SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265H + Intel Arc A570M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

95 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265H

41,621 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A570M

58,239 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265H and Intel Arc A570M combination represents a mobile platform aimed at balancing high-end CPU throughput with dedicated graphics capability. This analysis draws exclusively from the provided benchmark data to characterize the pairing’s performance, target workloads, and system-level implications. No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming performance discussion is framed as estimates derived from the component benchmark scores.

FAQ

Q: What is the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H’s benchmark percentile ranking?

A: The CPU ranks at the 88th percentile among all CPUs, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of processors in the benchmark database.

Q: How does the Arc A570M compare to its nearest GPU rival?

A: The Arc A570M scores 58,239 in Geekbench OpenCL, which is 0.3% lower than the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (58,392) and 0.3% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (58,085).

Q: What is the combined percentile for this laptop build?

A: The combined CPU+GPU percentile is 88, placing the system in the top tier of mobile configurations.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H supports ECC memory, a feature typically associated with workstation-grade reliability.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and bus width?

A: The Arc A570M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What process node is used for the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU is fabricated on TSMC’s 3 nm process, while the GPU uses TSMC’s 6 nm process with 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die.

Q: Are there any measured FPS results for this exact CPU+GPU pairing?

A: No, the data contains no measured FPS rows for this combination; all frame rate expectations must be inferred from the individual benchmark scores.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265H delivers an average benchmark score of 41,621, placing it at the 88th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core 7 251TE (41,650, -0.1% delta), the Intel Core i7-14650HX (41,576, +0.1%), the Intel Core i7-12850HX (41,779, -0.4%), and the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X (41,376, +0.6%). This means the 265H sits within a tight performance cluster where no rival exceeds a 0.6% difference, indicating that the 265H effectively trades blows with last-generation desktop-class processors like the Ryzen 9 5900X.

Multi-threaded workloads show a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 19,940, while single-core performance reaches 2,080 in the same test. The Cinebench R20 results are 12,131 (multicore) and 1,712 (single-core), and the older R15 test yields 2,989 (multicore) and 307 (single-core). These numbers suggest a processor that scales well across both lightly and heavily threaded tasks. The Passmark suite reinforces this: multithread score is 34,027, single-thread score is 4,334, integer math reaches 85,479, floating-point math hits 109,123, and data compression scores 334,711.

The Intel Arc A570M GPU posts a Geekbench OpenCL score of 58,239, which places it at the 88th percentile among all GPUs. Its closest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (58,392, -0.3%), the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (58,085, +0.3%), the NVIDIA P102-100 (58,528, -0.5%), and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 (58,657, -0.7%). The GPU’s percentile matches the CPU’s, meaning this pairing is well-aligned in terms of relative performance class.

Combined, the CPU and GPU both sit at the 88th percentile, yielding a system that is consistently high-performing across both compute and graphics benchmarks. The CPU’s average score of 41,621 and the GPU’s 58,239 OpenCL result indicate that neither component is a weak link when compared against the broader database. The absence of measured FPS data means that real-world frame rates must be extrapolated, but the benchmark scores suggest a platform capable of handling demanding workloads without a significant performance bottleneck in either direction.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The Arc A570M’s 88th percentile GPU ranking, combined with the CPU’s strong single-core score of 2,080 in Cinebench R23, suggests it can drive high-refresh displays in less demanding titles, though exact frame rates are unmeasured. The GPU’s 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 throughput provides a baseline for 1080p gaming, but users should expect lower settings for the most demanding games.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 cores and 16 threads, coupled with a Passmark multithread score of 34,027, provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The integrated Arc Graphics 140T could offload light encoding tasks, but the dedicated GPU’s 16 RT cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate support enable hardware-accelerated encoding pathways, assuming software support.

Video Editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 19,940 indicates strong rendering performance for timeline exports and effects processing. The GPU’s 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 166.4 GTexel/s texture rate assist with real-time previews and GPU-accelerated effects. The combination of 8 GB VRAM and dual-channel DDR5/LPDDR5X CPU memory support (102.4 GB/s) should handle 1080p and some 4K editing workflows.

3D Rendering: The CPU’s Passmark floating-point math score of 109,123 and the GPU’s 10.65 TFLOPS FP16 throughput (2:1 ratio) support rendering workloads that leverage both CPU and GPU compute. The CPU’s 24 MB of shared L3 cache helps with scene data, while the GPU’s 16 RT cores accelerate ray-tracing tasks where supported.

Software Development: The CPU’s Passmark data encryption score of 26,005 and extended instructions score of 26,805 indicate strong performance for compilation and cryptographic workloads. The 16-thread configuration with a 5.30 GHz boost clock allows fast single-threaded builds and parallel compilation tasks.

Student and Office Work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 4,334 in Passmark and the GPU’s OpenCL score of 58,239 are more than sufficient for productivity applications, web browsing, and document processing. The 28 W CPU TDP and 75 W GPU TDP suggest a power-efficient platform for all-day battery use, though exact battery life is not specified.

Balance and Bottleneck

The 88th percentile ranking for both CPU and GPU indicates a balanced pairing where neither component dramatically outclasses the other. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 41,621 versus rivals like the Ryzen 9 5900X (41,376) shows it delivers desktop-class compute, while the GPU’s OpenCL score of 58,239 places it near the Radeon RX 6950 XT (58,392) in raw compute. This symmetry suggests that CPU-bound workloads like physics simulation (Passmark physics score of 2,497) and GPU-bound tasks like pixel throughput (83.20 GPixel/s) will each find enough horsepower.

In gaming, the bottleneck will likely shift depending on the title. The CPU’s single-core Cinebench R23 score of 2,080 is competitive with its rivals, so frame rates in CPU-limited scenarios should not suffer disproportionately. The GPU’s 128-bit memory bus and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are modest compared to high-end desktop GPUs, which could limit performance in memory-intensive graphics workloads. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p ultra settings in many games, but 4K or heavy texture packs could exceed this capacity, causing the system to rely on slower system memory over PCIe 4.0 x8.

The CPU’s 16 cores with 16 threads (no hyperthreading) may underperform in heavily threaded tasks compared to rivals with higher thread counts, but the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 19,940 shows it still competes with the Core i7-14650HX (41,576 average score, +0.1% delta). The GPU’s FP32 throughput of 5.325 TFLOPS is moderate, suggesting that the GPU, rather than the CPU, will be the limiting factor in most gaming and rendering scenarios. For compute-heavy workloads like data compression (334,711 Passmark score), the CPU excels, while the GPU’s 5.325 TFLOPS limits raw compute throughput.

Who Should Build It

This laptop build targets users who need consistent high performance across both CPU and GPU tasks without a clear bias toward one. Gamers playing at 1080p with high settings will find the Arc A570M’s 88th percentile GPU ranking sufficient for most titles, though demanding games may require settings adjustments. Content creators editing video or performing 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s 16 cores and the GPU’s 16 RT cores, which accelerate both traditional rasterization and ray-traced workflows.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the CPU’s Passmark integer math score of 85,479 and data encryption score of 26,005, which indicate rapid build times and secure data handling. Students and office workers seeking a responsive machine for everyday tasks will find the CPU’s single-thread performance (4,334 Passmark) more than adequate, with the GPU providing headroom for occasional light gaming or creative projects.

Small business workstations that handle mixed workloads—such as financial modeling, data analysis, and light video conferencing—can rely on the CPU’s 24 MB L3 cache and ECC memory support for stable operation. The laptop class (buildClass: “laptop”) makes this a portable solution, and the combined 88th percentile ensures it outperforms most other mobile configurations in the database. Users who prioritize maximum gaming frame rates at 1440p or above should look elsewhere, but for a balanced mobile platform, this pairing is well-suited.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H and Intel Arc A570M combination, so all frame rate expectations are estimates derived from benchmark scores. The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 58,239, which is statistically equivalent to the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (58,392, -0.3% delta), suggests that at 1080p with ultra settings, this system could achieve playable frame rates in most modern titles, though exact numbers cannot be confirmed. The CPU’s single-core Cinebench R23 score of 2,080 indicates it will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios.

At 1080p ultra, the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit performance in games with heavy texture streaming, but the 83.20 GPixel/s pixel rate and 166.4 GTexel/s texture rate provide a solid foundation. For 1440p gaming, the GPU’s 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 throughput would likely require reduced settings to maintain smooth frame rates, as the 128-bit memory bus becomes a bottleneck. At 4K, the system would struggle with ultra settings due to VRAM capacity and memory bandwidth constraints, but lower settings could yield acceptable performance in less demanding titles.

The GPU’s DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support ensures compatibility with modern graphics features like ray tracing and variable rate shading, but the 16 RT cores are modest in number, so ray-traced effects will likely incur significant performance penalties. Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6 support provide broad API compatibility, but the absence of measured FPS means these estimates should be treated cautiously. Overall, the system appears capable of 1080p high-refresh gaming in esports titles and 1080p high settings in AAA games, with frame rates decreasing as resolution and graphical demands increase.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265H is a 16-core, 16-thread mobile processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture (Arrow Lake-H), manufactured on TSMC’s 3 nm process. It has a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, with a 28 W TDP that suits thin-and-light laptops. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache, which supports the high Passmark data compression score of 334,711 by keeping frequently accessed data close to the cores.

Benchmark results show strong multi-threaded performance, with Cinebench R23 multicore reaching 19,940 and Passmark multithread at 34,027. Single-thread performance is equally impressive, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,080 and a Passmark single-thread score of 4,334. The CPU’s 5.30 GHz boost clock drives these single-thread results, making it responsive for everyday tasks and lightly threaded applications.

The CPU supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in dual-channel configuration, providing 102.4 GB/s of memory bandwidth. ECC memory support is a notable feature for data integrity in workstation tasks. The integrated Arc Graphics 140T provides a fallback display output, but the dedicated GPU is the primary graphics solution. The CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 interface with 8 lanes (CPU only) offers high-bandwidth connectivity for the GPU and NVMe storage, though the GPU itself uses PCIe 4.0 x8. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 41,621 places it at the 88th percentile, just 0.1% behind the Intel Core 7 251TE and 0.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, indicating it competes with desktop-class processors from the previous generation.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: “laptop”) pairing the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H with the Intel Arc A570M. Both components sit at the 88th percentile in their respective categories, resulting in a combined percentile of 88. This places the system in the upper tier of mobile configurations, suitable for demanding workloads that require both strong CPU compute and dedicated GPU performance.

The CPU’s 16 cores and 16 threads, combined with a 5.30 GHz boost clock, provide a balanced mix of multi-threaded and single-threaded performance. The GPU’s 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 2048 shading units offer dedicated graphics capability that exceeds integrated solutions by a wide margin. The system’s overall tier is high, as indicated by the CPU’s average benchmark score of 41,621 and the GPU’s OpenCL score of 58,239, both of which rank in the top 12% of the database.

This build is not a top-tier enthusiast platform—the CPU’s nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-12850HX, is only 0.4% faster, and the GPU’s nearest rival, the AMD Radeon PRO V710, is 0.7% faster—but it represents a well-rounded mobile solution. The laptop form factor means the 28 W CPU TDP and 75 W GPU TDP are designed for thermal and power constraints, making this a practical choice for portable high performance rather than desktop replacement-class power.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A570M is based on the DG2-256 chip using the Xe-HPG architecture, manufactured on TSMC’s 6 nm process with 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die. It has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU’s clocks are 900 MHz base and 1300 MHz boost, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). These specifications yield a pixel rate of 83.20 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 166.4 GTexel/s.

The GPU’s 2048 shading units deliver 5.325 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 10.65 TFLOPS of FP16 performance (2:1 ratio). It includes 16 RT cores for ray tracing and 64 ROPs for rasterization. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with current graphics APIs. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which provides sufficient bandwidth for the GPU’s memory architecture.

Benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 58,239, placing the GPU at the 88th percentile. This score is 0.3% lower than the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (58,392) and 0.5% lower than the NVIDIA P102-100 (58,528), indicating performance parity with high-end desktop GPUs from previous generations. The GPU’s 75 W TDP is modest, making it suitable for laptop integration, but the 128-bit memory bus limits bandwidth compared to wider-bus desktop parts. For rendering, the GPU’s 5.325 TFLOPS provides moderate compute capability, while the 16 RT cores enable ray-traced effects at reduced performance. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p and some 1440p workloads, but texture-heavy scenes may exceed this capacity.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265H uses the Intel BGA 2049 socket, which is soldered to the motherboard, meaning CPU upgrades are not possible in this laptop form factor. The platform supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in dual-channel configuration, with a maximum memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. ECC memory support is available, which is unusual for mobile platforms and beneficial for error-sensitive workloads.

The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 8 lanes (CPU only), while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8. This means storage devices and the GPU have dedicated high-bandwidth connections, but the 8-lane CPU PCIe configuration limits expansion compared to desktop platforms. The GPU’s TDP is 75 W, and the CPU’s TDP is 28 W, for a combined 103 W of component power draw. No suggested PSU is listed, but the laptop’s power delivery system is designed for these TDPs.

A sensible next upgrade would be increasing system memory to the maximum supported capacity, as the dual-channel DDR5/LPDDR5X configuration benefits from higher capacity for multitasking and large datasets. Upgrading storage to a PCIe Gen 5 NVMe drive would leverage the CPU’s 8-lane PCIe Gen 5 interface, though the motherboard’s availability of such slots is not specified. The GPU is not upgradeable in a laptop, but external GPU enclosures via the PCIe interface could provide additional graphics horsepower if the laptop supports it, though this is not confirmed. The platform’s active production status and 2025-01-12 release date indicate it is a current-generation solution, so software and driver support should continue for the foreseeable future.