SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF + Intel Arc B580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF

71,910 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B580

23,021 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF and Intel Arc B580 pairing represents a specific configuration within the desktop market, combining a high-core-count processor with a discrete graphics card. This analysis is based entirely on synthetic benchmark data, as no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK. Consequently, all gaming performance discussions are framed as estimates derived from the component scores, not from direct gameplay testing. The data shows a system that occupies a distinct position in the performance hierarchy, with the CPU ranking in the 94th percentile and the GPU in the 68th percentile, resulting in a combined percentile of 81.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data is available for this specific CPU and GPU pairing, so all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the individual components. The Intel Arc B580's performance, as indicated by its benchmark results, suggests it is capable of handling modern titles, but the exact frame rates will vary significantly depending on resolution, game optimization, and CPU overhead. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 15748 and its percentile ranking of 68 against all GPUs indicate a mid-to-upper-tier graphics solution. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3068 provides a baseline for DirectX 12 performance, which is the standard for contemporary game engines.

Based on the GPU's compute capabilities, including an FP32 throughput of 13.67 TFLOPS and a texture rate of 427.2 GTexel/s, the B580 is estimated to deliver smooth gameplay at 1080p and likely at 1440p with adjusted settings. The 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus provides a bandwidth of 456.0 GB/s, which is a substantial resource for modern game assets. However, the CPU's influence is a critical factor; the Core Ultra 7 265KF, with a PassMark single-thread score of 4928 and a multi-thread score of 58518, ensures that frame pacing remains consistent, minimizing CPU-bound stutters in most scenarios. The estimated FPS for esports titles at 1080p with high refresh rates is expected to be high, given the CPU's strong single-core performance and the GPU's capable rendering pipeline. For more demanding AAA titles at 1440p, the estimates suggest playable frame rates, though users may need to rely on upscaling technologies to maintain high refresh rates. At 4K, the GPU's 68th percentile ranking indicates that it will likely struggle to maintain high frame rates without significant graphical compromises.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the Core Ultra 7 265KF's strong single-threaded performance, evidenced by a Geekbench single-core score of 2759 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 7021, provides the necessary CPU headroom to drive high frame rates. The Arc B580, with its 13.67 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, is estimated to be the limiting factor for achieving very high refresh rates in demanding titles, but it is well-suited for 1080p esports and competitive gaming.

Streaming benefits from the CPU's 20 cores and 20 threads, as the PassMark multi-thread score of 58518 indicates ample parallel processing capability for encoding video while gaming. The data shows the CPU can handle the additional load of x264 encoding without significant impact on game performance, although using the GPU's dedicated media encoders is a viable alternative given its modern architecture.

Video editing is a strong workload for this configuration, as the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 49736 and Geekbench multi-core score of 22913 indicate exceptional rendering and export times. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 456.0 GB/s bandwidth provide sufficient resources for timeline scrubbing and applying effects in 1080p and 1440p projects.

3D rendering workloads will heavily favor the CPU, which outperforms its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX, by 0.2% in average score. The 20-core, 20-thread configuration with a 30 MB L3 cache is well-suited for CPU-based rendering engines, while the GPU can accelerate GPU-accelerated renderers with its 2560 shading units.

Software development is another scenario where the CPU excels, with a PassMark data encryption score of 48198 and extended instructions score of 54513, indicating fast compilation times and secure data handling. The dual-channel DDR5 memory support with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth ensures smooth multitasking between development tools, databases, and virtual machines.

For student and office work, the system is vastly overqualified, but the data shows it will handle any productivity suite with ease. The PassMark single-thread score of 4928 ensures snappy application responsiveness, while the 20 cores provide future-proofing for increasingly parallel office software.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1851, which is specific to the Core Ultra Series 2 processors. The CPU supports DDR5 memory through a dual-channel interface, providing a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The processor also offers PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which is essential for high-bandwidth devices like modern NVMe SSDs and future graphics cards. The CPU has a TDP of 125W, while the GPU has a TDP of 190W, and the suggested PSU for the system is 450W, indicating that there is headroom for a more power-hungry GPU in the future, provided the power supply is adequate.

The upgrade path is defined by the socket and chipset. Since the CPU is an active production part with an unlocked multiplier, users can overclock to extend its lifespan, but a CPU upgrade would require a new motherboard if moving to a different socket. The GPU, however, is on the PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is backward and forward compatible with newer PCIe 5.0 slots, meaning a future GPU upgrade is straightforward without changing the motherboard. The 20-core CPU is unlikely to be the bottleneck in most gaming scenarios for the next several years, so a sensible next upgrade would be to a more powerful graphics card to improve gaming performance at higher resolutions. The data suggests that the CPU's performance is sufficient to feed a GPU that is significantly faster than the B580, given its high multi-thread score and strong single-thread performance.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who require substantial multi-core CPU performance for productivity tasks but do not need top-tier GPU performance for gaming. Gamers at 1080p and 1440p who prioritize high frame rates in esports titles will find the CPU's strong single-core performance and the GPU's 12 GB VRAM to be a capable combination. Content creators, particularly video editors and 3D artists, will benefit from the CPU's 20 cores and high Cinebench scores, which translate to faster rendering times. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the CPU's high integer math score of 143351 and data compression score of 666589, which speed up build times and data processing. Students in STEM fields and small business workstations that run multi-threaded applications like simulations or database management will also find this configuration well-suited, as the CPU's 94th percentile ranking ensures it is far more capable than typical office systems. The GPU, while not a flagship, provides enough compute for hardware acceleration in creative applications, making this a balanced system for a prosumer who does more than just game.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF is a 20-core, 20-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, built on a 3 nm process node by TSMC. It operates at a base clock of 3.90 GHz and can boost up to 5.50 GHz, with a TDP of 125W. The architecture is a departure from previous generations, and the data shows it is a formidable multi-threaded workhorse, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 49736. This score places it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, indicating top-tier performance. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX, has an average score of 71797, which is only 0.2% higher, showing that the 265KF is directly competitive with high-end mobile HX parts.

The cache hierarchy consists of 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 30 MB L3 cache. This configuration is designed to reduce latency and improve data throughput for multi-threaded workloads. The PassMark physics score of 3633 and find prime numbers score of 486 are relatively low, indicating that while the CPU is excellent at parallel tasks, its per-thread performance in specific legacy workloads may not be its strongest suit. However, the Geekbench single-core score of 2759 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 7021 show that it is still very fast for single-threaded applications. The CPU supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, providing a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, which is sufficient to feed the 20 cores. The lack of ECC memory support and integrated graphics are notable absences, but the unlocked multiplier and 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes make it a flexible platform for enthusiasts and workstation users.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF and Intel Arc B580 is 81.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX?

A: The Core Ultra 7 265KF has an average benchmark score of 71910, which is 0.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX's average score of 71797.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth and type supported by the CPU?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory, providing a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

Q: What is the TDP and suggested power supply for this system?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 125W, the GPU has a TDP of 190W, and the suggested PSU for the system is 450W.

Q: What are the key specifications of the Intel Arc B580's memory subsystem?

A: The Intel Arc B580 features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 456.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF has no integrated graphics (N/A).

Q: What is the socket type for the Core Ultra 7 265KF?

A: The Core Ultra 7 265KF uses the Intel Socket 1851.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a clear performance hierarchy where the CPU is the dominant component. The Core Ultra 7 265KF's 94th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 68th percentile indicates that in gaming scenarios, the Arc B580 will be the primary limiting factor. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 15748 is the bottleneck for frame rate output, especially at higher resolutions. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 4928 in PassMark ensures that it can easily feed the GPU at 1080p, but as resolution increases, the GPU's workload becomes more demanding, and its performance ceiling is reached. The FPS scaling is therefore expected to be limited by the GPU, with the CPU providing ample headroom.

In contrast, for productivity and compute workloads, the CPU becomes the critical component. The GPU's compute score of 7729 in PassMark is modest, and it will not accelerate all tasks. The CPU's multi-thread score of 58518 is the driving force for rendering and compilation. The 20-core CPU can handle massive parallel workloads, but tasks that are not well-threaded will rely on its single-core performance, which is still strong. The balance is skewed towards CPU-centric tasks, making this a system where the CPU's potential is not fully utilized in gaming but is essential for professional applications. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM is a limiting factor for large datasets and high-texture gaming, but it is not the primary bottleneck for the system's overall performance profile.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build that pairs a top-tier 20-core processor with a mid-range graphics card. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF is a high-end desktop CPU, while the Intel Arc B580 is a mainstream desktop GPU. The system's combined percentile of 81 places it in the upper echelon of desktop configurations, but the asymmetry between the CPU's 94th percentile and the GPU's 68th percentile defines its character. It is a system built for compute-heavy tasks and high-refresh 1080p gaming, not for 4K ultra settings. This is not a balanced gaming rig in the traditional sense; it is a workstation-class CPU with a competent gaming GPU attached.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF delivers exceptional benchmark scores across the board. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 49736 and single-core score of 7021 are standout figures. Geekbench scores of 22913 (multi-core) and 2759 (single-core) reinforce its position as a high-performance processor. The PassMark multi-thread score of 58518 and single-thread score of 4928 show consistency. The CPU's average benchmark score is 71910, placing it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon 6517P, has an average score of 72350, which is 0.6% higher, while the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX is 0.2% lower, indicating a tight competition at this performance level.

The Intel Arc B580's benchmark results are more modest. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 3068, and its PassMark G3D score is 15748. In compute tasks, it scores 7729 in PassMark GPU Compute and 92821 in Geekbench OpenCL. The GPU's average benchmark score is 23021, placing it in the 68th percentile of all GPUs. Notably, its average score is 0.2% lower than the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP and 0.6% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, showing that it competes with older high-end cards. The combined picture is of a system with exceptional CPU power and adequate GPU performance, where the CPU's scores are nearly three times higher in percentile terms than the GPU's.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B580 is based on the Xe2-HPG architecture, built on a 5 nm process node by TSMC, and is part of the Battlemage generation. It features 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 80 ROPs, along with 20 RT cores specifically for ray tracing. The GPU operates at a base and boost clock of 2670 MHz, with memory running at 2375 MHz for an effective 19 Gbps. It is equipped with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 456.0 GB/s. This memory configuration is a key asset, providing enough capacity and speed for modern games at 1080p and 1440p.

The benchmark scores indicate that the B580 is a capable 1080p and entry-level 1440p card. Its PassMark G3D score of 15748 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3068 suggest DirectX 12 performance that is competitive with older high-end cards like the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, which it outperforms by 0.6% in average score. The FP32 throughput of 13.67 TFLOPS provides a solid foundation for rasterization, while the 20 RT cores offer hardware-accelerated ray tracing, albeit at a performance level that will require upscaling for high frame rates. The GPU's pixel rate of 213.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 427.2 GTexel/s ensure it can handle high-resolution textures and complex geometry. For rendering, the GPU's compute performance is adequate for GPU-accelerated workflows, but its 68th percentile ranking shows it is not a top-tier compute device. The dual-slot design and single 8-pin power connector make it easy to install, and the 450W suggested PSU indicates modest power requirements.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF + Intel Arc B580

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF

Intel Arc B580

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds