SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
88%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

64,438 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

13,745 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F is a 20-core, 20-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake-S architecture and TSMC's 3 nm process node. It operates at a 2.40 GHz base clock and reaches a 5.30 GHz boost clock, with a 65 W TDP. The chip packs 30 MB of shared L3 cache, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 192 KB of L1 per core, all fed by dual-channel DDR5 memory at 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth. It uses the Intel Socket 1851 and supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes. There is no integrated graphics, and ECC memory is not supported. The CPU has a locked multiplier, meaning overclocking is not an option, and it launched with a $379 MSRP.

Benchmark results place this processor in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, which signals strong overall performance. In Cinebench R23, the 265F scores 41,980 in multi-core and 5,926 in single-core. The multi-core figure is the headline here — it indicates that the 20 physical cores (with no hyperthreading) pull their weight in heavily threaded workloads. The single-core score of 5,926 is competitive for everyday responsiveness and lightly threaded applications.

The PassMark suite adds more texture. The multithread score of 49,410 is robust, while the single-thread score of 4,750 suggests strong per-core performance for its class. Data compression scores 507,018, which is a very high mark and points to excellent throughput in archiving and file-management tasks. Data encryption comes in at 39,468, and extended instructions hit 39,235. Floating-point math scores 173,855, while integer math scores 138,078 — both healthy numbers that indicate solid compute capability for scientific and financial workloads. The physics score of 3,172 and prime-number finding score of 416 are more modest, but these are niche tests. Random string sorting at 62,439 rounds out the picture of a processor that handles a wide variety of tasks with ease.

Comparing to nearest rivals, the 265F sits within a tight cluster. It is 0.3% behind the Intel Core Ultra 7 265, 0.4% ahead of the AMD EPYC 7343, 0.6% behind the AMD EPYC 4464P, and 0.6% ahead of the Intel Core i9-13900KS. The average benchmark score of 64,438 places it right in the middle of these competitors. This is not a processor that dominates its peers by a wide margin; instead, it trades blows with high-end server and desktop chips from both Intel and AMD. For real workloads, this means the 265F is a high-tier desktop CPU that will not be the limiting factor in most systems.

FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread configuration of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F?

A: It has 20 cores and 20 threads. There is no hyperthreading, so each core maps to one thread.

Q: What is the boost clock speed, and how does it affect single-threaded performance?

A: The boost clock is 5.30 GHz. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5,926 and the PassMark single-thread score of 4,750 both indicate strong per-core speed for everyday tasks and lightly threaded applications.

Q: How does the 265F compare to the Intel Core i9-13900KS in benchmark scores?

A: The 265F is 0.6% ahead of the i9-13900KS in average benchmark score. This is a narrow margin, indicating near-parity in overall performance despite different architectures and core counts.

Q: What memory type does this CPU support, and what is the bandwidth?

A: It supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. ECC memory is not supported.

Q: Does the 265F have integrated graphics?

A: No, integrated graphics are listed as N/A. A discrete GPU is required for any display output.

Q: What is the process node and foundry for this chip?

A: The process node is 3 nm, and the foundry is TSMC. The die size is 243 mm² with 17,800 million transistors.

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: It ranks in the 93rd percentile, which places it well above the majority of processors in the database.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's strong single-core performance, evidenced by a PassMark single-thread score of 4,750 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5,926, provides the per-core speed needed to feed a high-refresh-rate monitor. The 93rd percentile ranking among all CPUs means it will not bottleneck a modern GPU in most gaming scenarios. However, since no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, frame rates are estimates based on these scores.

Streaming: The 20-core, 20-thread configuration with a 65 W TDP offers substantial headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding. The PassMark multithread score of 49,410 and the data compression score of 507,018 indicate that the CPU can handle the extra load of encoding video while maintaining game performance. The lack of integrated graphics means encoding must be done on the CPU or the discrete GPU.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 41,980 and the PassMark floating-point math score of 173,855 point to strong performance in rendering timelines and applying effects. The high data compression score also helps with exporting and archiving large video files. This is a capable CPU for 4K editing workflows, though the 65 W TDP suggests it may sustain high clocks for shorter bursts rather than all-day multi-hour renders.

3D rendering: Multi-threaded rendering workloads will benefit from the 20 cores. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 17,631 and R15 multi-core score of 4,231 confirm scaling across cores. The CPU sits 0.6% ahead of the Intel Core i9-13900KS in average score, making it a credible choice for CPU-based rendering tasks.

Software development: Compilation tasks rely on both single-threaded and multi-threaded performance. The PassMark integer math score of 138,078 and the extended instructions score of 39,235 indicate solid throughput for code compilation and test execution. The 30 MB of L3 cache helps with frequently accessed code and data.

Student and office work: The 65 W TDP and active production status make this an efficient processor for daily use. Single-thread scores of 5,926 (Cinebench R23) and 4,750 (PassMark) ensure snappy response in document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheets. The PassMark data encryption score of 39,468 also suggests fast disk encryption for sensitive files.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this CPU is a desktop builder who wants high-end multi-threaded performance without the power draw of a flagship chip. The 93rd percentile ranking puts it in the top tier of all CPUs, yet the 65 W TDP keeps it manageable in a standard desktop build. Gamers at 1440p or 4K resolutions will find the CPU's single-core strength sufficient, though the GPU will likely be the primary determinant of frame rates in those scenarios. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the 20 cores, as indicated by the strong multi-core scores in Cinebench R23 (41,980) and PassMark multithread (49,410).

Developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the high integer math score of 138,078 and the extended instructions score of 39,235. Students and office workers on a budget for a high-performance desktop will see snappy performance in everyday tasks, backed by the single-thread score of 4,750. Small business workstations that handle data processing or financial modeling will find the data compression score of 507,018 and encryption score of 39,468 useful for large datasets. The locked multiplier means this is not aimed at overclockers, but rather at users who want reliable, efficient high performance out of the box.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is a desktop GPU based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, using the Navi 31 chip codenamed Plum Bonito. It is built on TSMC's 5 nm process with 57,700 million transistors on a 529 mm² die. The GPU has a base clock of 1387 MHz, a boost clock of 2394 MHz, and a game clock of 2025 MHz. Memory runs at 2500 MHz with 20 Gbps effective speed. The card features 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 320-bit bus, delivering 800.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a substantial amount of VRAM and bandwidth, suited for high-resolution textures and compute workloads.

The GPU has 5,376 shading units, 336 TMUs, and 192 ROPs. It includes 84 ray-tracing cores, though tensor cores are not applicable in this RDNA 3.0 design. Pixel rate is 459.6 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 804.4 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 51.48 TFLOPS, with FP16 reaching 103.0 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. The card has a 300 W TDP, uses dual-slot cooling, requires two 8-pin power connectors, and needs a 700 W suggested PSU. Display outputs include one HDMI 2.1a, two DisplayPort 2.1, and one USB Type-C. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The card measures 276 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 51 mm in width.

Benchmark scores show a mixed picture. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 5,623, which is a modern DX12 test reflecting current gaming workloads. Geekbench OpenCL scores 12,756, while Geekbench Vulkan scores 71,068 — the Vulkan figure is notably strong. PassMark G3D scores 29,009, which is respectable, but the GPU compute score of 16,828 and the DirectX 12 score of 110 are lower than expected. The DirectX 10 and DirectX 11 scores of 158 and 340, respectively, are also modest. The G2D score of 1,232 indicates basic 2D performance.

The GPU's percentile ranking is 55th among all GPUs, and its average benchmark score is 13,745. Nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon 660M (0.5% ahead), NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile (0.5% ahead), AMD Radeon RX 570X (0.9% ahead), and AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT (1.5% behind). This places the RX 7900 XT in a cluster with some lower-end integrated and mobile GPUs in the average score metric, which is surprising given its raw specs. The production status is end-of-life, and it launched with an $899 MSRP.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows for the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT. Therefore, all frame rate expectations are estimates based on the benchmark scores of both components, and they should be treated as approximations rather than verified results.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,623 is a modern indicator of gaming performance in current titles. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 71,068 is particularly high and suggests strong performance in Vulkan-based games. The PassMark G3D score of 29,009 is moderate, but the card's raw specifications — 20 GB of VRAM, 800.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 51.48 TFLOPS FP32 — point to high frame rates at 1440p and 4K resolutions in most titles. The 84 ray-tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects, though the 55th percentile ranking among all GPUs suggests that competition at the high end is fierce.

The CPU's strong single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread of 4,750) should not bottleneck the GPU in gaming workloads. The 20 cores provide ample headroom for background tasks while gaming. At 1080p, the CPU may play a larger role, and the 265F's performance is sufficient. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the primary driver of frame rates, and the RX 7900 XT's 20 GB VRAM is advantageous for high-resolution textures. Expect smooth performance in esports titles and demanding AAA games alike, though the exact frame rates depend on the game and settings.

Balance and Bottleneck

In this pairing, the CPU and GPU have different strengths. The CPU is in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 55th percentile among all GPUs. This means the processor is significantly stronger relative to its peers than the graphics card is relative to its peers. In CPU-bound workloads — such as data compression, encryption, and multi-threaded rendering — the 265F will excel, with scores like 507,018 in data compression and 41,980 in Cinebench R23 multi-core. The GPU will not be a factor in these tasks.

In GPU-bound workloads — such as gaming at high resolutions and GPU compute — the RX 7900 XT will be the limiting component. Its 55th percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 13,745 indicate it is a mid-tier performer in the current GPU landscape. The CPU's high single-thread score of 4,750 ensures it can feed the GPU adequately, but the GPU's performance ceiling will cap frame rates in most gaming scenarios. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5,623 is the reference point for gaming performance, and it suggests the GPU is capable but not top-tier.

The balance is skewed toward the CPU. This is a system where the processor outperforms the graphics card in relative terms. For workloads that rely on both components — such as gaming with streaming — the CPU has enough headroom (20 cores, 65 W TDP) to handle encoding while the GPU renders frames. However, for pure gaming, upgrading the GPU would yield more frame rate improvement than upgrading the CPU. The combined percentile of 74 reflects this mixed picture, with the CPU pulling the overall rank up.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT. The CPU is a 20-core, 20-thread Arrow Lake-S processor on the Intel Socket 1851, and the GPU is a RDNA 3.0 Navi 31 card with 20 GB of GDDR6 memory. The combined percentile is 74, which places this system in the upper-mid tier of all desktop builds in the database. The CPU is a top-tier performer (93rd percentile), while the GPU is a mid-tier performer (55th percentile), so the overall rank is a compromise between the two.

The CPU's launch MSRP is $379, and the GPU's launch MSRP is $899. The system requires a 700 W PSU according to the GPU's suggested PSU rating. The GPU is end-of-life, so availability may be limited, while the CPU is active in production. This is not a budget build; it targets users who want strong multi-threaded CPU performance and a capable GPU with generous VRAM. The 20 GB of VRAM is a standout feature for content creation and high-resolution gaming.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F achieves an average benchmark score of 64,438, ranking in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 41,980, and single-core is 5,926. PassMark multithread scores 49,410, with single-thread at 4,750. The CPU sits 0.3% behind the Intel Core Ultra 7 265, 0.4% ahead of the AMD EPYC 7343, 0.6% behind the AMD EPYC 4464P, and 0.6% ahead of the Intel Core i9-13900KS.

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT achieves an average benchmark score of 13,745, ranking in the 55th percentile of all GPUs. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 5,623, Geekbench Vulkan is 71,068, and PassMark G3D is 29,009. The GPU sits 0.5% behind the AMD Radeon 660M, 0.5% behind the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile, 0.9% behind the AMD Radeon RX 570X, and 1.5% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU dominates the GPU in relative performance. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking is a clear strength, while the GPU's 55th percentile ranking is a relative weakness. The combined percentile of 74 reflects this imbalance. For a user prioritizing CPU-heavy workloads — such as rendering, compiling, or data processing — this is a strong build. For a user prioritizing gaming, the GPU is the limiting factor, and its performance relative to peers is average. The lack of measured FPS data for this exact combination means gaming performance is estimated from these scores, but the raw specs of the GPU (20 GB VRAM, 800.0 GB/s bandwidth, 51.48 TFLOPS) suggest it can handle demanding games at high resolutions.