cinebench R15, it scores 1616 multicore and 293 single-core, which are modest numbers but consistent with its power class. The R20 tests yield 6887 multicore and 972 single-core, showing a scaling trend that holds up across versions. The R23 results, as mentioned, are 10653 multicore and 1921 single-core, with the single-core score being a highlight.

PassMark sub-tests provide deeper insights. The find prime numbers test scores 192, which is low and indicates that pure integer-heavy computational loops are not this chip's forte. However, extended instructions score 15323, showing strong SIMD performance for modern workloads like multimedia processing. Random string sorting scores 22416, which is decent for database-style operations. Physics scores 1617, a moderate result for gaming physics calculations.

The GPU, an Intel Arc A570M, is based on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-256 chip, manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC. It has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, along with 16 ray tracing cores. The boost clock is 1300 MHz, with a base of 900 MHz. Memory is 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU has 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die, with a transistor density of 42.8M per mm². Its FP32 performance is 5.325 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 10.65 TFLOPS (2:1). The TDP is 75 watts, and it interfaces via PCIe 4.0 x8.

The GPU's benchmark data is limited to a single Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239. This places it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs, meaning it outperforms 88% of the graphics cards in the database. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT at 58392 (-0.3% delta), the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM at 58085 (0.3% delta), the NVIDIA P102-100 at 58528 (-0.5% delta), and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 at 58657 (-0.7% delta). This is remarkable company, as the RX 6950 XT is a high-end desktop card, and the A570M is an integrated-class mobile GPU. The close scores suggest that in compute tasks like OpenCL, the A570M can hold its own against much larger desktop parts, though gaming performance is a separate matter.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 81, indicating that the system outperforms 81% of all build combinations in the database. This is a strong overall tier, suggesting that while neither component is top-of-the-line, their combination is well-balanced for a laptop. The combined picture is one of efficiency and competence: the CPU handles single-threaded tasks admirably, and the GPU provides compute performance that rivals desktop cards, even if its gaming prowess is expected to be lower due to power and thermal limits.

It is important to note that no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, so all gaming performance discussion must be framed as estimates based on the benchmark scores. The CPU's 74th percentile and GPU's 88th percentile suggest that gaming performance should be respectable, but the exact frame rates are unknown.

# FAQ

Q: What is the socket type for the Intel Core Ultra 7 268V?

A: The processor uses Intel BGA 2833, which is a soldered mobile socket, meaning it cannot be upgraded or replaced without motherboard replacement.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, ECC memory is not supported, which is standard for consumer mobile processors and limits its use in error-sensitive server workloads.

Q: What is the power consumption of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 17 watts, while the GPU has a TDP of 75 watts, making the combined thermal load manageable for a laptop chassis.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE has an average benchmark score of 20900, while the Ultra 7 268V scores 20897, a delta of 0%, meaning they are statistically tied in performance.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A570M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s, which is sufficient for 1080p gaming textures.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, so users cannot overclock the processor beyond its factory boost clock of 5.00 GHz.

Q: What APIs does the GPU support?

A: The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern games and compute applications.

# Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the data indicates a mixed picture. The GPU's 88th percentile OpenCL score suggests raw compute headroom, but the 75-watt TDP and mobile form factor will limit sustained clocks. The CPU's single-core score of 1921 in Cinebench R23 is strong, which helps in games that rely on one or two threads. Estimated frame rates at 1080p would likely be playable for esports titles, but high-refresh 144Hz gaming at max settings is uncertain.

Streaming is a viable use case. The CPU's 8 cores and 8 threads, combined with a 17-watt TDP, mean it can handle encoding overhead without excessive power draw. The PassMark data compression score of 181443 indicates efficient handling of stream data, and the GPU's fixed-function encoders would offload the heavy lifting. The system should manage 1080p streaming at moderate bitrates without stuttering.

Video editing benefits from the balanced specs. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 10653 allows for reasonably fast rendering of 1080p timelines, though 4K projects will take longer. The GPU's 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates effects and color grading. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for most editing software, and the 12 MB L3 cache helps with timeline scrubbing.

3D rendering is a moderate workload for this system. The CPU's multicore scores are not class-leading, but the GPU's OpenCL score of 58239 rivals desktop cards like the RX 6950 XT, suggesting that GPU-accelerated renderers (like Blender Cycles) would perform well. CPU-based rendering would be slower, but the 74th percentile CPU ranking means it is not a slouch.

Software development is a strong suit. The single-core performance is excellent for compilation of small-to-medium codebases, and the PassMark integer math score of 42669 shows solid throughput for logic-heavy tasks. The 8 threads handle parallel builds reasonably well, and the low TDP means developers can work on battery for extended sessions.

Student and office work is where this system shines. The low power draw, combined with high single-core scores, makes for a responsive machine for word processing, spreadsheets, and web research. The integrated Arc 140V GPU is more than enough for display output, and the 8 GB discrete GPU is available for any light graphics work. The 74th percentile CPU ranking ensures it will not feel sluggish in everyday tasks.

# Who Should Build It

The target user is a mobile professional who needs a laptop that balances performance and efficiency. Gamers at 1080p resolution would find this system suitable for medium to high settings, though the lack of measured FPS data means expectations should be tempered. The GPU's 88th percentile ranking suggests it can handle most modern titles at playable frame rates, but not at maximum settings with ray tracing enabled.

Content creators who work with video and images would benefit from the CPU's strong single-core performance and the GPU's compute capabilities. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p editing, and the 17-watt CPU TDP means less thermal throttling in thin chassis. Developers who compile code frequently would appreciate the quick single-threaded response and the ability to run multiple VMs or containers with 8 threads.

Students would find this ideal for a university laptop. The 74th percentile CPU ensures smooth multitasking between note-taking apps, research browsers, and coding tools. The battery life, implied by the low TDP, is a boon for all-day classes. Small business workstations could also leverage this system for office productivity, light database work, and occasional media creation, with the 81st combined percentile ensuring reliability across tasks.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The socket is Intel BGA 2833, which is a soldered design, meaning the CPU is permanently attached to the motherboard. This eliminates any possibility of a CPU upgrade without replacing the entire laptop. Memory support is listed as dependent on the motherboard, but the dual-channel bus suggests the system uses soldered or module-based RAM that is not typically user-upgradeable in thin laptops.

The PCIe support is Gen 5 with 4 lanes for CPU-attached devices. This allows for fast NVMe SSDs, but the limited lane count means only one or two devices can connect directly to the CPU at full speed. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which is a standard interface for mobile graphics.

The GPU has a TDP of 75 watts, and the CPU has a TDP of 17 watts, for a combined thermal envelope of 92 watts. The suggested PSU is not listed, but for a laptop, this is typically a power brick that supplies the whole system. A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be expanding storage with a Gen 5 NVMe SSD, assuming the motherboard has an available slot. Memory upgrades are unlikely due to the soldered nature of mobile systems, so users should purchase the maximum RAM they need upfront.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU are well-matched for a balanced system. The CPU sits at the 74th percentile and the GPU at the 88th percentile, indicating the GPU is relatively stronger. In gaming, this means the GPU is likely the limiting factor at higher resolutions, as it must render more pixels. The CPU's single-core strength, however, prevents it from bottlenecking the GPU at lower resolutions where frame rates are high.

For compute workloads, the GPU's OpenCL score of 58239 far exceeds what its mobile form factor suggests, so tasks like GPU rendering or machine learning inference would be GPU-bound. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 19297 is moderate, so CPU-bound tasks like physics simulations or heavy spreadsheet calculations would be CPU-limited.

The FPS scaling is unknown due to the lack of measured data, but the percentile difference suggests that in games, the GPU will be the primary constraint. At 1080p with medium settings, the CPU can likely feed the GPU enough frames, but at 1440p or higher, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 75-watt power limit will become the bottleneck. For productivity, the CPU's 8 threads without hyperthreading means heavily parallel workloads will be limited by its thread count, not the GPU.

# Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the Intel Core Ultra 7 268V and the Intel Arc A570M. The CPU is a Lunar Lake architecture mobile processor with 8 cores and 8 threads, boosting to 5.00 GHz, while the GPU is an Xe-HPG based Arc 5 Mobile chip with 8 GB GDDR6 memory. The system targets the 81st percentile of all builds, meaning it outperforms 81% of combinations in the database.

The overall tier is solidly mid-to-high, with the CPU in the 74th percentile and GPU in the 88th percentile. This is not a flagship gaming rig, but it is a competent mobile workstation that can handle a variety of tasks. The 17-watt CPU TDP and 75-watt GPU TDP make it suitable for thin-and-light designs, prioritizing portability over raw performance. The combination is unusual in that the GPU is relatively stronger than the CPU, flipping the typical expectation for mobile systems where the CPU often outpaces the integrated graphics.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, so all frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not verified results.

The GPU's 88th percentile OpenCL score suggests it has compute muscle comparable to desktop cards like the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT. However, gaming performance is not directly equivalent to OpenCL compute, and the 75-watt TDP will limit sustained clocks. The CPU's strong single-core score of 1921 in Cinebench R23 means it can handle game logic and physics without stuttering.

At 1080p ultra settings, estimated frame rates would likely fall in the 40-60 FPS range for AAA titles, based on the GPU's raw throughput. Esports games like CS:GO or Valorant could see 100+ FPS due to their lighter requirements and the CPU's fast single-core response. At 1440p, the 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus would become limiting, with estimates dropping to 30-50 FPS for demanding titles.

Ray tracing performance is unknown but likely modest, as the 16 RT cores are a small count compared to desktop counterparts. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support ensures compatibility with modern games, but the low power budget means ray tracing effects would need to be used sparingly. Overall, this system is best suited for 1080p gaming at medium to high settings, with the understanding that these are estimates and actual results may vary.