SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

64,438 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

23,172 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 pairing presents an interesting balance question, as the data reveals a significant gap in their performance percentiles. The CPU sits at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU occupies only the 68th percentile among all GPUs. This 25-percentile-point difference suggests that in most workloads, the processor will be waiting on the graphics card rather than the reverse.

Looking at the CPU's benchmark scores, the multicore results are particularly strong. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 41,980 and the Passmark multithread score of 49,410 indicate a processor that can feed even demanding GPU workloads without breaking a sweat. The single-thread performance is equally impressive, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5,926, which means the CPU is unlikely to bottleneck even in lightly-threaded gaming scenarios.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4,407 and Passmark G3D score of 25,086 place it firmly in the mid-range of current graphics hardware. For gaming at 1080p or 1440p, the RTX 3080's raw compute should keep pace with the CPU's output. However, at higher resolutions or in compute-heavy workloads, the GPU becomes the limiting factor. The data suggests that the RTX 3080's 10 GB of GDDR6X memory and 760.3 GB/s bandwidth will be the primary constraint in texture-heavy scenarios.

The combined percentile of 81 further reinforces this interpretation. This pairing is not perfectly balanced, but the CPU's headroom means that users who upgrade the GPU later will see immediate gains without needing to replace the processor. The 65-watt TDP of the CPU versus the 320-watt TDP of the GPU indicates that power delivery is heavily skewed toward the graphics card, which is typical for gaming-focused builds.

# Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F delivers exceptional benchmark results across the board. In Cinebench R15, it scores 4,231 in multicore and 597 in single-core tests. The R20 iteration shows 17,631 multicore and 2,488 single-core. Moving to R23, the scores are 41,980 multicore and 5,926 single-core. These numbers place the CPU at the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 64,438.

The nearest rivals provide context for these figures. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 scores 64,640 on average, which is only 0.3% higher than the 265F. The AMD EPYC 7343 trails by 0.4%, scoring 64,202, while the AMD EPYC 4464P leads by 0.6% at 64,823. The Intel Core i9-13900KS scores 64,051, which is 0.6% lower. These tight margins indicate that the 265F is competitively positioned within its performance class.

The GPU benchmarks tell a different story. The RTX 3080 achieves a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4,407, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 152,423, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 33,620. In Passmark tests, it scores 25,086 in G3D and 14,397 in GPU compute. The GPU's average benchmark score is 23,172, placing it at the 68th percentile of all GPUs.

The GPU's nearest rivals show how close the competition is at this level. The NVIDIA P106-100 scores 23,249 (0.3% higher), the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 scores 23,250 (0.3% higher), the AMD Radeon RX 6600M scores 23,273 (0.4% higher), and the AMD Radeon R9 M290X scores 23,276 (0.4% higher). These sub-0.5% deltas indicate that the RTX 3080 is positioned in a crowded performance band.

The combined picture shows a CPU that outperforms its direct rivals by a hair while the GPU sits in a tightly contested mid-range tier. The CPU's Passmark scores are particularly telling: integer math at 138,078, floating point math at 173,855, data compression at 507,018, and data encryption at 39,468. These figures suggest that the processor is well-suited for both productivity and content creation workloads.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform with the Arrow Lake architecture. This is a desktop-class CPU built on a 3 nm process node at TSMC, featuring 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The socket supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is sufficient for a modern GPU and an NVMe drive.

The CPU's 65-watt TDP is notably modest for a 20-core processor. This low power draw means that users can pair it with a wide range of motherboards and cooling solutions without concern. The GPU, by contrast, has a 320-watt TDP and requires a 700-watt suggested PSU. The power supply recommendation accounts for the combined draw of both components, leaving headroom for additional drives and peripherals.

For users looking to upgrade, the data suggests that the GPU is the more likely candidate for replacement. The RTX 3080's end-of-life production status and 68th percentile ranking indicate that it has a shorter remaining lifespan than the CPU, which is still active in production. A future GPU upgrade would allow the CPU's full potential to be realized, particularly in GPU-bound scenarios.

The platform itself has room for expansion. The PCIe Gen 5 support on the CPU lanes means that future GPUs and storage devices can take advantage of increased bandwidth. The dual-channel DDR5 memory support with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth provides a solid foundation for memory-intensive applications. The lack of ECC memory support may be a consideration for workstation use, but it is not a limitation for gaming or general productivity.

# FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F compare to its closest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265?

A: The 265F scores 64,438 on average, which is 0.3% lower than the 265's 64,640. This difference is negligible in real-world usage, with the 265F effectively matching its sibling in performance.

Q: What is the RTX 3080's performance percentile and what does that mean for gaming?

A: The GPU sits at the 68th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 23,172. This places it in the mid-to-upper range of graphics hardware, capable of handling most games at high settings, though not at the absolute top tier.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the data shows the integrated graphics as "N/A." This means a discrete GPU is required for display output, which is already provided by the RTX 3080 in this pairing.

Q: What memory type and bandwidth does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. This is sufficient for gaming and productivity workloads, though not the highest available bandwidth.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked. Users cannot overclock the CPU by adjusting the multiplier, though BCLK overclocking may still be possible depending on the motherboard.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The RTX 3080 has 10 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 320-bit bus, providing 760.3 GB/s of bandwidth. This is adequate for 1440p gaming and most creative workloads.

Q: How does the CPU's single-thread performance compare to its multicore performance?

A: The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5,926 is roughly 14% of the multicore score of 41,980. This ratio is typical for a 20-core processor, indicating strong per-core performance that benefits gaming and lightly-threaded tasks.

# Who Should Build It

This desktop build targets users who need strong CPU performance for productivity while maintaining solid GPU capability for gaming and creative work. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking makes it an excellent choice for content creators who rely on multicore performance. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 41,980 and Passmark data compression score of 507,018 indicate that video editors, 3D renderers, and software developers will find ample processing power.

Students and small business workstation users will benefit from the CPU's efficiency. The 65-watt TDP means lower power consumption and reduced cooling requirements compared to higher-end desktop processors. The 20 cores and 20 threads handle multitasking well, allowing users to run virtual machines, compile code, or process large spreadsheets without slowdowns.

Gamers at 1440p resolution will find the RTX 3080 sufficient for most titles, though the GPU's 68th percentile ranking means it is not at the top of the graphics hierarchy. Users who play at 1080p with high refresh rates will likely be GPU-bound in many scenarios, which is acceptable given the CPU's headroom. Those who demand maximum settings at 4K may want to consider a higher-tier GPU.

Software developers and data analysts will appreciate the CPU's encryption and compression capabilities. The Passmark data encryption score of 39,468 and random string sorting score of 62,439 indicate strong performance in security-related and data-processing tasks. The lack of ECC memory support is a minor drawback for some workstation use cases, but it is unlikely to affect most users.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 is built on the Ampere architecture with the GA102 chip, manufactured on Samsung's 8 nm process. The chip contains 28,300 million transistors on a 628 mm² die, with a transistor density of 45.1 million per square millimeter. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1440 MHz and a boost clock of 1710 MHz, with memory running at 1188 MHz (19 Gbps effective).

The memory subsystem consists of 10 GB of GDDR6X on a 320-bit bus, providing 760.3 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a significant amount of bandwidth for the era of the GPU's release, though the 10 GB capacity may be limiting for some modern games at maximum texture settings. The GPU's 8,704 shading units, 272 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units provide a solid foundation for rasterization.

Ray tracing and tensor hardware are present in the form of 68 RT cores and 272 tensor cores. These enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS, respectively. The GPU's FP32 performance of 29.77 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 29.77 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio) indicate strong compute capability for rendering tasks.

The benchmark scores reflect the GPU's mid-range positioning. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4,407 and Passmark G3D score of 25,086 are respectable but not top-tier. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 152,423 and Vulkan score of 33,620 show that the GPU handles compute workloads well. The Passmark GPU compute score of 14,397 further confirms this.

The GPU's dual-slot design and 285 mm length require adequate case clearance. The 1x 12-pin power connector means users may need an adapter for standard 8-pin PSU cables. The display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, supporting modern monitors. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

# Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5,926) ensures that frame rates are not CPU-limited. The GPU's 68th percentile ranking suggests that 144Hz or 165Hz monitors are achievable in most esports titles, though demanding AAA games may require settings adjustments.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 cores and 20 threads provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The Passmark multithread score of 49,410 indicates that simultaneous gaming and streaming workloads will not cause significant performance degradation. The GPU's NVENC encoder (via tensor cores) can also offload this task.

Video Editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 41,980 and Passmark floating point math score of 173,855 demonstrate strong performance for video rendering and effects. The GPU's 10 GB VRAM and 760.3 GB/s bandwidth handle 4K timelines and GPU-accelerated effects, though the 68th percentile ranking means render times will be moderate.

3D Rendering: The CPU's 20 cores excel in CPU-based rendering, with the Cinebench scores indicating strong performance in Blender and similar applications. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 29.77 TFLOPS provides GPU-accelerated rendering capability, though its mid-range ranking means it is not a dedicated render farm solution.

Software Development: The Passmark data compression score of 507,018 and integer math score of 138,078 indicate fast compilation and data processing. The 65-watt TDP keeps power costs low during long build sessions. The 20 threads allow for parallel test execution in CI-like workflows.

Student and Office Work: The CPU's efficiency (65-watt TDP) and strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5,926) make it responsive for everyday tasks. The GPU, while more powerful than needed for office work, provides headroom for occasional creative projects or light gaming after hours.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 in a desktop configuration. The combined percentile of 81 indicates that this system performs better than the vast majority of desktop PCs. The CPU is the standout component, sitting at the 93rd percentile, while the GPU's 68th percentile is more modest.

The CPU is part of the Core Ultra Series 2, based on the Arrow Lake architecture. It features 20 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The 3 nm process node from TSMC and 17,800 million transistors represent high-end manufacturing technology. The launch MSRP is $379.

The GPU, from the GeForce 30-series, is based on the Ampere architecture. It was released in September 2020 and is now end-of-life, with the GeForce 40-series as its successor. The launch MSRP was 699 USD. Despite its age, the GPU remains capable, as evidenced by its benchmark scores.

The overall tier of this system is solidly mid-to-high-end. The CPU's performance places it among the best desktop processors available, while the GPU is competitive but not top-tier. This asymmetry suggests that the system is well-suited for CPU-intensive workloads with occasional GPU-heavy tasks.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F is a 20-core, 20-thread desktop processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture. It has a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, providing strong per-core performance when needed. The 65-watt TDP is remarkably low for a processor with this many cores, indicating excellent power efficiency.

The cache hierarchy consists of 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration provides fast access to frequently used data, which is critical for both gaming and productivity workloads. The lack of 3D V-Cache means the CPU relies on its high clock speeds and efficient architecture for performance.

The CPU's benchmark results are consistently strong. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 41,980 places it in the upper echelon of desktop processors. The Passmark multithread score of 49,410 and floating point math score of 173,855 further confirm its multicore prowess. Single-thread performance is also impressive, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5,926 and Passmark single-thread score of 4,750.

The nearest rivals show that the 265F is competitively positioned. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 scores 64,640 (0.3% higher), the AMD EPYC 7343 scores 64,202 (0.4% lower), the AMD EPYC 4464P scores 64,823 (0.6% higher), and the Intel Core i9-13900KS scores 64,051 (0.6% lower). These margins are within noise in real-world usage.

The CPU's memory support for DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for most applications. The PCIe Gen 5 support with 20 CPU lanes provides high-bandwidth connectivity for GPUs and NVMe drives. The lack of integrated graphics means a discrete GPU is mandatory, which is already present in this build.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, as the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All frame rate discussions below are estimates based on the CPU's and GPU's benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

Based on the CPU's 93rd percentile ranking and the GPU's 68th percentile, this system should deliver strong gaming performance at 1080p and 1440p resolutions. The CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5,926) ensures that even CPU-intensive games will not be bottlenecked by the processor. The GPU's 29.77 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 760.3 GB/s of memory bandwidth provide ample raw power for most titles.

At 1080p, the system should achieve high frame rates in competitive titles and maintain playable performance in demanding AAA games. The GPU's 68th percentile ranking suggests that it is below the absolute top tier, so maximum settings at 1440p may require occasional reductions in certain games. At 4K, the 10 GB VRAM capacity may become a limitation for games with high-resolution textures.

The CPU's 20 cores and 20 threads provide headroom for background tasks while gaming, such as streaming or Discord. The Passmark data compression score of 507,018 ensures that game loading times are not bottlenecked by the CPU. Overall, the gaming experience should be smooth and responsive, with the GPU being the primary determinant of frame rates in most scenarios.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds