SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

85 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
GPU Bottleneck
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

70,879 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM pairing represents a desktop build that sits at the 72nd percentile overall among all recorded system combinations. This is a configuration built around a 20-core Arrow Lake CPU paired with an Ampere-generation GPU that targets a specific performance tier. The benchmark data shows a processor with strong multi-threaded capabilities and a graphics card that holds a mid-range position in the GPU hierarchy, making this pairing suitable for a distinct set of workloads, though the lack of measured FPS data for this exact combination means all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the individual component scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is a 20-core, 20-thread processor from the Core Ultra Series 2 family, built on Intel's Arrow Lake architecture using a 3 nm process node from TSMC. The chip has a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, with a TDP of 125 W. It supports DDR5 memory through a dual-channel interface, providing a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, and includes ECC memory support for added reliability in workstation environments. The CPU connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes available from the processor itself, and it integrates Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units for basic display output.

The benchmark results for this CPU are extensive. In Cinebench R23, the 265K scores 35,850 in multi-core and 2,020 in single-core tests. The multi-core result places it in the 94th percentile among all CPUs, which means it outperforms roughly 94% of processors in the database. In Cinebench R20, the scores are 20,918 multi-core and 2,953 single-core. Cinebench R15 shows 5,020 multi-core and 708 single-core. Geekbench results indicate 23,085 in multi-core and 2,713 in single-core. PassMark tests reveal a multithread score of 58,594, with integer math at 143,242, floating point math at 189,629, data compression at 665,554, data encryption at 48,246, extended instructions at 54,333, find prime numbers at 491, random string sorting at 79,752, physics at 3,731, and single-thread performance at 4,928.

The average benchmark score for the 265K is 70,879, which is nearly identical to its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon 6511P, which scores 71,051 and is only 0.2% ahead. The Intel Xeon Platinum 8270 scores 71,370, which is 0.7% ahead. On the other side, the Intel Core i7-14700KF scores 70,163, which is 1% behind the 265K, and the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F scores 69,996, which is 1.3% behind. These tight margins show that the 265K sits in a competitive performance band where small deltas separate it from both server-class Xeons and mainstream desktop parts.

For real workloads, the 20-core configuration with a 5.50 GHz boost clock means the CPU excels at heavily threaded tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, where the multi-core scores of 35,850 in Cinebench R23 and 58,594 in PassMark multithread indicate substantial parallel processing capability. The single-core performance, with a Cinebench R23 score of 2,020 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2,713, is strong enough for everyday responsiveness and lightly threaded applications, though it is not the primary strength of this chip.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pair is 72, which positions the system above the median but not in the top tier of overall performance. The CPU's 94th percentile ranking among all CPUs contrasts sharply with the GPU's 50th percentile among all GPUs. This disparity suggests that the CPU is significantly more capable than the GPU in this pairing, and in many workloads, particularly gaming, the RTX 3070 TiM will be the limiting factor.

In CPU-bound scenarios such as video rendering, 3D modeling, and data processing, the 265K can operate at its full potential, leveraging its 20 cores and high multi-core scores. The PassMark multithread score of 58,594 and the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,850 indicate that the processor can handle demanding compute tasks without the GPU becoming a bottleneck. However, in gaming scenarios, the GPU's 50th percentile ranking means that frame rates will be constrained by the graphics card's capabilities, not the CPU's. The CPU's single-thread score of 4,928 in PassMark and 2,020 in Cinebench R23 is more than adequate for feeding a GPU at most resolutions, so the bottleneck will almost always be on the GPU side in gaming.

Since no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, all FPS figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The CPU's high percentile position indicates that it will not limit the GPU in most gaming workloads, but the GPU's mid-range standing means that users should expect performance consistent with a 50th percentile GPU, which is moderate for modern titles at higher settings. The balance is therefore skewed toward CPU-heavy workloads, where the 265K can shine, while gaming performance will be dictated by the RTX 3070 TiM's capabilities.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmark scores provide a clear picture of the 265K's capabilities. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 35,850 places the chip in the 94th percentile, meaning it outperforms 94% of all CPUs in the database. The single-core score of 2,020 is respectable but not class-leading. In Geekbench, the multi-core score of 23,085 and single-core score of 2,713 reinforce this pattern. The PassMark multithread score of 58,594, combined with the integer math score of 143,242 and floating point math score of 189,629, shows strong performance in both integer and floating-point workloads, which is relevant for scientific computing and financial modeling.

The GPU benchmark data is sparse, as the RTX 3070 TiM has no recorded benchmark scores in the FACT PACK, and its average benchmark score is listed as 0. However, its percentile vs all GPUs is 50, which places it exactly at the median of all GPUs in the database. This means that half of all GPUs perform better and half perform worse. The GPU's specifications include 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s, which is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming but may be limiting at higher resolutions or with high-texture games.

The combined picture shows a system that is CPU-dominant. The CPU's 94th percentile ranking is the standout feature, while the GPU's 50th percentile places the overall system at the 72nd percentile. This means that in CPU-intensive tasks, the system will perform exceptionally well, but in GPU-intensive tasks, it will perform at a moderate level. The lack of measured FPS data for this pairing means that exact gaming performance cannot be stated, but the component scores suggest that the system is better suited for productivity and content creation than for high-end gaming.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 3070 TiM's 50th percentile ranking among GPUs indicates that it can handle esports titles and older games at high frame rates, but for modern AAA games at high settings, users should expect moderate performance. The CPU's single-thread score of 4,928 in PassMark ensures that it will not bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios, so the GPU will be the limiting factor. At 1080p, the 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for most titles, but at 1440p, users may need to adjust settings to maintain high refresh rates.

Streaming: The 265K's 20 cores and 20 threads provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming. The PassMark data compression score of 665,554 and multithread score of 58,594 indicate that the CPU can handle real-time encoding without significantly impacting game performance. The GPU's lack of a dedicated encoder mention in the specs does not preclude streaming, but the CPU's multi-core strength makes software encoding a viable option for streamers.

Video editing: Video editing benefits from both CPU and GPU acceleration. The 265K's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,850 and PassMark multithread score of 58,594 ensure fast timeline scrubbing, rendering, and export times in CPU-bound stages. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth can accelerate effects and color grading, though the GPU's 50th percentile position means it is not a top-tier accelerator.

3D rendering: In 3D rendering applications that rely on CPU compute, the 265K is a strong performer. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 20,918 and Geekbench multi-core score of 23,085 indicate that the CPU can handle complex scenes efficiently. GPU-accelerated rendering will be limited by the RTX 3070 TiM's 50th percentile position, so users with heavy GPU rendering workloads may find the graphics card to be the bottleneck.

Software development: Compilation and code analysis benefit from the 265K's multi-core performance. The PassMark integer math score of 143,242 and multithread score of 58,594 suggest fast build times for large codebases. The CPU's 20 threads allow for parallel compilation, and the single-thread performance of 4,928 in PassMark ensures responsive IDE interactions.

Student and office work: For general productivity, the 265K is overkill, but it provides a smooth experience. The single-core Cinebench R23 score of 2,020 and Geekbench single-core score of 2,713 ensure quick application launches and spreadsheet calculations. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 EU can handle basic display output, though the discrete GPU is available for more demanding tasks.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who prioritize CPU compute performance over GPU gaming performance. The 265K's 94th percentile ranking among CPUs makes it an excellent choice for content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or software development, where the multi-core scores of 35,850 in Cinebench R23 and 58,594 in PassMark translate to shorter render times and faster compilation. The system is also suitable for small business workstations that run simulation, data analysis, or virtualization workloads, where the CPU's 20 threads and ECC memory support provide reliability and throughput.

For gamers, the RTX 3070 TiM's 50th percentile ranking means that this system is best suited for 1080p gaming at medium to high settings, with occasional dips at 1440p. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for current games at these resolutions, but users planning to play at 4K or with high-resolution textures may find the GPU limiting. The system is less ideal for high-refresh 1440p or 4K gaming, where a higher-tier GPU would be more appropriate. Students and office workers will find the system more than capable, but the cost and power of the CPU are not necessary for basic tasks.

The build class is desktop, and the combined percentile of 72 indicates that this is a mid-to-upper-tier system overall. Users who need a workstation for CPU-heavy tasks and game occasionally at 1080p will find this pairing well-suited. Those who prioritize gaming performance above all else should consider a different GPU.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM is based on the GA104 chip, using the Ampere architecture manufactured on Samsung's 8 nm process. The chip contains 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die, with a transistor density of 44.4 million per mm². The GPU has a base clock of 915 MHz and a boost clock of 1410 MHz, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective. It comes with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s.

The GPU features 5,888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation units. It includes 46 RT cores for ray tracing and 184 tensor cores for AI-accelerated tasks. The pixel rate is 135.4 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 259.4 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 16.60 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 16.60 TFLOPS in a 1:1 ratio. The GPU has a TDP of 220 W, requires a triple-slot cooler, uses a single 8-pin power connector, and has a suggested PSU of 550 W. It connects via PCIe 4.0 x16 and offers display outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The GPU's 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs indicates that it performs at the median level. With no benchmark scores recorded, the performance assessment is based on its specifications and percentile position. The 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the 50th percentile position suggests it will not excel at high resolutions or with demanding ray tracing workloads. The 46 RT cores provide ray tracing support, but performance will be moderate. The 184 tensor cores enable DLSS and other AI features, which can help boost frame rates in supported games.

For rendering tasks, the 16.60 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is adequate for GPU-accelerated rendering in applications like Blender or Octane, but the 50th percentile position means it is not a top-tier rendering GPU. The 8 GB VRAM may also be limiting for large scenes or high-resolution textures. Overall, the RTX 3070 TiM is a capable mid-range GPU that complements the CPU's strengths but does not match its high-end status.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K ranks in the 94th percentile among all CPUs, meaning it outperforms 94% of processors in the database.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 3070 TiM have?

A: The RTX 3070 TiM has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination, so all FPS discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this system?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 72, placing it in the upper-middle tier of all systems.

Q: What memory type does the CPU support?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K supports DDR5 memory through a dual-channel interface with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i7-14700KF?

A: The 265K has an average benchmark score of 70,879, which is 1% higher than the Intel Core i7-14700KF's score of 70,163.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The RTX 3070 TiM ranks in the 50th percentile among all GPUs, placing it exactly at the median.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM. The CPU is a 20-core Arrow Lake processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, released in late 2024 with a launch MSRP of $394, while the GPU is an Ampere-based card from the GeForce 30-series that is now end-of-life. The system's combined percentile is 72, which places it above average but not in the top tier of performance.

The pairing is characterized by a significant performance disparity between the CPU and GPU. The CPU's 94th percentile ranking is exceptional, while the GPU's 50th percentile is exactly average. This makes the system a strong choice for CPU-intensive workloads such as video editing, 3D rendering, and software development, where the 265K's multi-core scores of 35,850 in Cinebench R23 and 58,594 in PassMark multithread provide substantial compute power. For gaming, the RTX 3070 TiM's 50th percentile position means moderate performance at 1080p and 1440p, with the 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth being adequate but not exceptional.

The overall tier of this build is mid-to-upper, driven primarily by the CPU. Users who need a powerful processor for productivity tasks will find this system well-suited, while those who prioritize gaming performance may want to consider a stronger GPU. The build is a desktop-class system, and the lack of measured FPS data means that gaming performance is estimated from the component scores, with the CPU likely not being the bottleneck in most scenarios.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K uses the Intel Socket 1851, which is the platform for Arrow Lake-based processors. The CPU supports DDR5 memory through a dual-channel interface, and the platform supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The TDP of the CPU is 125 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 220 W, with a suggested PSU of 550 W for the entire system. This PSU recommendation provides headroom for the combined power draw of the CPU and GPU, though users with additional components or overclocking ambitions may want more capacity.

The CPU has an unlocked multiplier, allowing for overclocking, which can extract additional performance beyond the stock 5.50 GHz boost clock. The memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s is sufficient for most workloads, but users with memory-intensive applications may consider higher-speed DDR5 modules. The PCIe Gen 5 support ensures compatibility with the latest storage devices, though the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward-compatible and will not bottleneck the RTX 3070 TiM.

For a sensible next upgrade, the most impactful change would be to replace the GPU with a higher-tier model, as the CPU's 94th percentile ranking provides ample headroom for a more powerful graphics card. The 550 W suggested PSU may need to be upgraded if a higher-TDP GPU is installed, but the current setup has sufficient headroom for the existing components. The ECC memory support and 20 threads make the platform suitable for workstation use, and the Intel Socket 1851 platform should support future Arrow Lake refreshes, though the RTX 3070 TiM being end-of-life means the GPU is not a future-proof choice. The system is well-balanced for CPU-heavy tasks, and upgrading the GPU would make it more capable for gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads.