SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V + Intel Arc A530M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

85%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 258V

20,454 Benchmark Score

Top 15% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A530M

46,614 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Intel Core Ultra 7 258V and Intel Arc A530M form a laptop-class pairing that sits comfortably above the median of all recorded systems. The CPU holds the 74th percentile against all processors, while the GPU lands in the 85th percentile against all graphics cards, producing a combined percentile of 80. This places the platform firmly in the upper-midrange tier of mobile computing, with the graphics subsystem being the stronger half of the partnership.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A530M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-256 chip fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The die contains 11,500 million transistors across a 269 mm² area, yielding a transistor density of 42.8 million per square millimeter. The GPU operates with a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost clock of 1300 MHz, which are conservative figures for a mobile discrete part, but the memory subsystem compensates with 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus running at 1750 MHz, translating to 14 Gbps effective and a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s.

Compute resources include 1536 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output units. The ray tracing hardware consists of 12 dedicated RT cores, while the architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The pixel rate is 62.40 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 124.8 GTexel/s. Floating point performance is rated at 3.994 TFLOPS for FP32 and 7.987 TFLOPS for FP16 at a 2:1 ratio. The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8 and carries a 65 W TDP, with display outputs described as portable device dependent.

In synthetic benchmarks, the Arc A530M scores 49,735 in Geekbench OpenCL and 43,492 in Geekbench Vulkan. Its average benchmark score is 46,614, which places it at the 85th percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rivals illustrate its positioning: the AMD Radeon RX 5600M scores 46,601 (a 0.0% delta), the AMD Radeon RX 6550M scores 46,702 (a -0.2% delta, meaning the Arc trails by 0.2%), the NVIDIA RTX A2000 scores 46,043 (a 1.2% delta, meaning the Arc leads by 1.2%), and the NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation scores 45,972 (a 1.4% delta). The Arc A530M is effectively a dead heat with the RX 5600M, a hair behind the RX 6550M, and a small step ahead of both NVIDIA workstation-class parts. For rendering workloads, the 224.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth and 8 GB frame buffer are the defining characteristics; they enable 1080p texture-heavy scenes without immediate capacity pressure, though the 128-bit bus limits bandwidth-bound operations relative to wider-memory competitors.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 7 258V delivers a consistent set of CPU scores across multiple test suites. In Cinebench R15, it achieves 1596.5 points in multicore and 285 points in singlecore. Cinebench R20 shows 6739 points multicore and 951 points singlecore. Cinebench R23 results are 10,301 points multicore and 1872 points singlecore. Geekbench scores are 9325 multicore and 2100 singlecore. The Passmark suite breaks down further: multithread at 18,887, single thread at 4018, integer math at 42,889, floating point math at 57,372, data encryption at 13,534, data compression at 176,686, extended instructions at 14,717, physics at 1565, prime numbers at 185, and random string sorting at 21,580.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 20,454, placing it at the 74th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals show tight competition: the AMD Ryzen 5 5600 scores 20,468 (a -0.1% delta, meaning the Intel part trails by 0.1%), the AMD Ryzen 5 8500G scores 20,425 (a 0.1% delta), the AMD EPYC 9454P scores 20,422 (a 0.2% delta), and the AMD EPYC 7713 scores 20,363 (a 0.4% delta). The Ultra 7 258V is statistically indistinguishable from the Ryzen 5 5600, a desktop part, which speaks to the efficiency of the Lunar Lake architecture. The combined picture shows a balanced platform: the CPU at the 74th percentile and the GPU at the 85th percentile, with the combined percentile at 80. The GPU is the stronger component, but the CPU is not a bottleneck in most scenarios given the margin between the two percentiles is modest.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 258V uses the Intel BGA 2833 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform, meaning CPU upgrades are not a practical option. The memory support is LPDDR5X in a dual-channel configuration, providing 136.5 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory is not supported. The CPU's PCIe implementation is Gen 5 with 4 lanes available from the CPU only, which is a limited allocation typical of low-power mobile parts; the GPU, by contrast, uses PCIe 4.0 x8.

The CPU has a TDP of 17 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 65 W. No suggested PSU is listed for this mobile configuration, which is expected given that laptop power delivery is handled by the system's internal power supply and battery. The combined thermal envelope of roughly 82 W for the two primary compute components is modest by desktop standards but significant for a laptop, indicating that adequate cooling is necessary for sustained performance.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would focus on the GPU, as the BGA socket precludes CPU changes. However, since this is a laptop build class, even GPU upgrades are generally not user-serviceable. The practical upgrade path is a new system rather than component swaps. Within the existing platform, the most impactful change would be ensuring the system has sufficient LPDDR5X memory capacity, as the dual-channel bandwidth of 136.5 GB/s is shared between CPU and GPU tasks. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU are available for high-speed storage, which could improve load times and data-heavy workflows, though the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is not a limiting factor for its performance class.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a well-balanced pairing with the GPU slightly ahead in relative standing. The CPU's 74th percentile versus the GPU's 85th percentile suggests that in graphics-intensive workloads, the GPU will be the performance ceiling. The CPU's single-core score of 2100 in Geekbench and 1872 in Cinebench R23 are strong for a 17 W part, which means it can feed the GPU adequately in most gaming scenarios. The multi-core score of 9325 in Geekbench shows that the 8 cores can handle background tasks without starving the GPU.

In CPU-bound workloads, the Ultra 7 258V holds its own against desktop parts like the Ryzen 5 5600, with a delta of only -0.1%. This means the processor is not the limiting factor in productivity tasks. However, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth will cap performance in memory-heavy rendering or high-resolution textures. The FPS scaling, while not measured for this exact pairing, can be inferred from the component percentiles: the GPU's 85th percentile indicates it will deliver high frame rates at 1080p in most titles, while the CPU's 74th percentile ensures it will not drag down minimum frame rates in CPU-intensive scenes. The bottleneck profile is therefore GPU-centric for gaming and mixed workloads, with the CPU becoming the limiting factor only in heavily threaded compute tasks that exceed the 8-core, 8-thread configuration.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming at 1080p is well supported by this pairing. The GPU's 85th percentile and 8 GB VRAM provide sufficient headroom for modern titles at high settings, while the CPU's single-core performance of 2100 in Geekbench ensures frame pacing remains stable. Expect smooth experiences in esports titles and capable performance in AAA games, though the 224.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit extreme texture quality.

Streaming is a viable workload. The CPU's 8 cores and 12 MB of shared L3 cache handle encoding overhead, and the GPU's 12 RT cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate support provide hardware-accelerated features. The Passmark multithread score of 18,887 indicates the CPU can manage simultaneous game and encode tasks, though the 17 W TDP means sustained loads will throttle to lower clocks.

Video editing is a strong suit for this platform. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 10,301 and Geekbench multicore score of 9325 provide solid timeline performance, while the GPU's 3.994 TFLOPS FP32 and 7.987 TFLOPS FP16 accelerate effects and previews. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p and moderate 4K timelines.

3D rendering benefits from the CPU's multi-threaded throughput and the GPU's compute capabilities. The Passmark floating point math score of 57,372 and the OpenCL score of 49,735 indicate balanced performance for both CPU-based and GPU-accelerated renderers. The 12 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing support, though the 65 W GPU TDP limits sustained render throughput compared to higher-tier parts.

Software development is well served by the CPU's architecture. The Passmark data compression score of 176,686 and random string sorting score of 21,580 indicate strong performance in compilation and data manipulation tasks. The 8 threads are sufficient for parallel builds, and the single-thread score of 4018 in Passmark ensures snappy IDE responsiveness.

Student and office work is an easy workload for this platform. The CPU's 17 W TDP means long battery life potential, and the integrated Arc 140V graphics provide a fallback when the discrete GPU is idle. The Geekbench single-core score of 2100 handles document processing and web browsing with ample headroom.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need a single laptop for both productivity and gaming. Gamers at 1080p resolution will find the GPU's 85th percentile sufficient for high-refresh monitors in most titles, and the CPU's 74th percentile prevents bottlenecking. Content creators working with video or 3D assets benefit from the balanced CPU and GPU compute, with the 8 GB VRAM handling moderate projects. Software developers get a responsive system for compilation and testing, with the multi-thread score of 18,887 in Passmark indicating parallel build capability. Students and small business workstations gain a system that handles office suites, web applications, and occasional media tasks without strain, while the 17 W CPU TDP contributes to portability. The platform is not suited for heavy 4K rendering or extreme multi-GPU workloads, but for a mobile-first workflow, the percentiles show a capable and consistent performer.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 258V is part of the Core Ultra Series 2, built on the Lunar Lake architecture. It uses a 3 nm process at TSMC, with 8 cores and 8 threads. The base clock is 2.20 GHz and the boost clock is 4.80 GHz, which is a wide frequency range for a 17 W TDP part. The cache hierarchy consists of 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3. The CPU supports LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration with 136.5 GB/s of bandwidth. The integrated graphics are Arc 140V, providing a secondary display and compute option. The socket is Intel BGA 2833, confirming the mobile-only design. The market segment is mobile, and the production status is active, with a release date of September 2024.

The benchmark scores reveal a part that punches above its power class. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 10,301 is competitive with desktop mid-range parts, and the single-core score of 1872 is strong for any form factor. The Geekbench scores of 9325 multicore and 2100 single-core reinforce this. The Passmark multithread score of 18,887 and single-thread score of 4018 show consistent performance across different test methodologies. The nearest rival comparison shows the Ultra 7 258V is effectively tied with the AMD Ryzen 5 5600, a 65 W desktop processor, with a delta of only -0.1%. This is remarkable given the 17 W TDP, indicating that Lunar Lake's efficiency is exceptional. For real workloads, this means the CPU can handle sustained multi-threaded tasks like video encoding or software compilation without significant thermal throttling, while single-thread performance ensures responsive application behavior.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 80, with the CPU at the 74th percentile and the GPU at the 85th percentile.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V compare to the AMD Ryzen 5 5600?

A: The Ultra 7 258V has an average benchmark score of 20,454, while the Ryzen 5 5600 scores 20,468, a delta of -0.1%, meaning they are statistically equivalent.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A530M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s.

Q: Does this platform support ECC memory?

A: No, the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock?

A: The boost clock is 4.80 GHz, with a base clock of 2.20 GHz.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the AMD Radeon RX 5600M?

A: The Arc A530M scores 46,614 on average, while the RX 5600M scores 46,601, a delta of 0.0%, meaning they are performance equals.

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing hardware count?

A: The Intel Arc A530M has 12 RT cores.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows, so all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's 85th percentile and the CPU's 74th percentile suggest that at 1080p resolution with ultra settings, this pairing should deliver playable frame rates in most modern titles. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for high-detail textures at 1080p, while the CPU's single-core performance of 2100 in Geekbench ensures that CPU-bound scenes do not cause significant frame drops. At 1440p, the GPU's 3.994 TFLOPS FP32 will become the limiting factor, and users should expect lower settings to maintain smooth frame rates. The 12 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing, but the 65 W TDP means ray tracing performance will be modest; users should expect to use DLSS or similar upscaling techniques to maintain playable frame rates with ray tracing enabled. For esports titles, the CPU's strong single-thread performance and the GPU's 85th percentile indicate high frame rates well above 100 FPS at 1080p. Overall, this is a solid 1080p gaming platform with reasonable 1440p capability at reduced settings.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V with the Intel Arc A530M in a laptop form factor, as indicated by the build class. The CPU is a mobile Lunar Lake part with 8 cores and 8 threads, a 17 W TDP, and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The GPU is a mobile Alchemist part with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, a 65 W TDP, and a 128-bit memory bus. The combined percentile of 80 places this system in the upper-midrange tier of all recorded configurations. The CPU's 74th percentile and GPU's 85th percentile show a balanced pairing with a slight GPU lean. This is a versatile mobile platform capable of handling gaming at 1080p, content creation, and productivity tasks. The lack of measured FPS data means performance estimates are based on synthetic benchmarks, but the component scores indicate a cohesive and capable system for its class.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V + Intel Arc A530M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 258V

Intel Arc A530M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds