SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265 + Intel Arc B770

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

85 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
GPU Bottleneck
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265

64,640 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B770

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Platform Analysis: Intel Core Ultra 7 265 + Intel Arc B770

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 paired with the Intel Arc B770 represents a desktop build that sits at the 72nd percentile overall among all CPU+GPU combinations cataloged in the database. The CPU alone holds the 93rd percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile among all graphics cards. This pairing combines a high-end 20-core Arrow Lake processor with a mid-tier Battlemage graphics solution. Because no measured frame rate data exists for this exact combination, all gaming performance discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores of the individual components rather than derived from direct testing.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the database. Consequently, all frame rate expectations are qualitative estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and the Intel Arc B770 individually.

The Arc B770’s position at the 50th percentile among all GPUs suggests it delivers around the median level of raw graphics throughput across the full range of tested cards. With 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth, the card has sufficient memory capacity and bandwidth for modern game textures at high settings. The 4096 shading units and 128 ROPs provide a baseline that should handle 1080p and 1440p gaming comfortably, though the GPU’s mid-pack percentile ranking indicates it will not be a high-refresh 4K champion.

The CPU side is far stronger. The Core Ultra 7 265’s 93rd percentile ranking among all CPUs means it is unlikely to be the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios. The single-thread performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5960, is robust enough to feed frames to the GPU efficiently. In CPU-bound titles at lower resolutions, the processor’s high single-core throughput should allow the Arc B770 to reach its full potential.

At 1080p, where CPU overhead is most pronounced, the Core Ultra 7 265’s strong single-thread results (4689 in Passmark single-thread, 600 in Cinebench R15 single-core) suggest that the processor will keep up with the GPU’s output. The Arc B770’s 50th percentile position implies playable frame rates at high settings in most titles, though competitive esports titles at maximum refresh rates will depend on the specific game engine. At 1440p, the balance shifts toward the GPU, and the B770’s 512.0 GB/s bandwidth and 16 GB capacity become more relevant for texture-heavy scenes. At 4K, the 128 ROPs and 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 throughput will likely be the constraint, with the CPU having ample headroom that goes unused.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 posts an average benchmark score of 64640, placing it at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 4464P, scores 64823, putting the Intel part 0.3% ahead. The other nearby competitors include the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F at 64438 (0.3% behind the 265), the AMD EPYC 7343 at 64202 (0.7% behind), and the AMD EPYC 9124 at 65104 (0.7% ahead). This cluster of scores spanning roughly 900 points indicates that the Core Ultra 7 265 sits in a tightly competitive band of high-end processors.

In multi-threaded workloads, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42216 demonstrates substantial parallel throughput. The Passmark multithread score of 49682 reinforces this picture, as does the Passmark integer math score of 134773 and floating-point math score of 172776. The data compression score of 522983 is particularly strong, suggesting excellent performance in file archival and compression tasks. Data encryption at 40456 and extended instructions at 41478 round out a comprehensive multi-threaded profile.

For single-threaded performance, the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5960 and the Passmark single-thread score of 4689 indicate that the processor maintains high per-core efficiency despite its many cores. This combination of strong single-core and multi-core results is characteristic of a well-balanced high-end desktop processor. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 0 in the database, which reflects the absence of recorded benchmark entries for the Arc B770 rather than a performance measurement. Its 50th percentile ranking is the primary comparative datum available.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 is built on the Arrow Lake architecture, specifically the Arrow Lake-S desktop variant, manufactured on a 3 nm process at TSMC. The processor contains 20 cores and 20 threads, with no hyperthreading, operating at a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The die measures 243 mm² and contains 17,800 million transistors. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. Power consumption is rated at 65 W TDP, making this a relatively efficient high-core-count processor.

The 20-core, 20-thread configuration with a 5.30 GHz boost clock explains the strong multi-threaded results. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 4255 and R20 multi-core score of 6268 scale consistently with the R23 result of 42216, showing linear scaling across benchmark generations. The Passmark physics score of 2923 and the find prime numbers score of 418 are lower in absolute terms but reflect the specific nature of those workloads. The random string sorting score of 63833 indicates solid memory subsystem performance, which is supported by the dual-channel DDR5 memory interface providing 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth.

Memory support is limited to DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, and ECC memory is not supported. This positions the processor for consumer desktop use rather than workstation or server applications. The integrated graphics are a basic Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 32EU solution, which is sufficient for display output but not intended for gaming or compute workloads. The processor uses the Intel Socket 1851 and supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes. The multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not available, but the 5.30 GHz boost clock already provides high single-thread performance without manual tuning.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Core Ultra 7 265 and the Arc B770 is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The processor’s 93rd percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 50th percentile creates a substantial performance gap. In gaming workloads, the GPU will be the limiting factor in virtually all scenarios except those with extremely light graphics loads where the CPU’s single-thread performance could become relevant.

The benchmark data supports this conclusion. The CPU’s Passmark multithread score of 49682 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42216 are exceptional for a 65 W part, while the GPU’s mid-pack percentile suggests it delivers roughly average graphics throughput among all tested cards. In CPU-bound scenarios such as physics calculations (Passmark physics score of 2923), the processor will handle the load without strain. In GPU-bound scenarios such as high-resolution texture rendering and rasterization, the Arc B770’s 128 ROPs and 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 throughput will determine the frame rate.

The FPS scaling conclusion from this imbalance is that at lower resolutions (1080p), the GPU will still be the primary bottleneck because the CPU’s single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5960) is far above what any game requires. At higher resolutions (1440p and above), the GPU bottleneck becomes even more pronounced. This is a CPU-overpowered configuration where the processor has significant headroom for future GPU upgrades without requiring a platform change.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc B770’s 50th percentile GPU ranking and 16 GB GDDR6 memory with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth will deliver smooth frame rates at 1080p and 1440p in most titles, but the CPU’s 93rd percentile ranking means the processor will sit underutilized. Esports titles that are CPU-light will run especially well, but the GPU will cap maximum refresh rates before the CPU becomes a factor.

Streaming: The Core Ultra 7 265’s 20 cores and strong multi-threaded scores (42216 in Cinebench R23 multi-core) provide ample encoding headroom for simultaneous gameplay and stream encoding. The GPU’s mid-range performance means game capture at high settings may reduce frame rates, but the CPU can handle software encoding without impacting gaming performance significantly.

Video editing: The Passmark data compression score of 522983 and floating-point math score of 172776 indicate strong performance in video processing workloads. The 20 cores will accelerate export and rendering tasks, while the GPU’s 512.0 GB/s bandwidth and 16 GB VRAM can handle 4K video timelines. The overall balance favors CPU-heavy editing workflows over GPU-accelerated effects.

3D rendering: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42216 demonstrates strong CPU-based rendering performance, which benefits applications that rely on CPU ray tracing. The GPU’s 32 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but the 50th percentile ranking suggests it will not compete with higher-end GPUs in GPU-accelerated renderers.

Software development: The 20 cores and 20 threads handle compilation workloads efficiently, supported by Passmark integer math score of 134773 and extended instructions score of 41478. The 30 MB L3 cache and 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth reduce compilation bottlenecks. The processor’s 65 W TDP keeps power costs low during long build sessions.

Student and office work: The Core Ultra 7 265 is excessive for typical office tasks, but the Arc B770’s 50th percentile ranking means even this mid-tier GPU handles office applications with ease. The 65 W CPU TDP and dual-channel DDR5 memory make this a responsive system for productivity software, though the hardware is over-specified for most office workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus providing 102.4 GB/s of bandwidth. The processor provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU, while the Arc B770 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The GPU’s PCIe 4.0 connection means it will operate without bandwidth limitations, but the platform’s PCIe Gen 5 support leaves headroom for future graphics cards that may use the newer standard.

The Arc B770 has a TDP of 225 W and requires a suggested PSU of 550 W, with power provided through a 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin connector configuration. The CPU’s 65 W TDP means total system power draw is modest, leaving significant headroom in the 550 W suggested PSU for additional components or a future GPU upgrade. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-performance GPU that better matches the CPU’s 93rd percentile capability, since the current GPU at the 50th percentile leaves substantial CPU performance unused.

The platform supports up to 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU, which can accommodate a high-bandwidth GPU or NVMe storage. The memory controller supports DDR5 only, with no ECC option, which is standard for consumer desktop platforms. The locked multiplier on the CPU means the upgrade path is focused on GPU and storage improvements rather than CPU overclocking. The 3 nm process node and 65 W TDP suggest the platform is power-efficient, allowing for compact cooling solutions even with the 20-core processor.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B770 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, specifically the BMG-G31 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The die size is 368 mm², and the GPU operates at a base clock of 2100 MHz with a boost clock of 2400 MHz. Memory runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed, delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth across a 256-bit bus with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory.

The GPU contains 4096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 raster output units. The pixel rate is 307.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 614.4 GTexel/s. Compute throughput is rated at 19.66 TFLOPS for FP32 and 39.32 TFLOPS for FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. Hardware ray tracing is supported through 32 RT cores. The GPU interfaces with the system via PCIe 4.0 x16 and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Display outputs include one HDMI 2.1a and three DisplayPort 2.1 connections.

The 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs places this card at the median of tested graphics hardware. The 16 GB VRAM capacity is generous for the performance class, providing headroom for high-resolution textures and large datasets. The 512.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for the 128 ROPs and 4096 shading units to operate without memory starvation in most scenarios. The 32 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the overall compute throughput of 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 indicates that heavy ray-traced scenes will stress the GPU. The dual-slot design with a 225 W TDP requires the 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connectors, and the suggested PSU of 550 W provides adequate power delivery.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and Intel Arc B770 combination sits at the 72nd percentile among all CPU+GPU pairings in the database.

Q: How does the Core Ultra 7 265 compare to its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 4464P?

A: The Core Ultra 7 265 has an average benchmark score of 64640, which is 0.3% ahead of the AMD EPYC 4464P’s score of 64823.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Arc B770?

A: The Arc B770 provides 512.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth through 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus.

Q: Does the Core Ultra 7 265 support ECC memory?

A: No, the Core Ultra 7 265 does not support ECC memory; it uses dual-channel DDR5 memory with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What power supply is recommended for the Arc B770?

A: The suggested PSU for the Arc B770 is 550 W, and the GPU requires a 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connector configuration.

Q: What is the single-core performance of the Core Ultra 7 265 in Cinebench R23?

A: The Core Ultra 7 265 scores 5960 in Cinebench R23 single-core, placing it at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs.

Q: What is the process node for each component?

A: The Core Ultra 7 265 is manufactured on a 3 nm process at TSMC, while the Arc B770 uses a 5 nm process at TSMC.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1080p and 1440p will find the Arc B770’s 50th percentile GPU ranking and 16 GB VRAM sufficient for high settings in most titles, while the Core Ultra 7 265’s 93rd percentile CPU ranking ensures the processor will never be the limiting factor. Content creators working with video editing will benefit from the CPU’s Passmark data compression score of 522983 and the GPU’s 512.0 GB/s bandwidth for timeline playback and exports. Software developers compiling large codebases will leverage the 20 cores and 20 threads with a Passmark integer math score of 134773, and the 65 W CPU TDP keeps power costs low during extended build sessions.

Students and office workers do not need this hardware tier, but the combination provides a responsive system for any productivity workload. Small business workstations handling multi-threaded tasks such as data analysis or financial modeling will appreciate the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42216 and the 30 MB L3 cache. Enthusiasts who plan to upgrade the GPU later will find the CPU has substantial headroom, since the 93rd percentile processor is paired with a 50th percentile GPU, and the platform’s PCIe Gen 5 support accommodates future graphics cards.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core Ultra 7 265, a 20-core Arrow Lake processor on the Intel Socket 1851 platform, with the Intel Arc B770, a Battlemage architecture GPU using the Xe2-HPG chip. The CPU is a high-end processor at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 64640, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs. The combined configuration ranks at the 72nd percentile among all CPU+GPU pairings in the database.

The overall tier of this build is upper-midrange to high-end on the CPU side and midrange on the GPU side. The Core Ultra 7 265’s 20 cores, 5.30 GHz boost clock, and 65 W TDP make it a powerful and efficient processor, while the Arc B770’s 16 GB GDDR6 memory and 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 throughput provide solid but not class-leading graphics performance. The imbalance between the two components is significant, with the CPU’s 93rd percentile ranking far exceeding the GPU’s 50th percentile. This configuration is best suited for users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads but still need capable gaming performance, or for those planning a future GPU upgrade to match the processor’s substantial headroom.