SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 266V + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

86%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 266V

23,297 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 7 266V + Intel Arc A350M: A Balanced Lunar Lake Ultraportable Analysis

This mobile pairing combines Intel's Lunar Lake architecture with the entry-level Arc Alchemist GPU, delivering a combined performance percentile of 73 across all benchmarked configurations. The CPU is the clear driver of this pairing, sitting at the 76th percentile among all tested processors, while the GPU holds the 70th percentile among all tested graphics solutions. This is a laptop-class build designed for thin-and-light systems where power efficiency takes precedence over raw performance.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This pairing is not designed for high-refresh competitive gaming at demanding settings. The Arc A350M's 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 compute places it near the performance level of the AMD Radeon RX 590, which is a capable 1080p card but not a high-refresh powerhouse. The CPU's single-thread performance is strong — a Passmark single-thread score of 3943 puts it in the top quarter of all processors — but the GPU will bottleneck before the CPU in gaming workloads, limiting frame rates to mainstream levels rather than 144Hz-plus territory.

Streaming: The CPU's integrated Arc 140V graphics and the discrete Arc A350M both support modern media engines, though specific encoder details are not provided in the data. The CPU's Passmark multi-thread score of 19461 indicates adequate headroom for encoding workloads alongside gaming, but the GPU's modest compute resources mean game capture at high bitrates could impact frame pacing. For casual streaming at 1080p, this pairing is workable, but it is not a dedicated streaming rig.

Video Editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16544 places it slightly ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, which is a solid mid-range laptop processor for timeline editing and export tasks. The GPU's 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 112.0 GB/s bandwidth is workable for 1080p proxy editing and effects preview, but the 24 ROPs and 48 TMUs limit heavy compositing. The 12 MB of shared L3 cache helps with repeated data access during renders.

3D Rendering: This is a mixed scenario. CPU-based rendering in applications like Blender or Cinebench benefits from the 8 cores and 8 threads reaching a 5.00 GHz boost clock, yielding a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 6948. GPU rendering, however, is constrained by the Arc A350M's 768 shading units and 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, which lands near the GeForce GTX 1630 in raw compute. For architectural visualization or product renders, expect CPU rendering to be the primary path, with GPU acceleration as a secondary option.

Software Development: The CPU's Passmark integer math score of 41558 and floating point math score of 56923 indicate strong number-crunching abilities for compilation tasks. The data compression score of 187050 is notably high, suggesting fast build artifact handling and source tree operations. The single-thread performance is excellent for interactive IDE responsiveness and code analysis tools. This is a suitable developer machine for web, backend, or application development.

Student and Office Work: The 17W TDP CPU with LPDDR5X memory support translates to excellent battery efficiency for all-day class use. The Passmark single-thread score of 3943 ensures snappy office application performance, while the data encryption score of 13822 provides hardware-assisted security for VPN and disk encryption workloads. The integrated Arc 140V graphics can handle 4K video playback and productivity displays without engaging the discrete GPU, saving power.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not direct measurements. The Arc A350M's Geekbench Vulkan score of 24747 and OpenCL score of 24546 place it in the same performance class as the AMD Radeon RX 590, which historically handles modern titles at 1080p medium-to-high settings.

At 1080p with ultra settings, this pairing would likely deliver playable but not exceptional frame rates in most titles. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM is below the 6-8 GB commonly recommended for modern ultra presets, so texture quality settings may need to be reduced in VRAM-heavy games. Esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, which are CPU-bound, would benefit from the Core Ultra 7 266V's strong single-thread performance, potentially reaching high frame rates. AAA titles like Cyberpunk 2077 or Alan Wake 2 would likely run in the 30-45 FPS range at 1080p ultra, requiring drops to high or medium settings for smoother 60 FPS gameplay.

At 1440p, the Arc A350M's 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 64-bit bus become significant bottlenecks. The GPU's 52.80 GPixel/s pixel rate and 105.6 GTexel/s texture rate suggest that 1440p ultra settings would push the card beyond its comfort zone, with most modern titles falling below 30 FPS. At 4K, this pairing is not viable for gaming beyond very old or extremely light titles.

The CPU side of the gaming equation is strong. A Passmark physics score of 1608 and the high single-thread score indicate that the processor will not be the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios. The 8 threads, while not massive, are sufficient for modern game engines that utilize 6-8 threads effectively.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 266V is an 8-core, 8-thread processor built on the Lunar Lake architecture using TSMC's 3 nm process node. It has a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a 17W TDP that makes it exceptionally power-efficient for a mobile processor. The lack of hyper-threading means 8 threads total, which is a deliberate design choice for Lunar Lake to maximize per-core efficiency.

The cache hierarchy consists of 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. This generous L2 allocation per core helps with latency-sensitive workloads. The memory interface is dual-channel LPDDR5X with 136.5 GB/s of bandwidth, which is high for a mobile platform and benefits both CPU and integrated graphics workloads.

Benchmark results show a processor that performs well above its power class. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16544 is 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, a 45W-class processor, which speaks to the efficiency of the Lunar Lake architecture. The single-core Cinebench R23 score of 2335 is strong, indicating excellent responsiveness in lightly threaded applications. The Passmark multi-thread score of 19461 further confirms the CPU's capability, sitting at the 76th percentile of all tested processors.

The data compression score of 187050 is exceptionally high, suggesting strong memory bandwidth utilization and efficient instruction scheduling. The extended instructions score of 15928 indicates good SIMD and AVX-512 performance, which benefits scientific computing and media encoding. The find prime numbers score of 191 is modest, reflecting the trade-off of a power-efficient design that doesn't sustain maximum boost clocks indefinitely.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who prioritize portability and battery life while still requiring solid CPU performance for productivity tasks. The laptop-class form factor with the 17W TDP CPU and 25W TDP GPU means this system can be built into ultra-thin chassis without aggressive cooling solutions.

Gamers at 1080p who are willing to adjust settings from ultra to high or medium will find this pairing acceptable for mainstream titles. The CPU's strong single-thread performance ensures that frame times remain consistent even when the GPU is the bottleneck. However, enthusiasts seeking 1440p or high-refresh 1080p gaming should look at higher-tier GPU options.

Content creators working with 1080p video editing or photo processing will benefit from the CPU's multi-core strength and the GPU's hardware encoding support. Developers compiling code, running virtual machines, or working with large datasets will find the CPU's integer and floating point performance well-suited to their needs. The data encryption score of 13822 also makes this a good fit for security-conscious professionals.

Students and office workers who need a responsive machine for documents, spreadsheets, presentations, and web browsing will find the single-thread performance more than adequate. The power efficiency translates to long battery life, and the integrated Arc 140V graphics can handle day-to-day display tasks without engaging the discrete GPU. Small business workstations that need reliable multi-tasking performance without the thermal footprint of high-power components are also a good match.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 23297 places it at the 76th percentile of all tested processors. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the AMD Ryzen 7 5800H is 0.1% behind, the Intel Core i9-11900F is 0.2% behind, the Intel Core Ultra 9 288V is 0.3% behind, and the AMD EPYC 4124P is 0.6% behind. This clustering indicates that the Core Ultra 7 266V sits at a performance plateau where several processors from different generations and power classes converge.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 24647 places it at the 70th percentile of all tested GPUs. Its nearest rivals are similarly tightly packed: the AMD Radeon RX 590 is 0.4% ahead, the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile is 0.5% ahead, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT is 0.8% behind, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 is 1.5% behind. This grouping shows that the Arc A350M delivers desktop-class performance from a previous generation despite its modest 25W power envelope.

The combined percentile of 73 for this pairing indicates that the whole system outperforms roughly three-quarters of all tested configurations. The CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers, while the GPU is slightly below the CPU in relative standing. This creates a system where the processor has headroom to handle more demanding graphics than the current GPU can deliver, making the GPU the primary upgrade target in any future system refresh.

FAQ

Q: Does this pairing have measured gaming FPS data?

A: No. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All gaming performance assessments are estimates derived from benchmark scores, particularly the GPU's Geekbench Vulkan and OpenCL results.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 5800H?

A: The Core Ultra 7 266V has an average benchmark score of 23297, which is 0.1% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 5800H's score of 23277. This places the two processors at essentially identical performance levels despite the Intel part having a significantly lower 17W TDP.

Q: What is the GPU's performance relative to desktop cards?

A: The Arc A350M's average benchmark score of 24647 is 0.4% below the AMD Radeon RX 590, 0.5% below the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile, and 1.5% above the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630. This places it in the performance bracket of older desktop mid-range cards.

Q: How much L3 cache does the CPU have?

A: The Core Ultra 7 266V has 12 MB of shared L3 cache, along with 2.5 MB of L2 cache per core and 192 KB of L1 cache per core. This cache configuration supports the CPU's strong data compression score of 187050.

Q: Is the GPU suitable for modern games at 1080p?

A: Based on its benchmark position near the RX 590, the Arc A350M should handle 1080p gaming at medium-to-high settings in most modern titles. The 4 GB GDDR6 memory and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth may require texture quality reductions in VRAM-intensive games.

Q: What memory type does this platform support?

A: The CPU supports LPDDR5X memory on a dual-channel bus with 136.5 GB/s of bandwidth. The exact memory configuration depends on the motherboard implementation, as noted in the FACT PACK.

Q: What is the CPU's production status and release date?

A: The CPU is listed as Active in production status and was released on September 23, 2024. The GPU is marked as End-of-life with a release date of March 29, 2022.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor in graphics-intensive workloads, while the CPU has significant headroom. The CPU's 76th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 70th percentile shows that the processor is relatively stronger within its peer group than the graphics solution. In gaming scenarios, the Arc A350M will typically saturate before the Core Ultra 7 266V, meaning frame rates are bound by the GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS compute and 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth.

The GPU's nearest rival comparison illustrates this bottleneck clearly. The Arc A350M is 0.4% slower than the RX 590 and 0.5% slower than the RTX A5000 Mobile, both of which are older or higher-power designs. The CPU, by contrast, is 0.1% faster than the Ryzen 7 5800H, a well-regarded mid-range mobile processor. This asymmetric performance profile means that CPU-bound tasks like compilation, data compression, and single-threaded productivity will feel very responsive, while GPU-bound tasks like gaming at high settings or GPU rendering will feel more constrained.

The 8-thread CPU with a 5.00 GHz boost clock can feed frames to the GPU faster than the GPU can render them in most scenarios. The Passmark physics score of 1608 and single-thread score of 3943 confirm that the CPU will not be the source of stutter or frame pacing issues in gaming. This is a balanced pairing in the sense that neither component is wildly mismatched, but the GPU is the clear upgrade priority for users who want to push graphics settings higher.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the Intel Core Ultra 7 266V and the Intel Arc A350M. The CPU is a Lunar Lake architecture processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, manufactured on TSMC's 3 nm process. The GPU is an Alchemist-generation Arc 3 Mobile solution using the DG2-128 chip on a 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die.

The combined performance percentile of 73 places this system in the upper quartile of all tested configurations. The CPU is the stronger component, ranking at the 76th percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 70th percentile among all GPUs. This is a mid-upper-tier mobile configuration that excels at productivity and CPU-intensive tasks while providing competent but not exceptional gaming performance.

The system's power characteristics are notable: the CPU has a 17W TDP and the GPU has a 25W TDP, totaling 42W of component power draw. This low power envelope enables thin-and-light laptop designs with extended battery life. The GPU is marked as an IGP slot width, meaning it is integrated directly into the motherboard rather than being a removable module, which is typical for this class of mobile graphics.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 2833 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform. This means the processor cannot be upgraded in the traditional sense; the entire motherboard or system would need to be replaced. The GPU is similarly integrated, with an IGP slot width that indicates it is not a user-serviceable MXM module. For this laptop-class build, the upgrade path is effectively limited to the system level rather than component swaps.

Memory support is LPDDR5X on a dual-channel bus with 136.5 GB/s of bandwidth. The exact memory configuration depends on the motherboard implementation. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 4 lanes for the CPU, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. This means the GPU has adequate bandwidth for its performance class, and the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes could support fast NVMe storage or other high-bandwidth peripherals.

The suggested PSU is not listed in the FACT PACK, but the combined 42W TDP of the CPU and GPU means that even a modest power supply or battery capacity would suffice. The GPU's 25W TDP is remarkably low for a discrete-class graphics solution, reflecting the efficiency of the Xe-HPG architecture on TSMC's 6 nm process. The GPU's 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus is a limiting factor for modern games with high-resolution textures.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be a system with a higher-tier Arc GPU, such as the Arc 5 or Arc 7 series, which would better match the CPU's strong single-thread and multi-thread performance. Alternatively, users who prioritize gaming could consider a system with an NVIDIA or AMD mid-range mobile GPU. The CPU's strong benchmark scores, particularly the Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 16544, suggest it has years of useful life remaining for productivity tasks, but the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 70th percentile ranking will become increasingly limiting as game requirements grow.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 266V + Intel Arc A350M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 266V

Intel Arc A350M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds