SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265 + Intel Arc A580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

96 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265

64,640 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A580

57,756 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 is a 20-core, 20-thread desktop processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture, manufactured on a 3 nm process at TSMC. It operates with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, with a 65 W TDP and a die size of 243 mm² containing 17,800 million transistors. The chip uses a dual-channel DDR5 memory interface with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s and supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes.

The core configuration is substantial for a mainstream desktop part: 20 threads without hyperthreading means each core is a physical core, which is notable for multi-threaded workloads where thread scheduling overhead is minimized. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This layout favors workloads that can exploit per-core L2 locality, while the shared L3 provides a decent pool for data shared across cores.

Benchmark results show a strong multi-threaded capability. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 42,216 in multi-core and 5,960 in single-core. The single-core score is particularly impressive, indicating robust per-thread performance that benefits lightly-threaded applications like web browsing, office productivity, and legacy game engines. The multi-core score places it in the top tier of desktop processors, with an average benchmark score of 64,640 and a percentile ranking of 93 among all CPUs.

PassMark results reinforce this picture. The multithread score of 49,682 and single-thread score of 4,689 both support the Cinebench findings. The floating-point math score of 172,776 and integer math score of 134,773 show balanced arithmetic throughput, which is relevant for scientific computing and financial modeling. Data compression at 522,983 and encryption at 40,456 indicate solid performance for file archiving and security-related tasks. The extended instructions score of 41,478 and random string sorting at 63,833 round out a profile that handles diverse computing tasks competently.

In terms of rivals, the Core Ultra 7 265 sits within a tight cluster. It trails the AMD EPYC 4464P by 0.3%, leads the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F by 0.3%, leads the AMD EPYC 7343 by 0.7%, and trails the AMD EPYC 9124 by 0.7%. These deltas are minuscule — the differences are within a fraction of a percent, meaning real-world performance differences would be difficult to distinguish outside of synthetic benchmarks.

The integrated graphics, Arc Xe-LPG with 32 execution units, provide a basic display output capability but are not intended for demanding gaming. The CPU itself is the primary compute engine for workloads that do not rely on a discrete GPU.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between this CPU and the paired Intel Arc A580 GPU depends heavily on workload type. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking versus the GPU's 87th percentile suggests the processor has a slight edge in overall computational capability relative to the graphics card. However, this gap is small enough that neither component dominates the other in a way that would create a severe bottleneck.

For CPU-bound workloads such as software compilation, data analysis, and multi-threaded rendering, the Core Ultra 7 265 will be the limiting factor only in the sense that it determines the ceiling — and that ceiling is high given the 20 physical cores and 5.30 GHz boost. The GPU will not constrain these tasks. Conversely, for GPU-bound workloads like 3D rendering in DirectX 12 or Vulkan, the Arc A580's performance defines the frame rate or render time, while the CPU remains largely idle.

The combined percentile of 90 for this pairing indicates that the two components are well matched overall. In gaming scenarios, the balance shifts depending on resolution and graphical settings. At lower resolutions with lower detail settings, the CPU becomes more relevant because frame rates are higher and the GPU has less work per frame. At higher resolutions with maximum detail, the GPU becomes the dominant factor.

The absence of measured FPS data for this exact combination means bottleneck analysis must be inferred from benchmark scores. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,229 for the GPU suggests it can handle modern DirectX 12 titles, but the CPU's PassMark physics score of 2,923 and single-thread score of 4,689 indicate enough processing power to feed the GPU in most scenarios.

The memory configuration also plays a role in balance. The CPU's dual-channel DDR5 with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for the GPU's 8 GB GDDR6 with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU does not support ECC memory, which is a consideration for workstation use cases requiring error correction, but for gaming and content creation this is not a limitation.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 delivers a Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 4,255 and single-core score of 600. In R20, the multi-core score is 6,268 and single-core 884. These tests show scaling that is consistent with a 20-core processor: the multi-core scores are roughly seven times the single-core scores in R15 and R20, which is below the theoretical 20x scaling due to memory bandwidth and thermal limits but still indicates strong parallel efficiency.

The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,216 places the CPU in the upper echelon of desktop processors. The single-core score of 5,960 is competitive with the best desktop chips for lightly-threaded tasks. The average benchmark score of 64,640 and 93rd percentile ranking confirm that this is a high-end desktop part.

The Intel Arc A580 GPU scores 2,229 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 91,657 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 79,381 in Geekbench Vulkan. The average benchmark score is 57,756, placing it at the 87th percentile among all GPUs. The GPU's nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM, which scores 58,085 — a 0.6% difference. The Intel Arc A570M scores 58,239, 0.8% ahead. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE trails by 0.7% with a score of 57,367, and the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT leads by 1.1% with 58,392.

These GPU scores indicate the Arc A580 is a mid-range graphics card that competes with previous-generation upper-midrange parts. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 79,381 suggests strong performance in Vulkan-based games and applications, while the OpenCL score of 91,657 is respectable for compute workloads.

Combined, the CPU and GPU present a picture of a balanced system where the CPU has a slight edge in relative performance. The combined percentile of 90 reflects this, placing the pairing in the top 10% of all CPU-GPU combinations in the benchmark database.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance for productivity tasks while still maintaining competent gaming capability. The 20-core CPU with a 93rd percentile ranking suits content creators who edit video, render 3D scenes, or process large datasets. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,216 indicates the CPU can handle long render times effectively, and the PassMark data compression score of 522,983 supports file archiving and backup workflows.

Gamers at 1080p or 1440p with moderate graphical settings will find the Arc A580 sufficient, given its 87th percentile ranking and 3DMark score of 2,229. The CPU's strong single-thread performance of 5,960 in Cinebench R23 ensures that game logic and physics calculations are not a bottleneck. However, enthusiasts seeking maximum frame rates at 4K with ultra settings would need a more powerful GPU.

Software developers benefit from the 20 physical cores for parallel compilation. The PassMark integer math score of 134,773 and floating-point math score of 172,776 indicate strong arithmetic throughput for code compilation and test execution. The extended instructions score of 41,478 shows support for modern instruction sets used in optimized code.

Students and small business users running office applications, web browsers, and spreadsheet software will find the CPU's single-thread performance more than adequate. The integrated graphics provide a display output without needing a discrete GPU, though the Arc A580 in this build handles graphical tasks.

The lack of ECC memory support is a limitation for mission-critical workstation applications, but for most professional and consumer workloads, the standard DDR5 memory is sufficient.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A580 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-512 chip, manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The die contains 21,700 million transistors across 406 mm², with a transistor density of 53.4 million per mm². The GPU has 3,072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation units, along with 24 ray tracing cores.

Clock speeds are a base of 1700 MHz and a boost of 2000 MHz. Memory operates at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed, delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth across a 256-bit bus with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory. The pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s. The GPU has a TDP of 175 W, requires a 450 W power supply, uses dual-slot cooling, and needs two 8-pin power connectors.

Compute performance is rated at 12.29 TFLOPS for FP32 and 24.58 TFLOPS for FP16 (at 2:1 ratio). This places the card in the mid-range segment, with enough throughput for 1080p gaming and light to moderate 3D rendering tasks. The 24 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for DirectX 12 Ultimate features, and the API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,229 indicates the GPU can handle modern DirectX 12 titles at playable frame rates, though not at maximum settings in the most demanding games. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 91,657 and Vulkan score of 79,381 show that the GPU performs better in OpenCL compute tasks than in Vulkan graphics workloads. The 87th percentile ranking among all GPUs places it above the majority of graphics cards in the database.

Memory bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s is generous for an 8 GB card, which helps at higher resolutions where bandwidth becomes a limiting factor. The 256-bit bus is wider than typical for this performance class, providing headroom for texture-heavy scenes.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 has 20 cores and 20 threads, with no hyperthreading, meaning each core handles one thread.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A580 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s and memory clock of 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective).

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The CPU scores an average benchmark of 64,640, which is 0.3% lower than the AMD EPYC 4464P and 0.3% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F. It leads the AMD EPYC 7343 by 0.7% and trails the AMD EPYC 9124 by 0.7%.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and what power supply is suggested for the GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W. The GPU has a TDP of 175 W and the suggested power supply for the GPU is 450 W.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 does not support ECC memory. It supports dual-channel DDR5 with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing capability?

A: The GPU has 24 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes hardware-accelerated ray tracing.

Q: What is the CPU's integrated graphics?

A: The CPU includes Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 32 execution units, providing basic display output capabilities.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 uses the Intel Socket 1851 and supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel interface with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is sufficient for a single high-end graphics card and one or two NVMe SSDs. The platform does not support ECC memory, which limits its appeal for error-critical server workloads.

The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward compatible with the CPU's Gen 5 lanes, though the bus operates at Gen 4 speeds. This is not a bottleneck for the Arc A580 given its bandwidth requirements.

The CPU's TDP of 65 W and the GPU's TDP of 175 W suggest a total system power draw that is manageable with a 450 W power supply as suggested for the GPU. The 2x 8-pin power connectors on the GPU require a power supply with appropriate cables.

A sensible next upgrade path would involve replacing the GPU with a more powerful model while keeping the CPU, since the CPU's 93rd percentile ranking means it has headroom above the GPU's 87th percentile. The 20-core processor would not bottleneck a higher-tier GPU in most workloads. Alternatively, adding more DDR5 memory would benefit memory-intensive applications, though the dual-channel configuration limits the maximum bandwidth.

The socket 1851 platform is current for Intel's Core Ultra Series 2, so future CPU upgrades within the same generation are possible, though the 265 is already a high-end part in that lineup. For users needing more PCIe lanes or ECC support, a move to a workstation platform would be required, but that would involve a new motherboard and CPU.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 CPU with the Intel Arc A580 GPU in a desktop configuration. The CPU is a 20-core, 20-thread processor from the Core Ultra Series 2 (Arrow Lake architecture) with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is an Arc A580 from the Alchemist generation with a 175 W TDP and 8 GB of GDDR6 memory.

The combined percentile of 90 indicates that this pairing outperforms 90% of all CPU-GPU combinations in the benchmark database. The CPU's average benchmark score of 64,640 places it at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU's average score of 57,756 places it at the 87th percentile among all GPUs. The slight CPU advantage means the processor is the stronger component, but the gap is small enough that the system is balanced.

This is a mid-range to upper-mid-range desktop build suitable for gaming at 1080p and 1440p, content creation, and productivity tasks. The CPU provides excellent multi-threaded performance for rendering and compilation, while the GPU offers competent DirectX 12 and Vulkan performance for modern games. The system does not have measured FPS data, so gaming performance figures are estimated from benchmark scores.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU-GPU combination in the benchmark database. All frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores, not from direct testing of this specific pairing.

Based on the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,229 and 87th percentile ranking, the Arc A580 should deliver playable frame rates at 1080p with high settings in most modern games. At 1440p, users may need to reduce graphical settings to maintain smooth performance, particularly in demanding titles. The 8 GB of VRAM is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming, though some textures at 4K may exceed this capacity.

The CPU's single-thread score of 5,960 in Cinebench R23 and PassMark single-thread score of 4,689 ensure that game logic and physics are handled without bottlenecking the GPU. The 20-core configuration provides headroom for background tasks while gaming, such as streaming or voice chat.

The GPU's Vulkan score of 79,381 in Geekbench suggests that Vulkan-based games will perform well, as this API is commonly used in modern titles. The DirectX 12 performance, indicated by the 3DMark score, is also solid. Games that use ray tracing will benefit from the 24 ray tracing cores, though performance will be lower than rasterized rendering due to the computational cost of ray tracing.

For competitive esports titles that are typically CPU-bound, the Core Ultra 7 265's strong single-core performance will allow high frame rates at 1080p with low to medium settings. For AAA single-player games, the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions, and users should target 1080p or 1440p with adjusted settings for the best experience.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The combination of the CPU's 5,960 Cinebench R23 single-core score and the GPU's 87th percentile ranking supports 1080p gaming at high refresh rates in esports titles. The CPU ensures high minimum frame rates, while the GPU provides adequate throughput for competitive play.

Streaming: The 20-core CPU has enough processing headroom to handle game encoding and streaming simultaneously without significant frame drops. The PassMark multithread score of 49,682 indicates the CPU can manage the additional load from encoding software while maintaining game performance.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,216 and PassMark floating-point math score of 172,776 indicate strong performance for video encoding, color grading, and effects rendering. The GPU's 8 GB of VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth assist with GPU-accelerated effects and timeline previews.

3D rendering: The CPU's 20 physical cores provide substantial rendering performance in CPU-based renderers, with the Cinebench R23 score of 42,216 being particularly relevant. The GPU's 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 performance allows for GPU-based rendering in compatible applications, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit scene complexity.

Software development: The 20 cores and PassMark integer math score of 134,773 accelerate parallel compilation, while the extended instructions score of 41,478 supports modern instruction sets. The 20 threads handle build systems that parallelize across cores effectively.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread performance of 4,689 in PassMark handles web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheet calculations with ease. The integrated graphics provide display output, though the Arc A580 in this build handles graphical tasks. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps power consumption modest for long work sessions.