SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V + Intel Arc A570M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
85%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 258V

20,454 Benchmark Score
Top 15% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A570M

58,239 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 7 258V + Intel Arc A570M: A Balanced Lunar Lake Mobile Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 258V pairs an 8-core, 8-thread Lunar Lake processor with the Intel Arc A570M discrete GPU in a laptop-class build, landing at the 81st combined percentile across all CPU+GPU pairings. This is a mobile-first configuration where the CPU’s 17-watt TDP and the GPU’s 75-watt TDP suggest a system engineered for sustained performance in a portable chassis, with the CPU delivering strong single-core capability and the GPU providing discrete-class graphics without flagship power demands.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 258V is built on the Lunar Lake architecture, fabricated on a 3 nm process by TSMC — a notably advanced node for mobile silicon. It features 8 cores and 8 threads, with a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The lack of hyperthreading means each core handles one thread, yet the benchmark results show this design does not sacrifice throughput in lightly-threaded workloads. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache, which is a substantial pool for a mobile processor and helps mitigate the absence of extra threads in latency-sensitive tasks.

The CPU’s benchmark scores paint a clear picture of its strengths. In Cinebench R23, it achieves 10301 points multi-core and 1872 points single-core. The single-core figure is particularly notable: it sits at the 74th percentile among all CPUs, indicating that this chip outperforms roughly three-quarters of the processors in the database on a per-thread basis. The multi-core score of 10301 in Cinebench R23, while lower than desktop high-core-count parts, is strong for an 8-thread mobile chip, reflecting the efficiency of the 3 nm process and the architecture’s ability to sustain boost clocks under load. Geekbench results corroborate this: 9325 multi-core and 2100 single-core, with the single-core performance being especially competitive for mobile workloads like web browsing, office applications, and developer toolchains that rely on responsive single-threaded execution.

PassMark results add depth to the analysis. The single-thread score of 4018 confirms the CPU’s strength in lightly-threaded tasks, while the multithread score of 18887 shows respectable scaling across all 8 cores. More specialized metrics reveal workload-specific behavior: floating-point math scores 57372, integer math scores 42889, and extended instructions score 14717, indicating solid AVX-class performance for scientific and encoding tasks. Data compression scores 176686 and data encryption scores 13534, suggesting the chip handles archival and security workloads competently. The physics score of 1565 and find-prime-numbers score of 185 are lower, typical of a mobile chip constrained by power limits during sustained integer-heavy loads.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the Ultra 7 258V is nearly identical in average benchmark score to the AMD Ryzen 5 5600 (delta of -0.1%), the AMD Ryzen 5 8500G (delta of +0.1%), the AMD EPYC 9454P (delta of +0.2%), and the AMD EPYC 7713 (delta of +0.4%). This places the CPU in a performance class that spans both desktop and server parts, an unusual position for a mobile chip — it means that in aggregate, this processor matches or slightly exceeds the average performance of those established desktop and enterprise CPUs, despite its low 17-watt TDP. The practical implication is that for most productivity tasks, the Ultra 7 258V will feel comparable to a mid-range desktop CPU from a few generations ago, but in a far more power-efficient package.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture for this pairing is defined by the CPU’s 74th percentile and the GPU’s 88th percentile among all parts, yielding a combined percentile of 81 for the system. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 20454, while the GPU’s average benchmark score (from Geekbench OpenCL) is 58239. These numbers indicate that the GPU is the stronger component relative to its peers, sitting well above the CPU in percentile terms — a 14-point gap that suggests the graphics side of this build has more headroom over its competition than the processor does.

The CPU’s Cinebench R15 scores (1596.5 multi-core, 285 single-core) and R20 scores (6739 multi-core, 951 single-core) show consistent scaling across benchmark generations, with the single-core performance remaining a highlight. The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239 places it just below the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (delta of -0.3%) and just above the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (delta of +0.3%), with the NVIDIA P102-100 and AMD Radeon PRO V710 also within a fraction of a percent. This clustering is remarkable: the Arc A570M, a mobile GPU, delivers OpenCL compute performance statistically indistinguishable from desktop GPUs like the RX 6950 XT and RX 5600 OEM, which are far larger and power-hungry parts.

For real workloads, this means the system excels at GPU-accelerated compute tasks such as OpenCL-based rendering, physics simulations, and certain machine learning inference workloads, while the CPU handles general-purpose and single-threaded tasks with above-average efficiency. The combined picture is of a laptop that punches well above its class in GPU compute, with a CPU that is competent but not exceptional relative to its peers.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V compare to the AMD Ryzen 5 5600 in average CPU performance?

A: The Ultra 7 258V has an average benchmark score of 20454, which is 0.1% lower than the AMD Ryzen 5 5600’s score of 20468, making them effectively identical in aggregate performance.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The Intel Arc A570M sits at the 88th percentile among all GPUs, meaning it outperforms approximately 88% of graphics processors in the database based on its Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V does not support ECC memory, as indicated in the specifications.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the CPU?

A: The CPU supports LPDDR5X memory on a dual-channel bus, providing 136.5 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: What PCIe configuration does the CPU offer?

A: The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 4 lanes (CPU only), which is a limited allocation typical of mobile processors designed for integrated graphics and compact systems.

Q: How does the GPU’s performance compare to the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT?

A: The Arc A570M’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239 is 0.3% lower than the RX 6950 XT’s score of 58392, making them nearly equivalent in this specific benchmark.

Q: What is the process node for the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU is fabricated on a 3 nm process by TSMC, while the GPU is fabricated on a 6 nm process by TSMC.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this system is a mixed proposition. The GPU’s 88th percentile ranking suggests it can handle modern titles at competitive frame rates, but the lack of measured FPS data means expectations must be set from the benchmark scores — the Arc A570M’s compute performance near desktop-class GPUs like the RX 6950 XT implies strong rasterization potential, though the mobile form factor and 75 W TDP will limit sustained clocks compared to desktop counterparts.

Streaming is well-served by this pairing. The CPU’s strong single-core score of 4018 in PassMark ensures that encoding and streaming overhead won’t starve the main game thread, while the GPU’s Xe-HPG architecture with 16 ray tracing cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate support provides hardware-accelerated encoding and decoding capabilities, though specific encoder details are not in the data.

Video editing workflows benefit from both components. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10301 and PassMark floating-point score of 57372 indicate solid performance for timeline scrubbing and export tasks, while the GPU’s OpenCL score of 58239 accelerates effects and rendering in GPU-accelerated editors.

3D rendering is a strong suit for this build. The GPU’s compute performance, nearly matching the RX 6950 XT in OpenCL, means render engines that leverage OpenCL will see near-desktop-level throughput, while the CPU’s 8 cores provide adequate geometry and scene processing from its Cinebench R23 multi-core score.

Software development workloads appreciate the CPU’s single-threaded strength. The Geekbench single-core score of 2100 and PassMark single-thread score of 4018 ensure fast compilation of individual translation units and responsive IDE interactions, while the 8 threads handle parallel builds with the multithread score of 18887.

Student and office work is where this system excels relative to its power envelope. The 17 W CPU TDP means long battery life potential, and the CPU’s 74th percentile ranking ensures that document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheet calculations are smooth, with the GPU available for occasional light graphics tasks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a system where the GPU is the more dominant component relative to its peers. The GPU’s 88th percentile versus the CPU’s 74th percentile creates a 14-point gap, suggesting that in GPU-bound workloads — such as gaming at high resolutions or GPU-accelerated rendering — the CPU may not be the limiting factor, but rather the GPU’s mobile power constraints will cap performance. Conversely, in CPU-bound tasks like software compilation or single-threaded office applications, the CPU’s performance is adequate but not exceptional, and the GPU’s superior relative standing means it will likely wait on the CPU in such scenarios.

The nearest rival comparison is telling: the CPU matches the AMD Ryzen 5 5600 in average score (delta -0.1%) and slightly exceeds the AMD Ryzen 5 8500G (delta +0.1%), while the GPU nearly matches the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (delta -0.3%). This means the GPU is comparable to a high-end desktop part, while the CPU is comparable to a mid-range desktop part — an imbalance that favors GPU-heavy workloads. For gaming, the FPS will be dictated by the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth, which are sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming at high settings, but the CPU’s boost clock of 4.80 GHz ensures it won’t bottleneck in most titles.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The system uses the Intel BGA 2833 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform, meaning the CPU is not upgradeable in the traditional sense. The memory support is LPDDR5X on a dual-channel bus with 136.5 GB/s bandwidth, and since this is a laptop build class, memory is likely soldered as well. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 4 lanes, limiting expansion options, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which is adequate for its bandwidth needs.

The power envelope is modest: the CPU has a 17 W TDP and the GPU has a 75 W TDP, totaling 92 W for the two primary components. This leaves substantial headroom for a laptop power supply, as most mobile systems provide 100 W or more to the combined CPU+GPU package. The GPU’s suggested PSU is not specified in the data, but given the 75 W TDP and the laptop form factor, the system is designed for the power delivery already integrated into the chassis.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be to increase system memory if the laptop allows it, though the LPDDR5X standard and BGA socket likely preclude user upgrades. For external expansions, the PCIe Gen 5 lanes could support high-speed NVMe storage, and the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is future-proof for several generations of external GPU enclosures, though the laptop form factor limits such options. The real upgrade path is the next laptop generation, as the socket and memory are not user-serviceable.

Who Should Build It

This system targets mobile users who need discrete GPU performance without a desktop-class power draw. Gamers playing at 1080p or 1440p will find the GPU’s 88th percentile ranking and 8 GB VRAM sufficient for high settings in most titles, based on the GPU’s near-parity with the RX 6950 XT in OpenCL compute. Content creators working with GPU-accelerated software will benefit from the Arc A570M’s compute strength, while the CPU’s 74th percentile ensures smooth general-purpose performance.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU’s single-core strength for interactive tooling and the 8 threads for parallel builds, though the lack of ECC memory is a consideration for mission-critical workloads. Students and office workers in a small business setting will find this system provides a balanced mix of CPU and GPU capability that handles daily tasks efficiently, with the 17 W CPU TDP contributing to a portable, low-power chassis that suits mobile work environments.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (Lunar Lake, 3 nm, 8 cores, 8 threads, 17 W TDP) with the Intel Arc A570M (Xe-HPG, 6 nm, 8 GB GDDR6, 75 W TDP). The system sits at the 81st combined percentile, indicating it outperforms roughly four-fifths of all tested CPU+GPU pairs. The CPU’s 74th percentile and GPU’s 88th percentile together create a configuration where the graphics subsystem is the standout component, while the processor provides solid, efficient performance that matches desktop mid-range parts in aggregate benchmarks.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A570M is built on the DG2-256 chip using the Xe-HPG architecture, fabricated on a 6 nm process by TSMC with 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die. It features 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output pipelines, with 16 ray tracing cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost clock of 1300 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) across an 8 GB GDDR6 interface with a 128-bit bus, delivering 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its compute capabilities are rated at 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 and 10.65 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1), with pixel rate of 83.20 GPixel/s and texture rate of 166.4 GTexel/s.

The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239 places it at the 88th percentile, with nearest rivals including the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (delta -0.3%), AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (delta +0.3%), NVIDIA P102-100 (delta -0.5%), and AMD Radeon PRO V710 (delta -0.7%). This near-parity with the RX 6950 XT — a flagship desktop GPU — in OpenCL compute is extraordinary for a mobile part, indicating that the Arc A570M excels at compute-heavy workloads like rendering, scientific simulation, and certain AI tasks. The Radeon RX 6950 XT typically has far higher memory bandwidth and more compute units, so this result likely reflects the efficiency of the Xe-HPG architecture in OpenCL-specific benchmarks rather than raw gaming performance. The 16 ray tracing cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) mean hardware-accelerated ray tracing is available, and the Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6 API support ensure broad software compatibility.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. Based on the GPU’s 88th percentile ranking and its OpenCL score nearly matching the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, the Arc A570M is likely capable of high-refresh gaming at 1080p in most esports titles, with demanding AAA games at 1440p requiring medium-to-high settings to maintain smooth frame rates. The 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p and 1440p textures, though ultra-high resolutions with large texture packs may exceed VRAM capacity.

The CPU’s boost clock of 4.80 GHz and single-core score of 4018 in PassMark suggest it can keep pace with the GPU in most gaming scenarios, minimizing CPU-bound frame dips in CPU-intensive titles like strategy games or open-world RPGs. The 17 W TDP may limit sustained all-core boost under simultaneous gaming and background tasks, but the strong single-core performance mitigates this. Ray tracing performance, while supported by the 16 RT cores, will likely be lower than the rasterized performance, consistent with the GPU’s TDP class — expect playable but not exceptional ray-traced frame rates at 1080p. Overall, this is a capable gaming laptop platform for 1080p high-refresh and 1440p medium-to-high gaming, with the GPU’s compute strength providing additional headroom for future titles that leverage GPU acceleration beyond pure rasterization.