SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 268V + Intel Arc A550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
85%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 268V

20,897 Benchmark Score
Top 15% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A550M

49,737 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 268V and Intel Arc A550M form a laptop-class pairing that targets a specific performance tier. The CPU, a Lunar Lake part, sits in the 74th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU, an Alchemist mobile part, reaches the 86th percentile of all GPUs. Combined, this build lands in the 80th percentile, indicating a system that is well above average for general tasks and capable of solid 1080p gaming. This analysis relies strictly on the benchmark data available; there are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming performance discussion is estimated from the synthetic scores.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 7 268V compare to its closest rivals in overall CPU performance?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score of 20897 is nearly identical to its nearest rivals. It is effectively tied with the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE (0% delta) and the Intel Core i5-12600T (-0.1%). It is marginally ahead of the AMD EPYC 7J13 (0.2%) and Intel Core Ultra 5 125U (0.3%), making these four processors essentially interchangeable in raw multi-threaded output.

Q: What kind of graphics performance can be expected from the Intel Arc A550M?

A: Based on its Geekbench scores, the Arc A550M is a strong performer. It scores 49894 in OpenCL and 49580 in Vulkan, placing it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs. This puts it roughly on par with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, which is only 0.4% ahead, and the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, which is 0.5% ahead.

Q: Is this CPU+GPU combination suitable for high-refresh-rate gaming?

A: The GPU’s performance tier suggests it can handle high-refresh gaming at 1080p for many titles. However, since no measured FPS data exists, this is an estimate based on the Arc A550M’s percentile ranking and its proximity to desktop GPUs like the RX 6800 XT (which scores 2.6% higher). The CPU’s single-thread performance, which is in the 74th percentile, is likely sufficient to feed the GPU in most scenarios.

Q: What are the key specifications of the Intel Core Ultra 7 268V?

A: It is an 8-core, 8-thread mobile processor from the Lunar Lake architecture, built on a 3 nm TSMC process. It has a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a 17 W TDP. It includes 12 MB of shared L3 cache and features integrated Arc 140V graphics.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the Intel Arc A550M have?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. This is a key factor for texture streaming and higher-resolution rendering, though the 128-bit bus can be a limiting factor at higher resolutions.

Q: What is the production status of the Intel Arc A550M?

A: The GPU is marked as "End-of-life" in the production status. This means it is at the end of its manufacturing cycle, but the benchmark data indicates it still offers performance competitive with newer, higher-end desktop cards.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing is 80. This indicates that the system as a whole is expected to outperform 80% of all other benchmarked configurations, making it a high-mid-range laptop setup.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The Intel Arc A550M is the primary driver here. Its 86th percentile ranking and Vulkan score of 49580 suggest it has the raw horsepower to push high frame rates in e-sports and less demanding AAA titles at 1080p. The CPU’s strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1921) ensures it will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios, allowing the GPU to hit its frame rate limits.

Streaming: The CPU’s 8 cores and 8 threads may be a limiting factor for simultaneous gaming and software encoding. While the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10653 is respectable, a dedicated encoder is often preferred. The GPU supports modern APIs like DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4, which are essential for efficient hardware encoding, suggesting the Arc A550M could handle streaming duties via its media engine, offloading the CPU.

Video Editing: This workload benefits from both the CPU and GPU. The CPU’s multi-threaded performance, evidenced by a Geekbench multi-core score of 9963, will handle timeline editing and effects processing. The GPU’s high FP32 throughput (8.397 TFLOPS) and 8 GB of VRAM can accelerate rendering and playback of effects, making this a capable combo for 1080p and some 4K video work.

3D Rendering: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10653 indicates adequate performance for CPU-based rendering. However, the GPU is the star here. With 2048 shading units and a texture rate of 262.4 GTexel/s, the Arc A550M can significantly accelerate GPU-based render engines, offering performance comparable to desktop GPUs like the RX 6800 XT, which is only 2.6% faster in average benchmark score.

Software Development: The CPU is well-suited for compilation tasks. Its Passmark multi-thread score of 19297 and data compression score of 181443 show it can handle parallel builds efficiently. The single-thread performance (Passmark single-thread score of 4051) ensures fast, responsive UI and quick code navigation, making it a solid choice for developers who run local builds and containers.

