SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX + Intel Arc A770M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX

63,173 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A770M

18,383 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX + Intel Arc A770M: Mobile Workstation Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX paired with the Intel Arc A770M represents a mobile computing platform built around Intel's latest Arrow Lake-HX architecture and its high-end Alchemist discrete GPU. This combination targets the upper tier of laptop performance, with the CPU sitting at the 93rd percentile among all processors and the GPU at the 62nd percentile among all GPUs, resulting in a combined percentile of 78. The data in this analysis comes exclusively from synthetic benchmarks; no measured frame rate data exists for this specific CPU-GPU pairing, so all gaming performance discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX is a 20-core, 20-thread processor built on Intel's Arrow Lake architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 3 nm process node. The CPU features a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, with a thermal design power of 55 W. This is a mobile processor with an unlocked multiplier, allowing for potential overclocking in supported systems. The chip contains 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This large cache allocation is particularly beneficial for workloads that exhibit high data locality, such as database operations or complex simulation tasks. The processor supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, which provides adequate memory throughput for both CPU-intensive tasks and feeding the discrete GPU.

Benchmark results paint a clear picture of a high-performance mobile CPU. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 40,642 points in multi-core and 5,737 points in single-core tests. The multi-core score indicates strong parallel processing capability, while the single-core score reflects excellent per-thread performance, important for legacy applications and lightly-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R20, the scores are 17,069 multi-core and 2,409 single-core, while Cinebench R15 shows 4,096 multi-core and 578 single-core.

PassMark results further characterize the CPU's capabilities. The multi-thread score of 47,985 places this processor firmly in high-end territory, while the single-thread score of 4,500 confirms strong single-core efficiency. Specific workloads show interesting patterns: floating-point math scores 161,605, integer math scores 126,954, and extended instructions score 40,741. Data compression achieves 511,817, data encryption reaches 39,472, and random string sorting completes at 62,458. The prime number finding score of 406 and physics score of 2,978 are more modest, suggesting that while the CPU excels at parallel math operations, certain specialized workloads may not fully utilize its architecture.

The processor's average benchmark score of 63,173 places it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-13790F with an average score of 63,080 (0.1% ahead), the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G at 63,331 (0.2% behind), the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 at 62,839 (0.5% ahead), and the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX at 62,738 (0.7% behind). These small percentage differences indicate that the 265HX sits in a tightly competitive performance band, where the practical difference between these processors is minimal in real-world applications.

Benchmark Performance

The overall performance picture for this pairing is dominated by a strong CPU mated to a mid-tier GPU. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking across all CPUs indicates top-tier processing power, suitable for demanding professional workloads. The GPU's 62nd percentile ranking places it in the mid-range of laptop graphics solutions, capable of handling modern games at reasonable settings but not at the extreme high end.

The Intel Arc A770M GPU, based on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-512 chip, delivers specific benchmark scores that contextualize its position. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 2,278. Geekbench results show 89,494 in OpenCL and 74,422 in Vulkan. PassMark G3D score is 11,774, with a GPU compute score of 4,778. The 2D score of 711 is comparatively low, reflecting the GPU's focus on 3D rendering rather than 2D acceleration.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 18,383 places it near the AMD Radeon RX 460 (18,373, 0.1% behind), AMD FirePro D500 (18,533, 0.8% ahead), AMD Radeon Pro 5700 (18,189, 1.1% behind), and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile (18,159, 1.2% behind). These margins are small, suggesting that the Arc A770M performs similarly to these established GPUs in aggregate benchmarks, though individual workload performance may vary significantly.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU is the dominant component. The 93rd percentile CPU paired with a 62nd percentile GPU creates an imbalance where the processor can easily outpace the graphics solution in many tasks. This is particularly evident in compute-heavy workflows where the CPU's 20 cores can be fully utilized, while the GPU may become the limiting factor in graphics-intensive applications.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX uses the Intel BGA 2114 socket, which is a mobile platform connector, meaning the CPU is soldered to the motherboard and cannot be upgraded independently. The processor supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. ECC memory is not supported, which may limit adoption in certain enterprise or scientific computing environments that require error correction.

PCIe connectivity is provided through Gen 5 with 20 lanes available from the CPU. This high-bandwidth interface supports the latest storage devices and expansion options, though in a laptop form factor, the practical expansion is limited to internal components. The integrated graphics are Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units, providing a fallback display output and basic graphics acceleration when the discrete GPU is not in use.

The GPU has a TDP of 120 W, while the CPU has a TDP of 55 W, for a combined thermal envelope of 175 W. This is a substantial power requirement for a laptop, necessitating robust cooling solutions and a high-capacity battery for meaningful unplugged use. No suggested PSU is specified, which is typical for a laptop component where the power delivery system is integrated into the chassis design. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface, providing sufficient bandwidth for its 16 GB of VRAM.

A sensible next upgrade path for this platform is limited by the mobile form factor. The CPU cannot be swapped, and the GPU is typically soldered as well. Memory and storage are the primary upgradeable components, with DDR5 memory supporting higher capacities and PCIe Gen 5 NVMe drives offering faster storage performance. For users seeking more graphical performance, the entire laptop would need replacement, as the Arc A770M is already an end-of-life product.

Who Should Build It

This platform targets users who need substantial CPU compute power in a mobile form factor. The 93rd percentile CPU ranking makes it suitable for content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation, where the 20 cores and high boost clock of 5.30 GHz can significantly reduce processing times. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 40,642 indicates strong performance in heavily parallel workloads, while the single-core score of 5,737 ensures responsive performance in everyday tasks.

For developers, the CPU's PassMark data encryption score of 39,472 and extended instructions score of 40,741 suggest capable performance for cryptographic operations and SIMD-optimized code compilation. The data compression score of 511,817 is particularly strong, benefiting file archiving and data processing workflows. Students in engineering or computer science programs would benefit from the CPU's compute capabilities for simulations and compilation tasks.

Small business workstations could utilize this platform for data analysis, financial modeling, and office productivity, where the multi-thread performance and 30 MB of L3 cache provide smooth operation across multiple concurrent applications. The GPU's 62nd percentile ranking means it can handle moderate graphics workloads, including CAD visualization and light 3D modeling, though users requiring high-end GPU compute may find the Arc A770M limiting.

Gamers at 1080p resolution would find this system capable of running modern titles at medium to high settings, based on the GPU's benchmark performance. However, the CPU's far superior relative performance suggests that gaming at higher resolutions would be GPU-limited, making this a less optimal choice for enthusiast gamers seeking maximum frame rates at 1440p or 4K.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile ranking?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX ranks in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 63,173.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile?

A: The Intel Arc A770M has an average benchmark score of 18,383, which is 1.2% higher than the RTX 3060 Mobile's score of 18,159, indicating very similar overall performance.

Q: What type of memory does this platform support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. ECC memory is not supported.

Q: Is the CPU upgradeable?

A: The CPU uses an Intel BGA 2114 socket, which is a mobile platform connector, meaning it is soldered to the motherboard and cannot be upgraded independently.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc A770M has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the process node for each component?

A: The CPU is manufactured on TSMC's 3 nm process, while the GPU uses TSMC's 6 nm process.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the CPU includes Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units, providing a fallback display output when the discrete GPU is not in use.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A770M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-512 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process. The GPU contains 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die, with a transistor density of 53.4 million per mm². It operates at a base clock of 1650 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The GPU has a TDP of 120 W and uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface.

Memory configuration is substantial: 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus provides 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This large VRAM capacity supports high-resolution textures and complex scenes, though the GPU's computational throughput may limit its ability to fully utilize this memory in demanding scenarios. The GPU features 4,096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 raster operations pipelines. Ray tracing is supported through 32 dedicated RT cores, providing hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects in supported games and applications.

Compute performance is rated at 16.79 TFLOPS for FP32 and 33.59 TFLOPS for FP16 (2:1 ratio). Pixel rate reaches 262.4 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 524.8 GTexel/s. These specifications indicate a GPU capable of handling modern rendering workloads, though the 62nd percentile ranking suggests it performs below the top tier of laptop GPUs.

API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, providing compatibility with current and upcoming games and applications. The GPU is marked as end-of-life in production status, which may affect long-term driver support and optimization. Its benchmark scores in PassMark DX11 (69) and DX12 (70) are relatively low, suggesting that the GPU may not excel in traditional rasterization workloads compared to its compute capabilities.

The GPU's nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile, has a nearly identical average benchmark score (18,159 vs. 18,383, a 1.2% difference). This places the Arc A770M in direct competition with one of the most popular mobile GPUs of its generation, though the Arc's end-of-life status may impact its longevity in the market.

Gaming Performance

No measured frame rate data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps entries for this pairing, so all gaming performance discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking ensures that it will not be a bottleneck in gaming workloads, while the GPU's 62nd percentile ranking provides a baseline for expected frame rates.

Based on the GPU's benchmark scores, particularly the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,278 and PassMark G3D score of 11,774, this system is estimated to handle modern games at 1080p resolution with medium to high settings. The GPU's performance is comparable to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile, which is a capable 1080p gaming solution. At higher resolutions like 1440p, the GPU would likely require reduced settings to maintain playable frame rates, and 4K gaming would be limited to less demanding titles or significant settings reductions.

The 16 GB of VRAM provides ample capacity for high-resolution textures, but the GPU's raw compute throughput may limit performance in games that are heavily dependent on pixel and vertex processing. The 32 ray tracing cores enable ray-traced effects, but the GPU's overall performance tier suggests that ray tracing should be used sparingly to maintain frame rates.

The CPU's strong single-thread score of 5,737 in Cinebench R23 ensures that game physics and AI calculations will not bottleneck the GPU, even in CPU-intensive titles. The 30 MB of L3 cache helps with game asset streaming, and the dual-channel DDR5 memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s provides sufficient throughput for most gaming scenarios.

Build Overview

This pairing combines a top-tier mobile CPU with a mid-range mobile GPU in a laptop form factor. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX represents Intel's Arrow Lake-HX architecture, offering 20 cores at a 5.30 GHz boost clock, while the Intel Arc A770M provides 16 GB of VRAM and Xe-HPG architecture graphics. The combined percentile ranking of 78 places this system in the upper-middle tier of laptop configurations.

The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking is the standout feature, offering performance that rivals desktop processors in multi-threaded workloads. The GPU's 62nd percentile ranking is more modest, providing adequate but not exceptional graphics performance. This combination creates a system that excels in CPU-intensive tasks like video editing, 3D rendering, and software development, while gaming performance is decent but not class-leading.

The 55 W CPU TDP and 120 W GPU TDP combine for a 175 W thermal envelope, which is substantial for a laptop. This power requirement necessitates a robust cooling solution and limits battery life under load. The platform supports DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 5 connectivity, ensuring compatibility with current high-performance components.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance imbalance between the CPU and GPU is significant. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking versus the GPU's 62nd percentile creates a system where the processor can easily outpace the graphics solution in compute-heavy tasks. In workloads that utilize both components, such as gaming, the GPU will be the limiting factor in most scenarios.

Benchmark data supports this analysis. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 40,642 is exceptionally high, while the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,278 is modest by comparison. In gaming, the GPU's performance tier suggests that frame rates will be limited by the graphics solution, even at 1080p resolution. The CPU would have substantial headroom to drive higher frame rates if paired with a more powerful GPU.

In CPU-only workloads like software compilation, data processing, and scientific computing, the CPU's 20 cores provide excellent performance with no GPU involvement. The GPU's compute capabilities can assist in some workloads, but the 62nd percentile ranking means it is not a primary compute resource. For users primarily engaged in CPU-intensive tasks, this imbalance is acceptable; for gamers, the GPU will be a bottleneck at higher settings and resolutions.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This system can support high-refresh displays at 1080p with medium settings, based on the GPU's performance tier. The CPU's strong single-thread score ensures it will not limit frame rates, but the GPU's 62nd percentile ranking may struggle to maintain consistently high frame rates in demanding titles.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 cores and strong multi-thread performance provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The GPU can handle the rendering workload, though streamers may need to reduce in-game settings to maintain smooth output.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 40,642 and PassMark floating-point score of 161,605 indicate strong performance for video processing and rendering. The 16 GB of GPU VRAM supports large editing timelines and effects.

3D rendering: The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking makes it well-suited for CPU-based rendering, while the GPU's 32 ray tracing cores and 16.79 TFLOPS FP32 performance can accelerate GPU-accelerated renderers.

Software development: The PassMark integer math score of 126,954 and data compression score of 511,817 support fast compilation and build times. The 30 MB L3 cache benefits large codebases and build processes.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread score of 4,500 in PassMark ensures responsive performance in everyday applications. The 55 W TDP allows for reasonable battery life in light workloads, while the integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics provides display output when the discrete GPU is idle.