SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

98 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 2% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
99%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265

64,640 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D

178,050 Benchmark Score
Top 1% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D is a top-tier graphics card built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process with 76,300 million transistors across a 609 mm² die. Its benchmark placement is exceptional: the GPU sits at the 98th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 178,050. This places it just 2.2% behind the NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell (avg score 182,109), 3.1% behind the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB (183,725), and 3.6% behind the RTX 5000 Ada Generation (184,664). The deltaPct values show a tightly packed group of high-end accelerators, meaning the RTX 4090 D trades blows with professional-grade silicon rather than consumer gaming parts.

Memory configuration is a defining strength. The card carries 24 GB of GDDR6X on a 384-bit bus, yielding 1.01 TB/s of memory bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1313 MHz with 21 Gbps effective speed. For rendering workloads, this capacity and bandwidth matter enormously — large textures, multi-layer compositing, and high-resolution viewport previews all scale with VRAM headroom. The 24 GB allocation is double what most consumer cards offer, so scenes that would spill into system memory on lesser GPUs stay resident on the card.

Compute resources are equally formidable. The GPU packs 14,592 shading units, 456 texture mapping units, and 176 raster output units. Ray tracing hardware includes 114 RT cores, while 456 tensor cores handle AI-accelerated tasks like DLSS and denoising. Raw throughput figures are striking: FP32 performance reaches 73.54 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 73.54 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). Pixel fill rate is 443.5 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 1,149.1 GTexel/s. These numbers translate directly to rendering speed — the pixel rate drives rasterization throughput, while the texture rate feeds shader complexity.

Clock behavior is modest but sufficient. Base clock is 2280 MHz with a boost of 2520 MHz. The boost clock is not the highest in the market, but the sheer width of the architecture compensates. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 8,587 reflects this balance: it is a modern, demanding benchmark that stresses both rasterization and compute. Geekbench results reinforce the compute story — OpenCL scores 278,621 and Vulkan 246,941. The Vulkan score trailing OpenCL suggests the driver stack may favor certain APIs, but both are elite-level results.

For rendering specifically, the 114 RT cores accelerate ray-traced effects in real-time engines and path tracing in offline renderers. The 456 tensor cores enable hardware-accelerated denoising and AI upscaling, which shortens iteration cycles. The 1.01 TB/s bandwidth prevents memory-bound stalls when streaming geometry and textures. The card is end-of-life per production status, but that does not diminish its standing — it remains within 2.2% of the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell, which is a newer professional part.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 4090 D is built for extreme frame rates. Its 98th percentile standing and 73.54 TFLOPS FP32 throughput indicate it can push high-refresh 1440p and 4K displays without compromise. The 24 GB VRAM ensures texture packs at maximum quality settings fit entirely on card. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 8,587 confirms modern DirectX 12 titles will run at very high settings. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, but the GPU's compute headroom suggests it is not the limiting factor at any mainstream resolution.

Streaming: The tensor cores provide dedicated hardware for encoding and AI-based enhancements. The 456 tensor cores handle NVENC offload and real-time filters without stealing shader work. The FP16 performance at 73.54 TFLOPS matches FP32, meaning mixed-precision workloads like broadcast effects run at full speed. The 24 GB VRAM also allows a game, capture buffer, and streaming overlays to coexist without memory pressure. The 98th percentile GPU score ensures simultaneous game encoding and rendering stays fluid.

Video editing: Timeline scrubbing, effects stacking, and color grading all benefit from the 1.01 TB/s bandwidth and 24 GB capacity. Long 4K or 8K timelines with multiple layers remain resident in VRAM, avoiding constant re-uploads. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 278,621 indicates strong compute acceleration for GPU-accelerated filters and exports. The 456 tensor cores additionally speed up AI-assisted tools like auto-reframe and noise reduction. The card's 176 ROPs handle high-resolution compositing efficiently.

3D rendering: This is where the card excels most. The 114 RT cores accelerate ray-traced rendering, while the 73.54 TFLOPS FP32 throughput crunches polygon and shader workloads. The 24 GB VRAM fits large scenes and high-res textures natively. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 8,587 reflects sustained compute under load. The card's proximity to the RTX 5000 Ada Generation (within 3.6%) shows it performs near professional rendering parts. For offline renderers that use OptiX or Vulkan, the 246,941 Vulkan score indicates strong API-level performance.

Software development: Compilation workloads are typically CPU-bound, but shader compilation and GPU debugging offload to the graphics card. The 73.54 TFLOPS compute capability accelerates shader pre-processing and graphics API validation. The 24 GB VRAM is useful for running multiple virtualized GPU instances or testing graphics-heavy applications. The 456 tensor cores also enable local inference testing for ML-based development. The GPU's 98th percentile score ensures it will not bottleneck code that exercises graphics stacks.

Student and office work: This is overpowered for typical office tasks, but the data supports it as a capable workstation part. The 24 GB VRAM and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth handle large spreadsheets with embedded charts, multiple 4K displays, and heavy multitasking without strain. The 176 ROPs ensure smooth window compositing across many monitors. However, the 425 W TDP and triple-slot size make it a poor fit for compact office builds. Students in graphics-intensive fields like architecture or game design will find the 114 RT cores beneficial for coursework.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 is a 20-core, 20-thread desktop processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, built on Arrow Lake architecture (Arrow Lake-S codename). It uses a 3 nm process from TSMC, packing 17,800 million transistors onto a 243 mm² die. The base clock is 2.40 GHz with a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The TDP is 65 W, which is notably efficient for a 20-core part. The CPU sits at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 64,640.

The nearest rivals show tight competition. The AMD EPYC 4464P scores 64,823 (deltaPct -0.3%), meaning the Core Ultra 7 265 is essentially tied with it. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F scores 64,438 (deltaPct 0.3%), so the 265 is slightly ahead of its F-variant (which lacks integrated graphics). The AMD EPYC 7343 scores 64,202 (deltaPct 0.7%), and the AMD EPYC 9124 scores 65,104 (deltaPct -0.7%). These deltas are all under 1%, indicating the 265 performs within a narrow band of several high-end server and workstation chips. That is a strong showing for a desktop part.

Cache hierarchy is generous. L1 cache is 192 KB per core, L2 is 3 MB per core, and L3 is 30 MB shared. With 20 cores, the total L2 is substantial — 60 MB across all cores. This large on-die cache helps with data reuse in multi-threaded workloads. Memory support is DDR5 only, dual-channel, with a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. ECC memory is not supported. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes (CPU only), which is ample for a single high-end GPU and one or two NVMe drives. Integrated graphics are Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 32 execution units — capable for display output and light acceleration, but not a gaming part.

Benchmark scores break down by workload type. In Cinebench, the multicore scores are 4,255 (R15), 6,268 (R20), and 42,216 (R23). Single-core scores are 600 (R15), 884 (R20), and 5,960 (R23). The R23 multicore score of 42,216 is particularly informative — it places the 265 in range of many high-core-count workstation CPUs. The single-core R23 score of 5,960 indicates strong per-thread performance, driven by the 5.30 GHz boost clock.

PassMark results add depth. Multithread score is 49,682, and single-thread is 4,689. Floating-point math scores 172,776, while integer math scores 134,773. These are high marks for a desktop CPU. Data compression scores 522,983, which is very strong, and data encryption scores 40,456. Extended instructions score 41,478, and random string sorting scores 63,833. Physics score is 2,923, and finding prime numbers scores 418. The compression score in particular suggests excellent throughput for archiving and file-handling tasks.

The 20 threads (20 cores, no hyperthreading) mean the CPU is a pure multi-core design. This is a departure from Intel's previous hybrid approaches and from AMD's simultaneous multithreading. The absence of SMT means each core is a physical core, which can improve predictability in scheduling but may lower throughput versus SMT-enabled chips in heavily threaded workloads. The 93rd percentile ranking confirms this is a high-end part, but the 0.3% delta to its own 265F variant shows the integrated graphics add minimal compute performance — they are for convenience, not extra horsepower.

Who Should Build It

The target user is a desktop builder who needs both elite GPU compute and strong CPU multi-core throughput. The combined percentile is 96, meaning this pairing sits above 96% of all possible configurations. Gamers at 4K resolution will find the RTX 4090 D's 98th percentile GPU score and 24 GB VRAM sufficient for maximum settings in demanding titles. The CPU's 93rd percentile and 5.30 GHz boost clock ensure no frame-time spikes from processor bottlenecks at high resolutions, where GPU load dominates.

Content creators are the most obvious beneficiaries. Video editors working with 8K timelines or complex motion graphics will use the 24 GB VRAM and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth for real-time playback. The 73.54 TFLOPS FP32 throughput accelerates effects rendering. 3D artists using ray-traced renderers will leverage the 114 RT cores and 456 tensor cores for interactive viewports and AI denoising. The CPU's 42,216 Cinebench R23 multicore score handles scene parsing, physics simulation, and asset baking concurrently with GPU rendering.

Software developers building graphics-heavy applications or doing ML work will find the 456 tensor cores useful for local model inference, while the CPU's 522,983 data compression score speeds up build artifact handling. The 20 physical cores handle parallel compilation well. The 65 W TDP means the CPU does not require exotic cooling, freeing thermal budget for the GPU.

Students in engineering or design programs can use this for coursework, but it is overkill for standard productivity. Small business workstations handling CAD, video production, or data analysis will benefit from the combined 96th percentile performance. The CPU's 20 cores and 30 MB L3 cache handle multi-tasking across many applications, while the GPU's 24 GB VRAM accommodates large datasets in visualization tools. The lack of ECC memory support is a consideration for mission-critical data integrity, but the 93rd percentile CPU score indicates it is a robust general-purpose workstation platform.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1851, which is the LGA 1851 platform for Arrow Lake. Memory support is dual-channel DDR5, with a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The platform does not support ECC memory. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes — enough for one full-speed Gen 5 GPU and several Gen 5 NVMe drives. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 32 EU provide a fallback display output, which is useful for troubleshooting or office tasks without a discrete GPU.

The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16 and is triple-slot wide, measuring 304 mm long, 137 mm tall, and 61 mm wide. The suggested PSU is 800 W, and the GPU TDP is 425 W. The CPU TDP is 65 W. Combined, the system draws well under the 800 W PSU headroom, leaving room for drives, fans, and peripherals. The power connector is a single 16-pin, so the PSU must support that connector or use an adapter.

A sensible next upgrade path depends on the workload. For gaming, the GPU is already at the 98th percentile, so the next meaningful step would be a CPU with more single-thread performance — but the 265's 5.30 GHz boost and 5,960 Cinebench R23 single-core score are already elite. For multi-threaded work, the 20-core count is high, but a future Arrow Lake refresh on the same Socket 1851 could offer more cores. The 65 W TDP also means there is thermal headroom to run a higher-TDP chip in the same board if the VRMs allow.

Memory is a clear upgrade path. The platform supports DDR5, and the dual-channel bus can be filled with higher-capacity or higher-speed modules. The 102.4 GB/s bandwidth is the theoretical ceiling; faster DDR5 kits will approach it. Storage is another easy upgrade — the 20 Gen 5 lanes allow multiple fast NVMe drives. The GPU's end-of-life status means no driver-based performance increases are coming, but its 98th percentile position means it will remain competitive for several years. The CPU's active production status suggests a longer support window.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 96, meaning this configuration outperforms 96% of all possible pairings in the benchmark database.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 4090 D have, and what type is it?

A: It has 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, delivering 1.01 TB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count, and what is its boost clock?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 has 20 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz.

Q: How does the RTX 4090 D compare to the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB in average benchmark score?

A: The RTX 4090 D scores 178,050, which is 3.1% lower than the A100 SXM4 80 GB's 183,725.

Q: What is the TDP for each component, and what PSU is suggested?

A: The CPU has a 65 W TDP, the GPU has a 425 W TDP, and the suggested PSU is 800 W.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, ECC memory is not supported. The platform supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the production status of the GPU, and when was it released?

A: The GPU is end-of-life and was released on 2023-12-27. The CPU is active and was released on 2025-01-06.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and the RTX 4090 D is heavily skewed toward the GPU. The GPU's 98th percentile is five points higher than the CPU's 93rd percentile. In gaming workloads, the GPU will almost always be the limiting factor at 4K resolution, where the 73.54 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth are the primary drivers. The CPU's 5.30 GHz boost clock and 5,960 Cinebench R23 single-core score are sufficient to feed the GPU at high resolutions, where per-frame CPU work is lower.

At lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU becomes relatively more important. The 20-core, 20-thread design with 30 MB L3 cache handles game logic and physics, but the absence of SMT means multi-threaded game engines may not extract every bit of throughput. The 93rd percentile CPU score is high, but the 0.3% delta to the 265F shows the integrated graphics add no meaningful compute headroom — the CPU is the same silicon either way.

For productivity workloads, the bottleneck shifts based on the task. In 3D rendering, the GPU dominates — the 114 RT cores and 73.54 TFLOPS FP32 will outpace the CPU's 42,216 Cinebench R23 multicore score for ray-traced frames. In CPU-bound tasks like data compression (522,983 PassMark score) or integer math (134,773), the CPU is the workhorse and the GPU idles. Video editing is mixed: the GPU accelerates effects and exports, but the CPU handles timeline parsing and codec encoding that is not GPU-accelerated.

The memory bandwidth is a potential bottleneck for CPU-heavy workloads. The 102.4 GB/s dual-channel DDR5 bandwidth is modest compared to the GPU's 1.01 TB/s. If a workload requires frequent data exchange between CPU and GPU, the PCIe Gen 5 x16 link (20 lanes) can carry up to 64 GB/s per direction — faster than the CPU's own memory bus. This asymmetry means the GPU can receive data faster than the CPU can prepare it in system memory.

The 65 W CPU TDP paired with a 425 W GPU TDP creates a thermal imbalance. The CPU can run on a modest air cooler, but the GPU requires triple-slot cooling and adequate case airflow. The 800 W suggested PSU provides ample headroom — total system draw under full load is roughly 490 W plus drives and fans, leaving 300 W of safety margin. The GPU's end-of-life status means no future driver optimizations, but its 98th percentile position suggests it will remain a performance ceiling for several years.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D. The CPU is a 20-core, 20-thread Arrow Lake processor on Socket 1851, with a 5.30 GHz boost clock and 65 W TDP. The GPU is an Ada Lovelace architecture card with 24 GB GDDR6X, 14,592 shading units, and a 425 W TDP. The combined percentile is 96, placing this configuration in the top 4% of all builds in the database.

The CPU's 93rd percentile and the GPU's 98th percentile combine to create a system that is stronger on the graphics side than the processor side. The GPU's 178,050 average benchmark score is within 2.2% of the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell, indicating professional-tier graphics performance. The CPU's 64,640 average score is within 0.7% of the AMD EPYC 7343, showing server-class compute capability in a desktop package.

This pairing is best characterized as a high-end workstation with gaming capabilities. The 24 GB VRAM and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth are workstation-class, while the 73.54 TFLOPS FP32 is competitive with professional accelerators. The CPU's 20 physical cores and 30 MB L3 cache handle heavily threaded productivity tasks, while the 5.30 GHz boost clock ensures snappy single-threaded response. The lack of measured FPS data for this exact combination means gaming performance is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than directly observed.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's exact scores are as follows: Cinebench R15 multicore 4,255 and single-core 600; Cinebench R20 multicore 6,268 and single-core 884; Cinebench R23 multicore 42,216 and single-core 5,960. PassMark results include multithread 49,682, single-thread 4,689, floating-point math 172,776, integer math 134,773, data compression 522,983, data encryption 40,456, extended instructions 41,478, random string sorting 63,833, physics 2,923, and prime numbers 418. The average benchmark score is 64,640, placing it at the 93rd percentile.

The GPU's exact scores are: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 8,587, Geekbench OpenCL 278,621, and Geekbench Vulkan 246,941. The average benchmark score is 178,050, placing it at the 98th percentile. The nearest rival comparisons show the GPU is 2.2% behind the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell (182,109), 3.1% behind the A100 SXM4 80 GB (183,725), 3.6% behind the RTX 5000 Ada Generation (184,664), and 4.9% behind the A100 SXM4 40 GB (187,147). The CPU is 0.3% behind the EPYC 4464P (64,823), 0.3% ahead of the Core Ultra 7 265F (64,438), 0.7% ahead of the EPYC 7343 (64,202), and 0.7% behind the EPYC 9124 (65,104).

The combined picture is one of near-flagship performance on both fronts. The CPU's 42,216 Cinebench R23 multicore score and the GPU's 8,587 Steel Nomad score indicate a system that can handle both heavily threaded productivity and demanding modern graphics. The GPU's 98th percentile is the standout metric — it is closer to the top of the GPU hierarchy than the CPU is to the top of the CPU hierarchy. This means the graphics card is the more exceptional component, while the CPU is merely very good. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame-rate conclusions are estimates derived from these benchmark scores and percentile positions.