Student and Office Work: This is an overqualified setup for basic productivity. The CPU’s Passmark single-thread score of 4051 ensures snappy application launches and smooth multitasking in office suites. The GPU’s capabilities are largely irrelevant for word processing and spreadsheets, but the overall system’s 80th combined percentile means it will handle any office task with ease, including multiple virtual desktops and heavy browser workloads.

Gaming Performance

Important note: The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The following analysis is an estimate based on the synthetic benchmark scores of the Intel Arc A550M and the Intel Core Ultra 7 268V.

The Arc A550M’s benchmark scores suggest it is a strong 1080p gaming GPU. Its Geekbench Vulkan score of 49580 and OpenCL score of 49894 place it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs. Comparing to its nearest rivals, it is within 0.5% of the performance of an AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 and only 2.4% slower than the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT. These are high-end desktop cards, indicating the A550M should deliver very high frame rates in most games at 1080p with ultra settings.

At 1440p, performance will likely still be good, but the 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus (224.0 GB/s) may become limiting factors in texture-heavy titles. The GPU’s pixel rate of 131.2 GPixel/s is sufficient for high resolutions, but the memory bandwidth might cause occasional hitches in games that require large texture pools.

The CPU’s role in gaming is to maintain frame pacing. The Core Ultra 7 268V’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1921 and Passmark single-thread score of 4051 are strong, suggesting it can keep up with the GPU’s output in most titles. However, in CPU-intensive simulations or strategy games, the 8-thread limit could be a bottleneck. For the vast majority of gaming scenarios, the Arc A550M will be the performance ceiling, and users should expect high-refresh 1080p or solid 60 FPS 1440p gameplay based on these synthetic scores.

Who Should Build It

Gamers: This build is for gamers targeting high-refresh 1080p or smooth 1440p gaming. The GPU’s performance tier, akin to desktop RX 6800 XT and RTX 5070 Ti class cards, makes it ideal for playing the latest titles with high graphical settings without needing to compromise heavily on frame rates.

Content Creators: Video editors and 3D artists working on 1080p projects will find this setup efficient. The combination of a strong multi-threaded CPU (Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10653) and a powerful GPU with 8.397 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates both CPU and GPU rendering pipelines, reducing export times and enabling real-time previews.

Developers: Software engineers who compile large codebases will benefit from the CPU’s parallel processing capabilities. The Passmark data compression score of 181443 is particularly useful for build systems and version control operations, while the high single-thread score keeps the IDE responsive.

Students: For students in STEM or design fields, this laptop handles everything from coding and simulation software to CAD and light 3D modeling. The 80th combined percentile means it is more than capable for any academic software, ensuring a smooth and responsive experience.

Small Business Workstations: For professionals running virtual machines, large databases, or financial modeling, this build offers high throughput. The CPU’s Passmark integer math score of 42669 and floating-point math score of 57628 indicate strong computational abilities for data analysis, while the GPU can accelerate any visualization tasks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The system balance is heavily skewed toward the GPU. The Arc A550M is in the 86th percentile of all GPUs, while the CPU is in the 74th percentile. This means in gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks, the GPU is the primary driver, and the CPU is unlikely to hold it back.

However, there are scenarios where the CPU becomes the limiting factor. In CPU-bound workloads like physics simulations, the Passmark physics score of 1617 is relatively low, suggesting the CPU might struggle with complex in-game physics or heavy multitasking while gaming. The 8-thread limit is a hard constraint; unlike CPUs with hyperthreading, this chip cannot handle more than 8 concurrent threads, which can bottleneck in well-threaded applications.

The FPS scaling evidence, while estimated, suggests the GPU will scale well with resolution until the memory bus becomes a constraint. The 224.0 GB/s bandwidth is lower than the desktop GPUs it rivals, like the RX 6800 XT (which is 2.6% faster in average score). This indicates that at 1440p or 4K, the A550M may see a steeper performance decline than its raw compute scores suggest, making the CPU less of a factor at higher resolutions and the memory bandwidth the ultimate ceiling.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A550M is based on the DG2-512 chip using the Xe-HPG architecture, manufactured on a 6 nm TSMC process. It packs 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die, giving it a density of 53.4M transistors per mm². This is a large, complex GPU for a mobile part.

Memory specifications include 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, running at an effective speed of 14 Gbps and delivering 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a moderate amount of VRAM for high-resolution textures, but the narrow bus limits bandwidth compared to wider 256-bit competitors.

Clock speeds are set at a base of 900 MHz and a boost of 2050 MHz. These clocks, combined with 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, produce a peak FP32 performance of 8.397 TFLOPS. The GPU also features 16 ray tracing cores, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate, which enables hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported titles.

Benchmark results show the GPU achieving a Geekbench OpenCL score of 49894 and a Vulkan score of 49580. This performance is remarkably close to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (0.4% faster) and the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (0.5% faster), and it is only 2.4% slower than the RX 6900 XT. These scores indicate that for rendering and compute tasks, the A550M punches well above its mobile class, offering desktop-level rasterization performance. The 60 W TDP is a key efficiency metric, allowing this level of performance in a laptop form factor.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 7 268V achieves an average benchmark score of 20897. Its strongest results are in the Passmark multi-thread test (19297) and Geekbench multi-core (9963). In single-threaded tasks, it scores 4051 in Passmark and 1921 in Cinebench R23, placing it in the 74th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are all within 0.3% of its average score, indicating a very tight performance cluster.

The Intel Arc A550M has an average benchmark score of 49737, placing it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs. Its Geekbench Vulkan score (49580) and OpenCL score (49894) are nearly identical, showing consistent performance across different graphics APIs. It trails the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT by 2.4% but leads the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT by 2.6%, confirming its position as a top-tier performer.

The combined picture shows a system where the GPU is significantly stronger relative to its peers than the CPU. The CPU is solidly mid-range, while the GPU is high-end. This creates a build that excels in graphics-intensive tasks but is less exceptional in pure CPU workloads, which is a typical balance for a gaming-focused laptop. The combined percentile of 80 reflects this: the GPU pulls the overall score up, while the CPU keeps it from being a top-tier workstation.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build pairing the Intel Core Ultra 7 268V with the Intel Arc A550M. The CPU is a mobile processor from the Lunar Lake generation, designed for power efficiency with a 17 W TDP. The GPU is a mobile Arc part from the Alchemist generation, with a significantly higher 60 W TDP, indicating it is a performance-focused component.

The overall tier of this system, based on the combined 80th percentile, is high-mid-range. It is not an ultra-high-end enthusiast laptop, but it sits comfortably above the majority of systems. The GPU’s 86th percentile ranking is the standout feature, offering performance that rivals desktop cards from the previous generation. The CPU’s 74th percentile is respectable and ensures the system is well-rounded.

This pairing is designed for users who prioritize graphics performance over raw CPU throughput. It is an ideal choice for a gaming laptop that can also handle creative workloads, offering a balance of power and portability that is uncommon in the laptop market.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 268V is an 8-core, 8-thread processor based on the Lunar Lake architecture, built on a 3 nm TSMC process. It has a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache.

This CPU has a modest 17 W TDP, emphasizing efficiency. The 8-thread configuration is a notable design choice; it lacks hyperthreading, meaning it has a hard limit on concurrent threads. This is a compromise for battery life, but it can be a bottleneck in heavily threaded workloads.

Benchmark results show the CPU performing well in both single and multi-threaded tests. The Cinebench R23 scores (1921 single-core, 10653 multi-core) indicate strong IPC and decent scaling. The Geekbench scores (2270 single-core, 9963 multi-core) confirm this. In practical terms, the single-thread performance is excellent for daily tasks and gaming, while the multi-thread performance is sufficient for content creation and development, though not class-leading.

The Passmark suite reveals specific strengths: data encryption (13779) and extended instructions (15323) are solid, while physics (1617) is a relative weakness. The CPU’s overall average score of 20897 places it in the 74th percentile, making it a solid mid-range performer that is competitive with the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE and Intel Core i5-12600T.