SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F + Intel Arc B770

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

85 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
GPU Bottleneck
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

64,438 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B770

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F is a 20-core, 20-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake-S architecture, fabricated on TSMC's 3 nm process node. It uses a hybrid configuration with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, drawing a 65 W TDP. The chip integrates 30 MB of shared L3 cache, alongside 192 KB of L1 cache and 3 MB of L2 cache per core. This is a notably power-efficient design; the 65 W TDP is modest for a 20-core part, which suggests sustained multi-core workloads can run without aggressive thermal throttling in a properly configured system.

Benchmark results place the 265F in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, meaning it outperforms roughly 93% of processors in the database. Its average benchmark score of 64,438 is within 0.6% of the AMD EPYC 4464P (64,823), within 0.4% of the AMD EPYC 7343 (64,202), and within 0.3% of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 (64,640). It also edges out the Intel Core i9-13900KS (64,051) by 0.6%. These deltas are small enough that the 265F should be considered performance-equivalent to these rivals in aggregate; day-to-day differences will be workload-dependent rather than categorical.

In Cinebench tests, the 265F scores 41,980 in R23 multi-core and 5,926 in R23 single-core. The R20 results are 17,631 multi-core and 2,488 single-core, while R15 shows 4,231 multi-core and 597 single-core. The multi-core to single-core scaling is strong: the R23 multi-core score is roughly 7.1 times the single-core score, which is close to the ideal for a 20-thread chip with no hyperthreading. The Passmark suite reinforces this, with a multithread score of 49,410 and a single-thread score of 4,750. Data compression scores 507,018, while integer math reaches 138,078 and floating-point math hits 173,855. These numbers indicate a balanced design that handles both integer-heavy and floating-point-heavy code well.

The 265F supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus with a theoretical bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. This is not a high-end HEDT platform, but it is sufficient for a 20-core desktop processor; memory bandwidth will not bottleneck most productivity tasks, though heavily bandwidth-dependent workloads may see some headroom limits. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is ample for a single high-end GPU plus one or two Gen 5 NVMe drives. There is no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is mandatory. The multiplier is locked, meaning overclocking is not an option; users must rely on the stock boost behavior, which is already aggressive at 5.30 GHz.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The pairing of the Core Ultra 7 265F with the Intel Arc B770 creates a system where the CPU is the stronger component by percentile ranking. The CPU sits at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs. The combined system percentile is 72. This asymmetry suggests that in CPU-bound workloads, the processor will rarely be the limiting factor, whereas in GPU-bound scenarios, the Arc B770 will cap performance.

For gaming, this means that at lower resolutions, the 265F's high single-thread score (5,926 in R23 single-core) can feed frames quickly, but the GPU's mid-tier position will govern the final frame rate. At higher resolutions, the GPU bottleneck becomes even more pronounced, as the rendering load increases while CPU demand stays relatively flat. For productivity, the CPU's 93rd percentile ranking and 20 threads mean that compilation, rendering, and encoding tasks will scale well, but the GPU will limit any GPU-accelerated tasks such as 3D rendering in GPU-based engines or AI inference.

The 65 W TDP of the CPU paired with the 225 W TDP of the GPU creates a system with a moderate total power draw. The suggested PSU is 550 W, which is reasonable for this combination, leaving headroom for drives, fans, and motherboard components. The CPU's low TDP means it will not demand exotic cooling; a capable air cooler is sufficient. The GPU, however, requires a dual-slot cooler and a 1x 6-pin plus 1x 8-pin power connector configuration, which is standard for its class.

FPS scaling will be dictated by the GPU's 50th percentile position. The CPU can push well beyond the GPU's limits in most gaming scenarios, so the GPU is the bottleneck in games. For streaming, the CPU has enough headroom (20 threads) to encode video via software x264 while gaming, though using the GPU's hardware encoders would offload that work entirely.

# FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F have integrated graphics?

A: No. The FACT PACK lists integrated graphics as "N/A," meaning a discrete GPU is required for display output. The system in question pairs it with the Intel Arc B770.

Q: What is the memory configuration for this CPU?

A: The 265F supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, with a theoretical memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. ECC memory is not supported.

Q: How does the 265F compare to the Intel Core i9-13900KS?

A: The 265F has an average benchmark score of 64,438, which is 0.6% higher than the i9-13900KS's 64,051. This puts them at performance parity, with the 265F having a slight edge in aggregate.

Q: What PCIe generation does the CPU support?

A: The CPU provides 20 lanes of PCIe Gen 5. This is suitable for a modern GPU and high-speed NVMe storage.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked. This is a non-K series Intel part, so users cannot adjust the multiplier beyond factory settings.

Q: What is the process node and foundry for the 265F?

A: The chip is built on TSMC's 3 nm process node, with a die size of 243 mm² and 17,800 million transistors.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the 265F?

A: The launch MSRP is $379.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core Ultra 7 265F uses Intel Socket 1851, which is the platform for Arrow Lake-S desktop processors. This socket is shared with other Core Ultra Series 2 parts, meaning users can upgrade within the same generation without changing the motherboard. The memory support is DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, with a theoretical bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. There is no ECC support, which rules out certain workstation-class memory configurations.

The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is enough for a single high-end GPU and one or two Gen 5 NVMe SSDs. The motherboard should also provide additional PCIe lanes from the chipset for expansion, though the FACT PACK does not specify chipset lane counts. For a sensible next upgrade, users could move to a higher-core-count Core Ultra 9 part on the same socket, assuming one exists in the lineup, or they could upgrade the GPU to a higher-tier model since the CPU has headroom. The 65 W TDP means the CPU power delivery requirements are modest, so a mid-range motherboard with adequate VRM cooling is sufficient.

The GPU, an Intel Arc B770, uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward-compatible with the CPU's Gen 5 slots. The GPU has a 225 W TDP and requires a 550 W PSU according to the suggested PSU rating. This gives a total system power budget that leaves room for additional drives and peripherals without requiring a PSU upgrade. The GPU uses a 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin power connector configuration, which is standard for its class. The GPU is dual-slot, so case clearance should be checked against the specific model's dimensions (not listed in the FACT PACK).

For memory upgrades, users should stick to DDR5 modules. The dual-channel configuration means populating two or four DIMM slots is optimal. Higher-speed DDR5 kits may improve memory-bound workloads, but the 102.4 GB/s bandwidth is a hard platform limit that cannot be exceeded regardless of module speed.

# Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F posts an average benchmark score of 64,438, placing it in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs. This is a strong result for a 20-thread desktop processor. The nearest rivals are all within 0.6%: the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 scores 64,640 (0.3% higher), the AMD EPYC 7343 scores 64,202 (0.4% lower), the AMD EPYC 4464P scores 64,823 (0.6% higher), and the Intel Core i9-13900KS scores 64,051 (0.6% lower). The 265F effectively sits in a four-way tie with these parts, making it a high-end desktop performer that trades blows with server-class chips.

In Cinebench R23, the 265F scores 41,980 multi-core and 5,926 single-core. The R20 results are 17,631 and 2,488, respectively, while R15 shows 4,231 and 597. The Passmark suite shows a multithread score of 49,410 and a single-thread score of 4,750. Data compression scores 507,018, data encryption scores 39,468, extended instructions score 39,235, and find prime numbers scores 416. Floating-point math scores 173,855, integer math scores 138,078, physics scores 3,172, and random string sorting scores 62,439.

The Intel Arc B770 GPU has no benchmark scores listed in the FACT PACK, and its average benchmark score is 0. Its percentile is 50, meaning it sits at the median of all GPUs. The GPU's FP32 performance is 19.66 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 39.32 TFLOPS (2:1). The pixel rate is 307.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 614.4 GTexel/s. The combined system percentile is 72, reflecting the CPU's strength relative to the GPU's median position.

# Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination, and the dataIsMeasured flag is false. Therefore, all FPS figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and percentile positions. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking and the GPU's 50th percentile ranking suggest that the GPU will be the primary determinant of gaming frame rates.

At 1080p, the 265F's single-thread score of 5,926 in Cinebench R23 indicates it can handle high-refresh gaming in CPU-bound titles. However, the Arc B770's median GPU position implies that frame rates will be moderate; users should expect 60-100 FPS in most modern titles at ultra settings, with esports titles potentially exceeding this range. At 1440p, the GPU load increases, and the B770 will likely deliver 50-80 FPS in demanding AAA games. At 4K, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck, with frame rates dropping to 30-50 FPS in the most demanding titles.

The GPU's 16 GB of VRAM is ample for high-resolution textures, and the 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is sufficient for 1440p and 4K gaming. The 256-bit memory bus width supports high data throughput. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6, covering all modern gaming APIs. Ray tracing performance will be limited by the 32 RT cores, but the B770 should handle ray-traced effects at reduced settings or lower resolutions. The 4096 shading units and 256 TMUs provide solid rasterization throughput, though the 128 ROPs cap fill-rate-bound scenarios.

While no measured FPS numbers exist, the benchmark scores indicate a system that is well-balanced for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with the GPU as the limiting factor. For high-refresh 1080p esports, the CPU will not be the bottleneck, so the GPU will determine final FPS.

# Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance without requiring a top-tier GPU. The 265F's 93rd percentile CPU ranking makes it suitable for content creators, developers, and professionals who run CPU-bound workloads. The 20 threads and 41,980 Cinebench R23 multi-core score indicate strong performance in video encoding, 3D rendering (CPU-based), and software compilation. The GPU's 50th percentile ranking means it is adequate for casual gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks, but not for high-end 4K gaming or heavy GPU compute.

Gamers at 1080p and 1440p will find this system capable of running modern titles at medium-to-ultra settings, with the GPU as the bottleneck. Content creators working in Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve will benefit from the CPU's multi-core strength, while the GPU provides hardware acceleration for effects and encoding. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 20 threads and high single-thread performance. Students and small business users will find the system more than adequate for productivity tasks, though it may be overkill for basic office work.

The CPU's 65 W TDP makes it an efficient choice for workstations that run long-duration multi-core loads, as power draw and heat output remain moderate. The GPU's 225 W TDP is typical for its class, and the 550 W suggested PSU keeps the system power requirements manageable.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F with the Intel Arc B770. The CPU is a 20-core, 20-thread Arrow Lake-S part on Socket 1851, built on TSMC's 3 nm process. The GPU is an Intel Arc B770 based on the Xe2-HPG architecture, also known as Battlemage (Arc 7 generation), using TSMC's 5 nm process. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, while the GPU has a 225 W TDP. The suggested PSU for the system is 550 W.

In terms of overall tier, the combined system percentile is 72. This reflects a CPU that is well above average (93rd percentile) paired with a GPU that is exactly average (50th percentile). The system is therefore stronger in CPU-bound workloads than in GPU-bound ones. It is not a top-tier gaming rig, but it is a capable workstation-class desktop that can handle a wide range of tasks. The CPU's performance rivals server-class parts like the AMD EPYC 7343 and EPYC 4464P in aggregate benchmark scores, while the GPU provides median-level gaming and compute performance.

The 265F's locked multiplier, lack of integrated graphics, and DDR5-only memory support define the platform's boundaries. Users cannot overclock the CPU, must use a discrete GPU, and need DDR5 memory. The platform does support PCIe Gen 5 for storage and expansion, which future-proofs the system for high-speed NVMe drives.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (5,926 in Cinebench R23) ensures it will not bottleneck the GPU in most titles. The GPU's 50th percentile position caps frame rates, but esports titles and lighter games should achieve high refresh rates. At 1440p, expect lower but still playable frame rates.

Streaming: The 20-thread CPU can handle software x264 encoding while gaming, thanks to its 41,980 multi-core Cinebench R23 score. Streaming at 1080p60 should be feasible without significant frame drops, though using the GPU's hardware encoders would offload the work and preserve more CPU headroom.

Video editing: The CPU's multi-core strength (49,410 Passmark multithread) accelerates timeline rendering and export in non-GPU-accelerated workflows. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth assist with effects and color grading, though its median percentile means GPU-accelerated rendering will be moderate.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering (e.g., Blender Cycles CPU) will perform well, given the 93rd percentile CPU ranking. GPU-based rendering will be limited by the Arc B770's 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 performance, which is mid-range. The 32 RT cores provide some ray tracing capability, but not at high-end levels.

Software development: The 20 threads and high single-thread score (4,750 Passmark) speed up compilation, testing, and running development environments. The 30 MB L3 cache and 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth support large codebases and virtual machines.

Student and office work: This system is overkill for basic productivity, but it handles multitasking, spreadsheets, document editing, and light coding with ease. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps power costs low, and the system's overall performance ensures smooth operation for years.

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B770 is a desktop GPU based on the Xe2-HPG architecture, specifically the Battlemage generation (Arc 7). It uses the BMG-G31 chip, fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process with a die size of 368 mm². The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective data rate.

The GPU contains 4096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 raster output units. It has 32 ray tracing cores. The base clock is 2100 MHz, with a boost clock of 2400 MHz. The compute throughput is 19.66 TFLOPS for FP32 and 39.32 TFLOPS for FP16 (2:1 ratio). The pixel rate is 307.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 614.4 GTexel/s.

The GPU's percentile ranking is 50, placing it exactly at the median of all GPUs. With no benchmark scores provided, this ranking is the primary indicator of its performance class. The 16 GB VRAM is generous for its tier, providing headroom for high-resolution textures and large datasets. The 512.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1440p gaming and light 4K workloads, though it is not elite-tier.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, covering all current gaming and compute APIs. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, supporting high refresh rates and multi-monitor setups. The GPU uses a dual-slot cooler and requires 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin power connectors. The suggested PSU is 550 W, with a TDP of 225 W. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the CPU's Gen 5 slots.

For rendering workloads, the 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 performance is mid-range. The 32 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing, but performance will be modest compared to higher-tier GPUs. The 16 GB VRAM is beneficial for GPU-accelerated rendering and AI workloads that exceed 8 GB or 12 GB memory footprints. The GPU's median percentile means it is a capable all-rounder, but not a high-end performer.