SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
95%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265T

47,697 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

37,648 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Intel Core Ultra 7 265T paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 represents a desktop build that balances a highly efficient 20-core processor with a capable 12 GB graphics card. The combined system percentile of 86 places this configuration in the upper tier of all tracked hardware, though the specific performance dynamics between the CPU and GPU warrant detailed examination. This analysis relies exclusively on benchmark data from the FACT PACK, and it is important to note that no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all gaming frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the component scores.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a system where the CPU and GPU occupy different performance strata, creating a nuanced bottleneck profile. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T achieves a 90th percentile ranking among all CPUs, while the RTX 4070 sits at the 81st percentile among all GPUs. This nine-point gap suggests the processor is the stronger component relative to its peers, meaning in most workloads the GPU will be the limiting factor, especially at higher resolutions where graphics load increases.

The PassMark physics score of 2391 for the CPU indicates strong computational throughput for simulation and physics calculations, which are typically single-threaded or lightly threaded workloads. In contrast, the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 26927 shows it handles graphics rasterization tasks with relative ease. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31558 versus a single-core score of 4455 illustrates a 7.1x scaling factor, typical of a 20-thread processor that can feed even demanding GPU workloads without stalling.

For gaming scenarios, the bottleneck will shift based on resolution. At 1080p, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (4455 in Cinebench R23 single-core, 4338 in PassMark single-thread) should keep frame rates high, but the GPU's 81st percentile position means it will likely cap performance in graphically intense scenes. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the definitive limiting factor, as the CPU's 90th percentile standing provides ample headroom to process game logic and draw calls while the RTX 4070 works to fill the frame buffer.

The PassMark data compression score of 370158 and data encryption score of 29687 reveal that the CPU excels at data-intensive tasks, which can offload some work from the GPU in scenarios involving asset decompression or streaming. However, the GPU's FP32 throughput of 29.15 TFLOPS versus the CPU's PassMark floating-point math score of 129817 indicates that raw number-crunching for graphics remains firmly in the GPU's domain. The system is not perfectly balanced—the CPU has approximately 11% more headroom relative to its peer group than the GPU—so users should expect the RTX 4070 to be the primary constraint in most gaming and rendering workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 47697 places it at the 90th percentile of all processors, with nearest rivals including the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 (47527, 0.4% slower) and the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D (47908, 0.4% faster). This tight clustering around the 47,700-47,900 range shows the 265T competes directly with high-end desktop processors from the previous generation. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31558 confirms strong multi-threaded capability, while the single-core score of 4455 demonstrates excellent per-thread efficiency for a 35W TDP part.

The GPU delivers a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3854 and a PassMark G3D score of 26927, ranking at the 81st percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Tesla P4 (37628, 0.1% slower) and the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 (37507, 0.4% slower), though the RTX 4070 also sits within 1.3% of the RTX 4080 Mobile (38135). The Geekbench Vulkan score of 174152 and OpenCL score of 154858 indicate strong compute performance for both gaming and professional workloads.

Combined, the CPU's 90th percentile and GPU's 81st percentile yield a system percentile of 86, meaning this build outperforms 86% of tracked desktop configurations. The CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 37084 and the GPU's PassMark GPU compute score of 14720 together suggest a platform capable of handling both gaming and content creation tasks, though the GPU will be the ceiling for graphics-heavy applications. The CPU's 0.4% delta from the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 and -0.4% from the Ryzen 9 7900X3D places it in a dead heat with those competitors, while the GPU's -1.3% delta from the RTX 4080 Mobile shows it trails that mobile part slightly despite being a desktop component.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking and what does it mean?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T ranks at the 90th percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms 90% of tracked processors. Its average benchmark score of 47697 places it within 0.5% of the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 and AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 4070 sits at the 81st percentile of all GPUs with an average score of 37648. It is 0.1% faster than the NVIDIA Tesla P4 and 0.4% faster than the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56, but 1.3% slower than the RTX 4080 Mobile.

Q: What is the combined system percentile?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing is 86, indicating the build outperforms 86% of all tracked desktop configurations. This reflects the CPU's stronger relative position (90th percentile) compared to the GPU (81st percentile).

Q: What are the CPU's key multi-threaded performance metrics?

A: The CPU achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31558 and a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 13254. The PassMark multi-thread score is 37084, with a floating-point math score of 129817.

Q: What memory and PCIe specifications does the platform support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. It provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU, and the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

Q: What is the power draw and PSU recommendation?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 35W, while the GPU has a TDP of 200W. The suggested PSU for the system is 550W, which provides headroom for the combined component draw.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this specific build?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All gaming frame rate figures discussed are estimates based on the benchmark scores of each component.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance for productivity tasks while maintaining solid gaming capability. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking and 20 cores make it suitable for software developers compiling large codebases, where the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31558 translates to faster build times. Content creators working with video editing will benefit from the PassMark data encryption score of 29687 and integer math score of 104943, which speed up encoding and processing pipelines.

For gamers at 1440p, the RTX 4070's 81st percentile ranking and 12 GB of GDDR6X memory provide sufficient headroom for modern titles, while the CPU's single-core score of 4455 in Cinebench R23 ensures high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. Students and small business workstations will find the 35W TDP attractive for quiet, power-efficient builds, yet the system still delivers 86th percentile combined performance. The CPU's Arc Xe-LPG integrated graphics with 64 execution units offer a fallback for basic display tasks, but the dedicated RTX 4070 is the primary graphics solution.

The build is less suited for 4K gaming at maximum settings, where the GPU's 81st percentile position will likely become the bottleneck, but it excels as a high-refresh 1080p or solid 1440p gaming machine paired with a productivity powerhouse. The CPU's 90th percentile standing relative to the GPU's 81st means users who prioritize CPU-intensive workloads—like 3D modeling, scientific computing, or heavy multitasking—will see the processor's strengths shine.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around Intel Socket 1851, which supports the Core Ultra Series 2 processors. The CPU uses DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth, and the 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU provide high-speed connectivity for storage and expansion cards. The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe 5.0 capability.

The 35W TDP of the CPU is exceptionally low for a 20-core part, meaning the current cooling solution has significant headroom. The GPU's 200W TDP with a suggested PSU of 550W leaves room for additional components, though upgrading to a higher-tier GPU would require checking power headroom. The CPU's 30 MB of shared L3 cache and 3 MB L2 per core provide ample data staging for both gaming and compute workloads.

A sensible next upgrade would be a GPU with higher performance than the RTX 4070, as the CPU's 90th percentile ranking has headroom to support a more powerful graphics card. The CPU's boost clock of 5.30 GHz and 20 threads ensure it can feed a faster GPU without becoming the limiting factor in most scenarios. The DDR5 memory support and PCIe Gen 5 lanes mean the platform is current-generation, so the CPU should remain relevant for several years before needing a full platform change.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, the CPU's single-core performance of 4455 in Cinebench R23 and 4338 in PassMark single-thread should drive high frame rates, while the GPU's 26927 PassMark G3D score handles rendering. At 1440p, the RTX 4070's 12 GB VRAM and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth support modern game assets, but the GPU becomes the primary limiter.

Streaming benefits from the CPU's PassMark data compression score of 370158, which accelerates encoding and network packet handling, while the GPU's NVENC-class tensor cores (184 total) offload video encoding from the CPU. Video editing workflows leverage the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31558 for timeline rendering and the GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 154858 for effects processing.

3D rendering in applications like Blender or Maya will see strong CPU performance from the PassMark multi-thread score of 37084, while the GPU's FP32 throughput of 29.15 TFLOPS accelerates viewport and final-frame rendering. Software development benefits from the CPU's 20 threads and PassMark integer math score of 104943, which speeds up compilation and testing.

Student and office work is well-served by the CPU's low 35W TDP, enabling quiet operation, and the 90th percentile processing power handles spreadsheets, documents, and multitasking with ease. The GPU's 81st percentile ranking provides occasional gaming or graphics work capability without compromising the system's efficiency-focused design.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using TSMC's 5nm process, featuring 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. It has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth—sufficient for 1440p gaming and moderate 4K workloads. The memory clock runs at 1313 MHz with 21 Gbps effective speed.

The GPU's 5888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs provide a balanced rasterization pipeline. The 46 ray tracing cores and 184 tensor cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS-style upscaling, though the FACT PACK does not specify DLSS version. The boost clock of 2475 MHz achieves a pixel rate of 158.4 GPixel/s and texture rate of 455.4 GTexel/s.

The FP32 performance of 29.15 TFLOPS positions the GPU for solid compute workloads, as reflected in the PassMark GPU compute score of 14720. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 174152 indicates strong API-level performance, while the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3854 shows modern DirectX 12 workloads are handled efficiently. The GPU's 81st percentile ranking means it outperforms most discrete graphics cards, though it trails the top-tier 90th+ percentile parts.

The 200W TDP and dual-slot design make it manageable for most desktop cases, with a 1x 16-pin power connector. The display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, supporting multiple high-resolution monitors. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with current and near-future game APIs.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070, creating a system that ranks at the 86th combined percentile. The CPU's 90th percentile position and the GPU's 81st percentile position indicate a high-tier configuration where the processor slightly outpaces the graphics card in relative performance. The build targets users who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance for productivity tasks while maintaining solid gaming capability.

The 20-core, 20-thread CPU with a 5.30 GHz boost clock provides exceptional compute throughput, while the 12 GB GPU handles modern gaming resolutions. The 35W CPU TDP and 200W GPU TDP combine for a power-efficient system, with a 550W suggested PSU providing adequate headroom. The build class is desktop, confirming this is a stationary, upgradeable platform.

Overall, this configuration represents a high-performance desktop that sits in the top 14% of all tracked systems. The CPU's strength in multi-threaded workloads (Cinebench R23 multi-core 31558) and the GPU's capability in rasterization (PassMark G3D 26927) make it a versatile machine for both work and play. The system is not the absolute fastest available, but it offers a balanced combination of CPU and GPU performance that exceeds the majority of desktop builds.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T is a 20-core, 20-thread desktop processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, built on the Arrow Lake architecture using TSMC's 3nm process. It contains 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, with a base clock of 1.50 GHz and boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The 35W TDP is remarkably low for a 20-core part, making it highly power-efficient for its performance class.

The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration supports the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31558 and Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 13254. The single-core scores of 4455 (R23) and 1871 (R20) show excellent per-thread performance for a processor with such a low power envelope.

The CPU's PassMark results reveal its computational strengths: data compression at 370158, data encryption at 29687, and integer math at 104943. The floating-point math score of 129817 indicates strong scientific computing capability. The 90th percentile ranking confirms this processor outperforms 90% of all tracked CPUs, with nearest rivals within 0.5% performance delta.

The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units provides basic display capability, though the dedicated RTX 4070 handles all demanding graphics work. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth, and its 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes enable fast NVMe storage and expansion. The launch MSRP is $384, and the processor is currently in active production with a 2025-01-06 release date.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking and single-core score of 4455 in Cinebench R23 suggest it can drive high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, while the GPU's 81st percentile and PassMark G3D score of 26927 indicate solid rasterization performance.

At 1080p resolution, the system should deliver high frame rates in most titles, with the GPU's 29.15 TFLOPS FP32 performance handling modern game engines. The CPU's strong single-thread performance minimizes bottlenecking in games that rely on a few cores. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p ultra settings in most current games.

At 1440p, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, with the 504.2 GB/s memory bandwidth and 192-bit bus providing adequate but not exceptional data throughput. The 46 ray tracing cores enable ray-traced effects, though performance will vary by title. The 184 tensor cores can accelerate DLSS-style upscaling to boost frame rates at higher resolutions.

At 4K, the GPU's 81st percentile ranking means it will struggle with maximum settings in demanding titles, but the 12 GB VRAM and 29.15 TFLOPS compute should handle medium-to-high settings in many games. The CPU's 20 threads and 30 MB L3 cache provide ample processing power to avoid becoming a bottleneck even at lower resolutions where frame rates are high. Overall, this build is best suited for 1080p high-refresh or 1440p high-settings gaming, with playable 4K performance in less demanding titles.