SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 165H + Intel Arc A570M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

90%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 7 165H

34,083 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A570M

58,239 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# FAQ

Q: What is the Intel Core Ultra 7 165H and where does it sit in the CPU performance hierarchy?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 165H is a 16-core, 22-thread mobile processor from the Core Ultra Series 1 (Meteor Lake architecture), built on a 7 nm process. It holds the 84th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 34083, placing it within 0.5% of rivals like the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350.

Q: How does the Intel Arc A570M GPU compare to other graphics cards?

A: The Intel Arc A570M is a mobile GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture (Alchemist generation), built on TSMC's 6 nm process with 11,500 million transistors. It sits in the 88th percentile among all GPUs, with a Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239, putting it within 0.7% of the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT and 0.3% of the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM.

Q: What is the combined performance tier of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this laptop build is 86, indicating a system that outperforms roughly 86% of all tested configurations. The CPU's 84th percentile and GPU's 88th percentile are closely matched, suggesting a balanced platform for demanding workloads.

Q: What memory and PCIe capabilities does the platform support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with bandwidth up to 89.6 GB/s, and provides 8 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU. The GPU interfaces via PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for its 8 GB GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus delivering 224.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the power envelope of this mobile platform?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 28 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 75 W. No suggested PSU is listed for the GPU, which is typical for integrated mobile graphics (the GPU's slot width is listed as "IGP"). The combined thermal and power budget is modest, fitting for a laptop class build.

Q: Does the data include measured gaming frame rates?

A: No. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All gaming performance discussion must be treated as estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not from direct frame rate measurements.

Q: What are the nearest performance rivals for the CPU and GPU?

A: For the CPU, the nearest rivals are the Intel Core Ultra 5 338H (0.3% faster), AMD EPYC 4244P (0.4% slower), AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (0.4% slower), and AMD Ryzen 7 3700X (0.5% slower). For the GPU, the nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (0.3% faster), AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (0.3% slower), NVIDIA P102-100 (0.5% faster), and AMD Radeon PRO V710 (0.7% faster).

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The Arc A570M's 88th percentile GPU score suggests it can drive high-refresh gaming on laptop displays, particularly at 1080p. The GPU's 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 83.20 GPixel/s pixel rate indicate solid geometry and fill-rate capabilities. However, given the lack of measured FPS data, expect the GPU to handle esports titles at high frame rates, while AAA games may require settings adjustments to maintain smooth motion — the 8 GB GDDR6 frame buffer is adequate for 1080p with high textures, but not for 1440p or 4K ultra settings.

Streaming: The Core Ultra 7 165H's 22 threads provide ample headroom for encoding and broadcasting simultaneously with gaming. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 25933 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 14551 indicate it can handle x264 encoding at medium presets while sustaining gameplay. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG 128EU graphics can also offload encoding tasks, though the discrete Arc A570M is the primary renderer. The 84th percentile CPU ranking means minimal frame drops during concurrent streaming workloads.

Video Editing: The CPU's strong multicore performance — 9233 in Cinebench R20 and 14551 in Cinebench R23 — accelerates timeline rendering and export in applications like Premiere Pro and DaVinci Resolve. The GPU's 88th percentile OpenCL score of 58239 supports GPU-accelerated effects and color grading. The 24 MB shared L3 cache and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth help with large media files, though the dual-channel DDR5 constraint may limit 4K multi-stream editing compared to higher-end workstation platforms.

3D Rendering: The CPU's 84th percentile ranking makes it viable for CPU-based rendering in Blender or Cinema 4D, where the 16 cores (with 22 threads) deliver competitive throughput — within 0.5% of the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X, a well-regarded desktop rendering CPU. The GPU's 10.65 TFLOPS FP16 performance (2:1 ratio) supports GPU-accelerated rendering in applications that leverage OpenCL, though the 8 GB VRAM limits scene complexity for large architectural visualizations or high-poly assets.

Software Development: With 22 threads and a single-thread PassMark score of 3509, this CPU handles both parallel builds and responsive compilation. The PassMark data encryption score of 17169 and extended instructions score of 17299 indicate strong cryptography and SIMD performance for code signing, hashing, and vectorized workloads. The 16-core configuration with 24 MB L3 cache reduces context-switching overhead during multi-project builds, making this a capable development laptop.

Student and Office Work: The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 3509 ensures snappy application launches and fluid document editing, while the 28 W TDP means long battery life potential in a thin-and-light chassis. The GPU's 88th percentile performance is overkill for spreadsheet and browser workloads, providing headroom for future multitasking demands. The 84th CPU percentile and 86th combined percentile make this system more powerful than typical office machines, handling large datasets and complex presentations without stutter.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 7 165H is a 16-core, 22-thread processor based on the Meteor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 7 nm process node. It features a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a TDP of 28 W. The cache hierarchy consists of 112 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3 cache. This hybrid design likely combines performance and efficiency cores (given 16 cores and 22 threads, suggesting a mix of P-cores and E-cores), though the FACT PACK does not specify the core type breakdown.

The CPU's benchmark results paint a clear picture of strong all-around performance. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 14551 and R20 score of 9233 place it in the mid-range of modern mobile processors, capable of sustained all-core workloads. The single-core Cinebench R23 score of 1759 and R15 score of 257 indicate excellent per-thread performance, crucial for lightly-threaded applications like legacy software and web browsing.

PassMark results reveal specialized strengths: the integer math score of 89415 and floating-point math score of 66273 suggest robust arithmetic throughput, while the data compression score of 291161 and random string sorting score of 33473 highlight strong memory-bound operations. The physics score of 1806 is modest, indicating that the CPU may not excel at heavily physics-based simulations. The find prime numbers score of 118 is low, suggesting that this CPU is not optimized for pure integer-iteration benchmarks, but this rarely reflects real-world performance.

The 84th percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 34083, places it within 0.5% of the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X — a previous-generation desktop processor with 8 cores and 16 threads. That this mobile chip trades blows with a desktop CPU underscores its efficiency, especially given the 28 W TDP versus the 3700X's higher desktop power envelope. The nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 338H, is only 0.3% faster, suggesting the 165H sits at the top of the Ultra 7 mobile stack with diminishing returns over lower-tier parts.

The CPU's memory support for dual-channel DDR5 at 89.6 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for most tasks, though not exceptional. The 8 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU provide high-speed connectivity for storage and other peripherals, while the integrated Arc Xe-LPG 128EU graphics offer a fallback display solution and basic acceleration when the discrete GPU is idle.

Who Should Build It

This laptop platform targets users who need a single machine that can handle both productivity and creative workloads without compromising on either. Gamers at 1080p resolution will find the Arc A570M's 88th percentile GPU performance sufficient for modern titles at medium-to-high settings, though they should temper expectations for ultra settings in the most demanding games — the 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate but not generous for 2024-era game textures.

Content creators — video editors, 3D artists, and graphic designers — will benefit from the CPU's 84th percentile ranking and the GPU's 88th percentile OpenCL score. The 16-core/22-thread CPU handles rendering and encoding, while the GPU accelerates effects and compositing. The 24 MB L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 memory support multitasking across creative applications, though professionals working with 8K footage or massive 3D scenes may want more than 8 GB VRAM.

Software developers will appreciate the 22 threads for parallel builds and the strong single-thread score of 3509 for interactive tooling. The PassMark encryption score of 17169 and extended instructions score of 17299 make this suitable for cryptography-heavy development, and the 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth helps with large codebases and virtual machines.

Students and office workers get a system that far exceeds their needs — the 84th CPU percentile and 86th combined percentile mean this laptop will remain responsive for years, handling spreadsheet calculations, video conferencing, and multitasking with ease. The 28 W CPU TDP suggests efficient battery life for all-day campus use, while the GPU is overkill for document processing but future-proofs against unexpected demands.

Small business workstations requiring data analysis, financial modeling, or light video production will find the CPU's PassMark multithread score of 25933 and data compression score of 291161 valuable for batch processing and report generation. The system's 86th combined percentile places it above most pre-built office laptops, making it a sensible investment for power users who need occasional GPU acceleration.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 7 165H uses the Intel BGA 2049 socket, which is a soldered, non-upgradeable mobile platform. This means the CPU cannot be replaced or upgraded — the laptop's processor is fixed for its lifetime. The GPU, likewise, is an integrated mobile part (slot width "IGP") that cannot be swapped. The upgrade path for this platform is therefore limited to components that are modular in laptops: memory and storage.

The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory, with the exact capacity dependent on the motherboard implementation. Users should ensure they maximize memory capacity and speed within the platform's constraints, as the 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is shared between CPU and GPU workloads. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU (8 lanes) enable high-speed NVMe SSDs for fast boot times and asset loading, which can meaningfully improve gaming and content creation workflows.

The GPU's 75 W TDP and the CPU's 28 W TDP result in a combined thermal envelope of roughly 103 W, which is modest for a laptop. Since no suggested PSU is listed for the GPU and it is an integrated part, power delivery is handled by the laptop's internal power supply — users should check the laptop's included adapter for adequate wattage, but no external PSU upgrade is relevant. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface for the GPU is sufficient, as a x8 link at PCIe 4.0 provides ample bandwidth for the 5.325 TFLOPS GPU.

The sensible "next upgrade" for this platform is not component replacement but rather ensuring the laptop has maximum RAM and the fastest NVMe SSD available. Given the CPU's 84th percentile and the fact that the nearest rival (Core Ultra 5 338H) is only 0.3% faster, there is no meaningful CPU upgrade within the same socket generation — this is the ceiling. Users looking for more performance would need to change platforms entirely, which is not feasible for a BGA laptop.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for the Intel Core Ultra 7 165H with the Intel Arc A570M, so all gaming frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations, not measured results. The GPU's 88th percentile ranking and Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239 provide a baseline, while the CPU's 84th percentile ensures it will not bottleneck the GPU in most titles.

At 1080p ultra settings, expected performance varies by game genre. Esports titles (CS:GO, Valorant, League of Legends) should easily exceed 100 FPS given the GPU's 166.4 GTexel/s texture rate and 83.20 GPixel/s pixel rate, which handle low-complexity scenes efficiently. The CPU's single-thread score of 3509 ensures minimal frame time spikes in CPU-bound scenarios.

For AAA games at 1080p ultra, the 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth will be the limiting factors. Games like Cyberpunk 2077 or Assassin's Creed Mirage may see frame rates in the 40–60 FPS range at ultra, with drops below 40 FPS in dense areas. The GPU's 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 performance is comparable to the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (0.3% slower in OpenCL), which historically delivers ~60 FPS at 1080p high in most titles — suggesting the A570M will require medium-to-high settings for smooth 60 FPS gameplay in modern AAA releases.

At 1440p, the GPU's 128-bit memory bus and 8 GB VRAM become significant constraints. Frame rates would likely drop 30–40% from 1080p, making 1440p viable only for esports or older titles. 4K gaming is not recommended — the 83.20 GPixel/s pixel rate is insufficient for 4K at playable frame rates in most modern games. The CPU, however, is not the bottleneck; its 22 threads and 24 MB L3 cache handle game logic and physics without issue, as evidenced by its parity with the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X in overall CPU benchmarks.

Ray tracing performance is supported via 16 RT cores, but the 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 throughput suggests RT effects should be used sparingly, as enabling RT can halve frame rates. For a balanced gaming experience, 1080p with high settings (not ultra) and RT disabled is the sweet spot — this aligns with the GPU's 88th percentile position, which is good but not flagship-tier.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 34083 places it in the 84th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Core Ultra 5 338H scores 33989 (0.3% faster), the AMD EPYC 4244P scores 34220 (0.4% slower), the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 scores 34222 (0.4% slower), and the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X scores 34260 (0.5% slower). This indicates that the Ultra 7 165H is a mid-tier performer, effectively interchangeable with several desktop and mobile rivals within a 1% margin.

In the Cinebench suite, the multicore scores of 2641 (R15), 9233 (R20), and 14551 (R23) show a linear scaling pattern, with each generation of the test demanding more throughput. The single-core scores of 257 (R15), 1303 (R20), and 1759 (R23) reveal that single-threaded performance is roughly 6–7x lower than multicore, which is typical for a 16-core/22-thread chip. The PassMark multithread score of 25933 and single-thread score of 3509 corroborate this ratio.

The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 58239 places it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (58392, 0.3% faster), AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (58085, 0.3% slower), NVIDIA P102-100 (58528, 0.5% faster), and AMD Radeon PRO V710 (58657, 0.7% slower). This is a remarkable result — the A570M, a mobile integrated GPU, performs within 0.7% of the RX 6950 XT, a high-end desktop GPU from the same era. However, this is a single OpenCL benchmark, and gaming performance (which relies on driver optimization and other factors) may not scale the same way.

The combined picture shows a system in the 86th percentile of all laptop configurations. The CPU and GPU are well-matched: the CPU's 84th percentile ensures it can feed the GPU's 88th percentile without bottlenecking, while the GPU's headroom means the CPU is the limiting factor in compute-heavy tasks. The PassMark data points — particularly the integer math score of 89415 and floating-point math of 66273 — indicate strong general-purpose compute, while the GPU adds parallel throughput for graphics and OpenCL workloads.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") pairing the Intel Core Ultra 7 165H CPU with the Intel Arc A570M GPU. Both components are from Intel, creating a cohesive platform with shared driver stacks and optimization opportunities. The CPU is a 16-core, 22-thread Meteor Lake mobile processor with a 28 W TDP, while the GPU is an Xe-HPG Alchemist part with 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 16 RT cores, running at 900 MHz base and 1300 MHz boost with 8 GB GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus.

The combined percentile of 86 indicates this system outperforms 86% of all tested laptop configurations. The CPU's 84th percentile and GPU's 88th percentile are close, suggesting a balanced design. The GPU's 88th percentile is notably higher than the CPU's 84th, meaning the GPU has slightly more relative headroom — in GPU-bound scenarios, the CPU will be the limiting factor, but in CPU-bound scenarios, the GPU will not be held back.

This pairing is best described as a mid-to-upper midrange mobile platform. It is not a flagship (which would require 90th+ percentile components), but it significantly outperforms typical thin-and-light laptops and even some budget gaming desktops. The 7 nm CPU process and 6 nm GPU process (TSMC) indicate modern manufacturing, and the 11,500 million transistors in the GPU suggest a substantial die (269 mm²) with good efficiency.

The system's overall tier is solidly "enthusiast mobile" — capable of 1080p gaming, content creation, and development work, but not suited for 4K gaming or professional-grade 3D rendering. The 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus are the primary constraints, limiting high-resolution textures and large datasets. For most users, however, this is a well-rounded platform that hits a sweet spot between performance and portability.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU are closely matched in this platform, with the CPU at the 84th percentile and GPU at the 88th percentile. This 4-point gap means the GPU has slightly more relative performance headroom, so in workloads that stress both components (like gaming), the CPU is more likely to become the bottleneck, but only marginally. The 0.3% difference in nearest rival scores for the CPU and 0.3% for the GPU suggest neither component is an outlier in its class.

In CPU-bound workloads — such as physics simulation, AI inference, or heavily-modded games — the CPU's 16 cores and 22 threads will be the determining factor. The PassMark physics score of 1806 is low, indicating that this CPU may struggle with complex physics calculations, potentially bottlenecking games with advanced destruction or fluid simulation. However, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 14551 shows strong all-core performance for rendering and encoding, where the GPU's role is secondary.

In GPU-bound workloads — such as high-resolution gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering — the Arc A570M's 88th percentile provides ample throughput. The GPU's 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 and 10.65 TFLOPS FP16 performance, combined with 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, ensure that the CPU will not starve the GPU in most scenarios. The 8 GB VRAM is the hard limit here; once textures exceed this capacity, frame rates will plummet regardless of CPU or GPU compute power.

The FPS scaling evidence (estimated, not measured) suggests that at 1080p, the system is balanced, with neither component consistently limiting the other. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck due to memory bandwidth and pixel rate constraints. The 83.20 GPixel/s pixel rate is sufficient for 1080p at high refresh rates but inadequate for 4K, where the GPU's fill rate becomes the limiting factor.

For mixed workloads like streaming while gaming, the CPU's 22 threads handle encoding (via x264 or the integrated Arc graphics) while the discrete GPU renders frames — this parallel utilization is efficient, as the CPU's 84th percentile ensures enough spare threads for OBS without impacting game performance. The 28 W CPU TDP and 75 W GPU TDP mean the system's power delivery is balanced, with neither component drawing excessive power that would cause thermal throttling in a laptop chassis.

The overall bottleneck analysis shows a well-balanced system with the GPU becoming the limiting factor only at resolutions or settings that exceed its 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus. For the intended use case — 1080p gaming and content creation — this pairing is appropriately matched, with the CPU's 84th percentile and GPU's 88th percentile working in harmony to deliver the 86th combined percentile result.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 7 165H + Intel Arc A570M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 7 165H

Intel Arc A570M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds