SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

84 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
74%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265T

47,697 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM presents a striking asymmetry: the CPU sits at the 90th percentile among all processors, while the GPU rests at exactly the 50th percentile. This 40-percentile gap immediately signals that the graphics card is the limiting factor in most scenarios. The CPU's average benchmark score of 47,697 places it within 0.5% of four rival processors—the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945, Ryzen 9 7900X3D, Ryzen 9 3900, and Intel Core Ultra X9 378H—indicating a mature, well-balanced compute design. Meanwhile, the GPU's percentile rank of 50 means half of all discrete graphics cards outperform it.

The bottleneck dynamic is workload-dependent. In CPU-bound tasks like data compression (Passmark score of 370,158), encryption (29,687), and integer math (104,943), the 265T's 20 cores and 20 threads run at full capacity, and the GPU's role is negligible. Conversely, in GPU-bound workloads such as high-resolution gaming or 3D rendering with ray tracing, the RTX 3070 TiM's 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth become the ceiling. The CPU's 5.30 GHz boost clock and 1.50 GHz base clock provide ample headroom, but the GPU's boost clock of 1410 MHz and 16.60 TFLOPS FP32 throughput will saturate long before the processor reaches its limits in graphics-heavy tasks.

FPS scaling evidence, though estimated since no measured frames exist for this combination, follows predictable patterns. At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,455) can keep up with the GPU's output, so frame rates scale primarily with GPU load. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the dominant constraint, and the CPU's utilization drops. The 35W TDP of the processor versus the 220W TDP of the graphics card further emphasizes this split: the CPU is efficiency-focused, while the GPU draws significant power to sustain its performance tier.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM is built on the Ampere architecture using Samsung's 8 nm process, with a GA104 chip containing 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die. The memory subsystem comprises 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a mid-range configuration by modern standards, and the 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs confirms its position as an average performer. The base clock of 915 MHz and boost clock of 1410 MHz are modest, but the 184 texture mapping units and 96 raster output pipelines provide balanced throughput for traditional rasterization.

Ray tracing and tensor hardware are present but not overwhelming. The 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores enable DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) features, including hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS. The FP32 throughput of 16.60 TFLOPS, with FP16 operating at the same 16.60 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), indicates that the card handles both precision formats equally. Pixel rate of 135.4 GPixel/s and texture rate of 259.4 GTexel/s suggest the card can sustain high fill rates in less demanding titles, but the 8 GB VRAM capacity will become a limitation in texture-heavy modern games at higher resolutions.

The card's physical specifications—270 mm length, 140 mm height, and 55 mm width (triple-slot)—mean it requires substantial case clearance. Power delivery uses a single 8-pin connector, and the 220W TDP aligns with a 550W suggested PSU. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface matches the CPU's Gen 5 capability but operates at the older standard, which is sufficient for this performance class. Display outputs include one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 1.4a ports, supporting high refresh rates on modern monitors. The card is marked as end-of-life production, with the GeForce 40 series as its successor, which explains its mid-pack percentile standing.

Benchmark scores for the GPU are absent from the data, meaning its performance can only be inferred from its architectural specifications and percentile rank. The 50th percentile placement suggests it delivers average frame rates across a broad spectrum of games, with the 8 GB VRAM being the most probable bottleneck in future titles designed for larger memory pools.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's overall performance percentile?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T ranks in the 90th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 47,697. This places it in the top 10% of processors, competing closely with the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D (deltaPct -0.4%) and AMD Ryzen 9 3900 (deltaPct -0.5%).

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 3070 TiM have, and what memory type is used?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This configuration is typical for mid-range cards and may limit performance in VRAM-intensive applications.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No. The multiplier is locked (multiplierUnlocked is false), meaning users cannot adjust the clock multiplier to overclock. The CPU does have a boost clock of 5.30 GHz from a 1.50 GHz base, so it relies on automatic boosting rather than manual tuning.

Q: What socket does the CPU use, and what memory does it support?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1851 and supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. ECC memory is not supported.

Q: Does the GPU support modern graphics APIs?

A: Yes, the RTX 3070 TiM supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. This ensures compatibility with current and upcoming game titles that utilize these APIs.

Q: What is the CPU's process node and transistor count?

A: The CPU is fabricated on a 3 nm process by TSMC, containing 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. This advanced node contributes to its 35W TDP, making it highly power-efficient.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival in multi-core performance?

A: The closest rival is the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945, with a deltaPct of 0.4% (the Intel CPU is slightly ahead). The Intel Core Ultra X9 378H trails by 0.5%, while the Ryzen 9 7900X3D leads by 0.4%. These differences are within noise, indicating near-identical multi-core performance.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need strong CPU compute power but can accept average GPU performance. Content creators working with large datasets—such as data compression tasks scoring 370,158 on Passmark—will find the 20-core processor invaluable for encoding, archiving, and batch processing. Software developers compiling code or running virtual machines benefit from the 20 threads and high single-thread score of 4,338, which handles both parallel builds and interactive workloads smoothly. Students in engineering or data science programs can leverage the CPU's 90th percentile rank for simulations and analysis, while the GPU handles visualization tasks adequately.

Small business workstations that run database queries, spreadsheet calculations, or accounting software will see excellent CPU responsiveness, with integer math scoring 104,943 and floating-point operations at 129,817. The 35W TDP makes the CPU suitable for compact, power-conscious builds that don't sacrifice processing capability. Gamers at 1080p will find the RTX 3070 TiM's 50th percentile performance sufficient for most titles, though those seeking 1440p or 4K gaming should look at higher-tier GPUs. The CPU's 90th percentile ensures that no gaming scenario will be CPU-limited, making this a balanced choice for esports and competitive titles where frame rates are high but GPU demands are moderate.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T, part of the Core Ultra Series 2, is a desktop processor with 20 cores and 20 threads—no hyper-threading—based on the Arrow Lake architecture. Fabricated on TSMC's 3 nm process, it contains 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The base clock of 1.50 GHz is low, reflecting a power-efficient design, but the boost clock of 5.30 GHz provides substantial single-thread performance when needed. The 35W TDP is remarkably low for a 20-core chip, making it suitable for systems where thermal output and energy consumption are priorities.

Cache hierarchy includes 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB shared L3. This configuration supports high-bandwidth access to frequently used data, which is reflected in the Cinebench scores: multi-core R23 of 31,558 and single-core R23 of 4,455. The R20 multi-core score of 13,254 and single-core of 1,871 demonstrate consistent scaling across workloads. Passmark results show strong performance in data compression (370,158), encryption (29,687), and extended instructions (28,609), but the prime number finding score of 322 is relatively modest, indicating that integer-heavy algorithms may not be the chip's forte.

The CPU's 90th percentile ranking means it outperforms 90% of all processors, yet its nearest rivals are separated by less than 1% in average score. This suggests the 265T is not a performance outlier but rather a well-optimized mainstream processor. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provides basic display output without a discrete GPU, though it is not intended for gaming. Memory support is limited to DDR5, dual-channel, with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth, which is modest for a high-core-count chip but adequate for its power envelope. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 20 CPU lanes offers modern connectivity for storage and expansion.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all gaming figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU's 90th percentile and the GPU's 50th percentile create a scenario where the GPU dictates gaming performance. At 1080p, the RTX 3070 TiM's 16.60 TFLOPS FP32 and 259.4 GTexel/s texture rate should deliver high frame rates in most titles, with the CPU's single-core score of 4,455 preventing any processor-induced stutters. Esports titles like first-person shooters and MOBAs will likely run at well over 100 FPS, as they are typically GPU-bound at this resolution.

At 1440p, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM becomes a more significant factor. Games with high-resolution textures may approach the memory limit, causing texture streaming or reduced quality settings. The 448.0 GB/s bandwidth helps mitigate this, but it is below the threshold for heavy 1440p usage. Frame rates will drop proportionally to the increased pixel count, likely landing in the 60-90 FPS range for AAA titles. The CPU's 20 threads ensure that background tasks, such as game recording or streaming, do not impact frame pacing.

At 4K, the GPU's 50th percentile rank becomes the hard bottleneck. The pixel rate of 135.4 GPixel/s and 8 GB VRAM are insufficient for consistent 60 FPS at ultra settings in modern games. Users would need to reduce settings to medium or high and possibly rely on upscaling technologies. The CPU's performance is irrelevant at this resolution, as the GPU is saturated. Overall, this pairing is best suited for 1080p gaming with high refresh rates, or 1440p with adjusted settings, but it is not a 4K gaming solution.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming at 1080p: The CPU's single-core score of 4,455 and the GPU's 16.60 TFLOPS should sustain high frame rates, though the 50th percentile GPU may not reach the very highest refresh rates in demanding titles.

Streaming: The 20-core CPU handles encoding and streaming software without strain, while the GPU's NVENC (via tensor cores) offloads video encoding. The 35W CPU TDP ensures thermal headroom for prolonged streaming sessions.

Video editing: The CPU's multi-core R23 score of 31,558 accelerates rendering and export, while the GPU's 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p or light 4K editing. The 448.0 GB/s bandwidth moves timeline data efficiently.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering (e.g., Blender Cycles) benefits from the 20 threads, but GPU rendering will be limited by the 50th percentile card. Expect moderate performance for final-frame renders.

Software development: The CPU's integer math score of 104,943 and data compression of 370,158 speed up compilation and package management, while the GPU is adequate for UI rendering and minor graphics tasks.

Student and office work: The CPU's 90th percentile ensures snappy response in spreadsheets, documents, and web browsing. The low 35W TDP reduces noise and heat, making it ideal for quiet study environments.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T, a 20-core Arrow Lake processor, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM, an Ampere-based graphics card. The combined percentile ranks at 70, reflecting a system that excels in CPU tasks but is average in GPU performance. The CPU's 90th percentile and the GPU's 50th percentile create an imbalance where the processor is overqualified for the graphics card in gaming scenarios but well-matched for productivity workloads. The 35W CPU TDP versus the 220W GPU TDP highlights the divergent design philosophies: one is efficiency-optimized, the other is performance-oriented at a moderate level. This pairing is best characterized as a workstation-class CPU with a mid-range gaming GPU, suitable for users who prioritize compute performance over gaming frame rates.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 47,697, placing it in the 90th percentile. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945, scores 47,527 (deltaPct 0.4%), meaning the Intel chip is 0.4% faster. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D scores 47,908 (deltaPct -0.4%), so the Intel chip is 0.4% slower. The AMD Ryzen 9 3900 scores 47,918 (deltaPct -0.5%), and the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H scores 47,468 (deltaPct 0.5%). These tight margins indicate the 265T is competitive with previous-generation high-end processors, though not a clear leader. Detailed scores include Cinebench R15 multi-core 3,180 and single-core 449; R20 multi-core 13,254 and single-core 1,871; R23 multi-core 31,558 and single-core 4,455. Passmark results show multi-thread 37,084, single-thread 4,338, floating-point math 129,817, and integer math 104,943.

The GPU has no benchmark scores in the data, so its performance is defined solely by its 50th percentile rank. This means it is exactly average among all GPUs, with no nearest rivals to compare against. The combined picture is a system that is dramatically stronger in CPU-bound tasks than GPU-bound ones. The 70th combined percentile reflects this skew: it is above average overall, but the GPU drags the system down from what the CPU alone could achieve. For a balanced assessment, the CPU is a top-tier performer, while the GPU is a middle-of-the-road component that will not bottleneck productivity but will limit gaming at higher resolutions.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1851, which is specific to the Core Ultra Series 2. Memory support is DDR5 in dual-channel mode, with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth. The platform offers PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes, enabling fast NVMe storage and future expansion cards. The 35W TDP means the CPU can be cooled by modest air coolers or compact liquid coolers, and the motherboard's power delivery does not need to be overbuilt. ECC memory is not supported, so users requiring error correction must look elsewhere.

The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward-compatible with the CPU's Gen 5 slots. The 220W TDP and 550W suggested PSU leave headroom for the CPU and other components, but a higher-capacity PSU would be needed for future GPU upgrades. The card is end-of-life, so upgrading to a newer GeForce 40 series card would require checking power connector compatibility (the current card uses a single 8-pin) and physical clearance (the card is 270 mm long and triple-slot). The CPU's 90th percentile ensures it will not bottleneck a more powerful GPU, making a GPU swap the most sensible next step. Alternatively, users could add more RAM (up to the motherboard's maximum) or additional Gen 5 NVMe storage without changing the CPU. The platform's active production status ensures ongoing BIOS and driver support, though the CPU's locked multiplier limits overclocking. A sensible upgrade path is to replace the RTX 3070 TiM with a higher-tier GPU when budget allows, as the CPU has ample headroom to support it.