SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265T

47,697 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

17,639 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T pairs a highly efficient 20-core Arrow Lake processor with the mainstream NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060. This combination targets a specific sweet spot: high multi-threaded throughput for productivity on a 35 W CPU envelope, matched with an 8 GB graphics card designed for 1080p gaming. The data set contains no measured frame-rate results for this exact pairing, so all gaming analysis here is estimated from the component benchmark scores. The combined architecture delivers a balanced desktop platform centered on the modern Intel Socket 1851 and DDR5 memory.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using TSMC's 5 nm process, packing 18,900 million transistors into a 159 mm² die. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1830 MHz and a boost clock of 2460 MHz, with memory running at 2125 MHz (17 Gbps effective). The 8 GB GDDR6 frame buffer sits on a 128-bit bus, producing a bandwidth of 272.0 GB/s. This memory configuration is the defining constraint for the GPU: 8 GB is workable for 1080p rendering but becomes limiting as texture sizes and resolution scale upward.

Compute resources include 3072 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output pipelines. The 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced lighting and DLSS-based upscaling. The FP32 throughput is rated at 15.11 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 15.11 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). Pixel rate is 118.1 GPixel/s and texture rate is 236.2 GTexel/s. Benchmark data shows the GPU scoring 2302 in 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12), 95057 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 48643 in Geekbench Vulkan. Passmark results include a G3D score of 19545, a GPU compute score of 9213, and DirectX 12 and DirectX 11 scores of 76 and 175, respectively.

The percentile ranking against all GPUs is 61, placing it in the upper-middle tier. The average benchmark score is 17639, and the nearest rivals are notably close: the AMD Radeon HD 7790 sits at 17666 (0.2% ahead), the AMD Radeon 780M at 17588 (0.3% behind), the AMD Radeon Pro 560 at 17551 (0.5% behind), and the AMD Radeon Pro 460 at 17509 (0.7% behind). These tiny delta percentages indicate that the RTX 4060's raw compute performance is essentially interchangeable with those older or integrated parts, but the NVIDIA card brings modern feature support — DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6 — that the rivals lack. The 96 tensor cores are critical for DLSS, which can substantially boost effective frame rates in supported titles. For rendering workloads, the 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 throughput handles 1080p and some 1440p content, but the 8 GB VRAM and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth will cap texture-heavy scenes and high-resolution ray tracing.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1851, which hosts the Core Ultra 7 265T. This CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. ECC memory is not supported, which is typical for this desktop segment. The processor provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU itself. The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for the RTX 4060's bandwidth needs but means the slot is not using the CPU's Gen 5 lanes.

The power envelope is remarkably low for the CPU: the 265T has a TDP of 35 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 115 W. The suggested PSU for the whole system is 300 W, which leaves substantial headroom for drives, fans, and other peripherals. The GPU requires a single 12-pin power connector and is a dual-slot design measuring 240 mm (9.4 inches) in length, 111 mm (4.4 inches) in height, and 40 mm (1.6 inches) in width. This compact size allows installation in most mid-tower cases and many small-form-factor builds, though the 1x 12-pin connector may require an adapter for older PSUs.

A sensible next upgrade path depends on the workload. For gaming, the first bottleneck is the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus, so moving to a higher-tier GeForce 40-series or 50-series card with more memory and bandwidth would yield the largest frame-rate gains. The CPU's 20 cores and 5.30 GHz boost clock will not be the limiting factor for most games. For productivity, the 35 W TDP suggests the platform is power-constrained by design; users seeking more multi-threaded performance would need to move to a higher-TDP Arrow Lake chip on the same socket, though the 265T's 31558 Cinebench R23 multi-core score already rivals much higher-power parts. The PCIe Gen 5 support from the CPU ensures that future storage devices and accelerators will not be bandwidth-limited.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T is a 20-core, 20-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, manufactured on a 3 nm TSMC process. The die contains 17,800 million transistors within a 243 mm² area. Base clock is 1.50 GHz, boosting to 5.30 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The multiplier is locked, meaning overclocking is not an option, but the low 35 W TDP is the headline feature. Integrated graphics are present in the form of Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units, providing a fallback display output and basic acceleration.

Benchmark results are strong across the board. Cinebench R23 multi-core scores 31558, with single-core at 4455. Cinebench R20 shows 13254 multi-core and 1871 single-core, while Cinebench R15 shows 3180 multi-core and 449 single-core. Passmark tests reveal specific strengths: multi-thread score is 37084, single-thread is 4338, integer math scores 104943, floating-point math scores 129817, and extended instructions score 28609. Data compression scores 370158, data encryption scores 29687, and random string sorting scores 44400. The physics test scores 2391, and the prime numbers test scores 322.

The CPU's percentile ranking against all CPUs is 90, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of processors. The average benchmark score is 47697. Nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 scores 47527 (0.4% behind), the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D scores 47908 (0.4% ahead), the AMD Ryzen 9 3900 scores 47918 (0.5% ahead), and the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H scores 47468 (0.5% behind). These deltas are within noise, meaning the 265T trades blows with those high-end parts despite its dramatically lower TDP. The 20-thread configuration handles heavily parallel workloads such as video encoding and 3D rendering, while the 5.30 GHz boost clock ensures snappy single-threaded responsiveness in office applications and games. The 30 MB L3 cache is adequate but not exceptional; the Ryzen 7900X3D's 3D V-Cache likely gives it an edge in cache-sensitive workloads, though the 265T's parity in average benchmark score suggests the higher clocks compensate.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need serious multi-threaded CPU performance without the power draw or cooling requirements of a high-TDP flagship, combined with a GPU that delivers consistent 1080p gaming. The data shows the CPU at the 90th percentile for all CPUs, meaning it outperforms 90% of processors in the database. That makes it suitable for content creators who run Cinebench-style renders, video editors handling 4K timelines, and software developers compiling large codebases — all tasks that scale with the 20 threads.

The GPU, at the 61st percentile, is a mid-range part. It suits gamers playing at 1080p with high settings, where the 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for current titles at that resolution, though future-proofing is limited. The 96 tensor cores enable DLSS, which can push frame rates higher in supported games. Students and small business workstations benefit from the 35 W CPU TDP, which allows for compact, quiet systems with modest cooling. The 300 W suggested PSU keeps the bill of materials low and enables small-form-factor builds. For developers, the CPU's 90th percentile performance and 20 threads handle virtualization and parallel builds, while the GPU's 95057 Geekbench OpenCL score provides moderate compute acceleration for prototyping.

The platform is not ideal for high-end 4K gaming or heavy ray tracing, as the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus will bottleneck. It is equally unsuited for users who need ECC memory, as the CPU does not support it. For the target audience of 1080p gamers and productivity users, the combination offers a balanced ratio of CPU throughput to GPU rasterization.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU is skewed toward CPU performance. The Core Ultra 7 265T sits at the 90th percentile for all CPUs, while the RTX 4060 sits at the 61st percentile for all GPUs. This suggests that in gaming workloads, the GPU will be the primary limiter. The CPU's 31558 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 4338 Passmark single-thread score are sufficient to feed the GPU at 1080p, but the GPU's 19545 Passmark G3D score will cap frame rates in graphically intensive scenes.

In productivity workloads, the CPU is the star. The 37084 Passmark multi-thread score and 129817 floating-point math score indicate that rendering, simulation, and data processing tasks will be CPU-bound. The GPU's compute score of 9213 in Passmark is modest, so GPGPU acceleration for tasks like video encoding via NVENC will help, but raw CPU compute dominates. The memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s (CPU) versus 272.0 GB/s (GPU) means the GPU has more bandwidth for its dedicated tasks, but the CPU's memory channel is shared with the system, so heavy multi-threaded loads may contend.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent since no measured FPS data exists. However, the percentile gap — 90 for CPU versus 61 for GPU — implies that upgrading the GPU would yield larger gaming gains than upgrading the CPU. Conversely, users who run CPU-heavy workloads would see negligible benefit from a faster GPU. The 8 GB VRAM is a specific constraint: at 1080p ultra settings, some titles will exceed this capacity, causing texture thrashing and frame drops. The 128-bit bus exacerbates this, as the 272.0 GB/s bandwidth is lower than many competing cards.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so the following is estimated from the benchmark scores. The RTX 4060's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2302, Passmark G3D score of 19545, and 61st percentile ranking point to a card that handles 1080p well. The CPU's 4338 Passmark single-thread score and 4455 Cinebench R23 single-core score indicate no meaningful bottleneck at that resolution. Expect 60+ FPS in most esports titles at 1080p ultra, with demanding AAA games dropping to 40-60 FPS depending on optimization. The 8 GB VRAM will require texture quality reductions in titles with large texture packs.

At 1440p, the GPU becomes the clear limiter. The 272.0 GB/s bandwidth and 8 GB frame buffer will force lower settings to maintain playable frame rates. DLSS, enabled by the 96 tensor cores, can recover some performance, but the 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is below what modern 1440p titles demand for high refresh rates. At 4K, the card is not viable for anything beyond esports titles at low settings. The CPU's 90th percentile performance means it will not bottleneck the GPU at any resolution; the GPU's 61st percentile is the ceiling.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU's 4338 single-thread score and 5.30 GHz boost clock support high frame rates in CPU-bound titles, but the GPU's 61st percentile ranking limits overall FPS. At 1080p, this pair can drive 144 Hz monitors in competitive games like esports shooters, provided the GPU's 8 GB VRAM is not exceeded. The 24 RT cores enable ray tracing at reduced settings, while DLSS can boost frame rates in supported titles.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 threads handle game capture and encoding simultaneously, with the GPU's NVENC offloading video encoding. The 35 W CPU TDP keeps thermals low, but the 8 GB VRAM may struggle with game capture at high resolutions. Passmark data compression score of 370158 indicates fast data handling for stream overlays and chat.

Video Editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31558 accelerates timeline rendering and export. The GPU's 95057 Geekbench OpenCL score provides GPU acceleration for effects, but the 8 GB VRAM limits 4K multi-layer edits. The 272.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p ProRes and H.264 workflows.

3D Rendering: The CPU's 20 threads and 129817 floating-point math score shine in CPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles. The GPU's 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 throughput helps with GPU-accelerated renders, but the 8 GB VRAM will cap scene complexity. Passmark GPU compute score of 9213 indicates moderate compute capability.

Software Development: The 20 threads and 37084 Passmark multi-thread score speed up compilation and test execution. The 30 MB L3 cache aids in large codebase caching. The GPU is irrelevant for most development but supports basic graphics acceleration for UI and debugging tools.

Student and Office Work: The 35 W TDP allows for quiet, low-power systems. The CPU's 4338 single-thread score ensures responsive office applications, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provides display output without the discrete GPU, though the RTX 4060 is present for any graphics tasks.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T ranks at the 90th percentile against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 47697.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 4060 have and is it enough?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 272.0 GB/s bandwidth. This is sufficient for 1080p gaming but may require texture reductions in VRAM-heavy titles.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 300 W, given the CPU's 35 W TDP and GPU's 115 W TDP. The GPU requires a single 12-pin power connector.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, ECC memory is not supported. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock and core count?

A: The CPU has 20 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 1.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The multiplier is locked.

Q: How does the RTX 4060 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score is 17639, which is within 0.7% of the AMD Radeon HD 7790, Radeon 780M, Radeon Pro 560, and Radeon Pro 460. It ranks at the 61st percentile.

Q: What is the CPU's architecture and process node?

A: The CPU uses the Arrow Lake architecture (Arrow Lake-S codename) on TSMC's 3 nm process, containing 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark suite is comprehensive. Cinebench R23 multi-core scores 31558, single-core scores 4455. Cinebench R20 scores 13254 multi-core and 1871 single-core. Cinebench R15 scores 3180 multi-core and 449 single-core. Passmark scores include multi-thread 37084, single-thread 4338, integer math 104943, floating-point math 129817, extended instructions 28609, data compression 370158, data encryption 29687, random string sorting 44400, physics 2391, and prime numbers 322. The average benchmark score is 47697, placing it at the 90th percentile. Nearest rivals are within 0.5%: AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 (47527, 0.4% behind), AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D (47908, 0.4% ahead), AMD Ryzen 9 3900 (47918, 0.5% ahead), and Intel Core Ultra X9 378H (47468, 0.5% behind).

The GPU's benchmarks show 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 2302, Geekbench OpenCL at 95057, and Geekbench Vulkan at 48643. Passmark scores include G3D at 19545, G2D at 1037, GPU compute at 9213, DirectX 10 at 103, DirectX 11 at 175, DirectX 12 at 76, and DirectX 9 at 236. The average benchmark score is 17639, placing it at the 61st percentile. Nearest rivals are within 0.7%: AMD Radeon HD 7790 (17666, 0.2% ahead), AMD Radeon 780M (17588, 0.3% behind), AMD Radeon Pro 560 (17551, 0.5% behind), and AMD Radeon Pro 460 (17509, 0.7% behind).

The combined picture is a system with a top-decile CPU and a mid-range GPU. The combined percentile is 76. The CPU outperforms 90% of all processors, while the GPU outperforms 61% of all GPUs. This asymmetry means the platform is CPU-dominant for productivity, but GPU-limited for gaming. The absence of measured FPS data for this exact pair is notable; the benchmark scores indicate the CPU will not bottleneck the GPU, but the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth cap performance at 1080p. The CPU's 35 W TDP is extraordinary for its 90th percentile performance, making this an efficient choice for multi-threaded workloads, while the GPU's 115 W TDP and 300 W suggested PSU keep the system power budget modest.