SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 256V + Intel Arc A570M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

85%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 256V

21,112 Benchmark Score

Top 15% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A570M

58,239 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 7 256V + Intel Arc A570M: A Lunar Lake-Alchemist Pairing

This build pairs Intel’s Lunar Lake mobile processor, the Core Ultra 7 256V, with the discrete Intel Arc A570M GPU. The CPU is an 8-core, 8-thread part built on a 3 nm TSMC process, while the GPU is a 6 nm DG2-256 chip from the Xe-HPG Alchemist generation. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination; the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all frame rate discussion below is estimated from the individual CPU and GPU benchmark scores, not from direct game testing.

Gaming Performance

Since the FACT PACK lacks measured frame rates for this CPU+GPU pairing at any resolution or quality setting, all gaming expectations must be derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 58239 places it at the 88th percentile among all GPUs, which is a strong indicator of 1080p-class performance. The closest rivals in the GPU’s benchmark list include the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (score 58392, deltaPct -0.3%) and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (score 58085, deltaPct 0.3%), suggesting the Arc A570M sits in a performance tier roughly equivalent to those desktop parts in compute workloads.

For CPU-bound gaming, the Core Ultra 7 256V’s single-core Geekbench score of 1990 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1877.5 indicate solid frame pacing in titles that rely on a single powerful thread. The CPU’s 75th percentile ranking among all CPUs means it outpaces roughly three-quarters of the processor pool, which should keep modern game engines fed without becoming a severe bottleneck at moderate settings.

At 1080p ultra settings, the estimated frame rates would likely favor fast-paced esports titles over graphically heavy AAA games. The GPU’s 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are modest figures, so 1440p ultra or 4K gaming would likely push the A570M beyond its comfort zone, resulting in sub-60 FPS in many modern releases. At 1080p with high or medium settings, the data suggests playable frame rates in most titles, with the 8 GB GDDR6 frame buffer providing adequate capacity for current game assets.

The lack of measured FPS data means these are estimates only. The GPU’s 88th percentile and the CPU’s 75th percentile together suggest a system that can handle 1080p gaming with reasonable settings, but users seeking high-refresh 1440p or 4K experiences would need to look at higher-tier GPUs.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU build?

A: The build has a combined percentile of 82, meaning it outperforms 82% of all tracked CPU+GPU pairings in the database.

Q: How does the Intel Arc A570M compare to its nearest GPU rival?

A: The Arc A570M scores 58239 in Geekbench OpenCL, which is 0.3% below the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (score 58392) and 0.3% above the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (score 58085).

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP and what does that imply for cooling?

A: The Core Ultra 7 256V has a TDP of 17 watts, which is extremely low for a mobile processor, implying that a modest cooling solution such as a thin laptop heat pipe assembly would suffice.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc A570M has 16 dedicated RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), indicating hardware-accelerated ray tracing capability.

Q: What memory type and bus width does the GPU use?

A: The GPU uses 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 5 5600G in average benchmark score?

A: The Core Ultra 7 256V has an average benchmark score of 21112, which is 0.1% higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 5600G’s score of 21088.

Q: What is the CPU’s process node and foundry?

A: The CPU is built on a 3 nm process node at TSMC, while the GPU is built on a 6 nm process node, also at TSMC.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A570M is a discrete mobile GPU based on the DG2-256 chip, using the Xe-HPG architecture from the Alchemist generation. It features 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units, with 16 dedicated ray tracing cores. The GPU has no listed tensor cores, which means AI-accelerated workloads would rely on the Xe-HPG’s general compute capabilities rather than dedicated tensor hardware.

Memory configuration is 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective), providing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This bandwidth figure is a key limitation for high-resolution rendering, as modern games at 1440p or 4K require substantially more data movement. The pixel rate of 83.20 GPixel/s and texture rate of 166.4 GTexel/s suggest the GPU can fill frames quickly at lower resolutions, but the 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 throughput places it in the mid-range of mobile GPUs.

Clocks are relatively conservative: a base of 900 MHz and a boost of 1300 MHz. This modest clock speed, combined with a 75 W TDP, indicates the A570M is designed for thin-and-light laptops where power efficiency matters more than raw performance. The FP16 throughput of 10.65 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) doubles the FP32 rate, which can accelerate certain rendering and compute tasks that support mixed precision.

The GPU’s OpenCL score of 58239 at the 88th percentile is remarkably high for a mobile part, placing it near the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (a desktop flagship from an earlier generation) in raw compute terms. However, the nearest rival list also includes the RX 5600 OEM, a mid-range desktop card, indicating that the A570M’s compute performance does not directly translate to gaming FPS, as memory bandwidth and driver optimization play significant roles.

For rendering workloads, the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p content creation but may limit 4K texture sets. The 224.0 GB/s bandwidth could become a bottleneck in GPU-accelerated video effects or complex 3D scenes, but the 16 RT cores provide hardware support for ray-traced lighting in supported applications.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core Ultra 7 256V uses the Intel BGA 2833 socket, which is a soldered mobile package, meaning the CPU cannot be upgraded without replacing the entire motherboard or laptop. This is a fundamental limitation of the platform: the processor is permanently attached. The GPU, similarly, is a mobile part with a slot width of "IGP," indicating it is integrated into the system board, so users cannot swap it for a discrete desktop card.

Memory support is listed as "unknown — depends on motherboard," but the CPU has a dual-channel memory bus. The system’s PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 4 lanes from the CPU, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8. This mismatch means the GPU’s interface is one generation behind the CPU’s capability, though for a mobile platform this is unlikely to cause meaningful performance loss given the GPU’s bandwidth requirements.

The GPU’s TDP is 75 W, and the CPU’s TDP is 17 W, totaling roughly 92 W for the core compute components. Since no suggested PSU is listed, and this is a laptop build, power delivery is handled by the system’s internal power supply and battery. The absence of a suggested PSU rating suggests the platform is self-contained, typical for mobile designs.

A sensible next upgrade for a user invested in this platform would be impossible at the component level, given the soldered nature of both CPU and GPU. Instead, the upgrade path would involve moving to a new laptop with a more powerful processor or GPU, such as a higher-tier Core Ultra 7 or Arc 7-series part. The 12 MB of shared L3 cache and 2.5 MB per-core L2 cache on the CPU are fixed, so users cannot expand cache or memory bandwidth beyond the dual-channel configuration.

The PCIe Gen 5 support on the CPU, even with only 4 lanes, suggests future compatibility with high-speed NVMe storage, but the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is already sufficient for its memory bandwidth. This platform is best viewed as a complete, non-upgradable package, optimized for portability rather than expandability.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 256V is an 8-core, 8-thread processor from the Core Ultra Series 2, based on the Lunar Lake architecture. It has no hyper-threading, as indicated by the equal core and thread counts, which is a notable design choice that prioritizes power efficiency over multi-threaded throughput. The base clock is 2.20 GHz with a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, a wide frequency range that allows the chip to scale from idle to peak performance dynamically.

Built on a 3 nm TSMC process, the CPU is manufactured at the leading edge of semiconductor fabrication, which contributes to its low 17 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. This cache configuration is generous for a mobile part and helps mitigate the lack of simultaneous multi-threading by keeping frequently accessed data close to the cores.

Benchmark scores show a balanced performer. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 10399 multi-core and 1877.5 single-core, while in Geekbench it scores 8643 multi-core and 1990 single-core. The Passmark single-thread score of 4029 indicates strong single-core performance, which is critical for many legacy and lightly-threaded applications. The multi-thread score of 19530 in Passmark is respectable but not class-leading, given the 8-thread limitation.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 21112, placing it at the 75th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 5 7530U (score 21133, deltaPct -0.1%), the AMD Ryzen 5 5600G (score 21088, deltaPct 0.1%), and the Intel Core i3-1220P (score 21066, deltaPct 0.2%). These deltas are all within 0.3%, indicating the Core Ultra 7 256V is statistically tied with these mid-range parts in aggregate performance.

For real workloads, the CPU excels in tasks that favor single-core speed, such as office productivity, web browsing, and spreadsheet manipulation. The Passmark data compression score of 184985 and encryption score of 13998 suggest solid performance for archive management and secure communication. The floating-point math score of 58576 and integer math score of 43358 indicate healthy number-crunching capability for scientific or engineering software, though the 8-thread limit will cap performance in heavily parallel workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering.

The integrated Arc 140V graphics provide a fallback display output, but with the discrete A570M present, the iGPU is unlikely to be used for gaming. The lack of ECC memory support and locked multiplier (multiplierUnlocked: false) position this CPU as a mainstream mobile part, not an enthusiast overclocking chip.

Who Should Build It

This laptop build targets users who need a balance of CPU and GPU performance in a portable package, without requiring extreme multi-threaded throughput or high-end gaming at 4K. The 75th percentile CPU and 88th percentile GPU mean the system is above average in both compute areas, making it suitable for a broad range of tasks.

Gamers at 1080p resolution are the primary audience. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p ultra settings in many titles, and the CPU’s strong single-core score of 1990 in Geekbench ensures frame rates stay stable in CPU-bound scenarios. Users who prefer esports titles or older AAA games at high frame rates will find this system adequate, but those targeting 1440p or 4K should look elsewhere.

Content creators working with 1080p footage or moderate 3D scenes will benefit from the GPU’s 16 RT cores and 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 throughput. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10399 is enough for basic video editing and rendering, though longer exports or complex timelines will feel slower than on higher-core-count desktop parts.

Software developers compiling code will appreciate the CPU’s single-core speed and fast L2/L3 cache. The Passmark extended instructions score of 15643 indicates good SIMD performance for vectorized workloads, and the 17 W TDP means the system stays cool during long build sessions.

Students and small business workers who need a reliable laptop for office applications, email, and web browsing will find the CPU more than adequate. The single-thread Passmark score of 4029 ensures snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks, while the GPU’s compute power provides headroom for occasional photo editing or light CAD work.

The combined 82nd percentile ranking suggests this is a well-rounded system, but it is not a workstation replacement. Users requiring heavy multi-threaded rendering or high-end gaming should consider higher-tier components.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU and GPU each have distinct benchmark profiles that together define the system’s overall capability. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 21112, with a percentile ranking of 75 among all CPUs. Its best single-core scores are the Cinebench R23 single-core result of 1877.5 and the Passmark single-thread score of 4029, both indicating strong per-thread performance. The multi-core scores, including Cinebench R23 multi-core at 10399 and Geekbench multi-core at 8643, are solid but not exceptional for an 8-thread part.

The GPU’s only listed benchmark is Geekbench OpenCL, where it scores 58239, placing it at the 88th percentile among all GPUs. This is a high ranking, but the lack of additional gaming benchmarks means the score primarily reflects compute throughput rather than real-world frame rates. The nearest GPU rivals are all within 0.7% of the A570M’s score, including the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (deltaPct -0.3%) and the NVIDIA P102-100 (deltaPct -0.5%), suggesting the Arc A570M is tuned for compute-heavy tasks.

The combined percentile of 82 indicates that this CPU+GPU pairing outperforms 82% of all tracked builds in the database, which is a strong overall tier. However, the delta between the CPU (75th) and GPU (88th) percentiles reveals a slight imbalance: the GPU is relatively stronger than the CPU. This means the system’s gaming performance is more likely limited by CPU threading in multi-threaded game logic, while GPU compute tasks will hit the A570M’s ceiling first.

In Passmark sub-tests, the CPU shows a mixed profile: data compression at 184985 is very strong, physics at 1595 is moderate, and find prime numbers at 192 is low, indicating weaker integer-heavy parallel workloads. The floating-point math score of 58576 is respectable, suggesting the CPU handles scientific calculations well despite its modest thread count.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build, as indicated by the buildClass field, pairing the Intel Core Ultra 7 256V mobile processor with the Intel Arc A570M mobile GPU. The CPU is from the Lunar Lake architecture, representing Intel’s latest Core Ultra Series 2, while the GPU is from the older Alchemist generation, creating a mix of current and previous-generation Intel silicon.

The combined percentile of 82 places this system in the upper quintile of all tracked builds, making it a high-mid-range laptop configuration. The CPU’s 75th percentile and GPU’s 88th percentile together suggest a system that is balanced toward visual compute, with the GPU being the stronger component relative to its peers.

The CPU’s 17 W TDP and the GPU’s 75 W TDP total 92 W, which is low enough for a thin-and-light chassis. The 3 nm CPU process and 6 nm GPU process both come from TSMC, indicating Intel has outsourced manufacturing for both major chips in this build.

This pairing is unusual in that it combines a very power-efficient, modern CPU with a mid-range GPU from a previous architecture generation. The result is a system that prioritizes battery life and portability in CPU tasks, while offering discrete GPU performance that exceeds integrated graphics but falls short of high-end mobile GPUs.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a notable performance imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The GPU sits at the 88th percentile, while the CPU is at the 75th percentile, a 13-point gap that suggests the CPU is the limiting factor in many workloads. In gaming, this means that at 1080p with lower settings, the CPU’s single-core performance (Geekbench 1990, Cinebench R23 single-core 1877.5) will handle frame pacing, but in multi-threaded game logic or when paired with the GPU’s compute power, the 8-thread limit could cap performance.

The GPU’s OpenCL score of 58239, which rivals the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (score 58392), indicates the A570M has substantial raw compute capability. However, the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10399, while decent, is not in the same league as high-end desktop processors, meaning CPU-bound scenarios like physics simulation or AI-driven game logic will bottleneck the GPU’s potential.

In GPU-bound workloads like 3D rendering or video encoding, the A570M’s 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth will dominate, and the CPU will likely not be the limiting factor. Conversely, in CPU-bound tasks like spreadsheet calculations or compiling, the GPU is idle, and the CPU’s 17 W TDP ensures sustained performance without thermal throttling in a well-designed chassis.

The FPS scaling, estimated from the benchmark scores, suggests that at 1080p ultra, the GPU is the primary driver, but at lower resolutions like 720p, the CPU’s single-core speed becomes the bottleneck. The lack of measured FPS data makes precise bottleneck quantification impossible, but the percentile gap clearly indicates that the GPU outperforms the CPU relative to their respective pools.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the Arc A570M’s 88th percentile GPU score and 8 GB VRAM should deliver 60+ FPS in many esports titles, but the CPU’s 75th percentile and 8-thread limit may cap frame rates at 144 Hz in competitive shooters, making this a better fit for 60-100 Hz gaming.

Streaming: The CPU’s strong single-core score of 1990 in Geekbench can handle encoding at moderate bitrates, while the GPU’s 16 RT cores and 5.325 TFLOPS provide headroom for simultaneous gaming and streaming, though the combined 92 W power draw may limit sustained performance in thin laptops.

Video editing: The GPU’s 224.0 GB/s bandwidth and 8 GB VRAM are sufficient for 1080p timelines, and the CPU’s Passmark multi-thread score of 19530 supports basic rendering, but 4K projects with heavy effects will strain the system.

3D rendering: The GPU’s OpenCL score of 58239, rivaling the RX 6950 XT, accelerates ray-traced renders, but the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10399 will prolong CPU-based render passes, making this a hybrid approach best for GPU-accelerated renderers.

Software development: The CPU’s single-thread Passmark score of 4029 and data compression score of 184985 ensure fast compilation for small-to-medium codebases, while the 12 MB L3 cache reduces data access latency, making this a responsive dev machine.

Student and office work: The 17 W TDP CPU delivers excellent battery life, and the 75th percentile ranking means everyday tasks like word processing and web browsing are notably faster than average, with the GPU providing occasional acceleration for presentations or light image editing.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 256V + Intel Arc A570M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 256V

Intel Arc A570M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds