SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 165U + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

84%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 165U

20,249 Benchmark Score

Top 16% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The Intel Core Ultra 7 165U and Intel Arc A370M form a laptop pairing where the CPU and GPU occupy nearly identical performance tiers, but their workload characteristics create distinct bottleneck patterns. The CPU sits at the 74th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU also rests at the 74th percentile among all GPUs, placing both components at the same relative standing in their respective markets. This alignment suggests a balanced platform for most tasks, yet the nature of each component's strengths and weaknesses dictates where one will limit the other.

The CPU's benchmark spread reveals a processor that is far stronger in multi-threaded throughput than in single-thread responsiveness. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score of 10226 stands against a single-core score of 1662, a ratio of roughly 6.2:1. This indicates that the processor scales well across its 12 cores and 14 threads, but individual core performance is comparatively modest. For gaming, where single-core performance often drives frame pacing, the CPU's single-thread score of 1662 in Cinebench R23 and 1450 in Geekbench single-core suggest that the CPU could become the limiting factor in lightly-threaded titles, especially at lower resolutions where the GPU has headroom.

The GPU, with its 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus delivering 112.0 GB/s bandwidth, is constrained by memory capacity and bandwidth in modern titles. The Arc A370M's FP32 throughput of 4.198 TFLOPS and texture rate of 131.2 GTexel/s indicate a chip capable of 1080p gaming at medium to high settings, but the 4 GB frame buffer will force texture quality reductions in VRAM-heavy scenarios. The GPU's 74th percentile ranking places it in the same tier as the AMD Radeon RX 470, which scores 0.6% higher, and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M, which scores 1% higher according to the deltaPct values. This means the GPU is not the dominant bottleneck in most CPU-bound workloads, but it will cap frame rates in GPU-intensive scenes.

FPS scaling evidence is absent from the FACT PACK, as no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination. However, the benchmark scores allow for inference. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 17101 and the GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 29676 suggest that in a balanced workload, the GPU will typically be the limiting factor in graphically demanding games, while the CPU will limit in simulation-heavy or physics-intensive titles. The CPU's PassMark physics score of 1141 is notably lower than its integer math score of 57785, indicating that physics calculations—often used in game engines—are not this processor's strong suit. This creates a scenario where the CPU can bottleneck in games with complex physics simulations, even if the GPU has spare capacity.

Memory bandwidth plays a role in this balance. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the GPU has its own dedicated 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The CPU's memory bandwidth is adequate for its core count, but the shared nature of system memory for both CPU and GPU tasks (in integrated graphics scenarios) is not a concern here since the Arc A370M is a discrete GPU. The CPU's PCIe Gen 4 support with 12 lanes provides sufficient bandwidth for the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.

# Benchmark Performance

The combined picture from benchmark data shows a laptop platform performing at the 74th percentile overall, matching both the CPU and GPU individual percentiles. The CPU's average benchmark score of 20249 places it within 0.1% of the Intel Core i7-9700K (score 20271), a desktop processor from an older generation. This proximity is remarkable given the Ultra 7 165U's 15W TDP, indicating that the mobile chip achieves desktop-class multi-threaded performance in a fraction of the power envelope.

The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 10226 is the headline number, representing strong sustained multi-threaded performance for a 15W processor. The single-core score of 1662 is less impressive, falling behind many desktop parts but remaining adequate for everyday responsiveness. In Geekbench, the multicore score of 7329 and single-core score of 1450 paint a similar picture: solid multi-threaded capability with moderate single-thread performance. The PassMark suite provides additional granularity: multithread score of 17101, single-thread score of 3357, integer math at 57785, floating-point math at 40775, and data compression at 188105. The data encryption score of 11896 and extended instructions score of 10610 indicate strong cryptographic and SIMD performance, valuable for security workloads and scientific computing.

The GPU's benchmark scores are more limited, with only Geekbench OpenCL at 29676 and Vulkan at 28673. The average benchmark score of 29175 places it at the 74th percentile, with nearest rivals including the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (deltaPct -0.1%), AMD FirePro W8000 (deltaPct -0.1%), AMD Radeon RX 470 (deltaPct 0.6%), and AMD Radeon RX 6800M (deltaPct 1%). The small deltaPct values—all within 1%—indicate that the Arc A370M sits in a tightly clustered performance band. The GPU's OpenCL score is slightly higher than its Vulkan score, suggesting better compute performance than graphics API performance, which may indicate driver maturity or architectural strengths in compute workloads.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 165U is built on the Meteor Lake architecture, fabricated on Intel's 7 nm process node. It features 12 cores and 14 threads, a configuration that combines performance cores and efficiency cores, though the FACT PACK does not specify the exact core mix. The base clock of 1700 MHz is modest, but the boost clock of 4.90 GHz provides substantial single-thread headroom when thermal and power conditions allow. The 15W TDP is the defining characteristic of this processor, targeting thin-and-light laptops where power efficiency is paramount.

The cache hierarchy consists of 112 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The L3 cache size of 12 MB is adequate for a 12-core design, though it may limit performance in cache-sensitive workloads compared to processors with larger L3 pools. The memory support is DDR5, dual-channel, with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, which is sufficient for the core count. ECC memory is not supported, which limits the CPU's appeal in error-sensitive server or workstation environments.

Benchmark results indicate a processor that excels in multi-threaded productivity. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 10226 is strong for the power class, and the PassMark multithread score of 17101 confirms this. The data compression score of 188105 is exceptionally high, suggesting that the CPU's architecture handles compression algorithms very well—useful for file archiving, database workloads, and content delivery. The floating-point math score of 40775 and integer math score of 57785 indicate balanced arithmetic performance, while the extended instructions score of 10610 shows capable SIMD processing for multimedia and scientific applications.

The CPU's weaknesses are evident in single-threaded and physics workloads. The PassMark physics score of 1141 is low, and the find prime numbers score of 66 is minimal, indicating that the efficiency cores may not handle integer-heavy or physics-based tasks efficiently. For gaming, the single-core Cinebench R23 score of 1662 will limit frame rates in games that rely heavily on a single thread. The PassMark single-thread score of 3357 is more respectable, but it still places the CPU below many desktop parts in raw single-core speed.

The nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-9700K, which scores 0.1% higher on average, and the AMD Ryzen 3 30, which scores 0.6% higher. The AMD EPYC 7713 and EPYC 9454P score 0.6% and 0.8% lower, respectively. These comparisons highlight that the Ultra 7 165U achieves near-desktop-class performance despite its mobile 15W power envelope, but it lags slightly behind older desktop parts in raw throughput.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's multi-threaded performance relative to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 165U has an average benchmark score of 20249, placing it 0.1% below the Intel Core i7-9700K (20271) and 0.6% above the AMD Ryzen 3 30 (20137). It outperforms the AMD EPYC 7713 by 0.6% and the AMD EPYC 9454P by 0.8%.

Q: How does the GPU's performance compare to the AMD Radeon RX 470?

A: The Intel Arc A370M has an average benchmark score of 29175, which is 0.6% lower than the AMD Radeon RX 470's score of 28996. Both GPUs sit at the 74th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock and base clock?

A: The CPU has a base clock of 1700 MHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The boost clock provides a significant single-thread performance increase when thermal and power conditions permit.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Intel Arc A370M features 8 ray tracing cores, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes ray tracing capabilities.

Q: What is the CPU's memory bandwidth and memory type?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. ECC memory is not supported.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, delivering 112.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU's process node and foundry?

A: The CPU is fabricated on Intel's 7 nm process node, and the foundry is Intel. The GPU, in contrast, uses TSMC's 6 nm process.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This platform is not ideal for high-refresh gaming at 144Hz or above. The CPU's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 1662 and the GPU's 4 GB VRAM limit will cap frame rates in most modern titles. The GPU's 74th percentile ranking places it near the AMD Radeon RX 470, which is typically a 1080p 60fps-class card. At 1080p with medium settings, frame rates in the 60-75 fps range are plausible, but 144Hz gaming would require significant settings reductions or esports titles with low graphical demands.

Streaming: The CPU's multi-threaded capabilities, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 10226 and a PassMark multithread score of 17101, provide sufficient headroom for software encoding while gaming. The data compression score of 188105 also indicates strong performance for stream encoding workloads. However, the GPU's limited VRAM may constrain simultaneous gaming and encoding if the game itself consumes a large portion of the 4 GB frame buffer.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 10226 and the GPU's OpenCL score of 29676 combine for capable 1080p video editing. The CPU handles timeline scrubbing and export encoding well, while the GPU accelerates effects and color grading. The 12 MB L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 memory with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth support smooth multitasking, but 4K editing may strain the GPU's 4 GB VRAM.

3D rendering: The CPU's multi-threaded performance is the strong point here, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 10226 that rivals the Intel Core i7-9700K (0.1% higher average score). For CPU-based rendering in applications like Blender or Maya, this processor will deliver solid results. The GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 8 ray tracing cores provide acceleration for GPU-rendered scenes, though the 4 GB VRAM limits scene complexity.

Software development: The CPU's balanced performance profile suits compilation tasks. The PassMark integer math score of 57785 and extended instructions score of 10610 indicate strong arithmetic and SIMD performance for code compilation. The data encryption score of 11896 supports secure development workflows. The 14 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, and the 12 MB L3 cache reduces compilation bottlenecks.

Student and office work: This platform excels in productivity tasks. The CPU's single-thread score of 3357 in PassMark provides responsive application launching and document editing. The 15W TDP ensures long battery life, and the integrated Arc Xe-LPG 64EU graphics in the CPU provide a fallback for display output when the discrete GPU is idle. The 74th percentile CPU ranking ensures smooth multitasking across office applications, web browsing, and video conferencing.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 165U uses the Intel BGA 2049 socket, which is a soldered platform—the CPU is not upgradeable. This is standard for mobile processors, where the CPU is permanently attached to the motherboard. The memory support is dual-channel DDR5, with capacity and speed dependent on the motherboard. The platform supports PCIe Gen 4 with 12 lanes from the CPU, providing adequate bandwidth for storage and expansion devices.

The GPU is also soldered, as the Arc A370M is a mobile discrete GPU with an "IGP" slot width, meaning it is not a user-replaceable component. The GPU's bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which connects to the CPU's PCIe lanes. The GPU has a TDP of 35W, and the CPU has a TDP of 15W, combining for a 50W total thermal load for the core compute components. The FACT PACK does not list a suggested PSU, indicating that power delivery is handled by the laptop's internal power supply and battery system.

The upgrade path for this platform is essentially non-existent in the traditional sense—users cannot swap the CPU or GPU. The only meaningful upgrades would be increasing system memory (if the motherboard supports it) or replacing the storage drive. The platform's production status for the CPU is "Active," while the GPU is "End-of-life," indicating that the GPU is no longer in production. This suggests that new laptops with this exact configuration may become less available over time.

A sensible next upgrade for users of this platform would be to a newer laptop with a more recent CPU and GPU combination. The CPU's release date of December 2023 and the GPU's release date of March 2022 indicate that this is a relatively recent pairing, but the GPU's end-of-life status means that newer Arc mobile GPUs may offer better performance. Users who need more graphical performance should look for laptops with higher-tier Arc GPUs or competitor offerings, while those who need more CPU performance should consider processors with higher TDPs and more cores.

# Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing targets users who need a balance of CPU and GPU performance in a thin-and-light laptop. The CPU's 74th percentile ranking and the GPU's 74th percentile ranking mean that this platform is neither CPU-dominant nor GPU-dominant—it is evenly matched. Gamers at 1080p with medium settings will find this platform adequate, as the GPU's performance near the AMD Radeon RX 470 (0.6% higher score) suggests playable frame rates in most titles. Those seeking high-refresh or high-resolution gaming should look elsewhere, as the 4 GB VRAM and moderate single-thread CPU performance will bottleneck.

Content creators, particularly video editors and 3D renderers, will appreciate the CPU's multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 10226 rivals desktop processors like the Intel Core i7-9700K (0.1% higher average score), enabling efficient export and rendering workflows. The GPU's OpenCL score of 29676 adds hardware acceleration for effects and GPU rendering, though the 4 GB VRAM limits complex scenes.

Software developers will find the CPU's 14 threads and strong integer math performance (PassMark score of 57785) well-suited for compilation tasks. The data encryption score of 11896 supports secure development, and the dual-channel DDR5 memory with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth provides adequate memory throughput for large codebases.

Students and professionals in office environments will benefit from the energy efficiency of the 15W CPU, which enables long battery life and quiet operation. The CPU's single-thread performance (PassMark score of 3357) ensures responsive application use, while the 12 MB L3 cache handles multitasking smoothly. Small business workstations that require moderate compute performance without the power draw of desktop parts will find this platform suitable, provided the workload does not demand high-end graphics or large VRAM allocations.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core Ultra 7 165U with the Intel Arc A370M in a laptop form factor, as indicated by the buildClass field. The CPU is a 12-core, 14-thread mobile processor from the Core Ultra Series 1, based on the Meteor Lake architecture, while the GPU is a discrete mobile graphics chip from the Arc 3 series, based on the Xe-HPG architecture. Both components are manufactured by Intel, though the GPU uses TSMC's 6 nm process while the CPU uses Intel's 7 nm process.

The combined percentile of 74 places this platform in the upper-middle tier of laptop configurations. The CPU's average benchmark score of 20249 and the GPU's average benchmark score of 29175 both sit at the 74th percentile, indicating that neither component is a significant outlier in its respective market. The platform's overall performance is best described as balanced—capable of handling a wide range of tasks from productivity to light gaming and content creation, but not exceptional in any single area.

The CPU's launch MSRP was $448, and the GPU does not have a listed launch MSRP. The CPU's production status is Active, while the GPU is End-of-life. The CPU was released in December 2023, and the GPU was released in March 2022, making this a pairing of a newer CPU with an older GPU. The platform's performance tier is best understood through its rival comparisons: the CPU matches the Intel Core i7-9700K within 0.1%, and the GPU matches the AMD Radeon RX 470 within 0.6%. This is a competent mid-range laptop platform that will handle most everyday tasks and moderate gaming without issue.

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, using the DG2-128 chip fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process. The chip contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, with a transistor density of 45.9M per mm². The GPU has a base clock of 1550 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The memory subsystem consists of 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, delivering 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth—a configuration that is adequate for 1080p gaming but will limit texture quality and high-resolution rendering.

The GPU's compute resources include 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output pipelines. It also features 8 ray tracing cores for hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the absence of listed tensor cores means AI-accelerated features like DLSS (or Intel's XeSS) may rely on alternative hardware paths. The pixel rate is 65.60 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 131.2 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 4.198 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 8.397 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio).

In benchmark terms, the GPU scores 29676 in Geekbench OpenCL and 28673 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average score of 29175. The 74th percentile ranking places it near the AMD Radeon RX 470 (0.6% higher score) and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M (1% higher score). The deltaPct values are all within 1%, indicating that the GPU sits in a tight performance cluster. The OpenCL score being higher than Vulkan suggests the GPU performs better in compute workloads than in graphics API-specific tasks, which may reflect driver optimization status.

For rendering, the GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 and 8 ray tracing cores provide moderate acceleration for 3D rendering applications. The 4 GB VRAM is the primary limitation, as complex scenes with high-resolution textures will exceed the frame buffer. The 112.0 GB/s bandwidth is also constrained, which will impact performance in bandwidth-sensitive workloads like high-resolution texture streaming. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring broad API compatibility.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. The dataIsMeasured field is false, and the measuredFpsUltraByGame object is empty. All frame rate discussions are therefore estimates derived from the benchmark scores and comparative performance data.

Based on the GPU's average benchmark score of 29175, which places it within 0.6% of the AMD Radeon RX 470 and 1% of the AMD Radeon RX 6800M, the Arc A370M is expected to deliver playable frame rates at 1080p with medium to high settings in most modern titles. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM will require texture settings to be reduced in games with large texture packs, and the 64-bit memory bus with 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit performance in games with heavy memory bandwidth demands.

The CPU's gaming performance is the more significant concern. The single-core Cinebench R23 score of 1662 and Geekbench single-core score of 1450 indicate that the CPU will bottleneck in CPU-bound titles, particularly at lower resolutions where the GPU has spare capacity. The PassMark physics score of 1141 is notably low, suggesting that games with complex physics simulations will see reduced frame rates. In GPU-bound scenarios at 1080p with high settings, the GPU is likely the limiting factor, as the 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will cap performance.

For esports titles with low graphical demands, the CPU's single-thread performance may support frame rates above 100 fps, but the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and moderate compute performance will limit consistency. For AAA titles at 1080p, frame rates in the 40-60 fps range at high settings are plausible, with drops into the 30s in demanding scenes. At 1440p, the GPU's 4 GB VRAM will be insufficient for most modern titles, and users should expect to run at low settings or reduce resolution. The absence of measured FPS data means these figures are estimates, and actual performance may vary based on driver maturity and thermal constraints in specific laptop chassis.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 165U + Intel Arc A370M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 165U

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds