SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V + Intel Arc A550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

85%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 258V

20,454 Benchmark Score

Top 15% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A550M

49,737 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 258V and Intel Arc A550M pairing represents a distinctive mobile configuration, combining a low-power Lunar Lake processor with a dedicated Xe-HPG graphics solution. This analysis draws exclusively from the provided benchmark data to assess its capabilities, positioning, and suitability for various workloads. The combined system ranks in the 80th percentile against all other CPU/GPU pairings, indicating a hardware set that outperforms the majority of existing configurations.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the data presents a mixed picture. The GPU's average benchmark score of 49,737 places it in the 86th percentile, and its Geekbench Vulkan score of 49,580 suggests a strong foundation for DirectX 12 and Vulkan titles. However, the absence of measured frame rate data means that achieving high refresh rates at demanding settings is an estimate. The GPU's 8.397 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth suggest it can handle competitive esports titles at high frame rates, but AAA games at 1440p or 4K with maximum settings may require adjustments to hit 144Hz or higher.

Streaming is a viable workload for this pair, though the CPU's 8-core/8-thread configuration lacks the headroom of higher-core-count processors. The CPU's Passmark multithread score of 18,887 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 10,301 indicate that encoding video while gaming will consume a significant portion of the CPU's resources. This could lead to frame drops in CPU-bound titles. The Arc A550M's dedicated hardware, including its 16 RT cores, can offload some rendering tasks, but the encoding workload will still tax the processor.

Video editing workflows benefit from a combination of strong single-core and multicore performance. The CPU's Geekbench single-core score of 2,100 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,872 ensure responsive timeline scrubbing and effects preview. The multicore scores, while not class-leading, are sufficient for 1080p and light 4K editing. The GPU's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth can accelerate effects rendering and exports in applications that support Intel's Arc acceleration, though the lack of measured data means these gains are inferred.

3D rendering is a workload where the CPU's multicore performance becomes the primary bottleneck. The Cinebench R20 multicore score of 6,739 and R15 score of 1,596.5 indicate that this processor is positioned for mobile efficiency rather than heavy render tasks. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 8.397 TFLOPS can accelerate GPU-based renderers, but its 8 GB VRAM capacity may limit scene complexity. For occasional rendering tasks or preview renders, this system is capable, but sustained production rendering would push the hardware to its limits.

Software development environments benefit from the CPU's solid single-threaded performance, which is critical for compilation tasks that are often single-threaded. The Passmark single-thread score of 4,018 and Geekbench single-core score of 2,100 support fast code compilation and test execution. The 12 MB of shared L3 cache and 136.5 GB/s memory bandwidth provide adequate data throughput for development tools. The 8-thread configuration means parallel builds will be slower than on higher-core-count processors, but incremental builds and IDE responsiveness should be strong.

For student and office work, this hardware is significantly overqualified. The CPU's Passmark single-thread score of 4,018 and the GPU's 86th percentile ranking ensure smooth multitasking across office suites, web browsers, and communication tools. The 17W TDP of the CPU contributes to excellent battery life potential, while the GPU's 60W TDP adds some power draw for graphics-intensive tasks. The combination handles spreadsheet calculations, document editing, and video conferencing with substantial headroom, making it a premium choice for productivity-focused users.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 20,454 places it in the 74th percentile of all processors. This score is remarkably close to its nearest rivals, with the AMD Ryzen 5 5600 showing a deltaPct of -0.1%, meaning the Intel chip is 0.1% behind. The AMD Ryzen 5 8500G is 0.1% behind the Intel chip, and the AMD EPYC 9454P is 0.2% behind. This tight clustering indicates that the Core Ultra 7 258V delivers performance comparable to established desktop and server processors in aggregate benchmarks, despite its mobile, power-efficient design.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 49,737 places it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs. Its closest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, which is 0.4% ahead, and the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, which is 0.5% ahead. The AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT leads by 2.4%, while the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT trails by 2.6%. This positions the Arc A550M in the upper echelon of graphics processors, delivering performance competitive with high-end desktop cards from previous generations.

The combined percentile of 80 indicates that this pairing outperforms 80% of all CPU/GPU combinations in the database. The CPU's 74th percentile and GPU's 86th percentile create a system where the GPU is the stronger component relative to its peers. This imbalance suggests that the graphics solution provides more of the system's overall capability than the processor does. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 49,894 and Vulkan score of 49,580 for the GPU show consistent performance across different compute APIs, indicating good driver optimization for modern graphics workloads.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 258V is built on the Lunar Lake architecture, manufactured on a 3 nm process by TSMC. This is a mobile-focused processor with 8 cores and 8 threads, lacking Hyper-Threading. The base clock is 2.20 GHz with a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, allowing for substantial single-thread performance when needed. The 17W TDP is exceptionally low for a processor with this level of performance, making it ideal for thin-and-light laptops where thermal management is critical.

The cache hierarchy consists of 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 2.5 MB of L2 cache per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration provides low-latency access to frequently used data. The memory support is limited to LPDDR5X with a dual-channel bus, delivering 136.5 GB/s of bandwidth. This is sufficient for the processor's needs but is lower than what desktop processors with DDR5 support can achieve, which could impact memory-intensive workloads.

Benchmark results show a processor that excels in single-threaded tasks relative to its multicore performance. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,872 is strong, while the multicore score of 10,301 reveals the limitations of an 8-thread configuration. The Passmark results paint a similar picture: integer math scores 42,889, floating point math scores 57,372, and extended instructions score 14,717. The Passmark physics score of 1,565 and find prime numbers score of 185 indicate moderate computational throughput for these specific workloads.

The processor's 74th percentile ranking is noteworthy given its power efficiency. The nearest rivals include desktop processors like the AMD Ryzen 5 5600 and server processors like the AMD EPYC 9454P and EPYC 7713, all with average scores within 0.4% of the Intel chip. This demonstrates that the Core Ultra 7 258V achieves desktop-class aggregate performance at a fraction of the power draw, making it a compelling choice for mobile workstations where battery life and thermal output are primary concerns.

Who Should Build It

Gamers seeking a mobile solution that can handle modern titles at high settings should consider this pairing. The GPU's 86th percentile ranking indicates it can deliver smooth gameplay at 1080p and likely 1440p in many titles, with the 8 GB VRAM providing sufficient capacity for current game textures. The lack of measured FPS data means exact resolution and settings targets are estimates, but the hardware's compute capabilities support a high-refresh experience in less demanding titles.

Content creators working with video and photo editing software will find this system capable, though not optimal for heavy 3D work. The CPU's strong single-thread performance at 4,018 in Passmark single-thread ensures responsive editing tools, while the GPU can accelerate effects and exports. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p and 4K video editing timelines with moderate effects, but complex multi-layer compositions may require lower resolution proxies.

Software developers who value portability without sacrificing build performance are a target audience. The CPU's 74th percentile ranking means it outperforms most mobile processors in aggregate benchmarks, and its 8 threads handle typical compilation workloads adequately. The 136.5 GB/s memory bandwidth and 12 MB L3 cache support large codebases and virtual machines. The low 17W CPU TDP contributes to extended battery life during on-the-go development.

Students and small business users represent a less demanding audience that will benefit from the system's overall responsiveness. The combined 80th percentile ranking ensures smooth multitasking across productivity applications, web browsing, and communication tools. The GPU's capabilities are overkill for standard office tasks but provide future-proofing for emerging applications that leverage GPU acceleration for everyday tasks like video conferencing enhancements or browser-based 3D graphics.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A550M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-512 chip manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC. The die contains 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 53.4M per mm². This is a substantial GPU designed for mobile gaming and content creation, with a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz.

The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, running at 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective speed, delivering 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a moderate memory configuration that provides sufficient bandwidth for the GPU's 8.397 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. The 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output pipelines provide the compute backbone, while 16 RT cores handle ray tracing workloads. The pixel rate is 131.2 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 262.4 GTexel/s.

Benchmark results show a GPU performing in the upper tier of available graphics solutions. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 49,894 and Vulkan score of 49,580 are nearly identical, indicating strong performance across different compute APIs. The 86th percentile ranking places it above the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti by 0.4% and above the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 by 0.5%, while trailing the Radeon RX 6900 XT by 2.4%. The Radeon RX 6800 XT trails the Arc A550M by 2.6%, demonstrating the Intel GPU's competitive positioning against high-end desktop cards.

The 60W TDP is remarkably efficient for this level of performance, enabling its use in laptops where power and thermals are constrained. The API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern games and applications. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface provides adequate bandwidth for data transfer between the GPU and the rest of the system.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 80, meaning this pairing outperforms 80% of all CPU/GPU combinations in the database.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600?

A: The Intel processor has an average score of 20,454, which is 0.1% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 5600's average score of 20,468.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc A550M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Is measured FPS data available for this CPU and GPU combination?

A: No, no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination. All FPS discussions are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU respectively?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 17W, while the GPU has a TDP of 60W.

Q: Which component has a higher percentile ranking relative to its peers?

A: The GPU ranks in the 86th percentile, while the CPU ranks in the 74th percentile, indicating the GPU is stronger relative to its peer group.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has a boost clock of 4.80 GHz.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a system where the GPU is the dominant component. The GPU's 86th percentile ranking versus the CPU's 74th percentile creates a configuration where graphics performance is more competitive relative to peers than processor performance. In gaming workloads, this means the CPU may become the limiting factor in CPU-bound titles, particularly at lower resolutions where frame rates are high and the CPU must process more game logic per frame.

The CPU's 8-thread configuration is the primary constraint in heavily threaded workloads. With a Passmark multithread score of 18,887 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 10,301, the processor will bottleneck the GPU in scenarios that require simultaneous physics calculations, AI processing, and game logic. The GPU's 8.397 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth can feed data faster than the CPU can process game state in some scenarios, leading to CPU-bound situations.

Conversely, the GPU becomes the bottleneck in GPU-intensive workloads such as high-resolution rendering with ray tracing enabled. The 16 RT cores and 8 GB VRAM limit the complexity of ray-traced scenes, while the 2048 shading units handle traditional rasterization well. The GPU's 86th percentile ranking suggests it outperforms most GPUs, but the CPU's 74th percentile ranking means the processor cannot fully utilize the GPU's capabilities in all scenarios.

For productivity workloads, the balance shifts depending on the task. Video editing that leverages GPU acceleration will be limited by the GPU's 8 GB VRAM in complex timelines, while CPU-based rendering tasks will be limited by the 8-thread configuration. The 136.5 GB/s memory bandwidth shared between CPU and GPU workloads can also become a contention point in mixed-use scenarios, though it is adequate for most applications.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V processor with the Intel Arc A550M dedicated GPU. The CPU is a mobile processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, built on the Lunar Lake architecture, while the GPU is a mobile graphics solution from the Alchemist generation. The pairing represents a high-end mobile configuration designed for gaming and content creation on the go.

The combined percentile of 80 places this system in the upper quintile of all configurations in the database. The CPU's 74th percentile and GPU's 86th percentile together create a balanced system where graphics performance leads, but processor performance remains competitive. The GPU's average benchmark score of 49,737 is closely matched with high-end desktop GPUs, while the CPU's average score of 20,454 rivals desktop and server processors from AMD.

The system's overall tier is defined by the GPU's strong performance. With the Arc A550M outperforming the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti by 0.4% and the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT trailing by only 2.4%, this mobile GPU delivers desktop-class graphics performance. The CPU's performance, while not class-leading, is sufficient to support the GPU in most workloads without becoming a significant bottleneck.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination. The following frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than verified results. The GPU's 86th percentile ranking and its performance relative to high-end desktop GPUs suggest strong gaming capabilities.

The Geekbench Vulkan score of 49,580 indicates that the GPU is well-optimized for modern graphics APIs, which bodes well for DirectX 12 and Vulkan titles. The 8.397 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth support high-resolution textures and effects. The 16 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit ray-traced scene complexity at higher resolutions.

For competitive esports titles like first-person shooters and battle royale games, the hardware should deliver high frame rates at 1080p with competitive settings. The CPU's strong single-thread performance, evidenced by its 4,018 Passmark single-thread score, supports high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. At 1440p, frame rates will be lower but likely remain playable at high settings. For 4K gaming, the GPU's 224.0 GB/s bandwidth and 8 GB VRAM may struggle with the most demanding titles at maximum settings, requiring reduced settings or resolution scaling.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 2833 socket, which is a mobile-specific socket that is soldered to the motherboard. This means the CPU is not upgradeable in the traditional sense, and any processor upgrade would require a full system replacement. The memory support is limited to LPDDR5X with a dual-channel bus, and the memory is likely soldered as well, eliminating memory upgrades as an option.

The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, and in a laptop form factor, it is also soldered and not upgradeable. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 4 lanes for the CPU, which can be used for high-speed storage devices. The GPU's PCIe 4.0 x16 connection provides ample bandwidth for its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory.

The CPU has a TDP of 17W and the GPU has a TDP of 60W, resulting in a combined TDP of 77W. This low power draw means the system's power supply requirements are modest. The suggested PSU is not specified, but the combined power draw indicates that a standard laptop power adapter in the range of 100-150W would provide adequate headroom. A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be external storage via the PCIe Gen 5 lanes, as the CPU and GPU are not upgradeable. The system's performance is sufficient for its intended laptop use case, and the primary upgrade path would be to a new system with a higher-performance CPU and GPU pairing.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V + Intel Arc A550M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 258V

Intel Arc A550M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds