SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX + Intel Arc A570M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX

63,173 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A570M

58,239 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX is a 20-core, 20-thread mobile processor built on the Arrow Lake-HX architecture, marking Intel's second-generation Core Ultra Series 2 silicon. Fabricated on a 3 nm process at TSMC with 17,800 million transistors across a 243 mm² die, this chip represents a significant architectural departure from previous Intel mobile HX parts. It runs at a 2.60 GHz base clock and boosts to 5.30 GHz, with a 55 W TDP that positions it as a high-performance mobile part. The core configuration is uniform, with no hybrid P-core/E-core split in the reported specifications; all 20 cores are addressable as 20 threads, meaning the 265HX does not rely on Hyper-Threading. Cache hierarchy consists of 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3, which is a substantial pool for a mobile chip.

In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the 265HX scores 40,642 points, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs tracked. This is a strong result for a laptop processor, indicating sustained multi-threaded throughput that rivals many desktop parts. The single-core Cinebench R23 score of 5,737 is equally impressive, showing that the 5.30 GHz boost clock is not merely a marketing figure but translates into real single-thread performance. Cinebench R20 results echo this pattern: 17,069 multi-core and 2,409 single-core. The older R15 test yields 4,096 multi-core and 578 single-core, maintaining the same proportional advantage.

PassMark results provide a more granular view of workload characteristics. The multi-thread score of 47,985 and single-thread score of 4,500 confirm balanced scaling. Integer math scores 126,954, while floating-point math reaches 161,605, indicating that the FPU pipelines are particularly strong. Data compression scores 511,817, which is exceptionally high and suggests excellent memory subsystem performance. Data encryption at 39,472 and extended instructions at 40,741 show competent but not class-leading SIMD throughput. The find prime numbers test scores a modest 406, which is typical for a non-server part. Random string sorting at 62,458 and physics at 2,978 round out the suite, with the physics score being relatively low, possibly indicating that the scheduler does not optimally distribute this workload across the 20 threads.

Comparing to nearest rivals, the 265HX is virtually tied with the Intel Core i7-13790F, differing by only 0.1% in average benchmark score. It sits 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G and 0.5% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185. The closest sibling, the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, trails by 0.7%. These sub-1% deltas mean that in real-world use, the 265HX is indistinguishable from these competitors in aggregate performance, though workload-specific differences will emerge.

# FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread count of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX?

A: The CPU has 20 cores and 20 threads, with no Hyper-Threading support. All cores are identical in configuration, running at a 2.60 GHz base clock and boosting to 5.30 GHz.

Q: How does the 265HX compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-13790F?

A: The 265HX scores 63,173 average benchmark points versus 63,080 for the i7-13790F, a difference of just 0.1%. This places them in a statistical tie for overall CPU performance.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth available to this CPU?

A: The 265HX supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a peak bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. ECC memory is not supported.

Q: What integrated graphics does the 265HX include?

A: It features Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units. This is a separate GPU from the discrete Intel Arc A570M in this build.

Q: What socket does the 265HX use?

A: The CPU uses Intel BGA 2114, which is a soldered mobile socket, meaning it is not upgradeable in the traditional sense. The multiplier is unlocked for overclocking where the laptop BIOS permits.

Q: What PCIe lanes does the CPU provide?

A: The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. This is the CPU-only lane count, separate from any chipset-provided lanes.

Q: What is the production status and release date of this processor?

A: The 265HX is marked as Active in production status, with a release date of 2025-01-12.

# Benchmark Performance

The combined CPU and GPU performance places this build at the 91st percentile of all tracked configurations. The CPU alone holds the 93rd percentile position, while the Intel Arc A570M GPU sits at the 88th percentile. This indicates a well-matched pairing where both components are high-performing relative to the broader hardware landscape.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 63,173. This is remarkably close to the nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-13790F, which averages 63,080 — a delta of only 0.1%. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G scores 63,331 (0.2% higher), and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 scores 62,839 (0.5% lower). The Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX trails at 62,738, or 0.7% behind. These margins are within run-to-run variance, so the 265HX effectively ties all four competitors in aggregate CPU throughput.

For the GPU, the only benchmark reported is Geekbench OpenCL, where the Arc A570M scores 58,239. This places it at the 88th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, scores 58,392 (0.3% higher). The AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM scores 58,085 (0.3% lower), the NVIDIA P102-100 scores 58,528 (0.5% higher), and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 58,657 (0.7% higher). Again, these are near-identical results, meaning the A570M's compute performance is comparable to a previous-generation desktop flagship RX 6950 XT in OpenCL workloads.

The absence of measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination means all gaming frame rate figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The data clearly shows a balanced system: neither the CPU nor GPU is dramatically out of line with the other, as evidenced by the close 93rd and 88th percentile positions respectively. In workloads that stress both components simultaneously, such as gaming with background streaming, the system should maintain consistent performance without one component dragging the other down.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: With a CPU at the 93rd percentile and a GPU at the 88th percentile, this laptop can push high frame rates at reasonable settings. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 4,500 in PassMark ensures that game logic and physics threads are well-served, while the GPU's OpenCL score of 58,239 indicates sufficient compute for modern rendering workloads. 1080p high-refresh gaming is achievable, though 4K will be limited by the GPU's memory bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s.

Streaming: The 20-core CPU has ample headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding. The PassMark multi-thread score of 47,985 and data compression score of 511,817 suggest that software encoding will not significantly impact game frame rates, as there are enough idle threads to handle the encoding workload. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 EUs can also serve as a dedicated encoding engine if the laptop BIOS supports hybrid graphics offload.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 40,642 and floating-point math score of 161,605 indicate strong performance for timeline scrubbing, effects rendering, and export tasks. The 8 GB GDDR6 VRAM on the GPU is adequate for 4K timelines with moderate color grading, though very long projects may benefit from proxy workflows. The 30 MB L3 cache helps with random access to media files.

3D rendering: The CPU's 20 cores deliver a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 17,069, which is directly relevant to CPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles. The GPU's 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 16 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the 128-bit memory bus and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit very large scenes. The 93rd percentile CPU ranking makes this a credible mobile rendering workstation.

Software development: The PassMark integer math score of 126,954 and single-thread score of 4,500 show strong compile performance for both parallel builds (multi-core) and incremental builds (single-thread). Data encryption at 39,472 and extended instructions at 40,741 indicate capable SIMD processing for cryptographic and vectorized workloads. The 20 threads handle parallel test suites well.

Student and office work: This configuration is overkill for document editing and web browsing, but the 93rd percentile CPU and 88th percentile GPU ensure no stutter in demanding academic software like MATLAB or CAD tools. The 55 W CPU TDP and 75 W GPU TDP mean the laptop will require frequent charging, so battery life will be limited under sustained load, but the raw performance is there for any academic task.

# Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1080p high-refresh or 1440p medium-high settings will find this pairing well-suited, given the GPU's 88th percentile position and the CPU's 93rd percentile ranking ensuring no bottleneck. Content creators working with 4K video or complex 3D scenes benefit from the 20-core CPU's Cinebench R23 score of 40,642, which is competitive with desktop parts. Software developers running large parallel builds will appreciate the PassMark multi-thread score of 47,985 and integer math score of 126,954, which together indicate rapid compilation times.

Students in engineering or data science programs requiring heavy computation will find the CPU's 93rd percentile performance sufficient for any coursework, and the integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is disabled for battery saving. Small business workstations handling financial modeling, database operations, or virtualization will leverage the 20 threads and 30 MB L3 cache, with data compression score of 511,817 suggesting strong database query performance.

This build is not for users needing maximum portability or battery life, given the combined 130 W TDP of CPU and GPU, but for those needing desktop-class performance in a laptop form factor, the 91st combined percentile justifies the trade-off. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for most professional workloads but not for massive AI model training; that said, the 16 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for real-time ray tracing in supported applications.

# Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX + Intel Arc A570M combination in the data. All frame rate figures presented here are estimates derived from the GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 58,239 (88th percentile) and the CPU's benchmark suite, and should be treated as approximations rather than verified results.

Based on the GPU's compute performance being within 0.3% of the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT in OpenCL, this system is likely capable of 60+ FPS at 1080p ultra settings in most titles from the last few years. At 1440p, frame rates will drop to the 50-70 FPS range depending on the title's optimization, with the 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth being the primary constraint. The 128-bit memory bus may cause performance dips in games with very large texture sets, but the 8 GB VRAM capacity is adequate for modern titles at 1080p and 1440p.

The CPU's single-thread performance (PassMark 4,500, Cinebench R23 5,737) ensures that CPU-bound games will not be limited by the processor. In esports titles like Valorant or Counter-Strike 2, frame rates could exceed 144 FPS at 1080p, given the strong single-thread scores. For AAA single-player games, the GPU will be the limiting factor, but the 88th percentile ranking suggests consistent 60 FPS at high settings is achievable. Ray tracing performance will be modest, as the 16 RT cores in the A570M are not comparable to dedicated RT hardware in higher-tier GPUs, despite the DirectX 12 Ultimate support.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a well-balanced pairing. The CPU sits at the 93rd percentile while the GPU is at the 88th percentile, a gap of only 5 percentage points. In CPU-bound workloads like Cinebench R23 multi-core (40,642 points), the GPU will be idle, so no bottleneck exists. In GPU-bound workloads like ray-traced rendering, the CPU has sufficient headroom to feed the GPU without stalling.

The PassMark physics score of 2,978 is notably lower than other sub-scores, suggesting that the CPU's scheduling of physics calculations is less efficient than its integer or floating-point performance. This could manifest as a minor bottleneck in physics-heavy games, where the physics thread may not utilize all 20 cores effectively. However, the single-thread score of 4,500 mitigates this, as most physics engines are single-threaded.

Memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s for the CPU and 224.0 GB/s for the GPU are both adequate for their respective workloads, and neither is likely to be a systemic bottleneck. The PCIe Gen 5 x8 interface for the GPU provides sufficient bandwidth for the GPU's 8 GB VRAM. In gaming, the GPU will be the limiting factor at resolutions above 1080p, while the CPU will be the limiting factor in extremely high-refresh scenarios (240+ Hz) at low settings, where the single-thread score of 4,500 may not keep pace with the GPU's frame output.

# Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: laptop) combining the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX (20 cores, 5.30 GHz boost, 55 W TDP) with the Intel Arc A570M (8 GB GDDR6, 5.325 TFLOPS FP32, 75 W TDP). The combined percentile ranking of 91 indicates that this configuration outperforms 91% of all tracked CPU+GPU pairings, placing it in the upper tier of mobile systems.

The CPU is a 3 nm Arrow Lake-HX part from TSMC, while the GPU is a 6 nm DG2-256 chip from the Alchemist generation. Both are active production parts, with the CPU released on 2025-01-12 and the GPU on 2023-07-31. This pairing is intended for high-performance mobile computing, trading battery life for raw throughput. The system memory support is DDR5 dual-channel, and the CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes for the GPU and other peripherals.

At the 91st combined percentile, this build is positioned for demanding users who need desktop-class performance in a laptop. It is not a workstation replacement for multi-GPU setups, nor is it an ultraportable for light tasks. It sits in the performance tier where users expect high frame rates and fast renders without building a desktop.

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A570M is a mobile GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC with 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die. It features 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation pipelines. The GPU operates at a 900 MHz base clock and 1,300 MHz boost clock, with memory clocked at 1,750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The 8 GB GDDR6 memory sits on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Compute capabilities are rated at 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 and 10.65 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio). The 16 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) workloads, with Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6 API support. Pixel rate is 83.20 GPixel/s and texture rate is 166.4 GTexel/s. The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for its bandwidth needs.

In Geekbench OpenCL, the A570M scores 58,239, placing it at the 88th percentile of all GPUs. This is within 0.3% of the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (58,392), a desktop flagship from a previous generation, indicating that the A570M's compute performance is comparable to high-end desktop parts from a few years ago. However, the 128-bit memory bus and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit performance in memory-intensive workloads like 4K texture streaming, where wider-bus GPUs have an advantage. The 75 W TDP and IGP slot width indicate this is a mobile-specific part designed for integration into laptops, not a desktop card.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel BGA 2114 socket, which is soldered to the motherboard, meaning CPU upgrades are not possible without replacing the entire laptop. The GPU is also integrated (IGP slot width), so it cannot be upgraded independently. This is a closed platform by design, typical of high-performance laptops.

Memory support is DDR5 dual-channel with a peak bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which are available for the GPU and other devices. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, so it does not utilize the full Gen 5 bandwidth, but this does not bottleneck current workloads. ECC memory is not supported, limiting use in mission-critical server roles.

The CPU TDP is 55 W and the GPU TDP is 75 W, totaling 130 W for the compute components. There is no suggested PSU in the data, but for a laptop, the power delivery is handled by the integrated charger and battery system. Users should ensure the laptop's power adapter can sustain the combined load for extended periods.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be to increase system memory to the maximum supported capacity, as DDR5 bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s is a potential constraint for the 20-core CPU in memory-heavy workloads. For storage, the PCIe Gen 5 lanes support the fastest NVMe SSDs available, so upgrading to a Gen 5 drive would reduce load times in games and large applications. The GPU and CPU are not upgradeable due to the BGA socket and IGP form factor, so users should consider this a fixed configuration for the life of the laptop.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX + Intel Arc A570M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX

Intel Arc A570M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds