SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

95%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF

71,910 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

37,648 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 form a desktop pairing aimed at high-performance gaming and productivity. However, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussions below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not empirical game testing results. The data provided indicates that this is a robust combination of a top-tier CPU and a strong upper-midrange GPU, with the final gaming experience dependent on resolution and title demands.

Gaming Performance

Since no measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU and GPU pairing, the gaming performance is estimated based on the synthetic benchmark scores. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance (Geekbench single-core score of 2759 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 7021) suggests it can feed the GPU effectively at high frame rates, while the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 26927 places it in the 81st percentile of all GPUs. In practical terms, this means the combination should deliver excellent performance at 1440p and respectable performance at 4K, with the RTX 4070’s 12 GB of VRAM acting as a potential limit at the highest resolutions and texture settings.

At 1080p, the CPU’s high boost clock of 5.50 GHz and strong single-core scores would likely allow the GPU to reach its maximum output, making this pairing well-suited for high-refresh-rate monitors. The GPU’s Passmark DirectX 12 score of 103 and DirectX 11 score of 244, while difficult to translate directly to FPS, indicate a card that handles modern APIs well. The RTX 4070’s 29.15 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 504.2 GB/s memory bandwidth suggest it can handle most titles at ultra settings with ray tracing enabled, though the 192-bit memory bus might cause minor stuttering in VRAM-heavy scenes at 4K. At 1440p, the sweet spot for this pairing, the combination of the CPU’s 94th percentile ranking and the GPU’s 81st percentile ranking should produce a balanced experience where neither component consistently bottlenecks the other.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 71910 places it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, a dominant position. It outperforms the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX by 0.2% (71797) and the Intel Xeon Platinum 8270 by 0.8% (71370), while sitting slightly behind the Intel Xeon 6517P by -0.6% (72350) and the Intel Xeon 6724P by -0.7% (72396). These deltas are minimal, indicating the 265KF trades blows with enterprise-class Xeon processors in multi-threaded workloads. In single-core performance, the Geekbench score of 2759 and Cinebench R23 score of 7021 confirm that this is one of the fastest consumer desktop CPUs available for tasks that rely on low-latency, high-frequency execution.

The GPU’s average benchmark score of 37648 places it in the 81st percentile of all GPUs. It is nearly identical to the NVIDIA Tesla P4 (37628, 0.1% delta) and the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 (37507, 0.4% delta), while trailing the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile by -1.3% (38135) and beating the AMD Radeon PRO W6400 by 1.3% (37157). This shows the RTX 4070 is a solid performer, though not a class leader. Combined, the pairing’s percentile is 88, reflecting a strong overall system that excels in CPU-bound tasks and handles GPU-bound tasks with competence, though the CPU is clearly the more powerful component relative to its peers.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF is a 20-core, 20-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, built on a 3 nm process at TSMC. It has a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, with a TDP of 125 W. The lack of hyper-threading (20 threads for 20 cores) is notable, but the high core count and clock speeds compensate in multi-threaded workloads. The CPU features 30 MB of shared L3 cache and 3 MB of L2 cache per core, alongside 192 KB of L1 cache per core. Memory support is limited to DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, providing a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

In multi-threaded benchmarks, the 265KF scores 49736 in Cinebench R23 and 20889 in Cinebench R20, placing it in the 94th percentile. This indicates excellent performance for video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The Passmark multithread score of 58518 and integer math score of 143351 further underscore its capability in parallel workloads. For single-threaded tasks, the Geekbench score of 2759 and Cinebench R23 score of 7021 are elite, making it ideal for gaming, spreadsheet calculations, and other latency-sensitive applications. The Passmark single-thread score of 4928 confirms this strength. The CPU’s data encryption score of 48198 and compression score of 666589 suggest it handles security and archiving tasks with ease. The extended instructions score of 54513 indicates strong AVX-512 and related workload performance, which benefits scientific computing and certain content creation applications. The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1851 and supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, providing ample bandwidth for the latest GPUs and NVMe storage.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need both high-end gaming capability and substantial multi-threaded processing power. Gamers at 1440p will find this an ideal balance, as the CPU’s 94th percentile ranking ensures no frame pacing issues, while the GPU’s 81st percentile ranking handles modern titles at high settings. At 1080p, the CPU becomes overkill for most games, but this configuration future-proofs the system for upcoming titles. For 4K gaming, the GPU’s 12 GB VRAM and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth will manage most games, though the 192-bit bus may limit performance in the most demanding scenarios. Content creators, particularly video editors and 3D artists, will benefit from the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 49736, which accelerates rendering and encoding tasks. The GPU’s 29.15 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 46 RT cores make it suitable for GPU-accelerated rendering in Blender or Octane, though the 12 GB VRAM is a moderate constraint for large scenes.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the CPU’s Passmark integer math score of 143351 and multithread score of 58518, which reduce build times. Students and small business workstations that run virtual machines or heavy spreadsheets will find the CPU’s 20 cores and high single-thread score of 7021 (Cinebench R23) provide a responsive experience. The CPU’s lack of integrated graphics means a discrete GPU is mandatory, which the RTX 4070 fulfills, but this also means the system is not suitable for office tasks without the GPU active. The build’s combined percentile of 88 indicates it sits above most systems, making it a strong choice for enthusiasts who want a single machine for both work and play.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a system where the CPU is significantly stronger than the GPU relative to their respective markets. The CPU’s 94th percentile versus the GPU’s 81st percentile creates a potential CPU headroom situation, where the processor can outpace the graphics card in many workloads. In gaming, this means the RTX 4070 will typically be the limiting factor, especially at higher resolutions where GPU load increases. The CPU’s single-core score of 2759 (Geekbench) is so high that it is unlikely to bottleneck the GPU at 1080p or 1440p, but at 4K, the GPU’s VRAM capacity and memory bandwidth become the primary constraints. Evidence from the benchmarks suggests that in CPU-bound scenarios, such as e-sports titles at low settings, the system will perform exceptionally well, but in GPU-bound scenarios like 4K with ray tracing, the GPU will hold back the CPU’s potential.

In productivity workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU’s Passmark multithread score of 58518 is 2.17 times its single-thread score of 4928, indicating strong scaling across cores. For tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering, the CPU is the dominant component, and the GPU’s role is secondary. However, for GPU-accelerated rendering, the RTX 4070’s compute score of 14720 (Passmark GPU compute) and 29.15 TFLOPS FP32 become the limiting factor. The GPU’s nearest rival, the RTX 4080 Mobile, scores 1.3% higher on average, showing that the 4070 is close to that mobile part but not a top-tier desktop GPU. This indicates that for pure compute tasks, the CPU will wait on the GPU, but for general productivity, the CPU is the star.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is based on the Ada Lovelace architecture and the AD104 chip, built on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It features 5888 shading units, 184 tensor cores, and 46 RT cores, with a base clock of 1920 MHz and a boost clock of 2475 MHz. The memory subsystem consists of 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus, providing 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU’s pixel rate is 158.4 GPixel/s and its texture rate is 455.4 GTexel/s, which are solid figures for its class. The 29.15 TFLOPS FP32 performance is the same as the FP16 rate, indicating a 1:1 ratio that is common in consumer cards.

In benchmarks, the RTX 4070 scores 26927 in Passmark G3D and 14720 in Passmark GPU compute. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 154858 and Vulkan score of 174152 show strong cross-API performance. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3854 indicates it handles modern DirectX 12 titles well. The GPU’s 81st percentile ranking places it below the RTX 4080 Mobile by a 1.3% margin, but above the RX Vega 56 by 0.4% and the Radeon PRO W6400 by 1.3%. For rendering, the 12 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p and 1440p scenes, but 4K textures or heavy ray tracing may exceed this capacity. The 46 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced lighting, and the 184 tensor cores enable DLSS, which can boost frame rates in supported titles. The GPU has a TDP of 200 W and requires a 550 W power supply, with a dual-slot cooler and a single 16-pin power connector. It supports PCIe 4.0 x16 and outputs 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, making it compatible with modern displays. The production status is end-of-life, meaning it is no longer in active production, but its benchmark scores remain relevant for comparison.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU’s 7021 Cinebench R23 single-core score ensures high frame rates in competitive titles, while the GPU’s 2475 MHz boost clock and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth handle the rendering load. Expect the GPU to be the bottleneck, but the CPU will not hold it back.

Streaming: The CPU’s 20 cores and Passmark multithread score of 58518 allow simultaneous game encoding and streaming without significant frame drops. The GPU’s NVENC encoder (implied by the Ada Lovelace architecture) offloads the encoding task, though the data does not specify its capabilities.

Video editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 49736 accelerates timeline rendering and export times. The GPU’s 12 GB VRAM handles 4K previews and effects, but the 192-bit bus may slow down large multi-layer projects.

3D rendering: In CPU-based renderers, the 265KF’s 20 cores provide excellent performance, as shown by its Passmark floating point math score of 189431. For GPU-based renderers, the RTX 4070’s 29.15 TFLOPS FP32 and 46 RT cores are capable, but the 12 GB VRAM limits scene complexity.

Software development: The CPU’s Passmark integer math score of 143351 and data compression score of 666589 speed up code compilation and repository operations. The high single-thread score of 4928 (Passmark) also improves IDE responsiveness.

Student and office work: The CPU’s Geekbench single-core score of 2759 ensures snappy application launches, while the 20 cores handle multitasking. The GPU is overkill for office tasks, but the lack of integrated graphics means it is always active, which is fine for most productivity suites.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass: desktop) combining the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF, a 20-core Arrow Lake-S processor, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070, an Ada Lovelace-based GPU. The CPU is a top-tier desktop part with a 94th percentile ranking, while the GPU is a strong upper-midrange card with an 81st percentile ranking. The combined percentile is 88, indicating an overall system that outperforms the vast majority of configurations. The CPU’s launch MSRP was $379, and the GPU’s launch MSRP was $599, though these are historical values and not reflective of current market prices. This pairing is suited for users who prioritize CPU performance for productivity while still wanting a capable GPU for gaming. The CPU’s 125 W TDP and the GPU’s 200 W TDP suggest a system that requires a robust cooling solution and a 550 W power supply, as recommended for the GPU. The build lacks integrated graphics, so the GPU is essential for any display output. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, meaning the GPU will run at its full bandwidth without issue.

FAQ

Q: Does this build have integrated graphics?

A: No, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF has no integrated graphics (N/A), so the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is required for any video output.

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The CPU has 20 cores and 20 threads, meaning it does not support hyper-threading, but the high core count compensates for this in multi-threaded workloads.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and what type is it?

A: The GPU has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The CPU has a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, with a base clock of 3.90 GHz.

Q: Is the GPU still in production?

A: No, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 has a production status of "End-of-life," meaning it is no longer manufactured, though it remains available in the market.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this GPU?

A: The GPU’s suggested PSU is 550 W, and it uses a single 16-pin power connector.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF has an average benchmark score of 71910, which is 0.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX’s score of 71797.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds