SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F + Intel Arc A310E

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

85 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
GPU Bottleneck
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

64,438 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310E

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Platform Analysis: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F + Intel Arc A310E

This desktop pairing combines Intel's 20-core Arrow Lake processor with Intel's entry-level Arc Alchemist graphics card, creating a configuration that is heavily weighted toward CPU-centric workloads. The Core Ultra 7 265F sits in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, while the Arc A310E lands exactly at the 50th percentile for GPUs, and the combined system percentile is 72. This stark contrast in component tiers defines the character of this build: a processor with serious compute muscle paired with a modest graphics solution. The absence of measured FPS data for this exact combination means all gaming frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of each component.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which is the foundation for the Core Ultra Series 2 lineup. This socket supports DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The platform's memory controller does not support ECC memory, which positions it for consumer and prosumer use rather than mission-critical server deployments. The CPU itself provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the processor, offering substantial bandwidth for high-speed storage devices and expansion cards. The processor's 65 W TDP is remarkably modest for a 20-core part, and the Arc A310E carries an even lower 75 W TDP, with the GPU's suggested power supply rated at just 250 W. This low combined power envelope means most existing systems with a reasonable PSU can accommodate this pairing without requiring an upgrade.

The upgrade path from this configuration is interesting because the two components sit at very different performance tiers. The CPU is a top-tier performer that can be retained for years, while the GPU is entry-level and will likely be the first component replaced. A sensible next upgrade would involve swapping the Arc A310E for a more powerful discrete GPU that can take advantage of the CPU's capacity. The PCIe 5.0 lanes from the CPU ensure that even a high-end next-generation GPU will have adequate bandwidth. The motherboard socket supports the broader Core Ultra Series 2 family, so if more cores or higher clocks are needed, there are options within the same platform generation. However, since the 265F is already a 20-core processor with a 5.30 GHz boost clock, most users will find the CPU itself has headroom to drive faster graphics cards well into the future. The platform's 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth and dual-channel DDR5 support are adequate for most gaming and productivity scenarios, though memory bandwidth intensive tasks might benefit from a platform with quad-channel support.

Benchmark Performance

The Core Ultra 7 265F delivers benchmark scores that place it in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs. Its average benchmark score is 64,438, which puts it in close competition with several notable processors. The closest rival is the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 with an average score of 64,640, representing a negligible 0.3% difference. The AMD EPYC 4464P scores 64,823, which is 0.6% higher, while the AMD EPYC 7343 scores 64,202, or 0.4% lower. The Intel Core i9-13900KS scores 64,051, which is 0.6% lower. These margins are remarkably tight, indicating that the 265F performs essentially on par with both high-end desktop and server processors in aggregate benchmarks.

Looking at specific workload tests reveals the character of this CPU. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score is 41,980, while the single-core score is 5,926. The Cinebench R20 results show 17,631 multi-core and 2,488 single-core, and Cinebench R15 shows 4,231 multi-core and 597 single-core. These results indicate strong scaling across cores. In Passmark tests, the multi-thread score is 49,410, and the single-thread score is 4,750. The floating-point math score is 173,855, while integer math is 138,078. Data compression scores an impressive 507,018, and data encryption reaches 39,468. Extended instructions score 39,235, and random string sorting hits 62,439. The find prime numbers test scores 416, and physics simulation scores 3,172. These figures paint a picture of a processor that excels at parallel workloads involving math, compression, and encryption.

The GPU side of this pairing is far more modest. The Arc A310E sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, with no benchmark scores available in the data. Its nearest rivals are not listed, which suggests it occupies a relatively isolated position in the market. The combined percentile of 72 reflects the dominance of the CPU in this pairing. The data implies that this system will feel exceptionally fast in CPU-bound tasks but only average in GPU-bound scenarios.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between these two components is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The 93rd percentile CPU paired with a 50th percentile GPU creates a system where the graphics card is almost always the limiting factor in gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads. In CPU-intensive tasks such as data compression, encryption, and multi-threaded rendering, the 265F will deliver top-tier performance with its 41,980 Cinebench R23 multi-core score. However, any workload that relies heavily on the GPU will be constrained by the Arc A310E's 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 4 GB of GDDR6 memory.

The bottleneck analysis is straightforward: the CPU can feed far more data to the GPU than the GPU can process. The 265F's 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth and 20 cores can generate geometry, physics calculations, and game logic far faster than the A310E can render frames. In gaming scenarios, this means frame rates will be determined almost entirely by the GPU. The CPU will rarely break a sweat, with utilization likely staying well below its maximum. Conversely, in productivity tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, or software compilation, the GPU may sit idle while the CPU works at full capacity. The A310E's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus with 124.0 GB/s bandwidth are entry-level specifications that will limit texture resolution and memory-heavy workloads. The GPU's 6 ray tracing cores and support for DirectX 12 Ultimate provide modern feature support, but the raw throughput is limited.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users whose primary workloads are CPU-bound and who need occasional graphics capability. Gamers playing at 1080p with modest settings will find the Arc A310E adequate for many titles, though the 4 GB VRAM will limit texture quality in modern games. Content creators working with video editing, photo processing, or audio production will benefit enormously from the 265F's multi-core performance, with its 41,980 Cinebench R23 multi-core score indicating fast rendering and encoding times. Software developers will appreciate the 20 cores and 20 threads for parallel compilation, with the 507,018 data compression score also indicating fast archive operations. Students and small business users who run office applications, web development, or data analysis will find the system responsive, though the GPU is more than sufficient for their needs. The system is not well-suited for gamers seeking high refresh rates at 1440p or 4K, nor for 3D artists who rely heavily on GPU rendering, as the A310E's 3.072 TFLOPS will be a limiting factor.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. Therefore, all frame rate expectations below are estimates derived from the component benchmark scores, not from direct testing. The Arc A310E's 50th percentile GPU ranking and 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggest entry-level 1080p gaming capability. The 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will handle older titles and less demanding games at playable frame rates, but modern AAA games at high settings will likely struggle. The GPU does support DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6, which ensures compatibility with current game APIs. The 32 texture mapping units and 16 render output units provide a texture rate of 64.00 GTexel/s and a pixel rate of 32.00 GPixel/s, which are modest figures. The 75 W TDP means the card runs cool and quiet, making it suitable for small form factor builds. For competitive esports titles like League of Legends, CS2, or Valorant, the estimated frame rates should be quite playable at 1080p with medium to high settings. For AAA titles released in the last few years, users should expect lower settings and possibly reduced resolutions to maintain smooth gameplay.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The Arc A310E is not well-suited for high-refresh gaming at 1080p in demanding titles. The GPU's 50th percentile ranking and 3.072 TFLOPS performance suggest that achieving 144 FPS or higher in modern AAA games will require significantly reduced settings. Esports titles may reach high frame rates, but the CPU's 5.30 GHz boost clock and strong single-core score of 5,926 in Cinebench R23 will not compensate for the GPU's limited throughput.

Streaming: The 20-core CPU provides ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The 41,980 Cinebench R23 multi-core score indicates that the 265F can handle game encoding simultaneously without significant performance degradation. The GPU's support for modern APIs will handle hardware acceleration in compatible software, though the A310E's modest compute resources may limit encoding quality at higher bitrates.

Video Editing: This is a strong scenario for this system. The CPU's multi-core performance will accelerate timeline rendering, exports, and effects processing. The 173,855 floating-point math score and 138,078 integer math score indicate strong arithmetic throughput for video processing. The GPU can assist with effects and transitions, but the CPU will carry most of the workload.

3D Rendering: CPU-based rendering will be excellent, with the 20 cores providing substantial parallel processing capability. The 41,980 Cinebench R23 multi-core score is indicative of strong ray tracing performance in CPU-renderers like Blender's Cycles or V-Ray. However, GPU-based rendering with the A310E will be limited by the 3.072 TFLOPS and 4 GB VRAM, making the system better suited for CPU renders or hybrid workflows.

Software Development: The 20 cores and 20 threads will accelerate compilation of large codebases. The 507,018 data compression score indicates fast Git operations and archive handling. The 39,468 data encryption score will speed up secure communications and signing processes. The single-thread score of 4,750 ensures responsive IDE usage and fast startup times.

Student and Office Work: The system is overkill for most office tasks but offers headroom for future demands. Spreadsheets, word processing, and web browsing will run instantly. The low 65 W CPU TDP and 75 W GPU TDP mean the system runs cool and quiet, suitable for shared workspaces. The 4 GB GPU memory is sufficient for dual-monitor office setups and presentation software.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 72, reflecting the strong CPU contribution and average GPU performance.

Q: How does the Core Ultra 7 265F compare to the Intel Core i9-13900KS?

A: The 265F has an average benchmark score of 64,438, which is 0.6% higher than the Core i9-13900KS's score of 64,051.

Q: What memory type does this platform support?

A: The platform supports DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus with 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and memory bandwidth?

A: The Arc A310E has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 124.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The Core Ultra 7 265F has a boost clock of 5.30 GHz and a base clock of 2.40 GHz.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Arc A310E has 6 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which includes ray tracing capabilities.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the Arc A310E is rated at 250 W, and the GPU has a 75 W TDP.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F, a 20-core Arrow Lake processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, with the Intel Arc A310E, an Alchemist-generation entry-level GPU. The CPU sits in the 93rd percentile among all processors, making it a high-end performer, while the GPU sits exactly at the 50th percentile, representing average performance. The combined system percentile is 72, indicating an above-average overall configuration. The CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 75 W TDP create a power-efficient pairing that requires only a 250 W suggested PSU for the graphics card. This is fundamentally a CPU-first build, where the processor provides exceptional compute performance for productivity tasks, and the GPU provides adequate graphics capability for everyday use and light gaming. The 3 nm processor with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die represents a modern, efficient design, while the 6 nm GPU with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die is a smaller, older design. The asymmetrical performance levels between the two components make this build ideal for users who prioritize processing power over graphics performance.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F is a 20-core, 20-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC. It has a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The processor contains 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor is not multiplier unlocked, meaning overclocking is limited. It was released on January 6, 2025, with a launch MSRP of $379.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 41,980 is particularly strong, while the single-core score of 5,926 indicates excellent per-thread performance. The Passmark multi-thread score of 49,410 and single-thread score of 4,750 confirm this pattern. The 507,018 data compression score suggests the processor handles file archiving and compression tasks exceptionally well. The 173,855 floating-point math score and 138,078 integer math score indicate strong arithmetic capabilities for scientific computing and financial modeling. The 39,468 data encryption score shows robust cryptographic performance, useful for VPNs, disk encryption, and secure communications. The 39,235 extended instructions score demonstrates good SIMD performance for multimedia and scientific applications. The processor's 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth and dual-channel DDR5 support provide adequate memory throughput for most workloads, though memory-intensive applications might benefit from more bandwidth.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310E is an entry-level GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC. It contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, with a transistor density of 45.9M per mm². The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 124.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The memory operates at 1937 MHz with an effective speed of 15.5 Gbps. The GPU clock runs at a constant 2000 MHz for both base and boost. The card has 768 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 render output units. It features 6 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The compute performance is modest, with 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 6.144 TFLOPS of FP16 performance at a 2:1 ratio. The pixel rate is 32.00 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 64.00 GTexel/s. The card has a 75 W TDP and requires no power connectors, drawing all its power from the PCIe slot. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and offers 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs. The card measures 168 mm in length, 69 mm in height, and 20 mm in width, making it a compact single-slot solution. The GPU is end-of-life, with its successor being Battlemage. The 50th percentile ranking indicates average performance among all GPUs, which is appropriate for entry-level gaming and basic graphics acceleration. The 4 GB VRAM will limit texture quality and resolution in modern games, and the 64-bit memory bus constrains memory bandwidth. The GPU's 6 ray tracing cores provide ray tracing capability, but the overall throughput is limited, so ray tracing performance will be low. For productivity, the GPU can accelerate video encoding and decoding, and its 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs support multi-monitor setups.