SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 265 + Intel Arc A380

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
86%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 265

64,640 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380

8,558 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 sits at the heart of this desktop build, built on the Arrow Lake-S architecture using a 3 nm process from TSMC. The chip packages 20 cores and 20 threads, with no hyperthreading, relying instead on raw physical core count for multi-threaded throughput. The base clock of 2.40 GHz scales up to a 5.30 GHz boost, giving it strong single-thread headroom for latency-sensitive workloads. The processor integrates Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 32 execution units, providing a fallback display output even without the discrete GPU installed.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 93rd percentile among all processors, which signals top-tier performance for desktop workloads. In Cinebench R23 multi-core testing, the chip scores 42,216 points, while single-core reaches 5,960 points. The R20 results show 6,268 multi-core and 884 single-core, and R15 shows 4,255 multi-core with 600 single-core. These numbers consistently indicate a processor that excels in both heavily threaded rendering tasks and lightly threaded interactive work. The multi-core scores suggest that video encoding, 3D rendering, and code compilation will complete quickly, while the single-core scores support responsive gaming and snappy application launching.

The PassMark suite reinforces this dual-strength profile. Multi-thread performance lands at 49,682, while single-thread performance sits at 4,689. Integer math scores 134,773, floating point math reaches 172,776, and extended instructions hit 41,478. Data compression scores 522,983, which is an exceptionally high figure that indicates strong performance in file archiving and database workloads. Data encryption reaches 40,456, and find prime numbers scores 418, reflecting capable cryptographic and mathematical processing. Random string sorting scores 63,833, and physics simulation scores 2,923. The average benchmark score across all tests is 64,640.

The nearest rivals provide context for these numbers. The AMD EPYC 4464P averages 64,823, which is 0.3% higher than the Ultra 7 265. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F averages 64,438, 0.3% lower. The AMD EPYC 7343 averages 64,202, 0.7% lower, and the AMD EPYC 9124 averages 65,104, 0.7% higher. This places the Ultra 7 265 in a tight cluster with enterprise-grade EPYC processors, meaning its multi-threaded performance is comparable to server-class silicon despite being a desktop part. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache, which supports the high throughput numbers seen in the compression and math tests.

The memory subsystem uses dual-channel DDR5 with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. This is adequate for feeding 20 cores, though it is not the highest bandwidth available. The PCIe Gen 5 interface provides 20 CPU lanes, which supports modern high-speed storage and the discrete GPU. The 65 W TDP is notably efficient for the performance level, making this a strong candidate for systems where power draw matters.

# FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 compare to its closest rival, the AMD EPYC 4464P?

A: The AMD EPYC 4464P has an average benchmark score of 64,823, which is 0.3% higher than the Ultra 7 265's average of 64,640. This puts the two processors within a negligible performance margin, making them effectively equivalent in overall throughput.

Q: What is the single-thread performance of this CPU?

A: The CPU scores 5,960 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 4,689 in PassMark single-thread. These scores indicate strong per-core performance that supports responsive gaming and application use.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc A380 includes 8 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). However, the GPU's overall performance tier is modest, so ray tracing will run but at limited frame rates.

Q: What memory type and bandwidth does the platform support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. ECC memory is not supported on this processor.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 69, which places this build above the majority of all desktop systems. The CPU drives this percentile heavily, as it sits at the 93rd percentile while the GPU sits at the 44th percentile.

Q: Is the GPU production status active or end-of-life?

A: The Intel Arc A380 is marked as end-of-life production, with a successor named Battlemage. The CPU remains active in production status.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU?

A: The launch MSRP is $394. The GPU has a separate launch MSRP of 149 USD.

# Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, this build delivers playable frame rates in esports and moderately demanding titles, though the GPU's 44th percentile position means it will not push extremely high frame rates in AAA games. The CPU's single-core score of 5,960 in Cinebench R23 ensures that the processor will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios. The 6 GB VRAM capacity is sufficient for 1080p textures but may require reduced settings in newer titles.

Streaming and content creation benefit from the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,216 allows simultaneous game capture and encoding without significant frame drops. The PassMark data compression score of 522,983 indicates fast video file processing, and the floating point math score of 172,776 supports filter application and effect rendering. The GPU's modest 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance means GPU-accelerated encoding will be slower than CPU-based alternatives.

Video editing workflows see the CPU carrying the bulk of the load. The 20 cores process timeline scrubbing, export encoding, and color grading efficiently. The R20 multi-core score of 6,268 suggests that 4K video exports will complete in reasonable time. The GPU assists with preview rendering and effects, but its 6 GB memory and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth limit its ability to handle complex multi-layer compositions.

3D rendering relies heavily on the CPU's 42,216 Cinebench R23 score, which puts it on par with server processors like the AMD EPYC 4464P and EPYC 9124. This makes the build suitable for architectural visualization and product design. The GPU's 8 ray tracing cores can accelerate final-frame renders in supported applications, but the 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is a limiting factor for GPU-based renderers.

Software development benefits from the CPU's integer math score of 134,773 and data encryption score of 40,456. Code compilation, especially large C++ projects, will scale well across the 20 cores. The extended instructions score of 41,478 supports modern SIMD-heavy code. The dual-channel DDR5 memory at 102.4 GB/s provides adequate bandwidth for development tools and virtual machines.

Student and office work is well-served by this build, though it is overprovisioned for the task. The single-thread score of 4,689 in PassMark handles document editing and web browsing efficiently. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics provides a backup display solution. The 65 W TDP keeps power consumption low for a system that will spend much of its time in light workloads.

# Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1080p with medium to high settings will find this build acceptable. The GPU's 44th percentile ranking places it in the lower half of all GPUs, but the CPU's 93rd percentile ensures that any frame rate limitations come from the GPU, not the processor. This makes the system suitable for players who prioritize consistent frame pacing over maximum quality.

Content creators who work primarily in CPU-bound applications will benefit most from this pairing. Video editors, 3D modelers, and software developers will see excellent performance in their compute-heavy tasks, thanks to the CPU's 42,216 Cinebench R23 multi-core score. The GPU handles basic display and acceleration duties, but the CPU does the heavy lifting.

Students in engineering or computer science programs will appreciate the compilation speed and simulation performance. The CPU's 49,682 PassMark multi-thread score ensures that coursework involving large data sets or parallel algorithms runs smoothly. The system is also energy-efficient, with a combined TDP of 140 W, making it practical for dorm rooms.

Small business workstations handling database queries, financial modeling, or data analysis will benefit from the CPU's compression score of 522,983 and encryption score of 40,456. The system can handle concurrent virtual machines and containerized workloads. The GPU is sufficient for business graphics and presentations, though it is not suited for CAD or heavy visualization.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance in this build is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The processor sits at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 44th percentile. This means the GPU will be the limiting factor in gaming and graphics-intensive workloads, while the CPU has substantial headroom. In most games, the Arc A380 will reach its performance ceiling well before the Ultra 7 265 breaks a sweat.

The CPU's single-thread score of 5,960 in Cinebench R23 is more than sufficient for gaming, where most titles rely on one to four cores. The GPU's 6 GB VRAM and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth will constrain texture quality and resolution. At 1080p, the GPU can maintain playable frame rates in lighter titles, but its 44th percentile position indicates it will struggle with demanding AAA releases.

In productivity workloads, the balance flips. The CPU's 42,216 multi-core score in Cinebench R23 will dominate rendering, encoding, and compilation tasks, while the GPU has minimal impact. For GPU-accelerated workloads like machine learning inference or video encoding via hardware, the A380's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance will be the bottleneck.

The memory subsystem presents a potential constraint for CPU-bound tasks. Dual-channel DDR5 at 102.4 GB/s is adequate for 20 cores, but it is not exceptional. The CPU's L3 cache of 30 MB helps mitigate memory pressure. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 20 lanes provides ample bandwidth for the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x8 connection, so the bus is not a limiting factor.

The power delivery is well-balanced. The CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 75 W TDP combine for a modest 140 W total, and the suggested PSU of 250 W provides substantial headroom. This means the system will run quietly and efficiently, with no risk of power starvation under sustained load.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU and GPU combination, so all frame rate figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 6,252 and its 44th percentile ranking indicate entry-level gaming performance. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 808 points to limited DirectX 12 throughput. Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 38,224 and 36,736, respectively, suggest moderate compute capability.

For 1080p gaming, the Arc A380 will deliver playable frame rates in esports titles like CS:GO and Valorant, where the CPU's single-thread performance of 5,960 in Cinebench R23 ensures high frame ceilings. In more demanding AAA games, expect frame rates in the 30-60 FPS range at medium settings. The 6 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p textures, but the 96-bit memory bus and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth will cause performance drops in texture-heavy scenes.

At 1440p, the GPU will struggle to maintain 30 FPS in most modern games. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 808 indicates that the GPU's compute throughput is inadequate for high-resolution rendering. The CPU's strong performance will keep frame times consistent, but the GPU will be the clear bottleneck.

Ray tracing is technically supported via the 8 RT cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate, but performance will be very limited. The GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is insufficient for real-time ray tracing at playable frame rates in most titles. Users should expect to disable ray tracing or use it only in lightweight scenarios.

The PassMark DirectX scores are notably low, with DirectX 9 at 73, DirectX 10 at 37, DirectX 11 at 38, and DirectX 12 at 35. These numbers indicate that the GPU's driver and hardware implementation are not optimized for legacy APIs. Modern games using Vulkan or DirectX 12 will perform relatively better, as indicated by the Vulkan score of 36,736.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1851 platform, which is current and active. This socket supports the Core Ultra Series 2 family, meaning future processor upgrades within this generation are possible. The CPU's 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide a high-bandwidth connection for storage and accelerators. The platform supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with a maximum bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The PCIe 4.0 x8 connection provides sufficient bandwidth for the A380's 186.0 GB/s memory throughput. Upgrading to a higher-tier GPU would be straightforward, as the platform can support PCIe Gen 5 cards with full bandwidth.

The power delivery system has significant headroom. The CPU's 65 W TDP and the GPU's 75 W TDP combined draw 140 W, while the suggested PSU is 250 W. This leaves over 100 W of headroom for additional components or a future GPU upgrade. Users could install a GPU with a TDP up to around 150 W without exceeding the suggested PSU capacity.

A sensible next upgrade would be replacing the Arc A380 with a more powerful GPU. The CPU's 93rd percentile performance can drive much faster graphics cards without bottlenecking. The 65 W TDP is low enough to accommodate a higher-power GPU in the same thermal envelope. Alternatively, users could add more DDR5 memory, moving from dual-channel to higher capacity, though the bandwidth would remain at 102.4 GB/s.

The GPU is end-of-life, with a successor named Battlemage. This means driver support will eventually cease, making GPU replacement a more urgent consideration. The CPU is active and will receive ongoing support. The overall platform has several years of useful life remaining, with the GPU being the first component to require replacement.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 with the Intel Arc A380. The combined percentile is 69, placing this system in the upper third of all desktop configurations. The CPU is a high-end desktop processor, while the GPU is an entry-level discrete card. This creates a system that excels in CPU-bound tasks but is limited in graphics-intensive workloads.

The CPU is the dominant component, with a 93rd percentile ranking that puts it in the top 7% of all processors. It outperforms or matches server-grade AMD EPYC processors in average benchmark score. The GPU, at the 44th percentile, sits near the median of all GPUs, which is low for a discrete card in a desktop build. This pairing makes sense for users who prioritize processing power over gaming performance.

The build class is desktop, and the form factor supports a dual-slot GPU with a 222 mm length and an 8-pin power connector. The system is compact enough for standard mid-tower cases. The combined TDP of 140 W means the system runs cool and quiet, suitable for office or study environments where noise is a concern.

The platform is modern, with DDR5 memory support and PCIe Gen 5 connectivity. The CPU's release date of 2025-01-06 indicates a current-generation product. The GPU's release date of 2022-06-13 and end-of-life status suggest it is an older component that may soon be superseded.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 64,640, placing it at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs. The nearest rival, AMD EPYC 4464P, scores 64,823, which is only 0.3% higher. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F scores 64,438, 0.3% lower. The AMD EPYC 7343 scores 64,202, 0.7% lower, and the AMD EPYC 9124 scores 65,104, 0.7% higher. This tight grouping indicates that the Ultra 7 265 performs at server-grade levels.

The GPU achieves an average benchmark score of 8,558, placing it at the 44th percentile among all GPUs. The nearest rival, AMD FirePro W5170M, scores 8,595, which is 0.4% higher. The AMD Radeon HD 8870M scores 8,462, 1.1% lower. The NVIDIA GeForce MX330 scores 8,458, 1.2% lower, and the AMD Radeon 880M scores 8,436, 1.4% lower. The GPU's performance is clustered with mobile and integrated graphics solutions, underscoring its entry-level positioning.

The combined picture is a system with exceptional CPU performance and modest GPU performance. The CPU's 42,216 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 5,960 single-core score are top-tier figures. The GPU's 6,252 PassMark G3D score and 808 3DMark Steel Nomad score are entry-level. This combination results in a system that is vastly overqualified for CPU-bound tasks and underqualified for GPU-bound tasks.

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A380 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture using a 6 nm process from TSMC. The chip, designated DG2-128, contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU has 1,024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 render output units. It includes 8 ray tracing cores, providing hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects. The FP32 performance is 4.198 TFLOPS, while FP16 performance reaches 8.397 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio.

The memory subsystem consists of 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 96-bit bus, delivering 186.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1937 MHz with an effective speed of 15.5 Gbps. The GPU base clock is 2000 MHz, boosting to 2050 MHz. The pixel rate is 65.60 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 131.2 GTexel/s. These specifications place the A380 firmly in the entry-level segment.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 808 indicates limited DirectX 12 performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 38,224 and Vulkan score of 36,736 show moderate compute capability. The PassMark G3D score of 6,252 is the most representative overall gaming metric. The PassMark GPU compute score of 2,762 is low, indicating weak compute throughput for non-graphics workloads.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. It has 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0 outputs, supporting modern displays. The power consumption is 75 W TDP, with a suggested PSU of 250 W. The GPU is dual-slot, measuring 222 mm in length, 114 mm in height, and 42 mm in width.

In rendering workloads, the GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance is sufficient for basic 3D preview and light GPU-accelerated effects. The 8 ray tracing cores allow for hardware ray tracing, but the low FP32 throughput limits ray-traced scene complexity. The 6 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p textures but will spill over at higher resolutions. The GPU's 44th percentile ranking confirms that it is not suited for high-end rendering or gaming.