SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX + Intel Arc A770M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX

62,738 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A770M

18,383 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX and Intel Arc A770M pairing represents a high-end mobile computing platform built around Intel's latest architecture for laptops. This combination places the system in the 78th percentile overall, indicating a well-above-average performer for demanding tasks like content creation and high-refresh-rate gaming.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX is a 20-core, 20-thread processor built on the Arrow Lake architecture, specifically the Arrow Lake-HX variant. It belongs to the Core Ultra Series 2 family and is fabricated on a 3 nm process node by TSMC, a significant advancement that contributes to its performance and efficiency profile. The chip contains 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, showcasing the density of the modern manufacturing process.

Clock speeds are substantial for a mobile part, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock reaching 5.20 GHz. This high boost capability is crucial for single-threaded workloads, which is reflected in its strong Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2163 points. The cache hierarchy is generous, featuring 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 30 MB L3 cache. This large pool of fast memory helps feed the 20 cores efficiently, particularly in multi-threaded scenarios.

In multi-threaded performance, the CPU demonstrates its muscle. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32612 points is a strong result, placing it firmly in the high-performance laptop segment. This is reinforced by a Passmark multi-thread score of 48234 and a Passmark physics score of 2926. The processor's average benchmark score of 62738 places it in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, a clear indicator of its top-tier status. Data from nearest rivals shows it trading blows with the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185, which scores 62839 (a 0.2 percent difference), and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465, which scores 62498 (a 0.4 percent difference). It also edges out the Intel Core i7-13790F by 0.5 percent and the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX by 0.7 percent. This places the 255HX in a competitive cluster where performance differences are marginal, meaning real-world application support and power delivery will be the deciding factors.

The CPU also excels in specialized tasks. The Passmark data encryption score of 39499 and data compression score of 515143 indicate robust performance for security-related and archival workloads. Integer math, a proxy for general-purpose computation, scores 127126, while floating-point math, critical for scientific and engineering simulations, scores 160624. With a TDP of 55 watts, this processor is designed to deliver this high level of performance within a power envelope that is manageable for a large gaming or workstation laptop.

Benchmark Performance

The combined performance picture for this system is defined by a powerful CPU and a mid-range GPU. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking among all processors is the clear strength of this build. The Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX is a top-tier mobile processor, and its benchmark scores confirm this across a variety of tests. For example, in Cinebench R20, it scores 17187 points multi-core and 2426 points single-core, showing balanced capability across both multi-threaded and single-threaded tasks.

The GPU, an Intel Arc A770M, occupies a different tier. Its average benchmark score of 18383 places it in the 62nd percentile among all GPUs. This is a significant gap from the CPU's standing. The GPU's performance in 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12) is 2278 points, and its Geekbench scores are 89494 for OpenCL and 74422 for Vulkan. This indicates that the GPU is a capable performer, but it is clearly not in the same class as the CPU.

The overall system percentile is 78, dragged down by the GPU's relatively lower position. This creates an interesting dynamic. For CPU-bound workloads like code compilation, file compression, and 3D modeling physics simulation, the system will feel exceptionally fast. However, for GPU-bound tasks like high-resolution gaming or GPU rendering, the A770M will be the limiting factor. The data suggests a system that is a beast for productivity and a solid, but not top-tier, performer for graphics-intensive tasks. It is notably there is no measured FPS data for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A770M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically using the DG2-512 chip. It is a mobile GPU fabricated on a 6 nm process node by TSMC, containing 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. This is a large chip, indicative of a high-core-count design. It features 4096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 raster output units, providing substantial raw compute power.

Memory configuration is a strong point. The A770M comes equipped with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding a memory bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s. This high bandwidth is essential for feeding the GPU's many cores, especially at higher resolutions and with high-resolution textures. The memory clock runs at 2000 MHz with a 16 Gbps effective data rate. The GPU's base clock is 1650 MHz, with a boost clock of 2050 MHz, allowing it to scale performance when thermals permit.

In terms of compute capabilities, the A770M delivers 16.79 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 33.59 TFLOPS of FP16 performance (at a 2:1 ratio). It also includes 32 dedicated ray tracing cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported titles. The API support is comprehensive, including DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern games and applications. The pixel rate is 262.4 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 524.8 GTexel/s.

Benchmark scores for the GPU are mixed. The Passmark G3D score is 11774, and the Passmark G2D score is 711. The Passmark GPU compute score is 4778. DirectX performance in Passmark shows a score of 70 for DX12 and 69 for DX11, which are relatively modest numbers. In comparison to its nearest rivals, the A770M is nearly identical to the AMD Radeon RX 460 (0.1 percent difference) and the AMD FirePro D500 (0.8 percent difference). It is 1.1 percent faster than the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 and 1.2 percent faster than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile. This places the A770M in a competitive bracket with older desktop cards and previous-generation mobile GPUs, suggesting it is best suited for 1080p gaming and entry-level 1440p.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX compare to its closest rivals?

A: The 255HX is statistically tied with the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185, with a performance difference of only 0.2 percent. It is also 0.4 percent faster than the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 and 0.7 percent faster than the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX.

Q: What is the GPU's performance class based on benchmark data?

A: The Arc A770M sits in the 62nd percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score is nearly identical to the AMD Radeon RX 460 and AMD FirePro D500, and it is only 1.2 percent faster than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile.

Q: What kind of memory and bandwidth does the GPU offer?

A: The Arc A770M features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s. The memory operates at an effective data rate of 16 Gbps.

Q: What is the CPU's memory and expansion capability?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, offering a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. It also provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes for connecting high-speed devices like NVMe SSDs and the GPU.

Q: Does the system support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU has 32 dedicated ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which includes hardware-accelerated ray tracing features in games that implement them.

Q: What is the production status of the GPU?

A: The Intel Arc A770M is listed as "End-of-life" in the production status, while the CPU is marked as "Active". This suggests the CPU is a current product, while the GPU may be at the end of its production cycle.

Q: How does the CPU's single-threaded performance compare to its multi-threaded performance?

A: The CPU shows strong performance in both areas. Its Cinebench R23 single-core score is 2163 points, while its multi-core score is 32612 points. This balance makes it suitable for both responsive everyday tasks and demanding multi-threaded workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data paints a clear picture of a system with a significant bottleneck. The CPU, at the 93rd percentile, is a top-tier performer that will not be the limiting factor in almost any workload. The GPU, at the 62nd percentile, is a mid-range part. This creates a substantial imbalance where the GPU will consistently be the component that holds the system back in graphics-intensive tasks.

In CPU-bound workloads, such as software compilation, video encoding with CPU codecs, or complex spreadsheet calculations, the system will feel extremely fast. The 20 cores of the 255HX will tear through multi-threaded tasks, and its high boost clock will ensure snappy single-threaded response. The Passmark multi-thread score of 48234 and data compression score of 515143 are testaments to this capability.

However, in GPU-bound workloads like gaming at high resolutions or rendering in GPU-accelerated applications, the Arc A770M will limit overall performance. For example, while the CPU could easily push 200 frames per second in an esports title, the GPU might only be able to render 100 to 120 frames per second at the same settings. This means the system's overall gaming performance will be dictated by the GPU's 62nd percentile standing, not the CPU's 93rd percentile. The system is well-balanced for productivity, but for gaming, the GPU is the clear bottleneck.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination. The following frame rate expectations are estimates based on the benchmark scores of the individual components, particularly the GPU's 62nd percentile standing and its performance relative to the RTX 3060 Mobile.

At 1080p resolution, the Arc A770M is expected to deliver playable frame rates in most modern titles. For competitive and esports games like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, the GPU should be able to push well over 100 frames per second at high settings, as these games are less demanding. For AAA titles at high settings, players can expect frame rates in the 60 to 80 range, with some reduction in settings needed for the most demanding games to hit a consistent 60 FPS.

At 1440p resolution, the GPU will be under more strain. The high memory bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s will help, but the raw compute power of 16.79 TFLOPS will be a limiting factor. Players should expect to lower settings to medium or high to maintain a stable 60 frames per second in most AAA titles. In very demanding scenarios with ray tracing enabled, frame rates will drop further, and users may need to rely on upscaling technologies to achieve smooth performance. The 16 GB VRAM is a positive factor, allowing for high-resolution textures without worrying about memory capacity limits.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel BGA 2114 socket, which means the CPU is soldered to the motherboard. This is typical for mobile platforms and means the CPU is not upgradeable. The system supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and users should ensure they are using a matched pair of modules to maximize memory bandwidth, which is rated at 102.4 GB/s.

The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. This means the GPU has ample bandwidth for its needs. The primary upgrade path for this system is the GPU, but since this is a laptop, the GPU is also typically soldered and not upgradeable. Therefore, from a practical standpoint, the upgrade path is limited to increasing the amount of RAM and replacing the storage drive.

The CPU has a TDP of 55 watts, and the GPU has a TDP of 120 watts. The combined power draw of these components is significant, so a laptop with this configuration will require a substantial power supply. While no specific PSU wattage is suggested in the data, users should be aware that this system will require a high-capacity power adapter for the laptop to perform at its full potential. A sensible next upgrade for a user on this platform would be to ensure they have a fast NVMe Gen 5 SSD to take advantage of the CPU's PCIe lanes and to maximize the system's responsiveness.

Build Overview

This build is a high-performance laptop configuration that pairs a top-tier 20-core processor with a mid-range discrete GPU. The Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX places the system in the 93rd percentile for CPU performance, making it an exceptional workstation for compute-heavy tasks. The Intel Arc A770M, with its 62nd percentile GPU score, provides solid 1080p gaming capability and hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but it is the weaker link in this pairing.

The system's overall combined percentile is 78, reflecting the significant difference in tier between the CPU and GPU. This is a laptop designed for professionals and power users who need extreme processing power for tasks like software development, 3D modeling, and video editing, but who also want the ability to play modern games. It is not the ultimate gaming machine due to the GPU's limitations, but it is a highly capable all-rounder that excels at productivity. The 16 GB of VRAM on the GPU is a notable feature that will help with large datasets and high-resolution textures, making it a viable option for entry-level machine learning workloads and content creation.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is ideal for users whose primary workload is CPU-intensive. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 20 cores and high multi-threaded scores. Data analysts and engineers running complex simulations will see excellent performance in floating-point math, which scores 160624 in Passmark. Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will find the CPU's performance transformative, even if GPU-accelerated rendering is not the absolute fastest.

Students in engineering or computer science fields would benefit from a machine that can handle both demanding coursework and gaming. For gamers, this system targets those playing at 1080p resolution. It will handle current titles with ease and provide a smooth experience for competitive multiplayer games. The GPU's 16 GB of VRAM also makes it suitable for users experimenting with AI models or large-scale image processing. Small business workstations that need to compile, render, or process large datasets will find this system offers a significant boost in productivity. The combination of a massive 20-core CPU and a 16 GB GPU makes this a versatile tool for a wide range of professional and creative tasks, provided the user understands that the GPU is the limiting factor for high-end gaming.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX + Intel Arc A770M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX

Intel Arc A770M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds