SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265T + Intel Arc B580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265T

47,697 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B580

23,021 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T and Intel Arc B580 pairing presents an interesting balance profile. The CPU sits at the 90th percentile among all processors, while the GPU occupies the 68th percentile among all graphics cards. This 22-percentile gap suggests the processor is the stronger component in this pairing, meaning the Arc B580 will typically be the limiting factor in most workloads. In gaming, the GPU will almost certainly be the bottleneck at higher resolutions, while the CPU's substantial headroom means it can feed frames without holding back the graphics card in most scenarios.

The CPU's 20 cores and 20 threads, combined with a 35W TDP, indicate a power-efficient design that can sustain heavy multithreaded loads without thermal throttling concerns. The Arc B580, with its 190W TDP, draws significantly more power and will be the primary source of system heat. The lack of measured FPS data for this exact combination means bottleneck analysis must rely on benchmark scores alone, which show a clear division of labor: the CPU excels at compute-heavy tasks like physics and compression, while the GPU handles graphics rendering and parallel compute workloads.

In CPU-bound scenarios, such as physics calculations and data compression, the Core Ultra 7 265T demonstrates strong performance with a PassMark physics score of 2391 and a data compression score of 370158. These scores indicate the processor can handle complex simulations and data-intensive tasks without becoming a limiting factor. Conversely, the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 15748 shows it is well-equipped for graphics rendering but will cap frame rates in GPU-bound gaming scenarios. The combined percentile of 79 for this pairing reflects a system where the CPU has more headroom than the GPU, making it suitable for workloads that demand both strong single-threaded and multithreaded performance.

# Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T delivers strong benchmark results across multiple testing suites. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 31558 in multicore and 4455 in single-core tests. These numbers place it in the 90th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 47697. Compared to its nearest rivals, the Core Ultra 7 265T is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945, which scores 47527 (a 0.4% difference), and the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D, which scores 47908 (a -0.4% difference). The Intel Core Ultra X9 378H scores 47468, putting it 0.5% behind, while the AMD Ryzen 9 3900 scores 47918, 0.5% ahead. This clustering shows the 265T is competitive with high-end desktop processors from both Intel and AMD.

The Arc B580 GPU posts a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3068 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 109672. Its average benchmark score is 23021, placing it at the 68th percentile among all GPUs. The nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP (23061, -0.2% difference), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (22895, 0.6% difference), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (23172, -0.7% difference), and NVIDIA P106-100 (23249, -1% difference). The close margins between these scores indicate the Arc B580 performs in a similar tier to several established graphics cards, though it trails the RTX 3080 slightly in average score.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU outperforms the GPU relative to their respective markets. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking means it competes with top-tier processors, while the GPU's 68th percentile places it in the upper-midrange segment. In practical terms, this system can handle demanding productivity tasks through the CPU's strong multicore performance, while the GPU provides competent but not flagship-level graphics capability. The PassMark multithread score of 37084 and single-thread score of 4338 further confirm the CPU's balanced performance profile, capable of both high-frequency single-core tasks and heavy parallel workloads.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc B580's 68th percentile ranking suggests it can drive moderate refresh rates at 1080p or 1440p, though the lack of measured FPS data means exact expectations are estimates. The CPU's strong single-core Cinebench R23 score of 4455 ensures it won't bottleneck frame delivery in most titles.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 cores and 20 threads provide ample parallel processing headroom for encoding and streaming overlays. The PassMark data encryption score of 29687 indicates solid cryptographic performance for stream security, while the GPU's 12 GB VRAM can handle the frame buffer requirements of simultaneous gaming and encoding.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 31558 demonstrates strong rendering performance for video exports. The CPU's data compression score of 370158 and integer math score of 104943 support fast codec operations and timeline processing. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth can accelerate effects and preview rendering.

3D rendering: The CPU's floating point math score of 129817 and the GPU's FP32 throughput of 13.67 TFLOPS combine for respectable rendering times in CPU and GPU renderers. The 20-core processor handles viewport simulation and scene preparation, while the GPU accelerates final frame rendering. The system sits at the 79th combined percentile, indicating it can handle professional rendering workloads with reasonable efficiency.

Software development: The CPU's strong multithreaded performance accelerates compilation and testing pipelines. The PassMark integer math score of 104943 and random string sorting score of 44400 suggest fast build times and efficient data processing. The 30 MB shared L3 cache helps with frequently accessed code modules.

Student and office work: The 35W TDP CPU ensures low power draw during everyday tasks, while the integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU provides a fallback display output. The PassMark single-thread score of 4338 delivers responsive application performance for document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheet work. The GPU's compute capabilities are overkill for office tasks but provide headroom for future needs.

# Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need strong CPU performance without requiring flagship GPU capability. Gamers at 1080p or 1440p resolution will find the Arc B580's 68th percentile ranking sufficient for smooth gameplay, while the CPU's 90th percentile ensures no processor-induced frame drops. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 31558, which handles export and simulation tasks efficiently.

Software developers will appreciate the 20-core, 20-thread configuration for parallel builds and testing. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 37084 demonstrates strong throughput for compilation workloads. Students and professionals needing a reliable workstation for general productivity will find the system's balance suitable, with the low 35W CPU TDP keeping energy costs minimal during long work sessions.

Small business workstations requiring data processing capabilities will benefit from the CPU's data compression score of 370158 and encryption score of 29687. The system's 79th combined percentile places it above most mainstream configurations, making it suitable for demanding business applications. However, users seeking maximum GPU performance for 4K gaming or heavy AI workloads should note the Arc B580's 68th percentile ranking and consider a more powerful graphics solution.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from benchmark scores. The Arc B580's PassMark G3D score of 15748 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3068 suggest it can handle modern titles at 1080p with high settings and at 1440p with medium to high settings, depending on the game's optimization.

At 1080p, the CPU's strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 score of 4455) ensures high frame rates in CPU-bound titles like esports games. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM provides adequate memory buffer for high-resolution textures. At 1440p, the GPU becomes the primary limiting factor, with frame rates scaling down from 1080p results. The 68th percentile GPU ranking places it below enthusiast-tier cards, so users should expect playable but not extreme frame rates in demanding titles.

The GPU's support for DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4 ensures compatibility with modern game APIs. The 20 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing capability, though performance will be modest compared to higher-tier GPUs. The 456.0 GB/s memory bandwidth helps maintain texture streaming performance in open-world games. Users targeting high-refresh monitors (144Hz or above) should stick to 1080p resolution and lower graphical settings to achieve the necessary frame rates.

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B580 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture using TSMC's 5 nm process, featuring 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base and boost clock of 2670 MHz, with memory clocked at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective). The 12 GB GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus provides 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is competitive for the GPU's performance tier.

The GPU contains 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 80 render output units. The pixel rate of 213.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 427.2 GTexel/s support high-resolution rendering with detailed textures. The FP32 throughput of 13.67 TFLOPS and FP16 of 27.34 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) provide solid compute performance for general-purpose GPU tasks. The 20 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the GPU's 68th percentile ranking suggests ray tracing performance will be moderate.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3068 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 109672 indicate the GPU handles modern graphics APIs well. The PassMark G3D score of 15748 places it at the 68th percentile, with nearest rivals including the RTX 2080 (22895) and RTX 3080 (23172). The GPU's 190W TDP and 450W suggested PSU rating make it suitable for mid-range systems. The dual-slot design and 272 mm length require adequate case clearance, while the 1x 8-pin power connector simplifies installation.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T features 20 cores and 20 threads based on the Arrow Lake architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 3 nm process. The processor includes 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. Base clock is 1.50 GHz with a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, providing a wide frequency range for both efficiency and performance. The 35W TDP makes it a power-efficient choice for desktop systems.

Cache configuration includes 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB shared L3 cache. Memory support includes dual-channel DDR5 with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth. PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes provides fast connectivity for modern GPUs and NVMe storage. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU offers basic display output capability, though the discrete Arc B580 handles graphics duties.

Benchmark results show strong performance across various workloads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 31558 and single-core score of 4455 demonstrate balanced capability. PassMark tests reveal specific strengths: floating point math (129817), integer math (104943), and multithread score (37084) all indicate robust compute performance. The 90th percentile ranking places it among the top processors, with nearest rivals including the Ryzen 9 7900X3D (47908 avg score) and Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 (47527 avg score). The data compression score of 370158 and encryption score of 29687 show strong throughput for data-intensive applications.

# Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T with the Intel Arc B580, creating a system that prioritizes CPU performance while providing competent graphics capability. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking among all processors and the GPU's 68th percentile ranking among all graphics cards result in a combined percentile of 79. This places the system in the upper-midrange tier, suitable for demanding productivity tasks and mainstream gaming.

The Core Ultra 7 265T's 20 cores and 20 threads, combined with a 5.30 GHz boost clock, deliver strong performance for multithreaded applications. The 35W TDP ensures efficient operation, making this an attractive option for users who run long-duration workloads. The Arc B580's 12 GB VRAM and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth provide adequate graphics memory for modern games and creative applications.

The system uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform with DDR5 memory support and PCIe Gen 5 connectivity. The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, which provides sufficient bandwidth for its performance level. The build class is desktop, indicating a traditional tower form factor. The launch MSRP for the CPU is $384, and the GPU launch MSRP is 249 USD. This pairing represents a balanced configuration for users who need strong computational performance without requiring top-tier graphics power.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile among all processors?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T sits at the 90th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 47697.

Q: How does the Arc B580 compare to the RTX 3080 in benchmark scores?

A: The Arc B580 has an average benchmark score of 23021, while the RTX 3080 scores 23172, putting the Arc B580 0.7% behind.

Q: What memory bandwidth does the Arc B580 provide?

A: The GPU has 456.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth from 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus.

Q: How many cores and threads does the Core Ultra 7 265T have?

A: The CPU has 20 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 1.50 GHz and boost clock of 5.30 GHz.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The system achieves a combined percentile of 79, reflecting the CPU's 90th percentile and GPU's 68th percentile rankings.

Q: Does the Arc B580 support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU includes 20 RT cores, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the TDP of the Core Ultra 7 265T?

A: The CPU has a 35W TDP, making it a power-efficient processor for desktop use.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265T + Intel Arc B580

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 265T

Intel Arc B580

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds