SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265H + Intel Arc A550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265H

41,621 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A550M

49,737 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265H and Intel Arc A550M pairing represents a mobile platform designed to deliver strong all-around performance in a laptop form factor. The data available for this combination, however, does not include any measured frame rates from real-world game tests. The FACT PACK contains no entries for measured FPS by game or resolution. Therefore, the following analysis of gaming capability is derived exclusively from the synthetic benchmark scores and percentile rankings of the individual components, and all frame rate figures discussed should be treated as estimates based on that data, not as observed results.

Gaming Performance

Because no measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, the gaming analysis relies on the relative performance of the Intel Arc A550M GPU. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 49737 places it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs, which indicates it is a capable performer for its mobile class. In practical terms, this suggests the A550M can handle demanding titles at high settings, though the exact frame rates would vary by game and resolution.

The GPU’s nearest rivals in the benchmark database provide context for its expected gaming level. It sits nearly level with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, coming in just 0.4% slower, which is a negligible margin. Against older AMD flagships, the A550M is 0.5% behind the Radeon RX Vega 64 and 2.4% behind the Radeon RX 6900 XT. However, it shows a 2.6% advantage over the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT. This positioning suggests the A550M should deliver playable frame rates at 1080p and likely at 1440p with adjustments, but it is not a top-tier 4K performer.

The CPU side supports this gaming estimate. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265H scores a PassMark single-thread result of 4334 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2080, which are strong for feeding a GPU in gaming workloads. The multi-core scores, including a Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 19940, ensure that the CPU will not be a limiting factor in most gaming scenarios. The estimated frame rates would likely be smooth at 1080p and playable at 1440p, with the GPU being the primary determinant of the final performance ceiling.

Benchmark Performance

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pair is 87, placing it well above the majority of systems in the database. The CPU alone holds an 88th percentile ranking, with an average benchmark score of 41621. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core 7 251TE, which scores 41650, putting the 265H just 0.1% behind. The CPU also matches the Intel Core i7-14650HX, which scores 41576, giving the 265H a 0.1% lead. It outperforms the Intel Core i7-12850HX by 0.4% and the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X by 0.6%. These margins are tight, indicating the 265H sits in a well-populated performance band.

The GPU’s average benchmark score of 49737 comes from its Geekbench OpenCL result of 49894 and Vulkan result of 49580. The 86th percentile ranking for the GPU aligns closely with the CPU’s ranking, creating a balanced overall system. The combined picture is one of a laptop that excels at both compute-intensive and graphics-intensive tasks, with neither component dragging the other down. The CPU’s multi-threaded strength, evidenced by a PassMark multithread score of 34027, complements the GPU’s compute throughput, making this a well-rounded platform for professional workloads as well as gaming.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265H is built on the Arrow Lake-H architecture and uses the Intel BGA 2049 socket, which is a mobile-specific package. This means the CPU is soldered to the motherboard, so there is no component-level CPU upgrade path. The platform supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. This is sufficient for the CPU’s demands and the GPU’s needs, though users should consider populating both channels for optimal performance.

For storage and expansion, the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 8 lanes available at the CPU level, which is adequate for the latest NVMe SSDs. The GPU, however, connects via a separate PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The CPU’s TDP is 28 W, and the GPU’s TDP is 60 W, which is a modest combined power draw for a laptop. The FACT PACK does not list a suggested PSU, but the low TDPs indicate that a standard laptop power adapter will suffice; there is no headroom for adding a desktop-class discrete GPU. A sensible next upgrade for users would be increasing system memory to the maximum supported by the platform or swapping the storage drive for a higher-capacity PCIe Gen 5 model, as the CPU’s lanes can take advantage of it.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a well-balanced pairing. The CPU’s 88th percentile and the GPU’s 86th percentile are closely matched, meaning neither component dramatically outpaces the other. In CPU-bound workloads, such as data compression (PassMark score of 334711) or encryption (26005), the 265H performs strongly, and the GPU is not a factor. Conversely, in GPU-bound tasks like gaming at high resolutions, the A550M’s performance, which is within 2.4% of the Radeon RX 6900 XT, would be the limiting factor before the CPU.

Frame rate scaling, as estimated from the benchmark scores, would show the CPU capable of supporting high frame rates at lower resolutions, but the GPU would become the bottleneck as resolution increases. The CPU’s single-thread performance, with a PassMark single-thread score of 4334, is strong enough to avoid bottlenecking the GPU in most titles. The balance is tipped slightly toward the CPU for productivity tasks, but for 3D rendering or gaming, the GPU’s compute power, at 8.397 TFLOPS FP32, will define the experience. There is no clear weak link; the system behaves as a cohesive unit.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU’s 86th percentile ranking and its near-parity with the RTX 5070 Ti suggest it can drive high frame rates at 1080p, likely exceeding 144 Hz in esports titles, though exact numbers are estimates. At 1440p, users should expect moderate refresh rates, as the GPU is 2.4% behind the RX 6900 XT, which is a known 1440p performer.

Streaming: The CPU’s multi-threaded capabilities, including a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 19940, provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The GPU’s support for DirectX 12 Ultimate and its dedicated 16 ray-tracing cores assist in rendering, but the CPU can handle encoding without significant frame drops.

Video editing: The CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 85479 and floating-point math score of 109123 indicate strong computational throughput for codecs and effects. The GPU’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth accelerates timeline rendering and exports, making this a capable mobile editing station.

3D rendering: The GPU’s FP32 performance of 8.397 TFLOPS and the CPU’s 16 cores make this a solid entry-level rendering laptop. The CPU’s Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 2989 shows it can handle complex scene calculations, while the GPU accelerates viewport and final frame rendering.

Software development: The CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 334711 and encryption score of 26005 are excellent for compilation and code signing tasks. The 16 threads and 24 MB of L3 cache provide responsiveness for large codebases, and the GPU is irrelevant for most development workloads.

Student and office work: The low TDPs (28 W CPU, 60 W GPU) translate to better battery life, though no battery figures are in the pack. The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 4334 ensures snappy application launches, and the integrated Arc Graphics 140T provides a fallback for light tasks without engaging the discrete GPU.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration targets users who need a single machine for both productivity and play. Gamers at 1080p resolution will find the GPU’s performance sufficient for high settings, given its 86th percentile ranking. Those gaming at 1440p should expect to lower settings for smoother frame rates, as the GPU trails the RX 6900 XT by 2.4%. Content creators working with video or 3D assets benefit from the CPU’s 16 threads and the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM, which handles large textures and timelines. Developers compiling large projects will appreciate the CPU’s multi-threaded scores, while students and small business workstations gain from the efficient power envelope and strong single-thread performance. This is not a workstation for extreme 4K rendering or heavy simulation, but it comfortably covers a broad spectrum of mid-range workloads.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265H is a 16-core, 16-thread processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, built on the Arrow Lake architecture using a 3 nm process at TSMC. It has a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, with a TDP of 28 W. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB of L3 cache. This configuration provides a strong balance between power efficiency and performance, as evidenced by its 88th percentile ranking.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded tasks. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2080 is competitive with desktop parts, and the multi-core score of 19940 is substantial for a mobile chip. PassMark results show a multithread score of 34027 and a physics score of 2497, indicating strong sustained performance. The memory support for DDR5 and LPDDR5X with ECC capability, alongside a 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth, ensures the CPU is well-fed. For real workloads, this means fast compilation times, smooth multitasking, and responsive application performance, with the boost clock providing quick bursts of speed when needed.

Build Overview

This build is a laptop-class system, as indicated by the buildClass field, combining the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H CPU with the Intel Arc A550M GPU. The combined percentile of 87 places it in the upper tier of all systems in the database, indicating a high-performance mobile platform. The CPU is one of Intel’s latest Arrow Lake-H parts, while the GPU is from the Alchemist generation, specifically the Arc 5 Mobile segment. This pairing is designed to deliver a balanced experience across gaming and productivity, with the CPU’s strong multi-threading complementing the GPU’s capable compute power. The system sits just below the top-tier mobile workstations but well above average consumer laptops, making it a premium mid-range offering.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 87, indicating it performs better than 87% of all systems in the benchmark database.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265H has an average benchmark score of 41621, which is 0.6% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X’s score of 41376.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 or LPDDR5X memory with a maximum bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

Q: Does the Intel Arc A550M support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU features 16 dedicated ray-tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate.

Q: What is the GPU’s nearest rival based on average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is the nearest rival, with the Arc A550M scoring 0.4% lower.

Q: What is the process node for the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H?

A: The CPU is manufactured on a 3 nm process at TSMC, while the GPU uses a 6 nm process.

Q: Is the CPU socket upgradeable?

A: The CPU uses the Intel BGA 2049 socket, which is a mobile-specific package, so the CPU is soldered and cannot be upgraded.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A550M is a mobile GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-512 chip manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC. It contains 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die, with a transistor density of 53.4 million per mm². The GPU has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. It features 16 ray-tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The boost clock is 2050 MHz, with a base clock of 900 MHz.

Memory consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, with an effective data rate of 14 Gbps. Compute performance is rated at 8.397 TFLOPS for FP32 and 16.79 TFLOPS for FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. The pixel rate is 131.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 262.4 GTexel/s. The GPU’s TDP is 60 W, and it connects via PCIe 4.0 x16. Benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 49894 and a Vulkan score of 49580, giving an average of 49737 and an 86th percentile ranking.

In rendering workloads, the 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p textures, though larger scenes may require lower settings. The GPU’s FP32 throughput of 8.397 TFLOPS places it in the mid-range for mobile GPUs, and its ray-tracing cores enable hardware-accelerated effects in supported games. The 224.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for the 128-bit bus, though it is not class-leading. Overall, the A550M is a solid mid-range mobile GPU that performs close to desktop parts like the Radeon RX 6800 XT, which it leads by 2.6%, making it a strong choice for a balanced laptop build.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265H + Intel Arc A550M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 265H

Intel Arc A550M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

FAQ

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds