SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF + Intel Arc A310

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
85%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF

71,910 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310

7,550 Benchmark Score
Top 15% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Performance Profile: Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF + Intel Arc A310

This desktop pairing combines a top-tier 20-core Arrow Lake processor with an entry-level Alchemist graphics card, producing one of the most lopsided performance profiles in the database. The CPU sits at the 94th percentile among all processors, while the GPU languishes at the 40th percentile among all graphics cards, resulting in a combined system percentile of 67. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures discussed below are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores rather than direct testing.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which represents the current desktop foundation for Arrow Lake-S processors. This is a DDR5-only platform with a dual-channel memory bus, delivering a theoretical memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes available from the processor itself, which provides ample headroom for modern NVMe storage and expansion cards. Notably, the processor has no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is mandatory for any system built around this chip.

The memory configuration is straightforward: DDR5 is the only supported memory type, and ECC memory is not supported. This limits the platform's appeal in certain server-style workloads but is entirely appropriate for a desktop enthusiast build. The dual-channel memory bus is standard for this class, and the 102.4 GB/s bandwidth figure is sufficient to feed the 20-core processor in most scenarios.

Power delivery is a critical consideration for this build. The CPU has a 125 W TDP, which is moderate for a 20-core part, while the GPU has a remarkably low 30 W TDP. The suggested PSU for the entire system is 200 W, which is surprisingly modest given the CPU's core count. This suggests that the system as configured draws very little power under load, making it feasible to use a compact or efficiency-focused power supply. The GPU requires no power connectors, drawing all its power from the PCIe slot, which simplifies cabling and installation.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be a more capable graphics card. The CPU is clearly the dominant component, and the current GPU is severely underpowered relative to the processor's capabilities. Swapping the Arc A310 for a higher-tier GPU would require no platform changes, as the PCIe Gen 5 slot and 200 W PSU headroom would accommodate most mid-range cards. The processor's unlocked multiplier also allows for overclocking, though the 125 W TDP suggests that thermal headroom for significant clock increases may be limited without additional cooling.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between the CPU and GPU in this pairing is extreme. The processor achieves an average benchmark score of 71,910, placing it at the 94th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU's average benchmark score of 7,550 places it at the 40th percentile of all GPUs. This represents a roughly 9.5-to-1 ratio in raw benchmark scores, indicating that the CPU is capable of far more work than the GPU can handle in graphics-intensive scenarios.

In CPU-bound workloads, the processor will operate at its full potential, with the GPU playing little to no role. Tasks such as video encoding, compilation, and multi-threaded productivity will see the CPU's 20 cores fully utilized. However, in GPU-bound workloads such as gaming at higher resolutions or 3D rendering, the Arc A310 will become the limiting factor almost immediately. The GPU's 2.688 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 124.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are entry-level figures that will constrain performance well before the CPU reaches its limits.

The bottleneck analysis is therefore clear: the GPU is the primary constraint in graphics workloads, while the CPU is the constraint in compute-heavy tasks that do not rely on the GPU. In mixed workloads that use both components, such as gaming with streaming, the GPU will typically be the limiting factor, as the CPU has substantial headroom to handle encoding and other background tasks simultaneously. The processor's PassMark multi-thread score of 58,518 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 49,736 indicate that it can handle demanding multi-tasking without breaking a sweat.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF delivers exceptional CPU benchmark results across the board. In Cinebench R23, it scores 49,736 points in multi-core and 7,021 points in single-core tests. The R20 results show 20,889 multi-core and 2,948 single-core, while R15 yields 5,013 multi-core and 707 single-core. Geekbench scores are 22,913 multi-core and 2,759 single-core. These figures place the processor at the 94th percentile among all CPUs.

The nearest CPU rivals provide useful context. The AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX scores 71,797 on average, just 0.2% behind the Intel part. The Intel Xeon 6517P scores 72,350, which is 0.6% ahead, while the Xeon 6724P scores 72,396, 0.7% ahead. The Intel Xeon Platinum 8270 scores 71,370, trailing by 0.8%. The 265KF is therefore firmly in the middle of a tight pack of high-end server and workstation processors, separated by less than 1% from its nearest competitors.

The GPU side tells a different story. The Arc A310 scores 30,607 in Geekbench OpenCL and 28,964 in Vulkan. PassMark results show 5,433 in G3D and 2,157 in GPU compute. The 40th percentile ranking places it near the bottom of modern discrete GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon R7 250 (7,557 average, 0.1% ahead), AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 (7,580, 0.4% ahead), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (7,472, 1.0% behind), and AMD Radeon HD 8850M (7,447, 1.4% behind). The GTX 1650, a card from a previous generation, sits remarkably close in performance, highlighting just how limited the Arc A310 is.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 5,433 and DirectX 12 score of 29 suggest entry-level gaming capability at best. The DirectX 11 score of 33 and DirectX 10 score of 31 are similarly low, while the DirectX 9 score of 69 is comparatively stronger, indicating that older titles may run more acceptably.

The 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus provides 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which will be a limiting factor in modern games that require more video memory. At 1080p with medium to low settings, this GPU may handle esports titles and older games, but recent AAA releases will likely struggle. The CPU's single-thread performance, as indicated by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 7,021, is more than sufficient for gaming, so any frame rate limitations will stem from the GPU.

For competitive titles with low graphical demands, the system may deliver playable frame rates at 1080p. However, at 1440p or 4K, the GPU's 4 GB memory capacity and limited compute power will become severe constraints. The estimated performance picture is one of a system that can game at low to medium settings in less demanding titles, but will fall short in modern, graphically intensive games.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who prioritize CPU performance for productivity tasks but have minimal graphics requirements. The 94th percentile CPU ranking makes this an excellent choice for software developers, researchers, and professionals running multi-threaded workloads that do not rely heavily on GPU acceleration. The 20 cores and 20 threads, combined with the 30 MB of L3 cache, provide substantial compute throughput for compilation, data analysis, and scientific computing.

Content creators working with CPU-intensive tasks such as video encoding or 3D modeling could benefit from the processor's capabilities, provided their software does not depend heavily on GPU rendering. The PassMark data compression score of 666,589 and data encryption score of 48,198 indicate strong performance in data-intensive workloads. However, for users who need gaming performance or GPU-accelerated rendering, this pairing is inappropriate, as the GPU will severely limit overall system capability.

Students and small business users running office applications, web development tools, or database software would find the CPU more than adequate, though the GPU is largely unnecessary for these tasks. The system could serve as a workstation for CPU-bound tasks, with the GPU providing basic display output and minimal acceleration. For anyone whose workflow involves modern gaming, video editing with GPU effects, or machine learning, this build would require a GPU upgrade to be viable.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: Not viable with this GPU. The Arc A310's 2.688 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 40th percentile ranking will limit frame rates to low levels at 1080p, making high-refresh displays unachievable in most titles. The CPU is fully capable of high-refresh gaming, but the GPU cannot deliver the required frame output.

Streaming: The CPU's strong multi-threaded performance, with a PassMark multi-thread score of 58,518, can handle software encoding while gaming, but the GPU's limited gaming performance undermines the overall experience. Streaming older or less demanding titles at low settings could work, but modern games will not run well enough to stream effectively.

Video editing: CPU-based editing workflows will benefit from the 20 cores and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 49,736. Timeline scrubbing and export encoding will be fast. However, GPU-accelerated effects and color grading will be severely limited by the Arc A310's compute and memory bandwidth.

3D rendering: CPU rendering in applications that use the processor will perform excellently, given the high multi-threaded scores. GPU rendering with the Arc A310 will be very slow, as its 2.688 TFLOPS and 4 GB memory are far below what modern rendering workloads require.

Software development: This is a strong scenario. Compilation times will benefit from the 20 cores and 30 MB L3 cache. The high single-thread score of 7,021 in Cinebench R23 ensures responsive interactive development, and the PassMark integer math score of 143,351 indicates robust performance for code execution and testing.

Student and office work: Overkill for this scenario. The CPU provides far more performance than office applications require, and the GPU is sufficient for basic display output and 2D work. The PassMark G2D score of 625 suggests adequate 2D performance for document editing and web browsing.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310 is built on the DG2-128 chip using the Xe-HPG architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process. The chip contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, with a transistor density of 45.9M per mm². The GPU operates at a fixed 1,750 MHz base and boost clock, with memory running at 1,937 MHz, translating to 15.5 Gbps effective on GDDR6 memory.

The memory subsystem consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, providing 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a modest configuration that limits performance in memory-intensive workloads. The GPU has 768 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster operation units. It includes 6 ray tracing cores, though no tensor cores are listed. The compute capabilities are rated at 2.688 TFLOPS FP32 and 5.376 TFLOPS FP16 with a 2:1 ratio.

The pixel rate is 28.00 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 56.00 GTexel/s. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, providing modern API coverage. Display output is handled through 4 mini-DisplayPort 2.0 connections. The card is single-slot with no power connectors required, drawing just 30 W. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.

Benchmark results show the Arc A310 performing near the bottom of the GPU hierarchy. The PassMark G3D score of 5,433 places it at the 40th percentile, with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 just 1.0% behind. The GPU has been discontinued, with its production status marked as end-of-life and Battlemage listed as its successor. For rendering workloads, the combination of 4 GB memory, 64-bit bus, and 2.688 TFLOPS compute will severely limit scene complexity and render times.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The system achieves a combined percentile of 67 among all desktop builds in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF scores 71,910 on average, which is 0.2% ahead of the Ryzen 7 8840HX's 71,797.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc A310 has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 124.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: What power supply is suggested for this system?

A: The suggested PSU is 200 W, with the CPU drawing 125 W TDP and the GPU drawing 30 W TDP.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF has no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is required for display output.

Q: What is the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score?

A: The CPU scores 49,736 points in Cinebench R23 multi-core testing.

Q: What is the GPU's PassMark G3D score and percentile ranking?

A: The Arc A310 scores 5,433 in PassMark G3D, placing it at the 40th percentile among all GPUs.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF is a 20-core, 20-thread desktop processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, built on the Arrow Lake architecture using TSMC's 3 nm process. The chip contains 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. It operates at a base clock of 3.90 GHz with a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking. The 125 W TDP is modest for a 20-core part, suggesting efficient power delivery.

The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is limited to DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with a maximum memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The processor uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform and supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. ECC memory is not supported, and the processor has no integrated graphics.

Benchmark performance is exceptional across all tests. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 49,736 and single-core score of 7,021 demonstrate strong performance in both multi-threaded and single-threaded workloads. Geekbench results of 22,913 multi-core and 2,759 single-core corroborate this. PassMark tests show 58,518 multi-thread, 4,928 single-thread, and 143,351 integer math, with floating point at 189,431 and extended instructions at 54,513.

The 94th percentile ranking places this processor among the top 6% of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals are all within 1% of its average score, indicating that the 265KF is competitive with high-end server processors like the Xeon 6517P and Xeon 6724P. The release date of October 23, 2024, with a launch MSRP of $379, positions this as a current-generation desktop part that remains in active production. For real workloads, the 20 cores and high boost clock provide excellent performance across compilation, rendering, and multi-tasking scenarios.

Build Overview

This system pairs the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF, a 20-core Arrow Lake desktop processor, with the Intel Arc A310, an entry-level Alchemist GPU. The CPU is a high-end desktop part at the 94th percentile, while the GPU is a low-end discrete card at the 40th percentile. The combined system percentile of 67 reflects the GPU dragging down an otherwise exceptional processor.

The build class is desktop, targeting users who need substantial CPU compute but minimal graphics performance. The processor's 20 cores, 5.50 GHz boost clock, and strong multi-threaded scores make it suitable for productivity, development, and content creation. The GPU's 4 GB memory, 30 W TDP, and 2.688 TFLOPS compute limit it to basic display output and light graphical tasks.

Overall, this is a system defined by its imbalance. The CPU can compete with server-class processors, while the GPU performs near the level of a previous-generation NVIDIA GTX 1650. For users whose workloads are CPU-bound, this pairing offers exceptional processor performance with minimal power draw. For anyone expecting balanced gaming or GPU-accelerated performance, the Arc A310 represents a significant constraint that would require a GPU upgrade to resolve. The platform itself, with DDR5 support, PCIe Gen 5, and a 200 W suggested PSU, provides a solid foundation for future graphics upgrades.