SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF + Intel Arc A380

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
86%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF

71,910 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380

8,558 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF is a 20-core, 20-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture, marking Intel's move to a 3 nm process node fabricated by TSMC. This is a significant architectural shift for Intel, as the chip abandons hyperthreading in favor of 20 full physical cores, each paired with a 192 KB L1 cache and a 3 MB L2 cache, backed by a shared 30 MB L3 pool. The base clock sits at 3.90 GHz with a boost ceiling of 5.50 GHz, and the chip carries a 125 W TDP, making it a high-power part aimed at enthusiast desktop builds. The processor supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus with 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth, and it offers PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes, though it lacks integrated graphics and ECC memory support. The multiplier is unlocked, so overclockers can push the chip beyond its stock boost clock, and it was released on October 23, 2024, with a launch MSRP of $379.

Benchmark results paint a picture of a processor that excels in heavily threaded workloads while maintaining strong single-thread performance. In Cinebench R23, the 265KF scores 49,736 multi-core and 7,021 single-core. These numbers indicate that the chip can handle demanding rendering tasks with ease, as the multi-core score is nearly seven times the single-core figure, demonstrating excellent scaling across its 20 cores. The Geekbench scores of 22,913 multi-core and 2,759 single-core reinforce this pattern, showing a roughly 8.3:1 ratio between multi-threaded and single-threaded performance. The Passmark multithread score of 58,518 versus a single-thread score of 4,928 further confirms that the processor's strength lies in parallel workloads, making it a strong candidate for video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation.

The 265KF sits at the 94th percentile among all CPUs, placing it in the top 6% of processors in the database. Its average benchmark score of 71,910 is remarkably close to its nearest rivals, with the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX trailing by just 0.2% at 71,797, while the Intel Xeon 6517P and Xeon 6724P lead by 0.6% and 0.7% respectively, and the Xeon Platinum 8270 trails by 0.8%. This clustering indicates that the 265KF is positioned in a highly competitive tier where small percentage differences separate top-tier parts. For real workloads, this means the 265KF will trade blows with these rivals in multi-threaded tasks, though its 20 physical cores and high boost clock give it an edge in workloads that scale well across many threads. The Passmark data encryption score of 48,198 and data compression score of 666,589 suggest strong performance in security and archival tasks, while the floating-point math score of 189,431 and integer math score of 143,351 indicate robust scientific and general-purpose compute capability.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF and the Intel Arc A380. As a result, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of each component, and they should be treated as approximations rather than measured results.

Based on the CPU's strong benchmark showing, the 265KF is unlikely to be the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios. Its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 7,021 and Geekbench single-core score of 2,759 indicate that the processor can feed frames quickly in games that rely on single-threaded performance, while the multi-core scores ensure that modern titles that leverage multiple threads will run smoothly. The CPU's 94th percentile ranking among all CPUs means it outperforms the vast majority of processors in the database, so for gaming, the bottleneck will almost certainly be the GPU.

The Intel Arc A380, however, is a different story. With a 44th percentile ranking among all GPUs, this card is positioned in the lower half of the performance spectrum. Its Passmark G3D score of 6,252 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 808 suggest that it can handle esports titles and older games at 1080p with modest settings, but it will struggle with modern AAA games at high detail levels. The GPU's 6 GB GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus with 186.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p gaming but may run into capacity limits in newer titles that demand more video memory. For gaming, the estimated frame rates are likely to be playable at 1080p with medium-to-low settings in most titles, but the A380 will hold back the 265KF's potential in CPU-bound scenarios. In games that are heavily GPU-limited, the CPU will sit idle while the GPU works hard, meaning the pairing is imbalanced for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture of this CPU+GPU pairing is one of stark contrast. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF achieves an average benchmark score of 71,910, ranking in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. This places it among the top processors in the database, with nearest rivals including the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX (71,797, deltaPct 0.2%), Intel Xeon 6517P (72,350, deltaPct -0.6%), Intel Xeon 6724P (72,396, deltaPct -0.7%), and Intel Xeon Platinum 8270 (71,370, deltaPct 0.8%). The deltas here are minuscule, all within 1% of the 265KF's score, indicating that this processor is firmly in the top tier of CPU performance.

The Intel Arc A380, in contrast, has an average benchmark score of 8,558, ranking in the 44th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD FirePro W5170M (8,595, deltaPct -0.4%), AMD Radeon HD 8870M (8,462, deltaPct 1.1%), NVIDIA GeForce MX330 (8,458, deltaPct 1.2%), and AMD Radeon 880M (8,436, deltaPct 1.4%). The A380's GPU compute score of 2,762 in Passmark and its OpenCL score of 38,224 in Geekbench indicate that it has some compute capability, but its DirectX scores are notably weak, with Passmark DirectX 9 at 73, DirectX 10 at 37, DirectX 11 at 38, and DirectX 12 at 35. These low DirectX scores suggest that the GPU's gaming performance is limited, despite its more respectable G3D score of 6,252.

The combined percentile for this pairing is 69, which reflects the fact that the powerful CPU is dragged down by the weak GPU. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 808 for the A380 is particularly telling, as this modern DirectX 12 benchmark shows the GPU struggling with contemporary graphics workloads. The overall picture is a system that has exceptional CPU performance for productivity tasks but is severely GPU-limited for gaming and graphics-intensive applications. The data shows that this pairing is not balanced, with the CPU outperforming the GPU by a wide margin in their respective percentile rankings.

FAQ

Q: What is the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF's core and thread count?

A: The 265KF has 20 cores and 20 threads, meaning it does not use hyperthreading. Each core is a full physical core, with 192 KB of L1 cache and 3 MB of L2 cache per core, plus a shared 30 MB L3 cache.

Q: How does the Intel Arc A380's memory configuration affect its performance?

A: The A380 has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus with 186.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This configuration is adequate for 1080p gaming at moderate settings, but the limited bus width and memory size can become a bottleneck in modern titles with large texture loads.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking for this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 69, which places this system in the upper-mid range of all desktop configurations in the database. This ranking is heavily influenced by the CPU's high 94th percentile, while the GPU's 44th percentile pulls the overall score down.

Q: Is the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF good for multi-threaded workloads?

A: Yes. The 265KF scores 49,736 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 58,518 in Passmark multithread, placing it at the 94th percentile among all CPUs. Its 20 physical cores provide excellent parallel processing capability for rendering, encoding, and compilation tasks.

Q: What DirectX versions does the Intel Arc A380 support?

A: The A380 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), along with OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4. However, its Passmark DirectX 12 score of 35 is low, indicating weak performance in DirectX 12 workloads despite the API support.

Q: How does the 265KF compare to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The 265KF has an average benchmark score of 71,910, which is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX (71,797) and 0.8% ahead of the Intel Xeon Platinum 8270 (71,370). It trails the Intel Xeon 6517P (72,350) by 0.6% and the Xeon 6724P (72,396) by 0.7%. These differences are negligible in real-world terms.

Q: Does the Intel Arc A380 have ray tracing capabilities?

A: Yes, the A380 has 8 ray tracing cores as part of its Xe-HPG architecture. However, its low overall performance, with a Passmark G3D score of 6,252, means that ray tracing workloads will be very demanding and likely result in low frame rates in games that enable this feature.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates a significant imbalance between the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF and the Intel Arc A380. The CPU sits at the 94th percentile among all processors, while the GPU resides at the 44th percentile among all graphics cards. This 50-percentile-point gap means that in gaming workloads, the A380 will almost always be the limiting factor. The CPU's Passmark single-thread score of 4,928 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 7,021 are more than sufficient to feed frames to the GPU in most games, so the bottleneck will manifest as the GPU struggling to keep up with the CPU's output.

In CPU-bound workloads, the picture reverses. For tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, the 265KF's 20 cores will be the primary driver of performance, and the A380's 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 compute can assist with GPU-accelerated tasks like OpenCL and Vulkan compute, but its 44th percentile ranking means it will not be a major contributor. The GPU's 8,558 average benchmark score is just 0.4% behind the AMD FirePro W5170M (8,595) and 1.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon HD 8870M (8,462), placing it in a class of entry-level graphics solutions. The combined percentile of 69 reflects this imbalance, showing that the system's overall capability is dragged down by the GPU. For gaming, the bottleneck is unequivocally the GPU, and users will need to lower resolution and graphics settings to achieve playable frame rates. For productivity, the CPU dominates, and the GPU's role is secondary.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A380 is an entry-level graphics card built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-128 chip, fabricated on a 6 nm process by TSMC. It has 1,024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output units, delivering a pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 131.2 GTexel/s. The card operates at a base clock of 2000 MHz with a boost clock of 2050 MHz, and its memory runs at 1937 MHz with 15.5 Gbps effective speed, providing 186.0 GB/s of bandwidth across a 96-bit bus. The 6 GB GDDR6 memory capacity is modest by modern standards, and the 96-bit bus is narrow, which limits memory bandwidth and can constrain performance in memory-intensive applications.

The A380 includes 8 ray tracing cores, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate with ray tracing features, but its FP32 performance of 4.198 TFLOPS is low, and its FP16 performance of 8.397 TFLOPS (2:1) is equally modest. The card has a TDP of 75 W, requires a single 8-pin power connector, and has a suggested power supply of 250 W. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and offers display outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0. The GPU's benchmark scores reflect its entry-level positioning: a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 808, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 38,224, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 36,736. The Passmark G3D score of 6,252 is its strongest showing, while the DirectX scores are uniformly weak, ranging from 35 to 73 across DirectX 9 through 12. The GPU compute score of 2,762 in Passmark indicates limited compute capability. In the overall GPU rankings, the A380 sits at the 44th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 8,558, making it competitive with the AMD FirePro W5170M (8,595, deltaPct -0.4%) and NVIDIA GeForce MX330 (8,458, deltaPct 1.2%). For rendering and graphics workloads, this GPU is best suited for light 1080p gaming and basic 2D tasks, but it will struggle with modern 3D applications that demand high fill rates and large memory bandwidth.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This pairing is not suitable for high-refresh gaming at 1080p or higher resolutions. The A380's 44th percentile ranking and weak DirectX scores (35-73 in Passmark) mean that frame rates will likely be low in modern titles, and the CPU's power will be wasted as the GPU becomes the bottleneck. Users should expect to play at lower settings to achieve playable frame rates.

Streaming: The 265KF's 20 cores provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming, with a Passmark multithread score of 58,518 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 22,913. However, the A380's limited gaming performance means that the stream's game capture will be constrained by the GPU's capabilities, potentially requiring lower game settings to maintain smooth streaming.

Video editing: This is a strong scenario for the 265KF, as its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 49,736 and Passmark data compression score of 666,589 indicate excellent performance in video encoding and processing. The A380 can assist with GPU-accelerated effects, but its 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest, so most of the workload will fall on the CPU.

3D rendering: The 265KF's 94th percentile CPU ranking makes it an excellent choice for CPU-based rendering, with Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 5,013 and R20 score of 20,889 showing consistent strength across versions. The A380's 8 ray tracing cores can handle some GPU-accelerated rendering, but its low FP32 throughput will limit its contribution.

Software development: The 265KF's multi-threaded performance, evidenced by a Passmark integer math score of 143,351 and floating-point math score of 189,431, makes it ideal for compiling large codebases. The A380's role is minimal here, though its Vulkan 1.4 support and OpenCL score of 38,224 can assist with GPU compute tasks in development workflows.

Student and office work: This pairing is overkill for typical student and office tasks. The 265KF's single-core performance is excellent, with a Passmark single-thread score of 4,928, ensuring snappy application responsiveness, but the A380's 610 Passmark G2D score for 2D graphics is adequate for basic productivity, and the system's overall capability far exceeds the demands of document editing and web browsing.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF, a 20-core, 20-thread processor from the Core Ultra Series 2 based on the Arrow Lake architecture, with the Intel Arc A380, an entry-level graphics card from the Alchemist generation. The CPU is a high-end part, ranking at the 94th percentile among all processors with an average benchmark score of 71,910, while the GPU is a low-end part, ranking at the 44th percentile among all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 8,558. The combined percentile for this pairing is 69, placing it in the upper-mid range of all desktop configurations in the database.

This is a fundamentally imbalanced pairing. The CPU is a top-tier processor capable of competing with server-class Xeon parts, while the GPU is an entry-level card that competes with mobile-class GPUs like the NVIDIA GeForce MX330. The CPU's 20 cores and 5.50 GHz boost clock provide exceptional multi-threaded performance, while the GPU's 6 GB of GDDR6 memory and 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 performance are suited for basic gaming and light graphics work. The build class is desktop, and the overall tier, as indicated by the 69th combined percentile, is mid-range, but the individual components span a wide range of capability. This configuration would be better served by a more powerful GPU to match the CPU's potential, or a more modest CPU to pair with the A380 for a balanced entry-level system.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is best suited for users who prioritize CPU-intensive productivity tasks over gaming performance. The 265KF's 94th percentile ranking makes it an excellent choice for content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, and software development, where the 20 cores and high multi-threaded scores (Cinebench R23 multi-core of 49,736 and Passmark multithread of 58,518) will deliver substantial performance. The A380 can handle basic GPU-accelerated tasks and light gaming at 1080p, but it will not satisfy gamers seeking high frame rates in modern titles, as its 44th percentile ranking and low DirectX scores (35-73 in Passmark) indicate significant limitations.

For students and small business workstations, this build provides more CPU power than necessary for typical office tasks, but the A380's 610 Passmark G2D score is sufficient for 2D graphics, and the system's overall capability ensures smooth multitasking. Developers working on large codebases will benefit from the CPU's integer math score of 143,351 and data encryption score of 48,198, which accelerate compilation and security tasks. However, users who intend to play modern games at high settings or high refresh rates should look elsewhere, as the A380 will be the bottleneck in virtually all gaming scenarios. This build is a statement of CPU-first design, where the processor is the star and the GPU is an afterthought.