SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

97 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
99%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265T

47,697 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D

178,050 Benchmark Score
Top 1% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 7 265T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D: A Desktop Powerhouse with an Efficiency-First CPU

The pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D creates one of the most distinctive desktop configurations in the benchmark database. The GPU is a top-tier rendering monster sitting at the 98th percentile among all GPUs, while the CPU is a 35-watt efficiency-focused processor that still manages to place in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. This is not a balanced pairing in the traditional sense—the RTX 4090 D dramatically outclasses the 265T in raw compute—but the combination delivers a 94th combined percentile ranking, placing it among the top 6% of all recorded desktop builds. The data shows a system designed for GPU-bound workloads where the 24 GB of VRAM and 1.01 TB/s memory bandwidth can be fully exploited, even if the CPU's 20-core architecture keeps multi-threaded throughput respectable rather than class-leading.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T is built on the Arrow Lake architecture using a 3 nm TSMC process, packing 17,800 million transistors into a 243 mm² die. It features 20 cores and 20 threads with no hyperthreading, a design choice that prioritizes efficiency over raw thread count. The base clock sits at 1.50 GHz, which is remarkably low for a desktop processor, but the boost clock reaches 5.30 GHz, indicating a wide dynamic range that allows the chip to sip power during idle tasks and surge when needed. The 35 W TDP is the defining characteristic—this is a processor engineered for thermally constrained systems, yet it still achieves a 90th percentile ranking across all CPUs.

Benchmark results confirm this efficiency-first approach does not sacrifice capability. In Cinebench R23, the 265T scores 31,558 in multi-core and 4,455 in single-core tests. The single-core score of 4,455 places it competitively against higher-TDP rivals, suggesting that the 5.30 GHz boost clock is genuinely accessible. The multi-core score of 31,558 demonstrates that 20 physical cores can still deliver substantial parallel throughput, even at a 35 W power envelope. PassMark results reinforce this picture: a multi-thread score of 37,084 and a single-thread score of 4,338 show balanced performance across both metrics.

The nearest rival data places the 265T in a tight competitive band. It trails the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D by a mere 0.4% in average benchmark score, while leading the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 by 0.4% and the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H by 0.5%. The AMD Ryzen 9 3900 is 0.5% ahead. These deltaPct values are within noise territory, meaning the 265T trades blows with established desktop and mobile flagship processors. For real workloads, this translates to rendering performance that is statistically indistinguishable from the Ryzen 9 7900X3D in multi-threaded tasks, despite the 265T's dramatically lower TDP.

The memory subsystem includes 30 MB of shared L3 cache and 3 MB of L2 per core, with dual-channel DDR5 support delivering 102.4 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The 192 KB L1 cache per core is standard for the architecture. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, enabling high-bandwidth connectivity for the RTX 4090 D and modern NVMe storage. Integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units provides a fallback display output, though it is far from sufficient for gaming. Data compression and encryption scores from PassMark—370,158 and 29,687 respectively—indicate strong performance in archival and security workloads, with the extended instructions score of 28,609 further confirming the architecture's AVX-512-class capabilities.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D is a special configuration of the AD102 chip built on a 5 nm TSMC process with 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die. It is a triple-slot card measuring 304 mm in length, requiring an 800 W suggested PSU and a single 16-pin power connector. The 425 W TDP is substantial but justified by the specifications: 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus delivers 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth, and the 1,313 MHz memory clock translates to 21 Gbps effective. The GPU operates at a 2,280 MHz base clock and 2,520 MHz boost clock, driving 14,592 shading units, 456 TMUs, and 176 ROPs.

Rendering throughput is exceptional. The FP32 performance of 73.54 TFLOPS places this card in the upper echelon of consumer GPUs, with FP16 matching at a 1:1 ratio of 73.54 TFLOPS. The pixel rate of 443.5 GPixel/s and texture rate of 1,149.1 GTexel/s indicate the card can saturate high-resolution displays and handle complex texture-heavy scenes without bottlenecking. The 114 RT cores and 456 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads, making this a formidable choice for both gaming and content creation.

In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the RTX 4090 D scores 8,587, while Geekbench results show 278,621 in OpenCL and 246,941 in Vulkan. The 98th percentile ranking across all GPUs places it in the top 2% of all graphics cards ever benchmarked. Its nearest rivals are professional-grade workstation cards: the NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell leads by 2.2%, the A100 SXM4 80 GB leads by 3.1%, the RTX 5000 Ada Generation leads by 3.6%, and the A100 SXM4 40 GB leads by 4.9%. These deltaPct values show that the RTX 4090 D sits just below the most expensive data-center and professional cards, while outperforming virtually all consumer alternatives.

The 24 GB frame buffer is a crucial asset for modern workloads. At 4K resolution with ultra settings and ray tracing enabled, many games exceed 12 GB of VRAM usage, and 24 GB provides headroom for future titles. The memory bandwidth of 1.01 TB/s ensures that the GPU cores are never starved for data, which is essential for high-resolution textures and complex scenes. The Ada Lovelace architecture's dedicated RT and tensor cores enable DLSS frame generation and ray-traced effects without the massive performance penalty seen in previous generations.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p and 1440p, the RTX 4090 D is capable of frame rates that exceed most high-refresh monitors' capabilities, but the CPU's 4,455 Cinebench R23 single-core score may limit maximum frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. At 4K, the GPU becomes the primary driver, and the 73.54 TFLOPS FP32 performance ensures that ultra settings with ray tracing are playable.

Streaming: The NVENC encoder on the RTX 4090 D handles video encoding without taxing the CPU, but the 265T's 20 cores provide sufficient headroom for game capture, chat applications, and streaming software simultaneously. The 370,158 PassMark data compression score indicates fast handling of stream buffer operations.

Video editing: The combination of 24 GB VRAM and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth allows for smooth 8K timeline scrubbing and effects processing on the GPU, while the CPU's 31,558 Cinebench R23 multi-core score handles export encoding. The 129,817 PassMark floating-point score accelerates color grading and filter operations.

3D rendering: GPU-accelerated renderers will fully utilize the RTX 4090 D's 73.54 TFLOPS and 114 RT cores, making this system ideal for real-time viewport rendering and final-frame GPU rendering. CPU-based rendering is less optimal, with the 265T trailing the Ryzen 9 7900X3D by 0.4% in average score, but still viable for hybrid workflows.

Software development: The 20 physical cores and 5.30 GHz boost clock handle compilation tasks efficiently, with the 28,609 PassMark extended instructions score accelerating vectorized code. The 29687 data encryption score supports secure development environments, while the 322 prime number finding score indicates modest but adequate number-crunching for algorithmic workloads.

Student and office work: The 35 W TDP makes this an energy-efficient choice for daily productivity, with the 4,338 PassMark single-thread score ensuring responsive application performance. The integrated Arc graphics provide a fallback for office tasks, though the RTX 4090 D is vastly overqualified for spreadsheet and document workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a clear imbalance: the RTX 4090 D at the 98th GPU percentile vastly outranks the 265T at the 90th CPU percentile. In GPU-bound workloads—4K gaming, GPU rendering, machine learning inference—the RTX 4090 D will operate at near-full utilization while the CPU remains underutilized. The 73.54 TFLOPS FP32 performance of the GPU dwarfs the CPU's entire compute capability, making the GPU the definitive performance driver in most scenarios.

However, in CPU-bound scenarios—competitive gaming at 1080p, physics simulations, single-threaded applications—the 265T becomes the limiting factor. The 4,455 single-core Cinebench R23 score is respectable but not top-tier, and the 20-thread limit without hyperthreading means that heavily threaded workloads that benefit from more than 20 threads will see diminishing returns. The 35 W TDP constrains sustained multi-core performance, as the chip will thermally throttle earlier than a 125 W counterpart.

The 94th combined percentile suggests that the system's overall capability is greater than either component individually implies. This is because the RTX 4090 D's dominance in floating-point and memory-intensive tasks compensates for the CPU's relative weakness. The bottleneck shifts depending on workload: GPU-bound tasks see minimal CPU interference, while CPU-bound tasks cannot fully leverage the GPU's power. For balanced performance, users should prioritize GPU-accelerated workflows where the 4090 D's 24 GB VRAM and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth are the primary assets.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T sufficient for the RTX 4090 D?

A: For GPU-bound workloads like 4K gaming and GPU rendering, yes—the CPU's 90th percentile ranking and 31,558 Cinebench R23 multi-core score prevent it from being a significant bottleneck. For CPU-bound tasks like 1080p high-refresh gaming, the 4,455 single-core score may limit maximum frame rates.

Q: How does the 265T compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D?

A: The average benchmark scores are within 0.4%, with the 7900X3D leading slightly. The 265T achieves this parity while operating at a 35 W TDP compared to the 7900X3D's higher power draw, making it more efficient per unit of performance.

Q: What is the RTX 4090 D's VRAM capacity and bandwidth?

A: It has 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, delivering 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth. This is sufficient for 4K textures and ray-traced scenes that exceed 12 GB VRAM usage.

Q: Does the RTX 4090 D support ray tracing and DLSS?

A: Yes, it has 114 RT cores and 456 tensor cores. The tensor cores enable DLSS frame generation, while the RT cores handle dedicated ray-traced lighting and reflections.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile ranks at 94, placing it in the top 6% of all desktop builds in the database. This reflects the GPU's exceptional 98th percentile ranking partially offset by the CPU's 90th percentile.

Q: Is the 35 W TDP of the CPU a limitation?

A: It limits sustained multi-core performance compared to higher-TDP processors, but the 5.30 GHz boost clock and 20 cores still achieve a 90th percentile ranking. The efficiency is beneficial for systems with thermal or power constraints.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the RTX 4090 D?

A: The launch MSRP is 1,599 USD. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T has a launch MSRP of $384.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who prioritize GPU-accelerated workloads over CPU-intensive tasks. Gamers at 4K resolution will benefit most, as the RTX 4090 D's 73.54 TFLOPS and 24 GB VRAM ensure maximum settings and ray tracing are playable, with the CPU's 4,455 single-core score providing adequate frame pacing. Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, and AI workflows will find the 1.01 TB/s memory bandwidth and 114 RT cores indispensable, while the 265T's 20 cores handle background tasks and export processes.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 20 physical cores and 5.30 GHz boost clock, though those requiring maximum multi-threaded performance should consider higher-TDP alternatives. Students and office workers building a system for general productivity will find the 35 W TDP energy-efficient, but the RTX 4090 D is significantly over-specified for such tasks. Small business workstations handling GPU-accelerated data processing or visualization will benefit from the combination's 94th combined percentile, making it suitable for professional applications that leverage CUDA or OptiX. The system is less ideal for users whose workloads are primarily CPU-bound, as the 265T's 35 W TDP limits sustained multi-core throughput compared to desktop processors with higher power envelopes.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T achieves an average benchmark score of 47,697, placing it at the 90th percentile of all CPUs. Its Cinebench R15 scores are 3,180 multi-core and 449 single-core; R20 scores are 13,254 multi-core and 1,871 single-core; R23 scores are 31,558 multi-core and 4,455 single-core. PassMark results include 370,158 for data compression, 29,687 for encryption, 28,609 for extended instructions, 322 for prime numbers, 129,817 for floating-point math, 104,943 for integer math, 37,084 for multi-thread, 2,391 for physics, 44,400 for random string sorting, and 4,338 for single-thread. The nearest rivals are within a tight 0.9% band: AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 at 47,527 (0.4% ahead of the 265T), AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D at 47,908 (0.4% behind), AMD Ryzen 9 3900 at 47,918 (0.5% behind), and Intel Core Ultra X9 378H at 47,468 (0.5% ahead).

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D achieves an average benchmark score of 178,050, placing it at the 98th percentile of all GPUs. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 8,587, Geekbench OpenCL is 278,621, and Geekbench Vulkan is 246,941. The nearest rivals are all professional-grade cards: NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell at 182,109 (2.2% ahead), NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB at 183,725 (3.1% ahead), NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation at 184,664 (3.6% ahead), and NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB at 187,147 (4.9% ahead). The combined picture shows a system where the GPU dominates overall performance, with the CPU providing sufficient support to achieve a 94th combined percentile ranking.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T, a 20-core Arrow Lake processor with a 35 W TDP and 5.30 GHz boost clock, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D, an Ada Lovelace GPU with 24 GB GDDR6X memory and 73.54 TFLOPS FP32 performance. The CPU's 90th percentile and GPU's 98th percentile combine for a 94th overall percentile, making this one of the highest-performing desktop configurations in the database. The 265T is an efficiency-focused processor that achieves near-parity with the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D in average benchmark scores, while the RTX 4090 D sits just below professional workstation cards like the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell. This pairing is best described as a GPU-first system, where the RTX 4090 D's 1.01 TB/s bandwidth and 114 RT cores define the system's capability, and the CPU's 20 cores provide adequate multi-threaded support without dominating the performance profile.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame rate figures below are estimates based on the benchmark scores and are not measured data. The RTX 4090 D's 73.54 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 24 GB VRAM indicate that at 4K resolution with ultra settings, this system should deliver frame rates well above 60 FPS in most titles, with ray tracing enabled thanks to the 114 RT cores. At 1440p, the GPU's 443.5 GPixel/s pixel rate suggests frame rates exceeding 120 FPS in less demanding titles, while the CPU's 4,455 Cinebench R23 single-core score may limit maximum frame rates to around 100-150 FPS in CPU-bound esports titles. At 1080p, the CPU becomes the primary limiter, with the 265T's single-thread performance potentially capping frame rates below what the GPU could otherwise deliver. The 456 tensor cores enable DLSS frame generation, which can boost effective frame rates by 50-100% in supported titles, but these are estimated ranges derived from the benchmark scores rather than measured gameplay data.