SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265T

47,697 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

54,247 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T is a 20-core, 20-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture and manufactured on a 3 nm process at TSMC. This is a notable design departure from previous Intel generations, as the chip does not rely on hyper-threading — 20 physical cores handle 20 threads directly. The base clock sits at a modest 1.50 GHz, but the boost clock reaches 5.30 GHz, giving the chip a wide operating range that balances efficiency with burst performance. The 35 W TDP is remarkably low for a 20-core desktop part, indicating that Intel has prioritized power efficiency in this SKU.

The cache hierarchy is substantial, with 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This arrangement provides ample high-speed storage for frequently accessed data, which is critical for multi-threaded workloads that rely on shared data across cores. Memory support is limited to dual-channel DDR5 with a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s — adequate for most productivity tasks, though not exceptional for a high-end desktop part. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the processor itself, which is sufficient for a single high-end GPU and one or two fast NVMe drives. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units provides a functional fallback for display output and basic acceleration, though it is not intended to compete with the discrete GPU in this build.

Benchmark results paint a clear picture of the 265T's capabilities. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 31,558 in multi-core and 4,455 in single-core. The multi-core figure is strong for a 35 W part, suggesting that the chip can sustain substantial multi-threaded throughput despite its low power envelope. The single-core score is equally impressive, indicating that the 5.30 GHz boost clock delivers competitive per-thread performance. In the older Cinebench R20 tests, the scores are 13,254 multi-core and 1,871 single-core, while Cinebench R15 shows 3,180 multi-core and 449 single-core. These results confirm that the 265T scales well across different rendering workloads that exercise varying numbers of threads.

The PassMark suite provides additional insight into the CPU's character. The multi-thread score of 37,084 is robust, and the single-thread score of 4,338 is competitive with top-tier desktop processors. More specialized tests show where the architecture excels: floating-point math scores 129,817, integer math scores 104,943, and extended instructions (SIMD) score 28,609. Data compression scores 370,158, which is very high and suggests excellent performance in file archiving and compression workloads. Data encryption scores 29,687, indicating strong AES and cryptography performance. Random string sorting scores 44,400, a measure of memory subsystem efficiency under random access patterns. Physics simulation scores 2,391, which is moderate and may reflect the chip's power-conscious design. Prime number finding scores 322, a result that indicates the chip is not optimized for this particular integer-heavy, latency-sensitive workload.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 47,697, placing it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. This is a strong result that puts the 265T near the top of the desktop processor hierarchy. Its nearest rivals in the database are all AMD parts: the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 (average score 47,527, 0.4% slower), the Ryzen 9 7900X3D (average score 47,908, 0.4% faster), and the Ryzen 9 3900 (average score 47,918, 0.5% faster). The Intel Core Ultra X9 378H (average score 47,468, 0.5% slower) also sits nearby. These deltas are minuscule — sub-1% differences separate the 265T from its closest competitors, meaning the chip is essentially performance-equivalent to a broad cluster of high-end processors from both AMD and Intel's own mobile lineup.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The combination of a 5.30 GHz boost clock and a 90th percentile CPU score means the 265T can feed frames to a high-end GPU without becoming a bottleneck in most titles. The single-thread score of 4,455 in Cinebench R23 and 4,338 in PassMark single-thread indicate strong per-core performance, which is what matters most for gaming. However, no measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so gaming expectations must be inferred from the benchmark scores.

Streaming: The 20-core/20-thread configuration provides ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The multi-thread score of 31,558 in Cinebench R23 shows that the CPU can handle concurrent encoding and gaming workloads. The high data compression score of 370,158 also suggests efficient handling of stream encoding overhead.

Video editing: Timeline scrubbing, effects rendering, and export tasks will benefit from the strong multi-threaded performance. The 31,558 Cinebench R23 multi-core score indicates that the 265T can handle 4K video editing workflows with multiple tracks and effects. The 129,817 floating-point math score is relevant for color grading and compositing operations that rely on GPU-accelerated compute.

3D rendering: Cinebench scores of 3,180 (R15), 13,254 (R20), and 31,558 (R23) show consistent scaling across generations of the render benchmark. The 90th percentile CPU ranking places this chip in the upper tier for CPU-based rendering, though dedicated render engines that use GPU acceleration will depend more heavily on the RTX 4080.

Software development: Compilation tasks benefit from both high single-thread and multi-thread performance. The 4,338 PassMark single-thread score ensures fast incremental builds, while the 37,084 multi-thread score accelerates full-project rebuilds. The 28,609 extended instructions score indicates strong SIMD performance, which is useful for code that leverages vectorized operations.

Student and office work: The 35 W TDP makes this an efficient processor for sustained productivity workloads. Document editing, spreadsheet calculations, web browsing, and video conferencing will all perform smoothly given the high single-thread scores. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics provides a backup display solution, though the discrete GPU will handle any graphics-accelerated tasks.

# FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The 265T has an average benchmark score of 47,697, placing it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. It is 0.4% faster than the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 (47,527), 0.4% slower than the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D (47,908), 0.5% slower than the AMD Ryzen 9 3900 (47,918), and 0.5% faster than the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H (47,468). These differences are all within 1%, making the chips effectively performance-equivalent.

Q: What is the core and thread configuration of the 265T?

A: The processor has 20 cores and 20 threads. It does not use hyper-threading, so each core handles exactly one thread. The base clock is 1.50 GHz, and the boost clock reaches 5.30 GHz.

Q: What is the TDP of this processor?

A: The TDP is 35 W. This is a low power envelope for a 20-core desktop processor, indicating that the chip is designed for efficiency rather than maximum sustained power draw.

Q: What memory does the 265T support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. It does not support ECC memory. The memory bus is dual-channel, which is standard for desktop processors.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the 265T?

A: The launch MSRP is $384. The processor was released on January 6, 2025, and is currently in active production.

Q: Does the CPU include integrated graphics?

A: Yes, it includes Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units. This provides basic display output and hardware acceleration, though it is not designed for high-end gaming without a discrete GPU.

Q: What socket does the 265T use?

A: The processor uses Intel Socket 1851 and provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU. The process node is 3 nm at TSMC, with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die.

# Who Should Build It

This build targets desktop users who want top-tier performance in a power-efficient package. The 35 W CPU TDP combined with the 320 W GPU TDP creates a system that can deliver high frame rates without requiring exotic cooling solutions. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking means it sits alongside AMD's Ryzen 9 parts in overall performance, making it suitable for users who need strong multi-threaded throughput for productivity but also want excellent single-thread responsiveness.

Gamers at 1440p or 4K resolution will benefit from the pairing, as the RTX 4080's 86th percentile GPU ranking ensures high frame rates while the 265T's strong single-thread performance prevents CPU bottlenecks in most titles. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will appreciate the 20-core configuration, with Cinebench R23 multi-core scores of 31,558 indicating that export and render times will be competitive with far more power-hungry processors.

Software developers compiling large codebases will see fast build times from the combination of high single-thread and multi-thread scores. The 37,084 PassMark multi-thread score and 4,338 single-thread score provide a balanced profile that handles both incremental and full rebuilds efficiently. Students and office workers who want a system that never feels slow will find the 265T more than adequate for their needs, with the added benefit of lower power consumption reducing heat and noise in shared spaces.

Small business workstations that run virtual machines, database servers, or financial modeling software will benefit from the 90th percentile CPU performance and the 16 GB VRAM of the RTX 4080 for GPU-accelerated compute. The lack of ECC memory support is a consideration for mission-critical workloads, but for general business use the performance profile is strong.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for the exact combination of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for this pairing, so all frame rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct testing.

The RTX 4080's passmark_g3d score of 34,457 and its 86th percentile ranking among all GPUs indicate that this card is positioned near the top of the GPU hierarchy. For 1440p gaming, the card should deliver high frame rates in most titles at ultra settings, with the 16 GB GDDR6X memory providing ample capacity for modern game textures and assets. At 4K resolution, the 716.8 GB/s memory bandwidth and 48.74 TFLOPS FP32 compute will support playable frame rates in demanding titles, though the most graphically intensive games may require settings adjustments to maintain smooth performance.

The CPU side is equally important for gaming. The 265T's 90th percentile ranking and strong single-thread scores (4,455 in Cinebench R23, 4,338 in PassMark) mean that frame pacing should be consistent, with minimal CPU-induced stutters. Games that rely heavily on single-thread performance, such as esports titles, will benefit from the 5.30 GHz boost clock. Multi-threaded game engines that scale across cores will also perform well given the 20-core configuration.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6,567 for the RTX 4080 provides a synthetic estimate of DirectX 12 gaming performance. This score, combined with the Geekbench Vulkan score of 263,779, suggests that the GPU will handle modern APIs efficiently. Users can expect smooth gameplay at high refresh rates in most titles at 1440p, with 4K gaming requiring some compromises in the most demanding games.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using the AD103 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The GPU contains 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 121.1M per mm². This is a high-density design that packs substantial compute resources into a moderately sized die.

The memory subsystem is a key strength of this card. It features 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, with a memory clock of 1400 MHz (22.4 Gbps effective). Total memory bandwidth is 716.8 GB/s, which is substantial and ensures that the GPU's compute units are well-fed with data. This bandwidth is critical for high-resolution gaming and GPU-accelerated rendering workloads that move large amounts of texture and geometry data.

The compute configuration is robust: 9,728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units. The card features 76 RT cores for ray tracing and 304 tensor cores for AI-accelerated workloads. Pixel rate is 280.6 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 761.5 GTexel/s. FP32 compute is rated at 48.74 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 48.74 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), meaning the card does not have a dedicated FP16 boost path but can handle half-precision at the same rate as single-precision.

The GPU's benchmark results confirm its high-end positioning. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6,567 is a strong result for DirectX 12 gaming. Geekbench scores are equally impressive: 214,739 in OpenCL and 263,779 in Vulkan. PassMark results show a G3D score of 34,457 and a GPU compute score of 20,671. The DirectX 9, 10, 11, and 12 scores are 370, 204, 314, and 132 respectively, with a G2D score of 1,239.

The RTX 4080's average benchmark score is 54,247, placing it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the RTX 4080 SUPER with an average score of 54,209 (0.1% lower), making the two cards effectively identical in performance. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54,828 (1.1% higher), the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55,698 (2.6% higher), and the AMD Radeon 8060S scores 55,757 (2.7% higher). These deltas are small, indicating that the RTX 4080 sits in a tight performance cluster with several competing cards.

The card's TDP is 320 W, with a triple-slot cooler design and a single 16-pin power connector. The suggested PSU is 700 W. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and provides 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The card measures 310 mm in length, 140 mm in height, and 61 mm in width. It was released on September 19, 2022, with a launch MSRP of 1,199 USD. The production status is end-of-life, with the GeForce 50 series as its successor.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 47,697, placing it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. This is a strong showing that puts the 265T in the upper echelon of desktop processors. The nearest rivals are all within 0.5% of the 265T's score, indicating that this chip is performance-equivalent to a cluster of high-end AMD and Intel parts. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31,558 and single-core score of 4,455 demonstrate balanced performance across both multi-threaded and single-threaded workloads.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 54,247, placing it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rival, the RTX 4080 SUPER, is only 0.1% different in average score, confirming that the RTX 4080 remains a top-tier graphics card. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6,567 and the Geekbench Vulkan score of 263,779 show strong API-specific performance. The PassMark G3D score of 34,457 is a comprehensive measure of overall graphics capability.

Combined, the CPU and GPU scores place this build in the 88th percentile overall. This is a high-performance pairing where both components are near the top of their respective hierarchies. The CPU's 90th percentile and GPU's 86th percentile are closely matched, meaning neither component dramatically outclasses the other. This balance is desirable because it minimizes the risk of one component bottlenecking the other in most workloads.

The combined percentile of 88 reflects a system that is well above average but not at the absolute modern. The CPU is slightly stronger relative to its peers than the GPU, which is a favorable position for gaming because it ensures the processor can keep up with the graphics card's frame output. For productivity workloads, the strong CPU performance ensures that compilation, rendering, and data processing tasks are not CPU-bound.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 in a desktop configuration. The CPU is a 20-core, 20-thread Arrow Lake processor with a 35 W TDP and a 5.30 GHz boost clock. The GPU is an Ada Lovelace-based card with 16 GB of GDDR6X memory, 9,728 shading units, and a 320 W TDP. Both components are high-end parts that target the enthusiast desktop segment.

The combined percentile of 88 indicates that this system outperforms the vast majority of desktop builds in the database. The CPU's 90th percentile and GPU's 86th percentile are both strong individually, and their combination creates a well-rounded system that can handle demanding workloads across gaming, content creation, and productivity.

The CPU's launch MSRP is $384, and the GPU's launch MSRP is 1,199 USD. The CPU was released in January 2025 and is in active production, while the GPU was released in September 2022 and is now end-of-life with the GeForce 50 series as its successor. The CPU uses Intel Socket 1851 with 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, and the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

This is a desktop build that prioritizes performance per watt on the CPU side (35 W TDP for 20 cores) while the GPU delivers maximum graphics throughput within a 320 W envelope. The system requires a 700 W PSU and a triple-slot GPU cooler, so case compatibility and airflow are important considerations.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU in this build are closely matched in their relative performance tiers, with the CPU at the 90th percentile and the GPU at the 86th percentile. This proximity means that neither component is dramatically stronger than the other, reducing the likelihood of severe bottlenecks in either direction.

For gaming workloads, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (4,455 in Cinebench R23 single-core, 4,338 in PassMark single-thread) ensures that the processor can feed frames to the GPU without becoming a limiting factor in most titles. The GPU's 86th percentile ranking and 16 GB VRAM capacity mean that it can handle high-resolution textures and demanding graphics settings. In CPU-bound games at 1080p, the 265T's high boost clock and strong single-core scores will keep frame rates high. At 4K, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck as the resolution increases the rendering load, which is the expected and desirable behavior in a gaming system.

For productivity workloads, the balance shifts depending on the application. CPU-heavy tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and code compilation will leverage the 20-core configuration and the 31,558 Cinebench R23 multi-core score. GPU-accelerated tasks like machine learning inference, video transcoding with NVENC, and GPU-accelerated rendering will rely more heavily on the RTX 4080's 48.74 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 304 tensor cores. In mixed workloads, the system can offload parallel tasks to the GPU while the CPU handles sequential and control-flow-heavy operations.

The PassMark physics score of 2,391 for the CPU is moderate, which may indicate a slight weakness in physics simulation workloads that are heavily multi-threaded and memory-latency-sensitive. However, this is unlikely to be a significant bottleneck in real-world usage. The CPU's memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s is lower than what some competing platforms offer, which could be a minor limiting factor in bandwidth-hungry workloads like large data processing or high-core-count rendering. The GPU's 716.8 GB/s memory bandwidth, by contrast, is ample for its compute capabilities.

Overall, the system is well-balanced. The CPU's slight percentile advantage over the GPU suggests that the processor will not hold back the graphics card in most scenarios, and the GPU's strong compute capabilities will accelerate tasks that benefit from massive parallelism. The pair is a solid match for a high-performance desktop build where neither component is expected to consistently bottleneck the other.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 265T

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds