SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

64,438 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

54,247 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 7 265F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080: A High-End Desktop Analysis

This pairing combines a 20-core Intel Arrow Lake processor with NVIDIA's Ada Lovelace flagship-class GPU, placing the build in the 90th percentile overall among all desktop configurations. The CPU sits at the 93rd percentile of all processors, while the GPU holds the 86th percentile among all graphics cards. Benchmark data indicates a system capable of handling demanding workloads with substantial headroom, though the combination's true gaming performance must be estimated from component-level scores since no measured FPS data exists for this exact pairing.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The RTX 4080's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6567 and PassMark G3D score of 34457 place it firmly in the upper tier of graphics hardware. With 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus delivering 716.8 GB/s bandwidth, this GPU is positioned for 1440p and 4K gaming at high refresh rates. The Core Ultra 7 265F's single-thread performance — a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5926 — ensures the CPU can keep pace with the GPU's frame output in most gaming scenarios. The combination should comfortably handle esports titles at very high frame rates and AAA games at high refresh rates, though exact FPS figures are estimates.

Streaming: The 20-core, 20-thread configuration provides substantial multi-threaded capacity for simultaneous gaming and encoding workloads. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 49410 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 41980 indicate strong parallel processing capability. The RTX 4080's 304 tensor cores and support for DirectX 12 Ultimate enable hardware-accelerated encoding and AI-enhanced streaming features. The 65W TDP of the CPU leaves thermal and power headroom within the system, while the GPU's 320W TDP and suggested 700W PSU ensure stable operation during sustained streaming sessions.

Video Editing: Multi-core performance is critical for video rendering and export tasks. The 265F's Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 17631 and R15 multi-core score of 4231 demonstrate capable multi-threaded throughput. The PassMark floating-point math score of 173855 indicates strong numerical processing, which is essential for video effects and color grading. The GPU's 48.74 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates effects rendering and export through CUDA-accelerated workflows. The 16 GB VRAM buffer accommodates large timelines and high-resolution source material without memory pressure.

3D Rendering: The RTX 4080's ray tracing capability, evidenced by 76 RT cores, directly benefits 3D rendering workloads that utilize hardware-accelerated ray tracing. The GPU's PassMark GPU compute score of 20671 indicates substantial compute throughput for rendering tasks. The CPU's 20 cores provide ample geometry processing and scene complexity handling. The PassMark data compression score of 507018 suggests efficient handling of large scene files and asset streaming. This system is well-suited for architectural visualization, product rendering, and animation work where both CPU and GPU rendering are employed.

Software Development: Compilation and code analysis workloads benefit from the 265F's balanced single-thread and multi-thread performance. The PassMark integer math score of 138078 demonstrates strong arithmetic throughput for code compilation. The PassMark random string sorting score of 62439 indicates efficient handling of text processing and data manipulation tasks. The CPU's 30 MB shared L3 cache and 3 MB per-core L2 cache reduce memory latency during frequent context switches. The 265F's 93rd percentile ranking among all CPUs ensures responsive build times for large codebases.

Student and Office Work: While this system is over-specified for basic productivity, the performance headroom means zero-compromise multitasking. The PassMark single-thread score of 4750 ensures snappy application launches and responsive spreadsheet manipulation. The 20-core configuration handles virtual machines and containerized development environments without contention. The GPU's PassMark G2D score of 1239 supports high-resolution multi-monitor setups for research and document work. This build eliminates any hardware-induced waiting in office productivity scenarios.

FAQ

Q: How does the Core Ultra 7 265F compare to its closest rival, the Core Ultra 7 265?

A: The 265F scores 0.3% lower than the Core Ultra 7 265 in average benchmark score (64438 vs 64640), making the difference effectively negligible in real-world performance.

Q: What is the RTX 4080's performance relationship to the RTX 4080 SUPER?

A: The RTX 4080 scores 0.1% higher than the RTX 4080 SUPER in average benchmark score (54247 vs 54209), indicating the two cards perform nearly identically in synthetic benchmarks.

Q: Does this build support overclocking?

A: No, the Core Ultra 7 265F has a locked multiplier (multiplierUnlocked: false), so CPU overclocking is not supported. The GPU's boost clock of 2505 MHz is factory-determined.

Q: What memory type does this platform require?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. ECC memory is not supported.

Q: What PCIe generation does the GPU use?

A: The RTX 4080 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, while the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes for other devices. The GPU's PCIe 4.0 interface is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe 5.0 slots.

Q: What is the recommended power supply for this build?

A: The suggested PSU rating is 700W, which accounts for the GPU's 320W TDP and the CPU's 65W TDP. The GPU requires a single 16-pin power connector.

Q: How does this CPU compare to the Intel Core i9-13900KS?

A: The 265F scores 0.6% higher than the i9-13900KS in average benchmark score (64438 vs 64051), despite having fewer threads, showing the efficiency of the Arrow Lake architecture.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance between the 265F and RTX 4080 is well-matched for most workloads, but the bottleneck direction varies by task type. In gaming scenarios, the GPU is typically the limiting factor at higher resolutions, as the 4080's 86th percentile ranking among GPUs is lower than the CPU's 93rd percentile among CPUs. This suggests the CPU has more headroom relative to its peers than the GPU does, making the GPU the primary constraint in graphically intensive tasks at 4K resolution.

For CPU-bound workloads like software compilation, data encryption (PassMark score 39468), and prime number finding (PassMark score 416), the processor becomes the limiting component. The GPU's compute capabilities remain underutilized in these scenarios. The CPU's 20 threads provide substantial throughput, but the locked multiplier prevents overclocking as a mitigation for CPU-bound tasks.

In mixed workloads like video editing or 3D rendering, the balance shifts dynamically. The 265F's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 41980 handles scene processing and encoding, while the RTX 4080's 48.74 TFLOPS FP32 accelerates effects and rendering. Neither component consistently bottlenecks the other in these scenarios, creating a well-balanced pipeline. The 700W suggested PSU provides adequate headroom for simultaneous peak loads from both components.

Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1440p and 4K: The RTX 4080's 16 GB VRAM and 716.8 GB/s bandwidth target high-resolution gaming with ray tracing enabled. The CPU's single-thread performance prevents frame pacing issues in CPU-bound titles. This build is appropriate for gamers seeking maximum detail settings at 1440p and high-to-ultra settings at 4K, with performance estimated in the top 15% of systems.

Content Creators: Video editors, 3D artists, and motion graphics designers benefit from the combination of 20 CPU cores and 76 RT cores. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 41980 accelerates render times, while the GPU's 20671 PassMark compute score handles GPU-accelerated effects. The 16 GB VRAM supports large compositing projects and 4K video timelines.

Software Developers: The 265F's balanced performance profile suits developers working with large codebases, containerized environments, and local virtual machines. The 507018 PassMark data compression score indicates efficient handling of build artifacts and version control operations. The 20-thread configuration allows parallel test execution and compilation pipelines.

Students in STEM Fields: Engineering and computer science students running simulations, compiling code, and using GPU-accelerated computation libraries will find this system responsive. The 93rd percentile CPU ranking ensures no waiting in computation-heavy coursework, while the GPU supports CUDA-based assignments and machine learning projects.

Small Business Workstations: For businesses running data analysis, financial modeling, or design work, this build offers substantial performance headroom. The CPU's 65W TDP keeps power costs moderate, while the GPU accelerates tasks like data visualization and rendering. The production status is Active for the CPU, though the GPU is End-of-life, which may affect long-term procurement planning.

Benchmark Performance

The Core Ultra 7 265F achieves an average benchmark score of 64438, placing it at the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. This positions it 0.3% below the Core Ultra 7 265 (64640), 0.4% above the AMD EPYC 7343 (64202), 0.6% below the AMD EPYC 4464P (64823), and 0.6% above the Intel Core i9-13900KS (64051). In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 41980 multi-core and 5926 single-core, demonstrating strong performance in both parallel and single-threaded workloads. The PassMark multithread score of 49410 and single-thread score of 4750 reinforce this balanced profile.

The RTX 4080 achieves an average benchmark score of 54247, placing it at the 86th percentile of all GPUs. This is 0.1% above the RTX 4080 SUPER (54209), 1.1% below the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (54828), 2.6% below the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (55698), and 2.7% below the AMD Radeon 8060S (55757). In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 6567, while PassMark G3D shows 34457 and GPU compute shows 20671. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 214739 and Vulkan score of 263779 indicate strong compute API performance.

The combined picture shows a system at the 90th percentile overall, with the CPU performing slightly better relative to its peers than the GPU. The narrow deltaPct values among rivals (ranging from -2.7% to 0.6%) indicate that this build sits in a tightly contested performance tier where small benchmark differences translate to minimal real-world variation.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform with the Arrow Lake architecture. This socket supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes for storage and expansion, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The platform does not support ECC memory, and the CPU has a locked multiplier, limiting overclocking potential.

The RTX 4080 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface with a 320W TDP, requiring a suggested 700W power supply and a single 16-pin power connector. The GPU is triple-slot wide, measuring 310 mm in length, 140 mm in height, and 61 mm in width. Its production status is End-of-life, with the GeForce 50 series as its successor, meaning future upgrades would move to newer generation GPUs.

A sensible next upgrade would be a newer generation GPU, as the CPU's 93rd percentile ranking provides headroom for more powerful graphics cards. The 65W CPU TDP leaves thermal and power budget for a higher-TDP GPU. The PCIe 5.0 lanes from the CPU support next-generation storage and expansion cards. The platform's DDR5 memory support allows capacity and speed upgrades without changing the motherboard.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F features 20 cores and 20 threads with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and boost clock of 5.30 GHz. Built on the Arrow Lake-S architecture using a 3nm process from TSMC, the chip contains 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 30 MB shared L3. This configuration emphasizes efficiency and multi-threaded throughput over raw frequency.

Benchmark results show a strong balance between single-thread and multi-thread performance. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5926 places it among the top processors for lightly-threaded workloads, while the multi-core score of 41980 demonstrates substantial parallel capability. The PassMark suite reveals specific strengths: data compression at 507018, data encryption at 39468, extended instructions at 39235, floating-point math at 173855, and integer math at 138078. The physics score of 3172 and prime number finding score of 416 indicate moderate performance in specialized workloads.

The 93rd percentile ranking places this CPU above the vast majority of processors. Its nearest rivals include the Core Ultra 7 265 (0.3% faster), AMD EPYC 7343 (0.4% slower), AMD EPYC 4464P (0.6% faster), and Core i9-13900KS (0.6% slower). These tight margins show the 265F competes effectively with both server-class and previous-generation flagship desktop processors. The 65W TDP makes it an efficient choice for sustained multi-threaded workloads, with the 5.30 GHz boost clock providing burst performance when needed.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, creating a high-end configuration at the 90th combined percentile. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking and GPU's 86th percentile ranking indicate both components sit in the upper tier of their respective categories. The Core Ultra 7 265F, released in January 2025, is an active production processor with a launch MSRP of $379. The RTX 4080, released in September 2022, is end-of-life with a launch MSRP of 1,199 USD.

The system's overall tier is high-end desktop, suitable for demanding gaming, content creation, and professional workloads. The CPU's 20 cores provide ample multi-threaded throughput, while the GPU's 9728 shading units and 304 tensor cores deliver substantial graphics and compute performance. The 16 GB GDDR6X memory and 716.8 GB/s bandwidth ensure the GPU is not memory-limited in high-resolution scenarios.

The build's balance is characterized by the CPU outperforming the GPU relative to their respective peer groups. This suggests the CPU has more upgrade headroom than the GPU, making future GPU upgrades the most impactful path forward. The 90th combined percentile places this system in the top 10% of all configurations, suitable for users who demand high performance across a broad range of applications.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the component benchmark scores. The RTX 4080's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6567 and PassMark G3D score of 34457 indicate strong rasterization performance. The CPU's single-thread score of 5926 in Cinebench R23 ensures adequate frame pacing in CPU-bound titles.

At 1080p resolution, the CPU is likely to be the limiting factor in esports titles, with the GPU capable of very high frame rates that may exceed the CPU's frame delivery capacity. The 4750 PassMark single-thread score suggests the CPU can sustain high frame rates in most games, though extremely CPU-intensive simulations may see lower performance.

At 1440p, the balance shifts toward the GPU, with the 4080's 16 GB VRAM and 716.8 GB/s bandwidth providing ample memory bandwidth for high-detail textures and effects. The GPU's 86th percentile ranking suggests it can deliver high frame rates in most AAA titles at this resolution. Ray tracing workloads benefit from the 76 RT cores, with performance expected to be playable with DLSS enabled.

At 4K resolution, the GPU becomes the primary constraint, with the 4080 positioned to deliver playable frame rates in most titles at high settings. The 48.74 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 280.6 GPixel/s pixel rate support 4K rendering, though demanding titles may require settings adjustments to maintain high refresh rates. The CPU's 20 cores provide ample headroom for background tasks while gaming at 4K, ensuring consistent frame times in most scenarios.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds