SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265K + Intel Arc A380

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
86%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

70,879 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380

8,558 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K and Intel Arc A380 pairing represents a high-end desktop CPU combined with an entry-level discrete GPU. The data shows a significant performance disparity between the two components, with the CPU ranking in the 94th percentile among all processors while the GPU sits in the 44th percentile among all graphics cards. This combination produces a system whose overall benchmark percentile is 69, indicating that while the platform is robust, the graphics subsystem limits the experience in GPU-bound tasks. It is important to note that the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for this exact combination, so all FPS discussion herein is estimated from the benchmark scores.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A380 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture and uses the DG2-128 chip, manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC. The GPU contains 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster operation pipelines. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores, though it lacks specific tensor core hardware. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz, with memory clocked at 1937 MHz, translating to 15.5 Gbps effective. The memory subsystem consists of 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 186.0 GB/s. Pixel rate is rated at 65.60 GPixel/s, texture rate at 131.2 GTexel/s, and FP32 compute at 4.198 TFLOPS, with FP16 reaching 8.397 TFLOPS via a 2:1 ratio.

In benchmark results, the Arc A380 scores 808 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which is a modest result for modern gaming workloads. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 38224 and Vulkan score of 36736 indicate that the GPU handles compute and cross-platform graphics APIs reasonably well for its class. Passmark results show a G3D score of 6252, with much lower DirectX 10, 11, and 12 scores of 37, 38, and 35 respectively, which are surprisingly low and suggest that these specific legacy tests may not fully utilize the architecture. The DirectX 9 score of 73 is higher, and the G2D score of 610 reflects adequate 2D desktop performance. GPU compute score is 2762.

The GPU's percentile ranking of 44 places it in the lower half of all graphics cards. Its nearest rival is the AMD FirePro W5170M, which has an average score of 8595, a delta of -0.4% compared to the Arc A380's 8558 average. The NVIDIA GeForce MX330 is also close, at 8458 with a 1.2% delta, and the AMD Radeon 880M sits at 8436 with a 1.4% delta. These rivals are all entry-level mobile or integrated-class parts, which contextualizes the Arc A380's performance tier. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, meaning it is feature-complete for modern APIs. For rendering workloads, the FP32 throughput of 4.198 TFLOPS is sufficient for light 3D modeling and basic rendering tasks, but the 186.0 GB/s bandwidth and 6 GB VRAM will constrain high-resolution texture work and complex scenes.

FAQ

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile and what does that mean?

A: The Intel Arc A380 ranks in the 44th percentile among all GPUs, meaning it performs better than about 44% of graphics cards. Its average benchmark score is 8558, placing it just below the AMD FirePro W5170M (8595) by 0.4% and just above the NVIDIA GeForce MX330 (8458) by 1.2%.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-core performance compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K scores 35850 in Cinebench R23 multi-core. Its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon 6511P, has an average score of 71051, which is 0.2% higher. The Intel Core i7-14700KF is 1% behind, and the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F is 1.3% behind.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K supports ECC memory. It also supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a maximum memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

Q: What is the GPU's power requirement in terms of PSU?

A: The Intel Arc A380 has a TDP of 75 W, and the suggested PSU for the system is 250 W. The GPU requires a single 8-pin power connector.

Q: What API features does the GPU support?

A: The Intel Arc A380 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. This includes hardware ray tracing via its 8 RT cores, making it compatible with modern games that require these features.

Q: How does the CPU's single-thread performance score compare to its multi-thread score?

A: The CPU scores 2020 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 35850 in multi-core, showing a strong scaling ratio. In Geekbench, the single-core score is 2713 and multi-core is 23085, which suggests that the 20-core, 20-thread configuration scales well across workloads.

Q: What is the production status of the GPU and CPU?

A: The Intel Arc A380 is marked as end-of-life, with its successor being Battlemage. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is marked as active production, and it has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is a desktop processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, built on the Arrow Lake architecture (Arrow Lake-S) using a 3 nm process node from TSMC. It contains 20 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The processor has a TDP of 125 W and is socketed on Intel Socket 1851. It includes 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The cache hierarchy consists of 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, and it also supports ECC memory. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, and it includes integrated graphics in the form of Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units.

Benchmark results show strong performance across the board. In Cinebench R15, the CPU scores 5020 in multi-core and 708 in single-core. In Cinebench R20, scores are 20918 multi-core and 2953 single-core. Cinebench R23 results show 35850 multi-core and 2020 single-core. Geekbench scores are 23085 multi-core and 2713 single-core. Passmark results are extensive: data compression scores 665554, data encryption scores 48246, extended instructions score 54333, find prime numbers scores 491, floating point math scores 189629, integer math scores 143242, multithread score is 58594, physics score is 3731, random string sorting scores 79752, and single thread score is 4928.

The CPU's percentile ranking is 94, meaning it outperforms 94% of all CPUs. Its average benchmark score is 70879. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon 6511P with an average score of 71051 (0.2% higher), the Intel Xeon Platinum 8270 at 71370 (0.7% higher), the Intel Core i7-14700KF at 70163 (1% lower), and the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F at 69996 (1.3% lower). This places the 265K in a competitive position against both workstation Xeon parts and high-end consumer chips. For real workloads, the high multi-core scores indicate excellent capability in video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The single-core score of 2020 in Cinebench R23 suggests strong responsiveness for everyday tasks and gaming. The data compression and encryption scores of 665554 and 48246 imply solid performance in archival and security-related applications.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear imbalance between the CPU and GPU in this pairing. The CPU ranks in the 94th percentile, while the GPU ranks in the 44th percentile, creating a situation where the GPU is the primary bottleneck in most graphics-intensive workloads. The CPU's average benchmark score is 70879, while the GPU's average is 8558, a ratio of roughly 8.3 to 1. For gaming at standard resolutions, the Arc A380's 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit frame rates, while the CPU's 20 cores and 5.50 GHz boost clock will remain underutilized.

In CPU-bound workloads such as physics calculations, data compression, or software compilation, the CPU will dominate. The Passmark physics score of 3731 and multithread score of 58594 indicate that the CPU can handle complex simulations and parallel tasks with ease. Conversely, in GPU-bound workloads like high-resolution gaming or 3D rendering with ray tracing, the GPU's 8 RT cores and 6 GB VRAM will cap performance. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 808 is a low result, indicating that the GPU struggles with modern DX12 titles. Since no measured FPS rows exist for this combination, FPS estimates must be derived from these scores. The GPU's DirectX 12 score of 35 in Passmark is particularly low, suggesting that DX12 gaming performance will be underwhelming. The CPU will not bottleneck the GPU in any practical scenario; instead, the GPU will bottleneck the CPU in graphics tasks. For example, a game that requires high CPU single-thread performance, such as an esports title, would see the CPU's 2713 Geekbench single-core score provide a high frame ceiling, but the GPU's 6252 Passmark G3D score would likely hold frame rates to lower levels.

Benchmark Performance

In terms of exact scores, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K achieves 35850 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 2020 in single-core. It scores 23085 in Geekbench multi-core and 2713 in single-core. The Intel Arc A380 achieves 808 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 38224 in Geekbench OpenCL, 36736 in Geekbench Vulkan, and 6252 in Passmark G3D. The CPU's percentile rank is 94, meaning it is in the top 6% of all CPUs. The GPU's percentile rank is 44, meaning it is below average. The combined percentile for the build is 69.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 70879 puts it only 0.2% behind the Intel Xeon 6511P and 0.7% behind the Intel Xeon Platinum 8270, but 1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-14700KF and 1.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F. The GPU's average score of 8558 puts it 0.4% behind the AMD FirePro W5170M, but 1.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon HD 8870M, 1.2% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce MX330, and 1.4% ahead of the AMD Radeon 880M. This shows that the GPU competes with mobile and integrated graphics solutions, not desktop discrete cards. The combined picture is one of a very powerful CPU paired with a weak GPU. In CPU-centric benchmarks, the system will rank near the top; in GPU-centric benchmarks, it will rank in the lower half. For a balanced perspective, the 69th combined percentile indicates that overall, the system outperforms a majority of builds, but the GPU drags the average down considerably.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K uses the Intel Socket 1851 and supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The platform supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically found in workstation environments. The CPU has an unlocked multiplier, allowing for overclocking. The Intel Arc A380 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, which is compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots, though it will operate at PCIe 4.0 speeds. The GPU has a TDP of 75 W, and the suggested PSU is 250 W, which leaves ample headroom for upgrades. The CPU's TDP is 125 W, so a 250 W PSU is sufficient for the current configuration but would need to be upgraded for a more powerful GPU.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the Arc A380 with a more powerful GPU, as the CPU has significant headroom. The CPU's 94th percentile performance means it can drive much faster graphics cards without bottlenecking. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support ensures compatibility with future high-end GPUs. The memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s is adequate for most workloads, though higher-speed DDR5 kits could be installed. The CPU's 20 cores and 30 MB of L3 cache make it well-suited for multitasking and multi-threaded applications, so users could add more storage or memory without worrying about CPU limitations. For users who need more compute performance, the unlocked multiplier and active production status mean the CPU can be overclocked to extract additional performance. The GPU's end-of-life status suggests that driver support and performance optimizations may be limited, making a GPU upgrade the most impactful change.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU performance above all else. Gamers playing at 1080p with lower graphical settings will benefit from the CPU's strong single-core performance, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2713, but they will be limited by the GPU's 44th percentile rank. Esports titles that are CPU-bound will see high frame rates, but visually intensive games will not. Content creators who work with video encoding, 3D rendering, or software development will find the CPU's 20 cores and 35850 Cinebench R23 multi-core score exceptionally capable. The ECC memory support makes it suitable for developers and small business workstations where data integrity is critical.

Students in computer science or engineering fields will benefit from the CPU's compilation speed and the platform's PCIe Gen 5 support for fast storage. The integrated graphics on the CPU provide a fallback for basic display tasks, but the discrete GPU is present for accelerated workloads. Small business workstations that run database applications or virtualization will see strong performance from the CPU's Passmark multithread score of 58594 and data compression score of 665554. The GPU's capabilities are sufficient for general office productivity and 2D applications, but it is not suited for high-end 3D design or heavy video editing. Users who need a system for machine learning inference on GPU will find the Arc A380's lack of tensor cores a limitation, though the CPU's 54333 extended instructions score can handle some workloads.

Build Overview

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K + Intel Arc A380 is a desktop build that pairs a top-tier CPU with an entry-level GPU. The CPU is from the Core Ultra Series 2, based on Arrow Lake architecture, and ranks in the 94th percentile among all CPUs. The GPU is from the Arc 3 generation, based on Xe-HPG architecture, and ranks in the 44th percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile is 69, indicating the overall system is above average but not exceptional. The CPU has 20 cores and 20 threads, a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, and a TDP of 125 W. The GPU has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory, a boost clock of 2050 MHz, and a TDP of 75 W. This pairing is heavily skewed toward CPU performance, making it a workstation-class processor with a graphics card that is only suitable for light gaming or basic GPU-accelerated tasks. The build class is desktop, and the overall tier is mid-range due to the GPU's lower percentile, despite the CPU's high ranking.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the CPU's strong single-core performance will drive high frame rates in CPU-bound titles, but the GPU's low DirectX 12 score of 35 in Passmark and 808 in 3DMark Steel Nomad will cap performance in modern games. Users should expect to run games at 1080p with reduced settings to achieve playable frame rates. Streaming while gaming will benefit from the CPU's 20 cores, which can handle encoding workloads, but the GPU's limited VRAM and compute power may cause issues with game performance simultaneously.

For video editing, the CPU's 35850 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 23085 Geekbench multi-core score provide excellent processing power for rendering timelines and exporting videos. The GPU's 38224 OpenCL score can assist with effects and transitions, but the 6 GB VRAM may be insufficient for large projects with many high-resolution layers. For 3D rendering, the CPU's performance is outstanding, but the GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 will be a bottleneck for GPU-accelerated renderers like Blender's Cycles, though the 8 RT cores provide some ray tracing capability.

For software development, the CPU's high integer math score of 143242 and extended instructions score of 54333 make compilation and code analysis fast. The ECC memory support ensures data integrity for long-running builds. The GPU is sufficient for UI rendering and multiple displays. For student and office work, the CPU's 4928 Passmark single-thread score ensures smooth responsiveness for spreadsheets, documents, and web browsing. The GPU's 610 G2D score indicates adequate 2D performance for productivity applications. The system's overall 69th percentile means it will handle most office tasks with ease, and the CPU's 94th percentile ensures it remains relevant for years, though the GPU's 44th percentile may require an upgrade sooner for graphics-heavy tasks.