SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

64,438 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

2,690 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER is an intriguing desktop combination that presents a significant performance disparity. The CPU is a high-end 20-core processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, while the GPU data suggests a more modest graphics solution. This analysis examines the specifications and benchmark data to provide a clear picture of what this pairing offers for various workloads.

The CPU delivers exceptional multi-threaded performance, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all processors, while the GPU’s benchmark results place it in a significantly lower tier. This creates a system where the processor is the clear dominant component, and the graphics card will likely be the limiting factor in graphics-intensive tasks. The following sections break down the individual components, their benchmark standings, and how they interact to define the system's overall character.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F is built on the Arrow Lake architecture, manufactured on a 3 nm process node by TSMC. It features 20 cores and 20 threads, a configuration that prioritizes multi-threaded throughput. With a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, the processor is designed to handle both heavy parallel workloads and bursty single-threaded tasks effectively. The chip has a 65 W TDP, indicating an efficient power profile for a desktop processor of this capability.

Benchmark scores confirm the CPU's strong position. In Cinebench R23, it scores 41,980 points in the multi-core test and 5,926 points in single-core. These figures show a processor that is excellent for demanding tasks like video rendering, software compilation, and scientific computing. The Cinebench R20 scores of 17,631 multi-core and 2,488 single-core align with this narrative, reinforcing the CPU's ability to scale performance across many cores.

The CPU's Passmark results are equally impressive. It achieves a multi-thread score of 49,410 and a single-thread score of 4,750. In specific compute tasks, it scores 173,855 in floating-point math and 138,078 in integer math. The data compression score of 507,018 and data encryption score of 39,468 highlight its capability in data-heavy tasks. The CPU's 30 MB of shared L3 cache and 3 MB of L2 cache per core provide ample capacity for storing working data.

This performance places the Ultra 7 265F in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, a signal of its high-end status. Its average benchmark score of 64,438 puts it in direct competition with other top-tier processors. The nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265, has an average score of 64,640, which is 0.3% higher than the 265F. This shows the two are effectively interchangeable in most workloads. Other rivals include the AMD EPYC 7343 (score 64,202, 0.4% lower), the AMD EPYC 4464P (score 64,823, 0.6% higher), and the Intel Core i9-13900KS (score 64,051, 0.6% lower). These results indicate that the 265F is a top-tier consumer desktop chip, matching or exceeding the performance of the previous generation's flagship.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F compare to its immediate sibling, the Core Ultra 7 265?

A: Benchmark data shows they are nearly identical. The Core Ultra 7 265 has an average benchmark score of 64,640, which is a 0.3% difference from the 265F's score. In practical terms, there is no measurable performance difference between the two processors.

Q: What is the significance of the RTX 5070 SUPER's 3DMark score?

A: The GPU scored 2,690 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. This score places it in the 18th percentile of all GPUs, indicating entry-level to mid-range performance relative to the broader market of graphics cards.

Q: What kind of memory and storage connectivity does the CPU offer?

A: The processor supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. For expansion, it provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU itself, which allows for high-speed connectivity to modern storage devices and graphics cards.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F does not have an integrated GPU. A discrete graphics card, such as the RTX 5070 SUPER in this build, is mandatory for any display output.

Q: How does this CPU compare to a high-end previous-generation processor like the Core i9-13900KS?

A: The Ultra 7 265F has an average benchmark score of 64,438, which is 0.6% higher than the Core i9-13900KS's score of 64,051. This suggests the newer Ultra 7 offers slightly better overall performance despite its different core architecture.

Q: Is the CPU's high multi-threaded score more important than its single-threaded score?

A: Both are important for different tasks. The multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 41,980 is a strong indicator of performance in rendering, encoding, and compilation. The single-core score of 5,926 is more relevant for gaming and general application responsiveness, where it also performs admirably.

Benchmark Performance

The data available for this system includes a single GPU benchmark and a comprehensive suite of CPU benchmarks. There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK, so all FPS-related discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores.

The CPU performance is the highlight of this build. Its average benchmark score of 64,438 places it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. This is a strong indicator of top-tier performance for desktop processors. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 41,980 demonstrates excellent capability for heavily threaded tasks like 3D rendering and video editing. The single-core score of 5,926 is also high, ensuring snappy system responsiveness and strong performance in applications that rely on a few fast cores.

The GPU presents a contrasting picture. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER scored 2,690 points in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 benchmark. This score places the GPU in the 18th percentile of all GPUs. This is a relatively low standing, suggesting that, based on this data, the GPU performance is closer to entry-level or older mid-range models. Its nearest rivals in the benchmark are the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M (score 2,664, 1% lower), the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (score 2,662, 1.1% lower), and the Intel Arc Pro B50 (score 2,660, 1.1% lower). While the 5070 SUPER leads these, the margins are very small, indicating its performance is in this lower tier.

The combined picture is one of imbalance. The system's overall combined percentile is 56, a score that is dragged down by the GPU's low standing. The CPU is a champion, while the GPU appears to be a weak link based on the data. For a system with this processor, the GPU is the primary bottleneck in any graphics-related workload.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a significant bottleneck in this system. The CPU is operating at a high level, with an average score in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. In contrast, the GPU's average score is in the 18th percentile of all GPUs. This disparity means the graphics card will almost certainly limit performance in any workload that relies on the GPU.

In gaming, the GPU is typically the primary determinant of frame rates, especially at higher resolutions and graphics settings. Given its low benchmark standing, the RTX 5070 SUPER will struggle to produce high frame rates in demanding modern titles. The powerful CPU will be underutilized in these scenarios, waiting for the GPU to complete its work. The CPU's high single-threaded score of 5,926 in Cinebench R23 ensures it is not the limiting factor in most game logic or physics calculations.

For non-graphics workloads, the CPU dominates. In tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, the CPU's 20 cores and high multi-threaded scores will be fully utilized. The GPU will play a minor or no role in these tasks, meaning the system will perform exceptionally well. The bottleneck is clear: the CPU is a high-performance component that is held back by the GPU in graphics-intensive scenarios. The FPS scaling in games would be directly tied to the GPU's capability, and based on its 3DMark score, that capability is limited.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The system is built around the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which supports the Core Ultra Series 2 processors like the Ultra 7 265F. The platform supports dual-channel DDR5 memory, providing a modern foundation for a desktop build. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, enabling high-bandwidth connectivity for the latest SSDs and graphics cards. The GPU, an RTX 5070 SUPER, uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, ensuring it is fully compatible with the CPU's lanes.

The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 275 W. This is a modest power requirement for a modern desktop system. A high-quality power supply unit with sufficient wattage for this combined load is necessary, but the overall power draw is not extreme. The GPU is a dual-slot card that is 245 mm long, making it compatible with most mid-tower and full-tower cases.

A sensible next upgrade for this system would be to focus on the GPU. Given the CPU's high performance, it can easily support a more powerful graphics card. Swapping the RTX 5070 SUPER for a higher-tier GPU in the GeForce 50-series would resolve the performance bottleneck and unlock the CPU's full potential in gaming and graphics workloads. The CPU's 20-core design and high clock speeds ensure it will not be a limiting factor for even the most powerful graphics cards available.

Who Should Build It

This system is tailored for users who prioritize processor-heavy workloads but also need a basic graphics solution. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F is a powerhouse for productivity. Its 93rd percentile CPU score and high multi-core performance in Cinebench R23 (41,980) make it an excellent choice for content creators, video editors, and 3D modelers who work with complex scenes and timelines. Software developers compiling large codebases will also see significant benefits from the 20 cores and high performance in integer math (138,078 in Passmark).

Students and professionals in engineering, science, and finance will find the CPU's computational power valuable for simulations, data analysis, and complex calculations. The high data compression (507,018) and encryption (39,468) scores are beneficial for working with large datasets. For small business workstations, the CPU ensures a responsive and powerful experience for demanding business applications.

Gamers are not the primary target for this configuration. While the CPU is top-tier for gaming, the GPU's 18th percentile score suggests it will only handle less demanding games or run modern titles at lower resolutions and graphics settings. This build is for someone who needs a high-end workstation-class processor for their primary work, with the GPU serving as a secondary component for light graphics tasks or basic display output.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This scenario is not well-served by this configuration. The RTX 5070 SUPER's 3DMark score of 2,690, which places it in the 18th percentile, indicates it is not capable of driving high refresh rates in modern games. The CPU is powerful enough, but the GPU will be the limiting factor, preventing the system from achieving the high frame rates required for 144Hz or 240Hz displays.

Streaming: The CPU is well-equipped to handle game encoding and streaming workloads. Its high multi-threaded performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 score of 41,980, can handle the encoding workload on x264. However, the GPU's low performance will limit the in-game frame rates, resulting in a poor experience for both the streamer and the audience.

Video Editing: This is a strong scenario for the system. Video editing software heavily utilizes the CPU for effects, color grading, and rendering timelines. The Ultra 7 265F's high multi-core score will provide excellent performance in these tasks. The GPU can assist with some effects, but the CPU will be the main workhorse, making this a capable editing machine.

3D Rendering: This is another scenario where the CPU excels. 3D rendering, especially CPU-based renderers, will fully utilize all 20 cores of the Ultra 7 265F. The high Cinebench scores, including 41,980 in R23, directly translate to faster render times. The GPU's role is minimal here, making this an excellent system for this workload.

Software Development: The Ultra 7 265F is an ideal processor for developers. Compiling large projects is a heavily multi-threaded task, and the CPU's 20 cores will significantly reduce build times. The high Passmark integer math score of 138,078 is also relevant for code execution and logic. The GPU is sufficient for running multiple monitors and basic 2D/3D interfaces.

Student and Office Work: This configuration is overkill for standard student and office tasks like web browsing, word processing, and spreadsheets. The CPU's immense power will be largely idle, but it ensures the system will never feel slow, even with many applications open. The GPU is more than enough for these tasks, making it a very smooth and responsive system for daily work.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs a top-tier Intel processor with an entry-level graphics card. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F is a 20-core, 20-thread processor from the Arrow Lake architecture, designed for high-end desktop computing. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER is a graphics card with 18 GB of GDDR7 memory, but its benchmark performance is in a much lower tier.

The system's combined percentile is 56, a score that reflects the significant gap between the CPU and GPU performance. The CPU is in the 93rd percentile, while the GPU is in the 18th percentile. This is a processor-first build. It is designed for users who need maximum CPU compute power for their work and have minimal or secondary graphics requirements.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER is based on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture and the GB205 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It has 18 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s. The card features 6,400 shading units, 200 texture mapping units, and 80 raster operation units. It also includes 50 RT cores and 200 Tensor cores for ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads. The GPU has a base clock of 2325 MHz and a boost clock of 2512 MHz.

The single benchmark score from the FACT PACK, a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result of 2,690, provides the primary data point for its performance. This score places the GPU in the 18th percentile of all GPUs. This is a low score, putting it in the same performance bracket as much older or lower-end cards like the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 and the Intel Arc Pro B50, which are only 1.1% slower in these benchmarks.

For rendering, this score suggests the 5070 SUPER will have limited capability for modern 3D applications and games. Its 32.15 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 50 RT cores are present, but the low benchmark score indicates that real-world performance will be constrained. The GPU is a weak component in this build, and its performance will be the primary bottleneck for any graphics-intensive task. It is suitable for basic display output and light graphical work, but it is not a gaming or professional rendering card based on the data.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds