SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF + Intel Arc B570

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF

71,910 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B570

20,556 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF and Intel Arc B570 form a desktop pairing that lands in the 80th percentile against all CPU+GPU combinations, placing it firmly in the upper-midrange tier of the benchmark database. The CPU sits in the 94th percentile among all processors, while the GPU holds the 65th percentile among all graphics cards, creating a system where the processor carries significantly more compute weight than the graphics solution. This analysis draws exclusively from the benchmark database entries for both components, with no measured frame-rate data available for this exact pairing.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF is a 20-core, 20-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture, manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC. It belongs to the Core Ultra Series 2 generation and uses the Intel Socket 1851. The chip operates with a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, with a thermal design power of 125 W. The processor integrates 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, and it supports DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the processor, has no integrated graphics, and is multiplier-unlocked for overclocking.

Benchmark data shows the 265KF is a dominant multi-threaded performer. In Cinebench R23, it scores 49,736 points in the multicore test and 7,021 points in the single-core test. The Cinebench R20 results show 20,889 multicore and 2,948 single-core, while Cinebench R15 returns 5,013 multicore and 707 single-core. Geekbench scores reach 22,913 multicore and 2,759 single-core. The Passmark suite reinforces this picture: the multithread score is 58,518, integer math hits 143,351, floating-point math reaches 189,431, and extended instructions score 54,513. Data compression work scores 666,589, random string sorting hits 79,735, and data encryption scores 48,198. Physics performance in Passmark is 3,633, while single-thread performance is 4,928. The average benchmark score across all tests is 71,910.

The single-core scores indicate strong per-thread performance, which matters for lightly threaded workloads like legacy applications, certain game engines, and general desktop responsiveness. The multi-core results are exceptional, placing this chip in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. Relative to its nearest rivals, the 265KF is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX, 0.8% ahead of the Intel Xeon Platinum 8270, and 0.6% behind the Intel Xeon 6517P and 0.7% behind the Intel Xeon 6724P. These are near-identical scores, meaning the 265KF trades blows with high-end server and mobile HX-class parts. For real workloads, the data suggests this CPU can handle heavy compilation, 3D rendering, video encoding, and scientific computing with headroom, while the high single-core scores keep everyday tasks snappy.

Benchmark Performance

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 80, indicating that 80% of all tested desktop configurations score lower. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 71,910 places it at the 94th percentile among all CPUs, a top-tier position. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 20,556, which lands at the 65th percentile among all GPUs. The disparity between the two percentiles is significant: the processor is a high-end part, while the graphics card is a solid midrange offering.

In GPU-specific tests, the Arc B570 achieves a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,649. Geekbench results show 83,514 in OpenCL and 96,844 in Vulkan. Passmark scores include 14,195 in G3D, 7,281 in GPU compute, and lower scores for legacy DirectX tests: 65 in DirectX 10, 118 in DirectX 11, 72 in DirectX 12, and 164 in DirectX 9. The 2D graphics score is 661. These numbers indicate the GPU is strongest in modern API workloads, particularly Vulkan, while older DirectX tests show less relative strength.

The combined picture is a system that excels at CPU-bound tasks but is balanced by a GPU that, while competent, does not match the processor’s elite standing. The GPU’s nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, with the Arc B570 scoring 0.1% higher. It also sits 0.1% above the Intel Arc A750 and 0.4% above the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M, while trailing the AMD Radeon R9 M390X by 0.5%. These deltas are minuscule, placing the Arc B570 in a tightly contested performance band. For a user prioritizing compute-heavy workloads, this pairing is excellent; for pure gaming, the CPU will often wait on the GPU.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF and Intel Arc B570 pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 80, meaning the pairing outperforms 80% of all tested desktop configurations in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX?

A: The Core Ultra 7 265KF scores an average of 71,910, which is 0.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX’s average score of 71,797.

Q: What is the GPU’s average benchmark score and percentile ranking?

A: The Intel Arc B570 has an average benchmark score of 20,556, placing it in the 65th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: What are the CPU’s Cinebench R23 scores?

A: The CPU scores 49,736 in the Cinebench R23 multicore test and 7,021 in the single-core test.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF has no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is required for display output.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The Arc B570 has 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, with a memory bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s and a memory clock of 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective).

Q: How does the GPU compare to the Intel Arc A750?

A: The Arc B570 scores 0.1% higher than the Arc A750 in average benchmark score, with 20,556 versus 20,582.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. Therefore, all frame-rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not direct measurements. The data shows the GPU sits at the 65th percentile among all GPUs, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,649 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 96,844. These figures suggest the Arc B570 is a capable 1080p and entry-level 1440p gaming card, though the absence of measured data means exact FPS by game and resolution cannot be specified.

The CPU’s single-core performance — 7,021 in Cinebench R23 and 2,759 in Geekbench — will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios, as game engines typically rely heavily on single-thread speed. The GPU’s 10 GB of VRAM is sufficient for modern titles at 1080p, but the 160-bit bus and 380.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit performance at higher resolutions or with heavy texture loads. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support and Vulkan 1.4 API compatibility indicate the card is ready for current-generation game features, including ray tracing via its 18 RT cores. However, the relatively low Passmark DirectX 11 score of 118 suggests older API titles may not perform as strongly as newer ones. For gamers, the estimates point toward solid 1080p performance with high settings, but the GPU will be the limiting factor before the CPU in nearly every title.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need substantial CPU horsepower but are comfortable with a midrange GPU. The 94th percentile CPU performance makes it ideal for content creators, software developers compiling large codebases, and small business workstations running data-intensive applications. The Passmark data compression score of 666,589 and encryption score of 48,198 indicate strong throughput for file archiving, database workloads, and secure communications. Students in engineering or computer science fields will benefit from the multi-core power for simulations and compile jobs, while the single-core speed of 4,928 in Passmark keeps interactive work responsive.

Gamers at 1080p will find the combination workable, but those targeting 1440p or higher refresh rates should note the GPU’s 65th percentile standing. The system is better suited for gamers who also do productivity work — e.g., a developer who games casually or a video editor who plays at 1080p. The absence of integrated graphics means every build must include the discrete Arc B570 or another GPU, which is fine for this pairing. The 125 W CPU TDP and 150 W GPU TDP suggest a modest power envelope, making it viable for compact desktop builds with adequate cooling. Small business workstations running virtual machines, large spreadsheets, or local servers will appreciate the 20 cores and 30 MB of L3 cache.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B570 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, codenamed Battlemage, and manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC. The chip, designated BMG-G21, contains 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 72.1M per mm². The GPU has 2,304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 80 render output units. Clock speeds are fixed at 2500 MHz for both base and boost, with memory clocked at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective). The memory subsystem consists of 10 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, delivering 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The card offers pixel rate of 200.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 360.0 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance of 11.52 TFLOPS and FP16 of 23.04 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). Power consumption is rated at 150 W TDP, requiring a single 8-pin power connector and a suggested 450 W power supply.

The GPU includes 18 RT cores for ray tracing, though the absence of tensor core data in the FACT PACK means AI acceleration capabilities are unspecified. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, with display outputs including one HDMI 2.1a and three DisplayPort 2.1 connections. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for this performance class. Benchmark scores show the card excels in Vulkan (96,844 Geekbench) and OpenCL (83,514), indicating strong compute performance for its tier. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,649 reflects modern DX12 gaming capability. The Passmark G3D score of 14,195 and GPU compute score of 7,281 confirm midrange positioning. For rendering workloads, the FP32 throughput of 11.52 TFLOPS and high texture rate make it suitable for real-time previews and light 3D rendering, though the 10 GB VRAM may limit extremely large scenes.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-core scores (7,021 in Cinebench R23, 2,759 in Geekbench) will not bottleneck high-FPS gameplay, but the GPU’s 65th percentile and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,649 suggest 1080p high-refresh is achievable in esports titles, while demanding AAA games may require settings adjustments to hit high refresh rates.

Streaming: The 20-core CPU has ample headroom for encoding while gaming; the Passmark multithread score of 58,518 and integer math score of 143,351 support simultaneous game capture and stream encoding without significant performance loss, though the GPU’s encoder capabilities are not detailed in the data.

Video editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 49,736 and floating-point math score of 189,431 indicate fast timeline rendering and export times; the GPU’s 10 GB VRAM and 380.0 GB/s bandwidth can handle 1080p and some 1440p editing workloads, but 4K timelines may strain the memory bus.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 20 cores provide strong CPU-based rendering performance, evident in the 49,736 Cinebench R23 multicore score; the GPU’s FP32 of 11.52 TFLOPS offers GPU-accelerated rendering, but the 160-bit memory bus may limit complex scenes.

Software development: The high multi-core and single-core balance — 22,913 Geekbench multicore and 2,759 single-core — makes this ideal for compiling large projects, running containers, and managing virtual machines, with the data compression score of 666,589 speeding up build artifacts.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread Passmark score of 4,928 ensures snappy productivity apps, while the 30 MB L3 cache and 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth handle large documents and multitasking; the GPU is more than adequate for office suites and web browsing, though the lack of integrated graphics means the discrete card must always be active.

Build Overview

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF and Intel Arc B570 form a desktop-class build, as classified by the build class designation. The CPU is a 20-core Arrow Lake processor on Socket 1851, released on 2024-10-23 with a launch MSRP of $379. The GPU is an Arc B570 on the Xe2-HPG architecture, released on 2025-01-15 with a launch MSRP of 219 USD. The combined percentile is 80, placing this build in the upper-midrange tier of all tested configurations. The CPU’s 94th percentile is elite — rivaling server-grade Xeons and the best mobile HX parts — while the GPU’s 65th percentile is firmly midrange, trading blows with the RTX 3070 Mobile and Arc A750. This is a workstation-class CPU paired with a mainstream gaming GPU, creating a system that prioritizes compute throughput over graphics fidelity. The build targets users who need serious processing power for productivity, with gaming as a secondary consideration.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a clear asymmetry: the CPU operates at the 94th percentile while the GPU sits at the 65th percentile. This 29-point gap indicates the GPU is the primary bottleneck in gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads. In gaming, the CPU’s single-core strength (7,021 Cinebench R23, 4,928 Passmark) will rarely be the limiting factor; instead, the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,649 and 11.52 TFLOPS FP32 will cap frame rates. The GPU’s memory bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s on a 160-bit bus further constrains high-resolution textures and heavy post-processing.

Conversely, in CPU-bound tasks — rendering, compilation, data analysis — the GPU’s slower performance is irrelevant, and the CPU’s 49,736 Cinebench R23 multicore score shines. The GPU becomes the bottleneck in any workload that relies on parallel graphics compute, such as GPU rendering or AI inference, where its 65th percentile standing limits throughput. The FPS scaling, though estimated, follows this pattern: at 1080p, the GPU will saturate first in most titles; at lower resolutions or in CPU-heavy games, the CPU’s headroom shows. The 20 CPU cores and 20 threads mean there is no shortage of processing power for background tasks while gaming, but the GPU’s VRAM and bandwidth will determine the ceiling for visual quality. For a balanced system, the user should expect the CPU to outlast the GPU in upgrade cycles, making this a strong foundation for a future GPU upgrade without changing the processor.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF + Intel Arc B570

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF

Intel Arc B570

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds