SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 266V + Intel Arc A570M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

86%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 266V

23,297 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A570M

58,239 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Intel Core Ultra 7 266V pairs with Intel Arc A570M in a laptop-class build that lands at the 82nd percentile overall. The CPU is a 76th-percentile part, while the GPU sits at the 88th percentile, making this a graphics-leaning configuration. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK; all FPS discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 266V uses the Intel BGA 2833 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform. This means the CPU is not swappable in the traditional sense; it is permanently attached to the motherboard. The memory support is LPDDR5X, with the type depending on the motherboard design, running on a dual-channel bus with a memory bandwidth of 136.5 GB/s. This is a high-bandwidth configuration typical of ultraportable and thin-and-light laptops, where the memory is also soldered alongside the CPU.

The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 4 lanes, which is a modest allocation. This is sufficient for a single high-speed NVMe SSD or a low-lane-count peripheral, but it is not a platform designed for multi-GPU setups or heavily populated expansion slots. The GPU, an Intel Arc A570M, uses a separate PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is standard for mobile discrete graphics and provides adequate bandwidth for its 8 GB of VRAM.

The CPU has a TDP of 17 watts, which signals an extremely power-efficient part. The GPU has a TDP of 75 watts. There is no suggested PSU listed in the data, but the combined thermal envelope of roughly 92 watts for the two primary compute components indicates that the system is designed to run on a standard laptop power adapter, not a desktop power supply. The motherboard-dependent memory support further reinforces that this is a closed, integrated platform.

Given the soldered nature of the CPU and the motherboard-dependent memory, the upgrade path is essentially non-existent for the core components. A sensible next upgrade for a user on this platform would be to increase storage capacity via the PCIe Gen 5 lanes, assuming the motherboard has a compatible M.2 slot. Beyond that, the next logical step would be moving to a different laptop entirely, as the BGA 2833 socket ties the Ultra 7 266V to a specific board design. The integrated Arc 140V GPU provides a fallback if the discrete Arc A570M fails, but it is not a performance upgrade path.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile relative to all CPUs?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 266V scores in the 76th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 23297. This places it ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 5800H and Intel Core i9-11900F, which it beats by 0.1% and 0.2%, respectively.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core Ultra 9 288V?

A: The Ultra 7 266V is slightly ahead of the Ultra 9 288V in average benchmark score, with a delta of 0.3%. Specifically, the Ultra 7 scores 23297 versus the Ultra 9's 23219, meaning the Ultra 7 is the faster part in this dataset.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile relative to all GPUs?

A: The Intel Arc A570M is in the 88th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 58239 based on the Geekbench OpenCL test. It trails the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT by 0.3% and the NVIDIA P102-100 by 0.5%, but leads the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM by 0.3%.

Q: What is the CPU's memory bandwidth and how does it affect performance?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel LPDDR5X memory with a bandwidth of 136.5 GB/s, which depends on the motherboard for exact type and speed. This high bandwidth is critical for feeding the 8 cores and the integrated Arc 140V graphics, and it contributes to the CPU's strong Passmark multithread score of 19461.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the Intel Core Ultra 7 266V does not support ECC memory. This is consistent with its mobile market segment, where error-correcting memory is typically not offered.

Q: What is the GPU's pixel and texture throughput?

A: The Intel Arc A570M has a pixel rate of 83.20 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 166.4 GTexel/s. These figures are derived from its 64 ROPs and 128 TMUs running at a boost clock of 1300 MHz.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for the Intel Core Ultra 7 266V and Intel Arc A570M is 82, which places the overall build above the majority of systems in the benchmark database.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 266V is an 8-core, 8-thread processor based on the Lunar Lake architecture, manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC. It has a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a TDP of just 17 watts. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. This is a mobile-focused design, targeting high efficiency while retaining competitive single-thread performance.

Benchmark results show a processor that excels in single-threaded tasks relative to its multi-threaded throughput. The Cinebench R23 single-core score is 2335, while the multi-core score is 16544. The single-thread Passmark score is 3943, which is a strong result for a laptop part. The multi-thread Passmark score is 19461, which is respectable but not class-leading. The data indicates that the 5.00 GHz boost clock is delivering significant performance in lightly-threaded workloads, while the 17-watt TDP limits sustained all-core performance.

In real workloads, this translates to snappy responsiveness in everyday applications, fast compilation in software development, and good performance in single-threaded legacy applications. The Passmark data compression score of 187050 and encryption score of 13822 suggest strong capability in file archiving and security-related tasks. The floating-point math score of 56923 and integer math score of 41558 indicate balanced arithmetic performance, which is useful for scientific computing and financial modeling. The find prime numbers score of 191 is notably low, suggesting that the processor is not optimized for heavily parallel integer loops without proper vectorization support.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the Ultra 7 266V is virtually tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (delta of 0.1%) and the Intel Core i9-11900F (delta of 0.2%), but it does so at a significantly lower TDP. This makes it a more power-efficient choice for a laptop chassis, where thermal headroom is limited. The 76th percentile ranking confirms that this is a solidly above-average mobile CPU, capable of handling demanding productivity workloads without being a top-tier enthusiast part.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration is aimed at users who need strong graphics performance in a portable form factor. The GPU's 88th percentile ranking makes it suitable for creative professionals who work with GPU-accelerated applications, such as video editors using OpenCL-based effects or 3D artists rendering in real-time viewports. The CPU's 76th percentile ensures that these tasks are not bottlenecked by the processor in most scenarios.

Gamers at 1080p or 1440p resolution will find this build attractive, as the Arc A570M's performance class is sufficient for high-refresh gaming at medium to high settings, based on its benchmark scores. The CPU's single-thread performance is adequate for maintaining high frame rates in CPU-bound titles, though the 8-thread limit may show strain in the most demanding modern games. Students in engineering or computer science programs will benefit from the combination of portability and compute power, particularly for compiling code or running simulation software.

Small business workstations that require discrete graphics for tasks like CAD or data visualization will also find this pairing viable. The CPU's encryption score of 13822 and compression score of 187050 indicate it can handle VPN traffic and file server duties without issue. However, the lack of ECC memory and the soldered platform mean this is not a server-grade solution. The target user is someone who wants a single laptop that can handle both professional creative workloads and gaming, without compromising on either front.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 7 266V delivers an average benchmark score of 23297, placing it in the 76th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 7 5800H with an average score of 23277, a difference of 0.1%. The Intel Core i9-11900F is next at 23254, a 0.2% gap. The Intel Core Ultra 9 288V scores 23219, putting it 0.3% behind the Ultra 7 266V. This clustering shows that the Ultra 7 266V sits at the top of a tight performance band, edging out several established desktop and mobile processors.

In Cinebench tests, the CPU scores 1667 in R15 multi-core and 235 in R15 single-core. In R20, it scores 6948 multi-core and 980 single-core. In R23, it scores 16544 multi-core and 2335 single-core. These numbers show a consistent scaling pattern where single-core performance is roughly 14% of multi-core performance in R15, 14% in R20, and 14% in R23, indicating that the 8 threads are being utilized efficiently without hyper-threading overhead.

The Passmark suite provides additional insight. The multithread score is 19461, with a single-thread score of 3943. The data compression score of 187050 is exceptionally high, and the random string sorting score of 22905 supports this strength in data manipulation. The extended instructions score of 15928 suggests good SIMD performance, which benefits multimedia encoding. The physics score of 1608 is moderate, indicating games that rely heavily on CPU physics may see lower frame rates.

The Intel Arc A570M GPU has an average benchmark score of 58239 in Geekbench OpenCL, placing it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. It is nearly identical in performance to the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, which scores 58392 (a -0.3% delta), and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM, which scores 58085 (a 0.3% delta). It slightly trails the NVIDIA P102-100 at 58528 (-0.5%) and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 at 58657 (-0.7%). This places the mobile Arc A570M in the same performance tier as high-end desktop GPUs from previous generations, which is notable for a laptop part.

Combined, the CPU and GPU achieve an 82nd percentile ranking. This indicates a well-balanced system where both components are above average, with the GPU being the stronger of the two.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A570M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, using the DG2-256 chip manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC. It contains 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die, with a transistor density of 42.8M per mm². The GPU has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, along with 16 ray tracing cores. It does not list dedicated tensor cores, but the Xe-HPG architecture includes matrix engines for AI acceleration.

The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, with an effective data rate of 14 Gbps. The base clock is 900 MHz, boosting to 1300 MHz. This results in a pixel rate of 83.20 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 166.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 5.325 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 10.65 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio.

In rendering workloads, the 88th percentile OpenCL score of 58239 indicates strong compute throughput. The FP32 performance is adequate for real-time 3D rendering in applications like Blender or Maya, though not for heavy offline rendering. The FP16 performance, being double the FP32, is useful for AI inference and certain image processing tasks that utilize half-precision. The 16 ray tracing cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, which will improve visual fidelity in supported games and rendering engines, though the overall ray tracing performance will be limited by the 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 throughput.

The 8 GB VRAM is a practical amount for 1080p gaming and 1440p in many titles, but it may be insufficient for 4K textures or large 3D scenes. The 224.0 GB/s bandwidth is a potential bottleneck for memory-intensive workloads, but it is adequate for the GPU's compute capability. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics APIs.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a GPU-heavy balance. The GPU sits at the 88th percentile, while the CPU is at the 76th percentile. This 12-point gap means that in graphics-intensive workloads, the GPU will be the dominant component, but the CPU will not hold it back significantly. In CPU-bound tasks, the GPU will be underutilized, as the CPU's 8 threads and 17-watt TDP limit sustained multi-core throughput.

In gaming, the CPU's single-thread score of 3943 in Passmark is strong, but the multi-thread score of 19461 is modest. For titles that use more than 8 threads, the CPU may become the limiting factor. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16544 is roughly 7 times the single-core score, which shows good scaling but also highlights the lack of hyper-threading. Games that rely on heavy AI or physics calculations may see frame rate dips, as the physics score of 1608 is below average.

The GPU's performance, on the other hand, is capable of high frame rates at 1080p. The OpenCL score of 58239 is comparable to desktop GPUs that are known to handle 1440p gaming well. However, the 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth could be a bottleneck in games with large texture loads, as it is lower than what some desktop rivals offer. The estimated FPS in games will be limited by the GPU's raw compute and the CPU's ability to feed it draw calls.

For productivity, the balance shifts. The CPU's compression score of 187050 is excellent, making file archiving and data compression tasks CPU-bound. The GPU's compute performance accelerates rendering tasks, but the 75-watt TDP and mobile design mean sustained loads may cause thermal throttling, reducing performance over time. The memory bandwidth of 136.5 GB/s for the CPU is sufficient for most tasks, but it is lower than the GPU's 224.0 GB/s, which is expected given the different memory types.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") that pairs the Intel Core Ultra 7 266V with the Intel Arc A570M. The CPU is a Lunar Lake architecture part, released on 2024-09-23, while the GPU is an Alchemist (Arc 5 Mobile) part, released on 2023-07-31. Both are currently in active production.

The combined percentile of 82 places this build in the upper echelon of systems in the database. The CPU is a mid-to-high-tier mobile processor, and the GPU is a high-tier mobile graphics solution, as evidenced by its 88th percentile ranking. The overall system tier is that of a premium gaming or creator laptop, capable of handling most modern workloads with ease.

The CPU's 17-watt TDP and the GPU's 75-watt TDP together create a power-efficient package that is well-suited for a thin-and-light chassis. The 3 nm CPU process and 6 nm GPU process contribute to this efficiency. The lack of a suggested PSU and the IGP slot width for the GPU indicate that this is an integrated design, not a modular one. The system's strengths lie in its balanced performance across CPU and GPU tasks, with a slight edge toward graphics.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 88th percentile OpenCL score of 58239 suggests it can drive high frame rates at 1080p in most titles. The CPU's single-thread score of 3943 ensures that frame pacing remains consistent in CPU-bound games. However, the lack of measured FPS data means exact performance is estimated, and the 8-thread CPU may limit performance in games that use more cores.

Streaming: The CPU's 17-watt TDP and strong single-thread performance make it capable of handling encoding at 1080p, while the GPU's 16 ray tracing cores and 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 provide headroom for game rendering. The data compression score of 187050 suggests efficient handling of stream data, but the multi-thread score of 19461 may limit simultaneous game and encode workloads.

Video editing: The GPU's FP16 performance of 10.65 TFLOPS accelerates effects and color grading, while the CPU's 16544 Cinebench R23 multi-core score handles timeline scrubbing and export encoding. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p and 1440p timelines. The combined 82nd percentile ranking indicates a system that will feel responsive in editing suites.

3D rendering: The GPU's 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 and 16 ray tracing cores provide real-time viewport performance, but offline rendering will rely more on the CPU's 8 cores. The 17-watt CPU TDP may cause long render times for complex scenes. The GPU's 88th percentile score is the standout feature here, making it suitable for interactive rendering.

Software development: The CPU's Passmark integer math score of 41558 and extended instructions score of 15928 indicate solid compile times. The data encryption score of 13822 is useful for secure development environments. The 76th percentile CPU ranking means this is not a top-tier compile machine, but it is sufficient for most development tasks.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread score of 3943 ensures fast boot times and responsive productivity applications. The 17-watt TDP means long battery life, and the integrated Arc 140V GPU provides a fallback for light graphics tasks. The compression score of 187050 makes large file transfers and archiving fast, which is a practical benefit for everyday use.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 266V + Intel Arc A570M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 266V

Intel Arc A570M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds