SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

88 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
85%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 258V

20,454 Benchmark Score
Top 15% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 7 258V + Intel Arc A350M — Component Pair Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's Lunar Lake mobile processor with Intel's entry-level Alchemist discrete GPU in a laptop configuration. The CPU holds the 74th percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 70th percentile among all GPUs, yielding a combined 72nd percentile ranking. The data shows a system oriented toward balanced mainstream productivity with modest gaming capability.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming — Not a realistic target. The Arc A350M delivers 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 24 ROPs, with a 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 throughput. Benchmark scores place it at 70th percentile, roughly on par with an AMD Radeon RX 590 (0.4% behind) and within 1.5% of a GeForce GTX 1630. These are 1080p-class parts, not high-refresh performers. The CPU's 4.80 GHz boost clock and 1872 Cinebench R23 single-core score help frame pacing, but the GPU becomes the ceiling in any 144Hz scenario.

Streaming — The CPU's 8 cores and 8 threads with 12 MB shared L3 cache handle encoding workloads adequately, though the 17W TDP limits sustained throughput. The Arc A350M supports DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4, which covers modern streaming APIs. The GPU's 4 GB GDDR6 memory with 112.0 GB/s bandwidth may constrain simultaneous game capture and encode at higher bitrates. Realistically, this system streams at 1080p with conservative settings.

Video editing — The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 18887 and floating-point math score of 57372 indicate solid timeline scrubbing and effect processing for 1080p projects. The GPU's 6.758 TFLOPS FP16 throughput accelerates certain preview and export filters. However, the 4 GB VRAM ceiling becomes a limiting factor for 4K timelines or multi-layer composites. The 136.5 GB/s CPU memory bandwidth helps with large media files.

3D rendering — CPU rendering is competitive with desktop mid-range parts; the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 10301 places the Ultra 7 258V within 0.1% of an AMD Ryzen 5 5600 and 0.1% ahead of a Ryzen 5 8500G. GPU rendering is far more modest — the Arc A350M's 6 RT cores and 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 place it well below dedicated workstation GPUs. Expect Blender or similar workloads to favor the CPU path for final frames, with the GPU useful for viewport interaction.

Software development — The 9325 Geekbench multicore score and 42889 PassMark integer math score support rapid compilation of moderate-sized projects. The 8-core/8-thread configuration with 2.5 MB L2 per core and 12 MB shared L3 handles typical parallel build tooling. Data encryption scores of 13534 and compression at 176686 in PassMark indicate strong performance for repository operations and asset bundling. The 3nm process node from TSMC keeps power draw low during long build sessions.

Student and office work — This is the sweet spot. The single-core performance (2100 Geekbench, 4018 PassMark single-thread) delivers responsive application launches and smooth document editing. The 17W CPU TDP plus 25W GPU TDP enables extended battery life for all-day productivity. Spreadsheets, web browsing, and office suites run comfortably within the CPU's PassMark physics score of 1565 and random string sorting of 21580.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 20454, placing it at the 74th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are striking: the AMD Ryzen 5 5600 scores 20468 (0.1% higher), the Ryzen 5 8500G scores 20425 (0.1% lower), and the EPYC 9454P scores 20422 (0.2% lower). This positions the Ultra 7 258V squarely in desktop mid-range territory despite being a mobile chip. The Cinebench R23 numbers — 10301 multicore and 1872 single-core — reveal a processor that trades multicore throughput for exceptional single-thread efficiency. The Geekbench scores of 9325 multicore and 2100 single-core reinforce this pattern.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 24647, at the 70th percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 590 at 24744 (0.4% ahead), followed by the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile at 24763 (0.5% ahead), the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT at 24442 (0.8% behind), and the GeForce GTX 1630 at 24277 (1.5% behind). Geekbench OpenCL returns 24546, Vulkan 24747 — a narrow gap suggesting consistent performance across compute APIs. The combined picture shows a CPU that significantly outperforms its GPU in relative standing, creating a clear imbalance where the GPU is the primary constraint in graphics-bound workloads.

FAQ

Q: How does the CPU compare to desktop processors?

A: The Ultra 7 258V's average benchmark score of 20454 places it within 0.1% of the AMD Ryzen 5 5600 (20468) and 0.1% ahead of the Ryzen 5 8500G (20425). It also edges out the EPYC 9454P (20422) and EPYC 7713 (20363) by 0.2% and 0.4% respectively.

Q: What is the GPU's performance tier?

A: The Arc A350M scores 24647 on average benchmarks, placing it at the 70th percentile. It sits 0.4% behind the RX 590 (24744), 0.5% behind the RTX A5000 Mobile (24763), 0.8% ahead of the RX 6600 XT (24442), and 1.5% ahead of the GTX 1630 (24277).

Q: Can this system handle 4K video playback or editing?

A: The GPU's 4 GB GDDR6 memory and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit 4K editing timelines. The CPU's 136.5 GB/s system memory bandwidth and 57372 PassMark floating-point score help, but VRAM constraints make 4K multi-layer work problematic.

Q: What is the memory configuration?

A: The CPU supports LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration with 136.5 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory is not supported. The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus delivering 112.0 GB/s.

Q: Is this a desktop or laptop build?

A: This is a laptop configuration (build class: laptop). The CPU uses the Intel BGA 2833 socket, and the GPU's display outputs are listed as "Portable Device Dependent."

Q: How does the CPU's single-thread performance compare to its multicore?

A: The single-core Geekbench score of 2100 and Cinebench R23 single-core of 1872 are strong. The multicore scores (9325 Geekbench, 10301 Cinebench R23) are respectable but show the 8-core/8-thread design without hyperthreading limits scaling.

Q: What is the production status of these components?

A: The CPU is listed as Active, released September 2024. The GPU is End-of-life, released March 2022. This means the GPU may be harder to source new, though the pairing remains functional.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the FACT PACK confirms zero entries in measured FpsUltraByGame. All frame rate expectations here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and hardware specifications.

At 1080p ultra settings, the Arc A350M's 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 and 105.6 GTexel/s texture rate place it in the same class as the RX 590 and GTX 1630. Those parts deliver playable frame rates in esports titles and older AAA games, but struggle with modern AAA releases at ultra. Expect 30-50 FPS in demanding titles at 1080p ultra, with esports titles reaching 60-90 FPS. The 4 GB VRAM buffer is adequate for 1080p textures but will cause stuttering in games exceeding 4 GB allocations.

At 1440p, the GPU's 52.80 GPixel/s pixel rate and 64-bit memory bus become significant bottlenecks. Bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s is roughly half of what mid-range desktop parts offer. Expect 20-35 FPS in AAA titles at 1440p ultra, making 1080p the practical resolution for this system. The CPU's 4.80 GHz boost clock and 1872 Cinebench R23 single-core score ensure the GPU is the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios.

Lowering settings to high or medium at 1080p yields the best experience. The GPU's DirectX 12 Ultimate support enables hardware ray tracing, but the 6 RT cores are minimal — expect ray-traced effects to halve frame rates versus rasterized rendering. The Vulkan 1.4 support helps with modern game engines that leverage this API.

Who Should Build It

Mainstream laptop users seeking a balanced system for daily productivity, web browsing, and light content creation will find this pairing well-suited. The CPU's 74th percentile ranking ensures responsive general performance, while the GPU's 70th percentile covers basic graphics acceleration.

Students benefit from the 17W CPU TDP and 25W GPU TDP — total power draw remains low enough for extended unplugged use. The 8-core/8-thread CPU handles multitasking between research, writing, and video calls without strain, and the 136.5 GB/s memory bandwidth supports large document and PDF workloads.

Casual gamers who play at 1080p with medium settings get a viable experience. The GPU's performance parity with the RX 590 (0.4% difference) and GTX 1630 (1.5% ahead) means proven 1080p capability for less demanding titles.

Software developers benefit from the CPU's strong integer math (42889 PassMark) and data compression (176686 PassMark) scores. The 3nm process from TSMC keeps power draw low during extended compile sessions.

Small business workstations handling spreadsheets, email, and office suites run comfortably. The CPU's single-thread performance (4018 PassMark) ensures snappy application response, and the 12 MB L3 cache aids repetitive database operations.

Not suitable for — 3D rendering professionals, high-refresh competitive gamers, or 4K video editors. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth are hard ceilings, and the CPU's 8-thread limit constrains heavily parallel workloads.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M uses the DG2-128 chip on the Xe-HPG architecture, fabricated on TSMC's 6nm process. The die contains 7,200 million transistors across 157 mm², giving a density of 45.9M transistors per mm². The GPU operates at a 1150 MHz base clock and 2200 MHz boost clock, delivering 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 and 6.758 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1).

Memory consists of 4 GB GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) for 112.0 GB/s bandwidth. This is the most significant limitation. The 64-bit bus halves memory throughput compared to 128-bit competitors, and 4 GB VRAM is minimal for modern titles. The 24 ROPs produce a 52.80 GPixel/s pixel rate, while 48 TMUs generate 105.6 GTexel/s.

The 6 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing support under DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), but their low count means ray-traced workloads run at reduced efficiency. The GPU supports OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4, covering modern graphics APIs. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface provides adequate bandwidth for the GPU's compute needs.

Benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 24546 and Vulkan score of 24747, with an average of 24647. This places the GPU at the 70th percentile, essentially tied with the RX 590 (0.4% lower) and RTX A5000 Mobile (0.5% lower). The 0.8% lead over the RX 6600 XT and 1.5% lead over the GTX 1630 indicate consistent mid-range performance.

For rendering workloads, the FP16 throughput of 6.758 TFLOPS helps with AI-accelerated features, but the absence of dedicated tensor cores limits machine learning workloads. The GPU is best suited for traditional rasterization, basic video encoding, and compute tasks that fit within 4 GB VRAM.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 258V is a Lunar Lake architecture processor built on TSMC's 3nm process. It features 8 cores and 8 threads — no hyperthreading — with a 2.20 GHz base clock and 4.80 GHz boost clock. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB L1 per core, 2.5 MB L2 per core, and 12 MB shared L3.

Memory support covers LPDDR5X in a dual-channel configuration, delivering 136.5 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 4 lanes (CPU only), and includes integrated Arc 140V graphics. It is a mobile segment chip on the Intel BGA 2833 socket, with a 17W TDP and no unlocked multiplier.

Benchmark performance is characterized by strong single-core and moderate multicore results. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1872 and Geekbench single-core of 2100 indicate excellent per-thread performance, driven by the 4.80 GHz boost clock. Multicore results — 10301 in Cinebench R23 and 9325 in Geekbench — are respectable but reveal the 8-thread limit without SMT.

The PassMark suite shows a diverse workload profile. Integer math scores 42889, floating-point math 57372, and extended instructions 14717. Data encryption hits 13534, compression 176686, and random string sorting 21580. The physics score of 1565 and find prime numbers of 185 indicate moderate performance in specific compute patterns. The multithread score of 18887 and single-thread of 4018 confirm the balanced design.

The average benchmark score of 20454 places the CPU at the 74th percentile, with nearest rivals being the Ryzen 5 5600 (20468, 0.1% higher), Ryzen 5 8500G (20425, 0.1% lower), EPYC 9454P (20422, 0.2% lower), and EPYC 7713 (20363, 0.4% lower). This is remarkable — a 17W mobile chip matching desktop mid-range processors.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class pairing of Intel's Core Ultra Series 2 mobile processor with Intel's Arc A350M discrete GPU. The combined percentile ranking is 72nd overall, reflecting a system that is stronger in CPU than GPU performance. The CPU's 74th percentile versus the GPU's 70th percentile shows a modest imbalance favoring processor performance.

The pairing targets mainstream mobile computing: productivity, content consumption, and light creative work. The CPU's desktop-class performance (matching the Ryzen 5 5600 within 0.1%) ensures snappy system response, while the GPU's mid-range standing (on par with the RX 590) provides adequate graphics acceleration for 1080p gaming at medium settings.

Power characteristics are notably efficient — the CPU's 17W TDP and GPU's 25W TDP combine for a 42W total thermal budget. This enables thin-and-light laptop designs with good battery life. The 3nm CPU process and 6nm GPU process both come from TSMC, indicating a modern fabrication approach.

The production status differs: the CPU is Active (released September 2024), while the GPU is End-of-life (released March 2022). This creates a situation where the CPU is current-generation, but the GPU is one generation behind. Buyers should verify GPU availability and driver support.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear CPU-favored balance. The CPU's average benchmark score of 20454 versus the GPU's 24647 places the CPU at 74th percentile and GPU at 70th percentile — a 4-point gap. In practice, this means the GPU will be the limiting factor in graphics-intensive workloads.

In gaming, the GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth create a hard ceiling. The CPU's 4.80 GHz boost clock and 1872 single-core Cinebench score will rarely bottleneck frame generation. Games that are GPU-bound at 1080p will see the Arc A350M working at full utilization while the CPU idles.

In CPU-bound workloads — compilation, data processing, office multitasking — the GPU's role diminishes. The CPU's 8 cores and 12 MB L3 cache handle these tasks efficiently, with the GPU only accelerating specific compute functions. The PassMark integer math score of 42889 and compression score of 176686 show no GPU involvement needed.

The FPS scaling, while not measured, follows expected patterns: CPU performance ensures high minimum frame rates, while GPU performance caps maximum frame rates. The 4 GB VRAM can cause texture pop-in or stuttering in VRAM-heavy titles, independent of CPU capability.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 2833 socket, which is a soldered mobile format — not upgradeable in a conventional sense. The 17W TDP and LPDDR5X memory support indicate an integrated platform design where the CPU, memory, and potentially other components are fixed on the motherboard.

The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, a standard interface that could theoretically accommodate a different GPU in a modular laptop design. However, the "Portable Device Dependent" display outputs suggest the GPU is integrated into the laptop chassis, limiting replacement options. The End-of-life production status further reduces future upgrade feasibility.

Memory is LPDDR5X in dual-channel configuration with 136.5 GB/s bandwidth. This is soldered LPDDR5X, typical of mobile designs — not upgradable after purchase. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 4 lanes, which is adequate for the GPU and one or two NVMe drives.

Power delivery is constrained by the 17W CPU TDP and 25W GPU TDP. The GPU has no suggested PSU listed, and no power connectors are specified — this is an IGP-class component running off motherboard power. A future upgrade to a higher-TDP GPU would require a completely different laptop platform.

The realistic upgrade path is a full system replacement. A newer laptop with a current-generation Intel or AMD processor and a more powerful GPU would be the logical next step. The CPU's performance class (matching Ryzen 5 5600) suggests users upgrading from this system should target processors at or above that tier, with GPUs above the RX 590 performance level to achieve meaningful gains.