SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265 + Intel Arc A770

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

97 Score

Top 3% Ranking

97 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265

64,640 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A770

68,809 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and Intel Arc A770 combination represents a pairing of Intel’s latest desktop silicon with its flagship discrete graphics card. The processor, built on the Arrow Lake architecture, is a 20-core, 20-thread part fabricated on a 3 nm process by TSMC, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The Arc A770, meanwhile, is an Alchemist-generation GPU using the Xe-HPG architecture on a 6 nm process, featuring 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 256-bit bus. This analysis draws exclusively on the provided benchmark data, which includes CPU scores from Cinebench and Passmark, GPU scores from 3DMark and Geekbench, and percentile rankings against all other tested components. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all gaming performance discussion is framed as estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores. The data indicates a system that sits at the 92nd percentile overall among desktop builds, with the CPU at the 93rd percentile and the GPU at the 90th percentile, suggesting a well-balanced pairing for demanding workloads.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 is a 20-core, 20-thread processor, which means it uses a single core type without hyperthreading, a design choice that prioritizes efficiency and predictable scaling across multi-threaded tasks. The base clock of 2.40 GHz is modest, but the boost clock of 5.30 GHz provides significant headroom for single-threaded performance when workloads demand it. The architecture, Arrow Lake, is Intel’s second generation of its Core Ultra series, and this particular SKU is built on a 3 nm process from TSMC, with a die size of 243 mm² and 17,800 million transistors. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache, which is a substantial pool for a desktop processor and helps reduce memory latency in data-intensive applications.

Benchmark results show a processor that excels in both single-core and multi-core scenarios. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 42,216 in multi-core and 5,960 in single-core, which are strong numbers for a 65 W TDP part. The multi-core score places it in the upper echelon of desktop CPUs, as indicated by its 93rd percentile ranking against all CPUs. The single-core score of 5,960 is particularly notable because it suggests excellent responsiveness in lightly threaded tasks like web browsing, office applications, and older games that rely on one or two cores. The Passmark results reinforce this picture: a single-thread score of 4,689 and a multithread score of 49,682. The single-thread performance is competitive with the best desktop parts, while the multithread score benefits from the 20 physical cores, which handle parallel workloads efficiently.

In real workloads, these numbers translate to a processor that can handle video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation without breaking a sweat. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 6,268 and R15 multi-core score of 4,255 show consistent scaling across different versions of the same benchmark, indicating that the architecture does not suffer from thermal or power throttling in sustained loads. The Passmark physics score of 2,923 and floating point math score of 172,776 suggest strong computational throughput for scientific simulations and physics calculations. Data compression and encryption scores of 522,983 and 40,456, respectively, point to solid performance in file archiving and security-related tasks, though the encryption number is modest compared to processors with dedicated crypto acceleration. The extended instructions score of 41,478 indicates good support for AVX-512 and similar instruction sets, which benefit certain professional applications.

The nearest rivals for the Core Ultra 7 265, based on average benchmark scores, include the AMD EPYC 4464P, which scores 64,823 on average, just 0.3% higher than the Intel part. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F is essentially identical, with a deltaPct of 0.3% in favor of the non-F variant, meaning the only difference is the presence of integrated graphics. The AMD EPYC 7343 and EPYC 9124 score 64,202 and 65,104, respectively, with deltas of 0.7% and -0.7%, putting them in the same performance envelope. This shows that the Core Ultra 7 265 is a high-end desktop processor that competes directly with server-class EPYC parts in raw compute, though it lacks the multi-socket and ECC memory support that enterprise users might need.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture from benchmark scores shows a system that is exceptionally well-rounded, with the CPU and GPU both landing near the top of their respective charts. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 64,640, which places it at the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 68,809, placing it at the 90th percentile of all GPUs. Together, the build achieves a combined percentile of 92, indicating that this pairing is more capable than the vast majority of desktop configurations, and that neither component drags the other down significantly.

Delving into the CPU scores, the Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 42,216 is a standout figure, representing a level of multi-threaded performance that was once reserved for HEDT (high-end desktop) platforms. The single-core score of 5,960 is equally impressive, and the delta between the two shows that the processor does not sacrifice single-thread speed for core count. The Passmark multithread score of 49,682 and single-thread score of 4,689 corroborate these findings, with the latter indicating that the 5.30 GHz boost clock delivers real-world gains in latency-sensitive tasks. The integer math score of 134,773 and floating point math score of 172,776 show a balanced ALU and FPU design, which is important for mixed workloads like game development, where both integer and floating point operations are common.

On the GPU side, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,969 is a measure of modern gaming performance under DirectX 12, and while it is not a direct FPS metric, it places the Arc A770 in the performance tier of mid-to-high-end cards from its generation. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 109,175 and Vulkan score of 94,284 provide cross-API comparisons, with OpenCL showing slightly higher throughput for compute workloads. The GPU’s nearest rivals include the NVIDIA CMP 90HX, which scores 69,000 on average (0.3% higher), and the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25, which scores 68,562 (0.4% lower). The presence of professional and mining cards in this list suggests that the Arc A770’s compute performance is competitive with specialized hardware, despite being a consumer-focused gaming card.

The combined picture is one of complementary strengths. The CPU’s high single-core score ensures that the GPU is fed with data in gaming scenarios, while the GPU’s strong compute scores (19.66 TFLOPS FP32) mean that the CPU’s multi-core prowess is utilized in rendering tasks. The lack of measured FPS data means that these interpretations are based on synthetic benchmarks, but the correlation between such scores and real-world performance is well established in the hardware community. The data suggests a system that will not bottleneck in most applications, with the CPU and GPU both operating in the top 10% of their respective categories.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A770 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, a design that Intel introduced with the Alchemist generation. It uses the DG2-512 chip, fabricated on a 6 nm process by TSMC, with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. The GPU has 4,096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 128 raster operation units (ROPs), which are the building blocks for its rendering capabilities. The clock speeds are listed as a base of 2100 MHz and a boost of 2400 MHz, which are high for a GPU of this class and contribute to its pixel rate of 307.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 614.4 GTexel/s.

Memory is a key strength of the Arc A770. It comes with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding a memory bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 2000 MHz, with an effective data rate of 16 Gbps. This large memory pool and high bandwidth make the card well-suited for 1440p and 4K gaming, as well as for content creation tasks that require large texture datasets or render buffers. In contrast to many competitors that offer 8 GB or 12 GB at this performance tier, the 16 GB capacity provides headroom for future game releases that are increasingly memory-hungry. The memory bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s is sufficient to feed the GPU’s compute units, and it helps maintain performance in scenarios with high-resolution textures and heavy anti-aliasing.

The Arc A770 includes 32 ray tracing cores, which are dedicated to accelerating ray-traced lighting, shadows, and reflections. While the card does not list tensor cores, it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which means it can handle hardware-accelerated ray tracing and variable rate shading in supported games. The FP32 performance of 19.66 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 39.32 TFLOPS (at a 2:1 ratio) indicate strong compute throughput, which is also reflected in the Geekbench OpenCL score of 109,175. This makes the card viable for GPU-accelerated rendering in Blender, video encoding with AV1 support (a feature of the Xe-HPG architecture), and machine learning inference tasks that rely on FP16.

The GPU’s percentile ranking of 90th against all GPUs places it in the top decile of graphics cards, but its nearest rivals are notable. The NVIDIA CMP 90HX, a mining card, has an average score of 69,000, just 0.3% higher, while the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 and NVIDIA Quadro P6000 are 1.5% and 1.7% lower, respectively. This suggests that the Arc A770’s raw compute is on par with professional workstation cards from the previous generation, though it lacks the specialized drivers and certified software support that professionals often require. The card’s power consumption is listed at 225 W TDP, with a suggested PSU of 550 W, and it requires one 6-pin and one 8-pin power connector. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 support, though the GPU will operate at Gen 4 speeds.

The display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0, which support high refresh rates and high resolutions, making the card suitable for multi-monitor setups. The GPU is marked as end-of-life, with Battlemage as its successor, meaning it is no longer in active production. This does not diminish its current performance, but it implies that driver optimization may slow over time, a factor to consider for long-term ownership.

Who Should Build It

The target audience for this pairing is broad, thanks to the CPU’s high percentile and the GPU’s strong compute and gaming performance. The Core Ultra 7 265, with its 93rd percentile ranking and 20 cores, is ideal for content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,216 indicates that it can handle 4K video exports and complex 3D scenes without becoming the bottleneck. The Arc A770, with its 16 GB of VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth, complements this by providing ample memory for GPU-accelerated tasks like ray tracing in Blender or rendering in DaVinci Resolve.

Gamers at 1440p will find this build particularly appealing. The GPU’s 90th percentile ranking suggests it can drive high frame rates at this resolution in most games, while the CPU’s single-core score of 5,960 in Cinebench R23 ensures that even CPU-bound titles will perform well. The 16 GB VRAM is future-proof for upcoming games that require more than 8 GB, and the GPU’s ray tracing cores add support for visual effects without the need for a separate card. For gamers at 4K, the Arc A770 may require settings adjustments, but the large memory pool helps maintain texture quality.

Software developers and students in computer science will benefit from the CPU’s multi-threaded performance, which speeds up code compilation and running test suites. The Passmark integer math score of 134,773 and data encryption score of 40,456 indicate strong performance in cryptographic operations and data processing, which are common in backend development. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 32EU on the CPU provides a backup display output, though the discrete GPU will handle most graphics tasks.

Small business workstations that run productivity applications, financial modeling, or database management will see excellent responsiveness from the single-core performance. The CPU’s 65 W TDP means it can be cooled with a capable air cooler, and the overall system power draw, with the GPU at 225 W, is manageable for a standard office PSU rated at 550 W or higher. The lack of ECC memory support is a limitation for enterprise workloads, but for small businesses, the standard DDR5 support is sufficient. The launch MSRP is $394 for the CPU and 329 USD for the GPU, though the latter is end-of-life and may be available at different prices.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming at 1440p is a primary scenario for this build. The CPU’s single-core score of 4,689 in Passmark ensures that frame times remain low, and the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,969 suggests it can push frame rates above 100 FPS in less demanding titles, with slightly lower performance in AAA games. The 16 GB VRAM prevents texture pop-in, and the 512.0 GB/s bandwidth supports high-resolution assets.

Streaming while gaming is another scenario where this build excels. The CPU’s 20 cores handle the encoding workload, either through software x264 encoding or by leaving headroom for the GPU to handle encoding via its media engine. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,216 means that streaming and gaming simultaneously will not cause significant frame drops, and the Passmark multithread score of 49,682 suggests there is spare capacity for background tasks.

Video editing in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve will benefit from the CPU’s multi-core performance and the GPU’s compute capabilities. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 6,268 indicates fast timeline scrubbing and export times, while the GPU’s OpenCL score of 109,175 accelerates effects and color grading. The 16 GB VRAM allows for large preview caches, and the 512.0 GB/s bandwidth handles 4K multi-stream edits.

3D rendering in Blender or similar software will utilize both components. The CPU’s Passmark floating point math score of 172,776 accelerates CPU-based rendering, while the GPU’s FP32 performance of 19.66 TFLOPS can be used for GPU-based rendering with OptiX or similar APIs. The 32 ray tracing cores on the GPU provide hardware acceleration for final-frame rendering, and the CPU’s 20 threads are sufficient for scene preparation and physics simulations.

Software development, particularly compiling large codebases, is a strong use case. The CPU’s Passmark multithread score of 49,682 and integer math score of 134,773 indicate that parallel builds will complete quickly. The data compression score of 522,983 speeds up packaging and archiving, and the 30 MB of L3 cache reduces recompilation times by keeping more of the working set in cache.

Student and office work is handled with ease. The single-core performance ensures snappy application launches and spreadsheet calculations, while the 65 W TDP means low power consumption during light loads. The integrated graphics on the CPU provide a fallback if the discrete GPU is not needed, and the 20 cores are overkill for this scenario but provide headroom for future multitasking.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination of Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and Intel Arc A770, as the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. Therefore, all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,969 and its 90th percentile ranking suggest that it delivers playable performance at 1440p in most modern games, with high settings yielding frame rates between 60 and 100 FPS depending on the title’s optimization. At 1080p, the GPU is likely to be less of a bottleneck, and the CPU’s high single-core score ensures that even esports titles like Valorant or Counter-Strike 2 can achieve frame rates well above 144 FPS, which is ideal for high-refresh monitors.

In more demanding games, such as Cyberpunk 2077 or Alan Wake 2, the Arc A770’s 16 GB VRAM will prevent memory-related stutters, but the GPU’s raw performance may limit ultra settings to around 60 FPS at 1440p with upscaling enabled. The ray tracing cores, numbering 32, provide hardware support for ray-traced effects, but the performance impact will vary by game; users may need to enable Intel’s XeSS upscaling to maintain smooth frame rates. The GPU’s memory bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s is sufficient for 4K textures, but at 4K resolution, the GPU is likely to be the primary bottleneck, with estimated frame rates dropping below 60 FPS in AAA titles unless settings are reduced.

The CPU’s role in gaming is to provide consistent frame pacing. The Passmark single-thread score of 4,689 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5,960 indicate that the Core Ultra 7 265 will not bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios, even at lower resolutions where CPU load is higher. The 30 MB of L3 cache helps maintain low latency for game logic, and the 20 threads allow for background tasks, such as Discord or browser tabs, without impacting gameplay. Overall, the estimated gaming performance puts this build in the sweet spot for 1440p high-refresh gaming, with the caveat that driver maturity for the Arc A770 may affect performance in certain titles, as it is an end-of-life product.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 uses the Intel Socket 1851, which is exclusive to the Core Ultra Series 2 processors. This socket supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a maximum memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which are sufficient for a single high-end GPU and one or two NVMe SSDs at full speed. The lack of ECC memory support means that this platform is not aimed at servers or mission-critical workstations, but for desktop users, standard DDR5 modules are fully supported.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is backward compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slots, so there is no bandwidth limitation when pairing the Arc A770 with this processor. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 550 W, which, combined with the CPU’s 65 W TDP, leaves significant headroom for future upgrades. A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the Arc A770 with a newer GPU, as the platform’s PCIe Gen 5 support means that any next-generation graphics card will run at full bandwidth. The CPU’s 20 cores and 5.30 GHz boost clock should remain relevant for several years, so a GPU upgrade would provide the most immediate performance boost for gaming.

Memory upgrades are also straightforward, as the platform supports DDR5 with a dual-channel memory bus. Users can add more RAM or increase the speed, though the memory bandwidth ceiling of 102.4 GB/s is set by the CPU’s integrated memory controller. The power supply requirement of 550 W is modest, and most quality PSUs in the 650 W to 750 W range will provide ample headroom for overclocking the GPU or adding additional storage. The CPU’s multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not an option, but the boost clock of 5.30 GHz is already high, and the 65 W TDP means that thermal headroom is likely not a concern with a capable air cooler.

For users looking to extend the system’s lifespan, adding a second M.2 NVMe SSD is a logical step, as the CPU’s 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes can accommodate multiple devices. The Arc A770’s end-of-life status means that its resale value will decline, but its performance is still competitive, and its successor, Battlemage, would be a drop-in upgrade in the same power envelope. The platform does not support overclocking the GPU via the CPU, but the GPU’s 2400 MHz boost clock is already high, and users can manually adjust the power limit if their PSU allows.

FAQ

Q: What is the socket type for the Intel Core Ultra 7 265?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 uses Intel Socket 1851, which is specific to the Core Ultra Series 2 processors.

Q: How much VRAM does the Intel Arc A770 have and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc A770 comes with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this build is 92, with the CPU at the 93rd percentile of all CPUs and the GPU at the 90th percentile of all GPUs.

Q: Does the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 support ECC memory?

A: No, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 does not support ECC memory, as indicated by the eccMemory field being false.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for the Intel Arc A770?

A: The suggested PSU for the Intel Arc A770 is 550 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 225 W, requiring one 6-pin and one 8-pin power connector.

Q: What is the process node for the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and the Intel Arc A770?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 is fabricated on a 3 nm process by TSMC, while the Intel Arc A770 uses a 6 nm process, also from TSMC.

Q: What are the measured FPS figures for this build?

A: There are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates based on synthetic benchmark scores.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and the Intel Arc A770 is remarkably even, as evidenced by their similar percentile rankings (93rd for CPU, 90th for GPU) and combined percentile of 92. In CPU-bound workloads, such as software compilation or data compression, the CPU is the primary driver, with its Passmark multithread score of 49,682 and data compression score of 522,983 ensuring that these tasks are processed as quickly as the platform allows. The GPU plays a minimal role in these scenarios, so the CPU’s performance is the limiting factor, but its high core count and clock speed mean that it rarely becomes a bottleneck in practical use.

In GPU-bound workloads, such as 3D rendering or high-resolution gaming, the Arc A770 is the limiting component. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,969 and FP32 performance of 19.66 TFLOPS are strong, but they are lower than the CPU’s relative standing. For example, in 4K gaming, the GPU is likely to be the bottleneck, with estimated frame rates dropping below 60 FPS in demanding titles, while the CPU still has headroom. The 16 GB VRAM helps prevent memory-related bottlenecks, but the raw shader throughput is what limits performance at high resolutions.

The FPS scaling between the two components is indicative of a balanced system. At 1080p, the CPU’s high single-core score ensures that frame rates are not limited by the processor, but the GPU may still be the bottleneck in very demanding titles. At 1440p, both components are utilized more evenly, with the GPU providing the majority of the rendering power and the CPU maintaining frame pacing. At 4K, the GPU is unequivocally the bottleneck, as its pixel rate of 307.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 614.4 GTexel/s are insufficient to maintain high frame rates at this resolution with ultra settings.

The data suggests that for gaming, a GPU upgrade would provide the most significant performance improvement, as the CPU has ample headroom. For compute workloads, the CPU is the stronger component, and a GPU upgrade would have less impact unless the workload specifically uses GPU compute features like FP16 or ray tracing. The 32 ray tracing cores on the Arc A770 are a limiting factor for ray-traced games, as they are not as numerous as those found on higher-end GPUs from NVIDIA or AMD. Overall, the bottleneck shifts based on the workload, but the system is well-balanced for a general-purpose desktop, with neither component being severely underpowered relative to the other.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265 + Intel Arc A770

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 265

Intel Arc A770

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds