SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265H + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265H

41,621 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265H and Intel Arc A370M form a mobile-first pairing designed for thin-and-light laptops. This combination targets a specific performance envelope where CPU horsepower is abundant, but the GPU is deliberately constrained for power efficiency. The data indicates a system with an 81st combined percentile ranking, placing it above the majority of laptop configurations, yet the distinct gap between the CPU's 88th percentile and the GPU's 74th percentile reveals a significant performance imbalance that shapes all possible usage scenarios.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The foundation of this platform is the Intel BGA 2049 socket, which is a soldered, non-upgradeable connection. This means the Core Ultra 7 265H is permanently affixed to the motherboard, making any future CPU swap impossible. The platform is built around the Arrow Lake architecture on a 3 nm process node from TSMC, representing Intel's second generation of Core Ultra processors. Memory support is limited to DDR5 and LPDDR5X in a dual-channel configuration, providing a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The system also supports ECC memory, a feature typically reserved for workstation-class hardware. For expansion, the CPU provides 8 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which are typically dedicated to the GPU or primary NVMe storage.

The Arc A370M connects via a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, a suitable bandwidth allocation for a GPU of its class. The GPU has a 35 W TDP, while the CPU has a 28 W TDP, suggesting a combined thermal envelope that is manageable for standard laptop cooling solutions. There is no suggested PSU figure available for this component, but given the low TDPs of both the CPU and GPU, a standard laptop power adapter is sufficient; there is no need for an external power supply unit. The integrated graphics on the CPU, the Arc Graphics 140T, provides a fallback for basic display output and power-saving modes. A sensible next upgrade for this platform is impossible in the traditional sense; because both primary compute components are soldered, the only meaningful hardware upgrade is increasing system RAM or swapping the NVMe SSD for a larger or faster model, assuming the laptop manufacturer provides accessible slots.

Gaming Performance

There is no measured FPS data available for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All FPS figures presented here are estimates derived from the average benchmark scores of the individual components, and should be treated as approximations rather than definitive results. The Arc A370M's 74th percentile ranking and its average score of 29175 in Geekbench tests suggest it is a capable entry-level discrete GPU. In practical terms, this GPU is suited for 1080p gaming at medium to low settings in modern AAA titles, and it can handle esports titles at high refresh rates. The GPU's 4 GB of VRAM is a limiting factor for texture-heavy games at higher resolutions or with maximum detail settings.

Based on the CPU's strong Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2080 and the GPU's FP32 throughput of 4.198 TFLOPS, the system would likely deliver playable frame rates in esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant at high settings, potentially exceeding 100 FPS at 1080p. For more demanding AAA games like Cyberpunk 2077 or Starfield, the estimate would be between 30 and 50 FPS at 1080p with upscaling technologies enabled and graphical settings reduced to medium or low. The 64-bit memory bus and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth of the A370M will be a bottleneck in scenarios requiring high texture streaming, but the 8 dedicated ray tracing cores provide some hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects, though the overall GPU horsepower is limited. The 1024 shading units and 32 ROPs indicate a GPU that can handle rasterization well at lower resolutions, but it will struggle to maintain high frame rates at 1440p or above.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance tier of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H compared to other CPUs?

A: The CPU sits in the 88th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 41621. It performs nearly identically to the Intel Core 7 251TE, which has a deltaPct of -0.1%, and it is 0.1% faster than the Intel Core i7-14650HX.

Q: How does the Arc A370M compare to desktop GPUs from AMD?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score of 29175 places it in the 74th percentile. Its performance is very close to the AMD Radeon RX 470, which is 0.6% faster, and it is actually 1% faster than the AMD Radeon RX 6800M in this specific metric.

Q: What type of memory does this platform support, and what is the bandwidth?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration. The total memory bandwidth available to the CPU is 102.4 GB/s.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is locked. The Core Ultra 7 265H has a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, but the unlocked multiplier feature is not available on this mobile chip.

Q: What is the manufacturing process for both the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU is built on a 3 nm process node, while the GPU is built on a 6 nm process node. Both are fabricated by TSMC.

Q: Does the GPU support modern graphics APIs?

A: Yes, the Arc A370M supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with the latest game engines and graphics features.

Q: What is the transistor count and die size of the GPU?

A: The Arc A370M chip, designated DG2-128, contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 45.9M per mm².

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p, this system can drive high-refresh-rate monitors in esports titles. The strong single-threaded CPU performance, evidenced by a Passmark single-thread score of 4334, ensures high frame rates in CPU-bound games, but the GPU will limit maximum FPS in graphically intensive scenes. Players should expect high but not maximum frame rates in competitive shooters.

Streaming: The CPU is well-equipped for streaming workloads. The Passmark data compression score of 334711 and data encryption score of 26005 indicate robust encoding capabilities, allowing the CPU to handle x264 encoding for streaming while maintaining playable frame rates in most games. The GPU's limited VRAM may require lower in-game settings to free up memory for the encoding process.

Video Editing: The combination of the CPU's high multi-threaded performance and the GPU's hardware-accelerated encoding/decoding engines makes this a capable laptop for 1080p video editing. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 19940 will accelerate export times, while the Arc A370M provides smooth timeline scrubbing and preview rendering. The 4 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p projects but may be restrictive for complex 4K compositions with many effects.

3D Rendering: This is a mixed scenario. The CPU's 16 cores and Cinebench R20 multicore score of 12131 will render CPU-based scenes efficiently. However, the GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 4 GB VRAM will struggle with GPU-accelerated rendering in applications like Blender or Octane, especially with complex scenes that exceed the VRAM capacity. This system is better suited for CPU rendering or light GPU preview tasks.

Software Development: Developers will find this platform highly responsive. The Passmark integer math score of 85479 and floating-point math score of 109123 indicate strong performance for code compilation and data processing. The CPU's high single-core speed of 2080 in Cinebench R23 ensures fast build times for small to medium-sized projects, and the 16 threads handle parallel compilation tasks effectively.

Student and Office Work: For standard productivity tasks, this system is overkill. The CPU's 88th percentile ranking guarantees a responsive experience in word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The integrated Arc Graphics 140T allows the discrete GPU to remain idle for most tasks, saving power and extending battery life, while the A370M is available for occasional light graphics work or casual gaming.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265H demonstrates strong all-round performance, with an average benchmark score of 41621 and a percentile ranking of 88 among all CPUs. In Cinebench R23, it scored 19940 in multi-core and 2080 in single-core tests, indicating a balanced architecture capable of both heavy multi-threaded workloads and responsive single-threaded tasks. The Passmark suite reinforces this, with a multi-thread score of 34027 and a single-thread score of 4334. Data-centric tasks also show strength: the data compression score of 334711 is substantial, and the extended instructions score of 26805 suggests good SIMD performance. The CPU's nearest rival is the Intel Core 7 251TE, which is a negligible 0.1% slower, and it sits just 0.6% ahead of the desktop AMD Ryzen 9 5900X.

The Intel Arc A370M lags significantly behind the CPU in relative performance. Its average benchmark score of 29175 places it in the 74th percentile of all GPUs. In Geekbench compute tests, it scored 29676 in OpenCL and 28673 in Vulkan. The GPU's nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, which is 0.1% faster, and it is 0.6% slower than the AMD Radeon RX 470. The combined picture is one of a high-end CPU paired with an entry-level discrete GPU. The 81st combined percentile reflects the CPU's strong contribution, but the overall system performance in graphics-intensive tasks will be dictated by the GPU's limits. The data shows a clear performance hierarchy: the CPU is a top-tier mobile processor, while the GPU is a mid-tier mobile graphics solution.

Who Should Build It

This build is tailored for users who prioritize CPU performance and need a discrete GPU for light to moderate graphics tasks. It is ideal for gamers at 1080p resolution who play esports titles or are willing to lower settings in AAA games. The CPU ensures high frame rates in CPU-bound games, and the GPU provides a playable experience for most titles at this resolution. Content creators who work with 1080p video or photos will benefit from the CPU's fast export and rendering times, while the GPU accelerates effects and previews. Software developers will appreciate the fast compilation times and responsive simulation environment. Students in engineering or computer science fields will find the performance sufficient for all coursework and projects. For small business workstations, this combination provides robust performance for data analysis, financial modeling, and general office productivity, with the discrete GPU offering headroom for occasional graphics work or CUDA-accelerated tasks. Users who need high-refresh-rate gaming at 1440p or 4K, or who require GPU rendering for complex 3D scenes, should look elsewhere.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a significant imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The CPU's 88th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 74th percentile creates a scenario where the GPU is almost always the limiting factor. In gaming, the CPU can process game logic and physics far faster than the GPU can render frames. The A370M's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth are the primary constraints; high-resolution textures and high-detail settings will cause performance to plummet as the GPU runs out of memory. The FPS scaling will be poor at higher resolutions; while the CPU might allow 100 FPS at 1080p, the GPU will likely deliver far less at 1440p, because the pixel fill rate and memory bandwidth are insufficient.

In productivity applications, the bottleneck shifts. For tasks like video editing, the CPU's high multi-threaded score of 19940 in Cinebench R23 will dominate rendering and export, while the GPU only assists with specific effects. However, for GPU-accelerated rendering in 3D applications, the GPU becomes the bottleneck again. The CPU's Passmark physics score of 2497 is relatively low compared to its other scores, suggesting that the CPU may also be a limiting factor in complex physics simulations, though this is a rare workload for most users. The 16-thread count (16 cores, 16 threads, no hyperthreading) is a notable architectural choice; it provides high core count for parallel tasks, but the lack of SMT may cause a slight dip in heavily threaded workloads compared to CPUs with hyperthreading. Ultimately, the system is well-balanced for general productivity and light gaming, but the GPU limits high-end graphics performance.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H processor with the Intel Arc A370M discrete GPU. The CPU is a 16-core, 16-thread mobile processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, manufactured on a 3 nm process. The GPU is an entry-level mobile part based on the Xe-HPG architecture, manufactured on a 6 nm process. The combined system sits in the 81st percentile of all configurations, indicating strong overall performance relative to the broader laptop market. This pairing is best described as a "productivity-first" laptop with gaming capabilities. The CPU is a high-end part capable of handling demanding professional workloads, while the GPU is sufficient for 1080p gaming and light creative tasks. The system is not designed for high-end gaming or GPU compute; it is a balanced workstation that can handle entertainment on the side. The Arc A370M is already marked as end-of-life, but the CPU is active, suggesting this is a current-generation platform with a GPU from the previous generation.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265H is a 16-core, 16-thread mobile processor with a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. It is built on the Arrow Lake architecture (codename Arrow Lake-H) using a 3 nm process node from TSMC. The cache hierarchy consists of 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 cache is crucial for gaming and productivity, reducing memory latency and improving data throughput. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with a maximum bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, and it includes ECC memory support, making it suitable for error-sensitive workloads.

Benchmark results confirm its high performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 19940 and single-core score of 2080 place it in the upper echelon of mobile processors. The Passmark multi-thread score of 34027 and single-thread score of 4334 reinforce this. The data compression score of 334711 is particularly strong, indicating excellent performance for file archiving and compression tasks. The floating-point math score of 109123 shows robust capability for scientific and engineering computations. The CPU's average score of 41621 places it in the 88th percentile, a full 14 percentage points higher than the GPU. This is a processor that will not be the bottleneck in almost any workload, from 3D rendering to software compilation. The 5.30 GHz boost clock is exceptionally high for a 28 W TDP part, indicating Intel's efficiency improvements with the 3 nm node are effective. The lack of hyperthreading (16 cores, 16 threads) is a design choice that simplifies the architecture and reduces power consumption, but in heavily threaded workloads, this can result in slightly lower performance compared to CPUs with SMT.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is a discrete mobile GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-128 chip. It is manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC, containing 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective. The GPU features 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. It has 8 dedicated ray tracing cores, which provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects. The GPU clock speeds are set at a base of 1550 MHz and a boost of 2050 MHz, delivering a peak FP32 performance of 4.198 TFLOPS.

In benchmark terms, the A370M scores 29676 in Geekbench OpenCL and 28673 in Vulkan. These scores place it in the 74th percentile of all GPUs, with an average score of 29175. The pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s and texture rate of 131.2 GTexel/s indicate that the GPU can handle fill-rate-limited tasks at 1080p reasonably well. However, the 64-bit memory bus is the primary weakness, as it limits the memory bandwidth to 112.0 GB/s, which is low for modern games. The 4 GB VRAM capacity is also a limiting factor, preventing the use of high-resolution textures. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring broad software compatibility. With a TDP of just 35 W, it is highly power-efficient, which is a benefit for laptop battery life, but this efficiency comes at the cost of raw performance. The GPU is marked as end-of-life, meaning Intel has discontinued production, but it remains a viable option for entry-level gaming and light content creation in current laptop models.